SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 1560-1568.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.10.013
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Online:
2017-10-20
Published:
2017-10-20
Supported by:
CLC Number:
Huanlin Ren. On Value Evaluation of Tourism Resource of Cross-regional Linear Cultural Heritage: Taking the Routes Network of Chang’an-Tianshan Corridor in China as an Example[J].SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2017, 37(10): 1560-1568.
Table 1
Value evaluation index system for tourism resource of cross-regional linear cultural heritage"
目标层(A) | 项目层(B) | 因子层(C) | 目标层(A) | 项目层(B) | 因子层(C) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
资源价值 | 内涵价值(B1) | 年代久远度(C1,1) | 资源价值 | 应用价值(B2) | 珍稀奇特程度(C3,2) |
文化开创性(C2,1) | 完整性(C4,2) | ||||
资源规模与丰度(C3,1) | 与其它资源的互补性(C5,2) | ||||
体现某些文化的程度(C4,1) | 社会影响力 (B3) | 影响社会文化程度(C1,3) | |||
与历史人物/事件相关度(C5,1) | 知名度(C2,3) | ||||
与传统/当代文化活动相关度(C6,1) | 美誉度(C3,3) | ||||
应用价值(B2) | 审美观赏价值(C1,2) | 荣誉称号(C4,3) | |||
文化认知价值(C2,2) |
Table 3
Indicator weights of tourism resource value evaluation for cross-regional linear cultural heritage"
评价目标(A) | 评价项目(B) | 单/总排序权值 | 评价因子(C) | 单排序权值(ωj) | 总排序权值(wj) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
资源价值 | 内涵价值(B1) | 0.466 | 年代久远度(C1,1) | 0.053 | 0.025 |
文化开创性(C2,1) | 0.088 | 0.041 | |||
资源规模与丰度(C3,1) | 0.187 | 0.087 | |||
体现某些文化的程度(C4,1) | 0.222 | 0.104 | |||
与历史人物/事件相关度(C5,1) | 0.428 | 0.200 | |||
与传统/当代文化活动相关度(C6,1) | 0.022 | 0.010 | |||
应用价值(B2) | 0.433 | 审美观赏价值(C1,2) | 0.185 | 0.080 | |
文化认知价值(C2,2) | 0.185 | 0.080 | |||
珍稀奇特程度(C3,2) | 0.545 | 0.236 | |||
完整性(C4,2) | 0.055 | 0.024 | |||
与其它资源的互补性(C5,2) | 0.030 | 0.013 | |||
社会影响力 (B3) | 0.101 | 影响社会文化程度(C1,3) | 0.550 | 0.055 | |
知名度(C2,3) | 0.115 | 0.012 | |||
美誉度(C3,3) | 0.272 | 0.027 | |||
荣誉称号(C4,3) | 0.063 | 0.006 |
Table 4
Factor scoring criteria of tourism resource value evaluation for cross-regional linear cultural heritage"
评价因子(C) | 评分标准 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
100~80分 | 79~60分 | 59~40分 | 39~20分 | 19~0分 | |
年代久远度(C1,1) | 很远 | 较远 | 一般 | 较近 | 很近 |
文化开创性(C2,1) | 很强 | 较强 | 一般 | 较弱 | 很弱 |
资源规模与丰度(C3,1) | 很大/高 | 较大/高 | 一般 | 较小/低 | 很小/低 |
体现某些文化的程度(C4,1) | 很充分 | 较充分 | 一般 | 较不足 | 很不足 |
与历史人物/事件相关度(C5,1) | 很高 | 较高 | 一般 | 较低 | 很低 |
与传统/当代文化活动相关度(C6,1) | 很高 | 较高 | 一般 | 较低 | 很低 |
审美观赏价值(C1,2) | 很高 | 较高 | 一般 | 较低 | 很低 |
文化认知价值(C2,2) | 很高 | 较高 | 一般 | 较低 | 很低 |
珍稀奇特程度(C3,2) | 极罕见 | 很罕见 | 稀有 | 少有 | 较常见 |
完整性(C4,2) | 很完整 | 基本完整 | 反映整体特征 | 反映局部特征 | 特征不明显 |
与其它资源的互补性(C5,2) | 很强 | 较强 | 一般 | 较弱 | 很弱 |
影响社会文化程度(C1,3) | 很深远 | 较深远 | 一般 | 较浅近 | 很浅近 |
知名度(C2,3) | 很高 | 较高 | 一般 | 较低 | 很低 |
美誉度(C3,3) | 很高 | 较高 | 一般 | 较低 | 很低 |
荣誉称号(C4,3) | 很高 | 较高 | 一般 | 较低 | 很低或无 |
Table 5
The composite scores and evaluation grades of 22 heritage sites of Chang’an-Tianshan Corridor Routes Network in China"
世界遗产点 | 克孜尔石窟 | 克孜尔尕哈烽燧 | 苏巴什佛寺遗址 | 北庭故城遗址 | 交河故城 | 高昌故城 | 玉门关遗址 | 悬泉置遗址 | 锁阳城遗址 | 炳灵寺石窟 | 麦积山石窟 | 张骞墓 | 彬县大佛寺石窟 | 汉长安城未央宫遗址 | 唐长安城大明宫遗址 | 小雁塔 | 大雁塔 | 兴教寺塔 | 崤函古道石壕段遗址 | 新安汉函谷关遗址 | 隋唐洛阳城定鼎门遗址 | 汉魏洛阳城遗址 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
项目层 | 内涵价值 | 单 | 92.0 | 66.9 | 86.9 | 85.5 | 87.8 | 87.2 | 75.0 | 87.8 | 82.0 | 91.1 | 93.2 | 77.1 | 90.0 | 91.4 | 91.4 | 84.8 | 86.8 | 90.8 | 73.3 | 85.4 | 82.6 | 88.8 |
总 | 43.0 | 31.2 | 40.6 | 39.9 | 41.0 | 40.7 | 35.0 | 41.0 | 38.3 | 42.6 | 43.5 | 36.0 | 42.0 | 42.7 | 42.7 | 39.6 | 40.5 | 42.4 | 34.2 | 39.9 | 38.6 | 41.5 | ||
应用价值 | 单 | 93.1 | 73.0 | 86.6 | 83.1 | 85.6 | 86.4 | 70.5 | 86.8 | 85.6 | 92.3 | 95.4 | 72.7 | 89.1 | 89.1 | 90.5 | 85.6 | 88.2 | 90.4 | 76.4 | 81.6 | 80.3 | 85.3 | |
总 | 40.3 | 31.6 | 37.5 | 36.0 | 37.1 | 37.4 | 30.5 | 37.6 | 37.1 | 40.0 | 41.3 | 31.5 | 38.6 | 38.6 | 39.2 | 37.1 | 38.2 | 39.1 | 33.1 | 35.3 | 34.8 | 36.9 | ||
社会影响力 | 单 | 92.2 | 64.4 | 84.5 | 83.3 | 85.3 | 86.6 | 70.9 | 84.5 | 78.8 | 91.3 | 93.7 | 73.7 | 86.9 | 90.6 | 92.0 | 86.8 | 89.3 | 89.8 | 67.4 | 80.1 | 78.7 | 86.0 | |
总 | 9.21 | 6.44 | 8.45 | 8.33 | 8.53 | 8.66 | 7.10 | 8.45 | 7.88 | 9.13 | 9.37 | 7.38 | 8.69 | 9.07 | 9.20 | 8.68 | 8.94 | 8.98 | 6.75 | 8.02 | 7.87 | 8.60 | ||
目标层 | 综合得分 | 92.5 | 69.3 | 86.5 | 84.3 | 86.6 | 86.8 | 72.7 | 87.1 | 83.3 | 91.7 | 94.2 | 74.9 | 89.3 | 90.4 | 91.1 | 85.3 | 87.7 | 90.5 | 74.1 | 83.2 | 81.2 | 87.0 | |
评价等级 | 五级 | 三级 | 四级 | 四级 | 四级 | 四级 | 三级 | 四级 | 四级 | 五级 | 五级 | 四级 | 四级 | 五级 | 五级 | 四级 | 四级 | 五级 | 三级 | 四级 | 四级 | 四级 |
[1] | 杨晓霞,向旭,雷丽,等.旅游规划原理[M].北京:科学出版社,2013. |
[Yang Xiaoxia,Xiang Xu, Lei Li et al. Principles of Tourism Planning.Beijing: Science Press,2013.] | |
[2] |
任唤麟. 基于地理特征的跨区域线性文化遗产旅游形象策略研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2017,33(1):95-101.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2017.01.017 |
[Ren Huanlin.Study on the Tourism Image Strategies of Cross-regional Linear Culture Heritage Based on Geographical Characteristics. Geography and Geo-information Science,2017,33(1):95-101.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2017.01.017 |
|
[3] | 杨效忠,张捷,彭敏.跨界旅游区合作的特征及影响机制研究[J].地理科学,2011,31(10):1189-1194. |
[Yang Xiaozhong,Zhang Jie,Peng Min.The Characteristics and Impact Mechanism of Region Cooperation in Cross-border Tourism.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2011,31(10):1189-1194.] | |
[4] | UNESCO. Silk Roads: The Routes Network of Chang’an-Tianshan Corridor[EB/OL]. [2016-05-24]. |
[5] |
邹嘉龄,刘卫东.2001~2013年中国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易网络分析[J].地理科学,2016,36(11):1629-1636.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.11.004 |
[Zou Jialing, Liu Weidong.Trade Network of China and Countries along “Belt and Road Initiative” Areas from 2001 to 2013.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2016,36(11):1629-1636.]
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.11.004 |
|
[6] |
王丰龙,张衔春,杨林川,等.尺度理论视角下的“一带一路”战略解读[J].地理科学,2016,36(4):502-511.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.04.003 |
[Wang Fenglong,Zhang Xianchun, Yang Linchuan et al.Rescaling and Scalar Politics in the “One Be1t, One Road” Strategy.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2016,36(4):502-511.]
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.04.003 |
|
[7] | 雍万里. 武夷山风景区划及其旅游资源评价[J].地理科学,1984(3):269-276. |
[Yong Wanli. Division of Scenic Spot and Tourist Resources of the Wuyi Mountains. Scientia Geographica Sinica,1984(3):269-276.] | |
[8] | 邢道隆,王玫.关于旅游资源评价的几个基本问题[J].旅游学刊,1987,2(3):34-39. |
[Xing Daolong, Wang Mei.Several Basic Problems about Tourism Resources Evaluation.Tourism Tribune,1987,2(3):34-39.] | |
[9] |
杨汉奎. 论风景资源的模糊评价——以贵州省为例[J].自然资源学报,1987,2(1):49-58.
doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.1987.01.006 |
[Yang Hankui.An Fuzzy Appraisal Mothod for Scenic Resources in Guizhou Province.Journal of Natural Resource,1987,2(1):49-58.]
doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.1987.01.006 |
|
[10] | 楚义芳,钱小芙.关于旅游地理的几个问题[J].经济地理,1987,7(2):137-143. |
[Chu Yifang,Qian Xiaofu.Several Problems of Tourism Geography.Economic Geography,1987,7(2):137-143.] | |
[11] | 保继刚. 旅游资源定量评价初探[J].干旱区地理,1988,11(3):57-60. |
[Bao Jigang.A Preliminary Study on the Quantitative Evaluation of the Tourist Resource.Arid Land Geography,1988,11(3):57-60.] | |
[12] | 罗德成,方海川,罗利群.金口大峡谷旅游资源评价与开发构想[J].乐山师范学院学报,2004,19(12):106-109. |
[Luo Decheng,Fang Haichuan,Luo Liqun.The Tourism Resources Evaluation and Development Plan of Jinkou Grand Canyon.Journal of Leshan Teaehers College,2004,19(12):106-109.] | |
[13] | 唐明达. 新疆“丝绸之路”(新)北道旅游资源评价与开发设想[J].干旱区地理,1990,13(3):57-64. |
[Tang Mingda.Imagination on Evaluation and Development of (New) Northern Way Tourism Resources of Xinjiang “Silk Road”. Arid Land Geography,1990,13(3):57-64.] | |
[14] | 王啸. 西北丝绸之路旅游的文化价值及其开发——以甘肃为例[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2004. |
[Wang Xiao.The Cultural Value and the Exploitation of the Northwestern Silk Road Tourism—Take Gansu Province for Example.Xi’an:Shaanxi Normal University,2004.] | |
[15] | 杜忠潮,柳银花.基于信息熵的线性遗产廊道旅游价值综合性评价——以西北地区丝绸之路为例[J].干旱区地理,2011,34(3):519-524. |
[Du Zhongchao,Liu Yinhua.Comprehensive Analysis of the Tourism Value of Linear Heritage Corridor in the Silk Road on Northwestern China. Arid Land Geography,2011,34(3):519-524.] | |
[16] | 狄静. 京杭运河山东段旅游资源价值评价研究——历史文化特色角度[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2009. |
[Di Jing.Research on the Tourism Resources Value of Shandong Section of Jing-Hang Canal—Historical Cultural Angle.Qingdao:Ocean University of China,2009.] | |
[17] |
吕龙,黄震方.遗产廊道旅游价值评价体系构建及其应用研究——以古运河江苏段为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2007,17(6):95-100.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2007.06.019 |
[Lv Long,Huang Zhenfang.Establishment and Application of Indexes of Qualitative Evaluation of Tourism Value for Heritage Corridor:A Case Study on the Jiangsu Section of the Grand Canal.China Populaton, Resources and Environment,2007,17(6):95-100.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2007.06.019 |
|
[18] |
王亚辉,吴小伟.申遗背景下的运河文化旅游资源评价——以运河淮安段为例[J].经济论坛,2013,(11):102-106.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3580.2013.11.030 |
[Wang Yahui,Wu Xiaowei.On Evaluation of Cultural Tourism Resources to Declare World Heritage for the Grand Canal: A Case of Huai'an Section. Economic Forum,2013,(11):102-106.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3580.2013.11.030 |
|
[19] | 屠一帆. 线性文化遗产构成及其旅游价值评价研究——以大运河浙东段为例[D].上海:上海师范大学,2016. |
[Tu Yifan.The Composition of the Linear Cultural Heritage and Its Evaluation of Tourism Value: A Case of the Grand Canal of Zhedong Section. Shanghai:Shanghai Normal University, 2016.] | |
[20] | 朱尖,姜维公.黄河故道线性文化遗产旅游价值评价与开发研究[J].资源开发与市场,2013,29(5):553-556. |
[Zhu Jian,Jiang Weigong.Study on Evaluating Tourism Value of Ancient Course of Yellow River Lineal Cultural Heritage and Tourism Development.Resource Development & Market,2013,29(5):553-556.] | |
[21] | 尹泽生,宋关福.区域旅游资源评价基本原理[J].旅游学刊,1995,(5):39-43. |
[Yin Zesheng,Song Guanfu.On the Basic Principles of the Evaluation of Regional Tourism Resources. Tourism Tribune, 1995,(5):39-43.] | |
[22] | 尹泽生,陈田,牛亚菲,等.旅游资源调查需要注意的若干问题[J].旅游学刊,2006, 21(1):14-18. |
[Yin Zesheng,Chen Tian, Niu Yafei et al.Some Problems to Be Noticed in the Investigation of Tourism Resources. Tourism Tribune,2006,21(1):14-18.] | |
[23] | CIIC. The ICOMOS Charter on Cultural Routes[EB/OL].[2016-01-2]. |
[24] | Saaty T L.The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M].New York: Mcgraw-Hill,1980. |
[25] |
袁荃,曾克峰.基于AHP与菲罗模型评价地质遗迹景观——以贵州思南乌江喀斯特国家地质公园为例[J].国土资源科技管理,2012,29(2):84-90.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4210.2012.02.014 |
[Yuan Quan,Zeng Kefeng.Evaluation of Geological Relic Landscapes Based on AHP and Fishbein-Rosenberg Modle: With Sinan National Geopark of Guizhou Province as an Example.Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources,2012,29(2):84-90.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4210.2012.02.014 |
|
[26] | 蒋耀. 基于层次分析法(AHP)的区域可持续发展综合评价:以青浦区为例[J].上海交通大学学报,2009,43(4):566-571. |
[Jiang Yao.Evaluation of Regional Sustainable Development Based on Analytial Hierarchy Process:Qingpu District as an Example.Journal of Shanghai JiaoTong University,2009,43(4):566-571.] | |
[27] |
罗艳,李荣彪.国内外旅游资源评价研究综述[J].凯里学院学报,2015,33(1):88-93.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9329.2015.01.21 |
[Luo Yan,Li Rongbiao.Review of Assessment of Domestic and Foreign Tourism Resources Research.Journal of Kaili University,2015,33(1):88-93.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9329.2015.01.21 |
|
[28] | 沙春蕾. 辽宁地区历史文化遗产旅游价值评价与开发研究[D].大连:辽宁师范大学,2013. |
[Sha Chunlei.The Research on Evalution and Exploitation of Tourism Value of Historical and Cultural Heritage in Liaoning Province.Dalian:Liaoning Normal University,2013.] | |
[29] | 周自翔,李晶,任志远.基于GIS的关中-天水经济区地形起伏度与人口分布研究[J].地理科学,2012,32(8):951-957. |
[Zhou Zixiang,Li Jing,Ren Zhiyuan.The Relief Degree of Land Surface and Population Distribution in Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region Using GIS.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2012,32(8):951-957.] |
|