山区人口与环境互动关系的初步研究

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2002.03.282

地理科学 ›› 2002, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 282-287.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2002.03.282

山区人口与环境互动关系的初步研究

陈勇^1,2, 陈国阶¹, 王益谦²

1. 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 四川成都 610041;
2. 四川大学, 四川成都 610064

收稿日期:2001-04-13 修回日期:2001-09-29 出版日期:2002-05-20 发布日期:2002-05-20
基金资助:
中国科学院知识创新工程重大项目(岷江上游典型退化生态系统恢复与重建实验示范研究);中国科学院区域开发前期研究项目(IV-9906);四川大学西部开发研究院院长基金2001年项目(南方农牧交错带的环境恢复与重建)。

A Preliminary Study on the Interactive Relationship Between Population and Environment in Mountains

CHEN Yong^1,2, CHEN Guo-jie¹, WANG Yi-qiang²

1. Chengdu Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041;
2. Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064

Received:2001-04-13 Revised:2001-09-29 Online:2002-05-20 Published:2002-05-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 与平原/低地相比,山区(主要指典型中高山区)环境具有其本身固有的诸多属性。山区环境的复杂性表现在山地诸要素的垂直地带性规律与非地带性规律及其相互叠加上,而其不确定性是由山地环境和物质本身的不稳定性所决定。山区环境的的脆弱性和敏感性表现在山区生态系统抗干扰能力低,容易在外界因素的诱导下偏离生态阈值,甚至出现崩溃。由于高山与河流的阻隔,山区聚落和社区常常表现出分散性、封闭性以及文化的多样性和相对稳定性等特点。山区人地关系地域系统由环境系统和人口系统组成,山区环境对人口具有限制和制约作用,而人口对环境则表现出适应与改造的趋向。山区人口与环境的关系既可以表现为相互恶化,也可以表现为良性互动,其中间过程是通过人类对土地的不同利用方式而得以实现。

Abstract: All ecosystems on earth have been under the influence of human beings. It is also true for mountain ecosystem. Comparing with ecosystem on plains/low lands, mountain ecosystem is characteristic of complexity and uncertainty, fragility and sensitivity. Mountains are three-dimensional systems, of which the complexity is displayed in their verticality, non-verticality and compilation of both. Due to the complexity of mountains, it has been very hard to give mountain a well-understood definition. The uncertainty of mountains lies in their instability of internal structure and high potential energy. The fragility and sensitivity of mountain eco-environment is displayed in that mountain ecosystems usually have a low capability to resist external disturbance and it is easy for them to exceed ecological threshold or even to go to collapse under external influences. The fragility of mountain eco-environment is determined by its bio-physical features: high elevation, cold climate, thin air, thin layer of soil, low concentration of organic matters in soil and slow biochemical process. It is usually hard for soil and vegetation in mountains to rehabilitate and restore once they are destroyed. In most cases degradation of mountain environment is an irreversible process. Due to physical constraints, mountain settlements or communities have showed their characteristics of scattering, closeness and stability. Considering the interaction between population and environment in mountains, environment, on one hand, may be a constraint for human activities. Although human being is a keystone species in earth ecosystem, human activities are always constrained by environment. It is more like this in mountains where physical environment is harsh. Humans,on the other hand, are able to adapt to their environment by transhumance, physiological adaptive reaction, storage of foods and cultivation of wild plants. The man-earth relationship in mountains may take two forms: mutual deterioration or mutual amelioration in different types of land use such as farming, animal husbandry, forestry, settlement construction and mining.

中图分类号:

K901

陈勇, 陈国阶, 王益谦. 山区人口与环境互动关系的初步研究[J]. 地理科学, 2002, 22(3): 282-287.

CHEN Yong, CHEN Guo-jie, WANG Yi-qiang. A Preliminary Study on the Interactive Relationship Between Population and Environment in Mountains[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2002, 22(3): 282-287.

参考文献

[1] Vitousek P M, H A Mooney, J Lubchenco, et al. Human domination of earth's ecosystem [J]. Science, 1997, 277: 494-499.
[2] Tivy J and O'hare G. Human Impact on the Ecosystem[M]. Edinburg: Oliver & Boyd, 1981.
[3] 徐樵利,谭传凤等. 山地地理系统综论[M]. 武汉: 华中师范大学出版社,1994.
[4] Ives J D. Applied high geoecology: can the scientist assist in the preservation of the mountains? . Webber, P J. High Altitude Geoecology. Colorado: Westview Press, 1979, 9-46.
[5] Miller Jr G T. Living in the Earth: An Introduction to Environmental Science (Sixth Edition) [M], California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1989.
[6] Miller Jr G T. Sustaining the Earth: An Integrated Approach (Third Edition) [M]. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1998.
[7] FAO. International Year of Mountains : Concept Paper , Rome, 2000.
[8] 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所. 山地学概论与中国山地研究.成都: 四川科技出版社,2000.
[9] UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development). Agenda 21, Chapter 13 , 1992.
[10] 钟祥浩. 山地研究的一个新方向——山地环境学[J].山地研究,1998, 16(2):81~84.
[11] 陈国阶. 论山区环境保护与产业发展方向[J].科技导报, 1999,(2):49~52.
[12] Ahmad A. Environmental impact assessment in the Himalayas: an ecosystem approach[J]. Ambio, 1993, 22(1): 4-9.
[13] 李明华. 建立山地社会学的理论思考[J].浙江社会科学,1994,(6):114~117.
[14] Whiteman P T S. The mountain environment: an agronomist's perspective with a case study from Jumla, Nepal[J]. Mountain Research and Development, 1985, 5(2): 151-162.
[15] Allan N J R. Accessibility and altitudinal zonation model of mountains. Tej Vir Singh. Geography of the Mountains. New Dehli: Heritage Publishers, 1990, 4-14.
[16] Groetzback E F. High mountains as human habitat. Allan N J R, Knapp G W and Stadel C. Human Impact on Mountain. New Jersey: Rowman & Littlefield, 1988, 24-35.
[17] O'Neill R V and Kann J R. Homo economus as a keystone species[J]. BioScience, 2000, 50(4): 333-337.
[18] Golley F B. Human population from ecological perspective. Teitelbaum M S and Winter J M Population and Resources in Western Intellectual Traditions. A Supplement to Vol. 14 of Population and Development Review, New York: the Population Council, 1988, 199-212.
[19] Little M A. Human populations in the Andes: the human science basis for research planning [J]. Mountain Research and Development, 1981, 1(2): 145-170.
[20] Chen Y,Ai N, He J. Minority population and sustainable development in mountain regions—a case study of the Tibetan inhabited region in Sichuan, China[J]. The Journal of Chinese Geography, 1998, 8(4): 333-341.
[21] 黄鼎成等. 人与自然关系导论[M].武汉: 湖北科学技术出版社,1997.
[22] 徐天芬. 适应论 [Z].中国大百科全书,地理学[M].北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 1990.383~384.
[23] Bennett J W. Human Ecology as Human Behavior[M]. New Brunswick (USA): Transaction Publishers, 1993.
[24] Norton W. Human Geography[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
[25] Skeldon R. Population pressure, mobility, and socio-economic change in mountainous environments: regions of refuge in comparative perspective[J]. Mountain Research and Development, 1985, 5(3): 233-250.
[26] Ayyad M A. Conservation of marginal lands. G B Marini-Bettolo. A Modern Approach to the Protection of the Environment. Orford:Pergamon Press, 1989, 215-238..
[27] Thomas R B. Effect of change on high mountain human adaptive pattern . Webber, P J. High Altitude Geoecology. Colorado: Westview Press, 1979, 139-188.
[28] Eckholm E P. The deterioration of mountain environments[J]. Science, 1975, 189: 764-770.
[29] Moehch M. and Bandyyopadhyay, J. People-forest interaction: a neglected parameter in Himalayan forest management[J]. Mountain Research and Development, 1986, 6(1):3-16.
[30] Kuznar L A. Mutualism between chenopodium, herd animals, and herders in the south central Andes[J]. Mountain Research and Development, 1993, 13(3): 257-265.
[31] Batzer K W. The human role in environmental history[J]. Science, 2000, 387: 2427-2428.
[32] Price L W. Mountains & Man[M]. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1981.
[33] Oba G. New perspective on sustainable grazing management in arid zones of sub-Saharan Africa[J]. BioScience, 2000, 50(1): 35-51.
[34] Messerli B. African mountains and highlands: introduction and resolutions[J]. Mountain Research and Development, 1988, 8(2/3): 93-100.
[35] 余大富. 我国山区人地系统结构及其变化趋势[J].山地研究,1996, 14(2):122-128.
[36] Hewwit K. The study of mountain lands and people: a critical overview . Allan N J R, Knapp G W and Stadel C. Human Impact on Mountain. New Jersey: Rowman & Littlefield, 1988. 6-23.

山区人口与环境互动关系的初步研究

A Preliminary Study on the Interactive Relationship Between Population and Environment in Mountains

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	阮一晨, 刘声, 李王鸣, 章明宇. 城市社区中心空间特征及其影响要素研究——以杭州市西湖区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 74-82.
[2]	洪学婷, 黄震方, 陈晓艳, 徐冬. 场所叙事视角下乡愁的多维解构与影响机理——基于新民谣歌词与评论的分析[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 55-63.
[3]	郑殿元, 文琦, 黄晓军. 干旱风沙区农村多维贫困地域分异机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 149-156.
[4]	黄亚平, 郑有旭. 江汉平原乡村聚落形态类型及空间体系特征[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 121-128.
[5]	张文忠, 何炬, 谌丽. 面向高质量发展的中国城市体检方法体系探讨[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 1-12.
[6]	陈昊曦, 袁振杰, 蔡晓梅. 广州法系群体的日常生活与地方认同研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 2027-2036.
[7]	赵臣, 陈扬乐, 张凯, 申文灿. 三亚市季节性旅游移民社会融合对主观幸福感的影响[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 2064-2072.
[8]	许红梅, 郭炎, 李志刚, 林赛南, 李娈琼. 大城市近郊农地流转的时空特征及影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 2055-2063.
[9]	白雪, 乔观民, 李加林, 梅思雨, 马仁锋. 浙江省新型冠状病毒感染肺炎疫情时空分布特征[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 2010-2018.
[10]	李伯华, 徐崇丽, 郑始年, 王莎, 窦银娣. 基于图式语言的少数民族传统村落空间布局特征研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1784-1794.
[11]	武荣伟, 王若宇, 刘晔, 古恒宇. 2000—2015年中国高学历人才分布格局及其影响机制[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1822-1830.
[12]	王永生, 文琦, 刘彦随. 贫困地区乡村振兴与精准扶贫有效衔接研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1840-1847.
[13]	朱政, 贺清云, 覃伟. 长沙市居住区空间宜居程度研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1859-1867.
[14]	薛冰, 肖骁, 苏芳, 唐呈瑞, 程叶青, 谢潇, 赵宏波, 王燕侠, 张子龙, 李京忠. 地理学在新冠肺炎疫情早期防控中的学术响应及展望[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(10): 1593-1600.
[15]	陈浩然, 安宁, 朱竑. 城市的垂直流动：广州再领域化中的人地关系重构[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(10): 1627-1635.