基于主体功能区规划的中国城市化地区生态功能评估

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.06.003

Abstract

Abstract:

The ecological function of major urbanized areas in China was evaluated and analyzed at county scale, the correlation between ecological function index and three-level index was analyzed, and suggestions were put forward for areas with obvious ecological function decline. The results show that from 2009 to 2015, the proportion of districts and counties with high level ecological function of the ‘two horizontal and three vertical’ urbanization strategic pattern decreased from 78.68% to 68.13%. The proportion of districts and counties with high level ecological function of the optimized development zones decreased from 53.85% to 37.28%. Counties with obviously degradation in ecological function are mainly distributed in the southeast of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and the Bohai coastal region. The proportion of districts and counties with high level ecological function index of the key development zones decreased from 73.78% to 69.21%. Counties with obviously degradation in ecological function are mainly distributed in the central Henan urban agglomeration and northeast region. Urban areas with ecological degradation are accompanied by different degrees of habitat quality index reduction, ecological space reduction, development intensity and population density increases. The order of the correlation between eco-function index and three-level index are as follows: Proportion of ecological space, habitat quality index, development intensity and population density. It is suggested to emphasize development control, strengthen ecological protection, implement classification control, and improve the long-term mechanism of differentiated coordinated development of different major functional areas.

Key words: major functional areas, urbanized area, ecological functions, assessment, China

CLC Number:

X321

Xia Han, Zhang Wanshun, Peng Hong, Li Lin, Huang Panpan, Xia Jingjing. Evaluation of Ecological Functions of Urbanized Areas Based on the Plan for Major Functional Areas in China[J].SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(6): 882-889.

Figures/Tables 5

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

References 30

[1]	Fan Jie, Tao Anjun, Ren Qing On the historical background, scientifc intentions, goalorientation, and policy framework of Major Function-oriented Zone Planning in China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2010. 1 (4): 289- 299.
[2]	Fan Jie, Sun Wei, Yang Zhenshan et al Focusing on the major function-oriented zone: A new spatial planning approach and practice in China and its 12th Five-Year Plan[J]. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 2012. 53 (1): 86- 96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8373.2012.01477.x
[3]	钟茂初, 孙坤鑫中国城市生态承载力的相对表征——从胡焕庸线出发[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2018. 37 (5): 154- 159.
	Zhong Maochu, Sun Kunxin Relative characterization of urban ecological carrying capacity in China: Analysis from the Hu Line[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2018. 37 (5): 154- 159.
[4]	戚伟, 刘盛和, 赵美风 “胡焕庸线” 的稳定性及其两侧人口集疏模式差异[J]. 地理学报, 2015. 70 (4): 551- 566.
	Qi Wei, Liu Shenghe, Zhao Meifeng Study on the stability of Hu Line and different spatial patterns ofpopulation growth on its both sides[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015. 70 (4): 551- 566.
[5]	吴丹, 邹长新, 林乃峰, 等基于主体功能区规划的长江经济带生态状况变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018. 27 (8): 1676- 1682.
	Wu Dan, Zou Changxin, Lin Naifeng et al Characteristic analysis of ecological status in the Yangtze River Economic Belt based on the plan for major function-oriented zones[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018. 27 (8): 1676- 1682.
[6]	杨桂山, 徐昔保, 李平星, 等长江经济带绿色生态廊道建设研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015. 34 (11): 1356- 1367. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.003
	Yang Guishan, Xu Xibao, Li Pingxing et al Research on the construction of green ecological corridors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015. 34 (11): 1356- 1367. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.003
[7]	刘菁华, 李伟峰, 周伟奇, 等京津冀城市群扩张模式对区域生态安全的影响预测[J]. 生态学报, 2018. 38 (5): 1650- 1660.
	Liu Jinghua, Li Weifeng, Zhou Weiqi et al Prediction of expansion pattern and impact on regional ecological security of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018. 38 (5): 1650- 1660.
[8]	吴健生, 马洪坤, 彭建基于 “功能节点-关键廊道” 的城市生态安全格局构建——以深圳市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018. 37 (12): 1663- 1671. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.12.008
	Wu Jiansheng, Ma Hongkun, Peng Jian Improving urban ecological security pattern based on functional nodes-key corridors: A case study of Shenzhen City[J]. Progress in Geography, 2018. 37 (12): 1663- 1671. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.12.008
[9]	刘健法国国土开发政策框架及其空间规划体系——特点与启发[J]. 城市规划, 2011. 35 (8): 60- 65.
	Liu jian Policy framework and planning system of territorial development in France: Characteristics and inspirations[J]. City Planning Review, 2011. 35 (8): 60- 65.
[10]	孙玥荷兰: 第五个空间规划——保持增长与环境的平衡[J]. 宏观经济管理, 2004. (1): 52- 55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-907X.2004.01.017
	Sun Yue Netherlands: Fifth spatial plan—To maintain the balance between growth and environment[J]. Macroeconomic Management, 2004. (1): 52- 55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-907X.2004.01.017
[11]	赵星烁, 邢海峰, 胡若函欧洲部分国家空间规划发展经验及启示[J]. 城乡建设, 2018. 543 (12): 76- 79.
	Zhao Xingshuo, Xing Haifeng, Hu Ruohan Experience and inspiration of space planning development in some European countries[J]. Urban and rural Construction, 2018. 543 (12): 76- 79.
[12]	蔡玉梅不一样的底色不一样的美——部分国家国土空间规划体系特征[J]. 资源导刊, 2014. (4): 48- 49.
	Cai Yumei Different background and different beauty—The characteristics of some countries' land space planning system[J]. Resources Tribune, 2014. (4): 48- 49.
[13]	Fan Jie, Li Pingxing The scientific foundation of Major Function Oriented Zoning in China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2009. 19 (5): 515- 531. doi: 10.1007/s11442-009-0515-0
[14]	Fan Jie, Sun Wei, Zhou Kan et al Major function oriented zone: New method of spatial regulation for reshaping regional development pattern in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2012. 22 (2): 196- 209. doi: 10.1007/s11769-012-0528-y
[15]	盛科荣, 樊杰主体功能区作为国土开发的基础制度作用[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2016. (1): 44- 50.
	Sheng Kerong, Fan Jie Fundamental institution function of Major Function Oriented Zoning for China’s land development and protection[J]. Proceedings of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016. (1): 44- 50.
[16]	郭培坤, 王勤耕主体功能区环境政策体系构建初探[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011. (s1): 34- 37.
	Guo Peikun, Wang Qingeng Preliminary study on the construction of environmental policy system for functional zones[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2011. (s1): 34- 37.
[17]	黄海楠. 基于主体功能区规划的政府绩效评估体系研究[D]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2010.
	Huang Hainan. Research on government performance evaluation system based on functional area planning. Xi’ an: Xi’ an University of Architecture and Technology, 2010.
[18]	刘纪远, 刘文超, 匡文慧, 等基于主体功能区规划的中国城乡建设用地扩张时空特征遥感分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016. 71 (3): 355- 369.
	Liu Jiyuan, Liu Wenchao, Kuang Wenhui et al Remote sensing-based analysis of the spatiotemporal characteristics of built-up area across China based on the plan for Major Function-oriented Zones[J]. Acta Geographical Sinica, 2016. 71 (3): 355- 369.
[19]	赵艳华, 苏德, 包扬, 等阴山北麓草原生态功能区植被覆盖度遥感动态监测[J]. 环境科学研究, 2017. 30 (2): 240- 248.
	Zhao Yanhua, Su De, Bao Yang et al Remote sensing dynamic monitoring of vegetation coverage in grassland ecological functional area at the north foot of Yinshan Mountain[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2017. 30 (2): 240- 248.
[20]	侯鹏, 翟俊, 曹巍, 等国家重点生态功能区生态状况变化与保护成效评估——以海南岛中部山区国家重点生态功能区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2018. 73 (3): 429- 441.
	Hou Peng, Zhai Jun, Cao Wei et al Evaluation on ecosystem changes and protection of the national key ecological function zones in mountainous areas of central Hainan Island[J]. Acta Geographical Sinica, 2018. 73 (3): 429- 441.
[21]	王晓玲, 仝耀华基于统计综合评价的主体功能区协调发展探析[J]. 山西大同大学学报: 自然科学版, 2014. (3): 6- 8.
	Wang Xiaoling, Tong Yaohua Analysis of coordinated development of main functional areas based on statistical comprehensive evaluation[J]. Journal of Shanxi Datong University, 2014. (3): 6- 8.
[22]	孙雪. 主体功能区视角下重庆区县政府绩效评估指标体系设计和实证研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2015.
	Sun Xue. Design and empirical study of performance evaluation index system of Chongqing district and county government from the perspective of main functional area. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2015.
[23]	唐玉芝, 邵全琴, 曹巍, 等基于物质量评估的贵州南部地区生态系统服务及其县域差异比较[J]. 地理科学, 2018. 38 (1): 122- 134.
	Tang Yuzhi, Shao Quanqin, Cao Wei et al The ecosystem services and its spatial variation at county scale in the Southern Guizhou Based on physical assessment method[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018. 38 (1): 122- 134.
[24]	周文华, 王如松城市生态安全评价方法研究——以北京市为例[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005. 24 (7): 848- 852. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.2005.07.027
	Zhou Wenhua, Wang Rusong Study on evaluation methods of urban ecological security—A case study of Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2005. 24 (7): 848- 852. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.2005.07.027
[25]	郭宏斌, 黄义雄, 叶功富, 等厦门城市生态功能网络评价及其优化研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010. 25 (1): 71- 79. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.01.008
	Guo Hongbin, Huang Yixiong, Ye Gongfu et al A study on the evaluation and optimization of urban ecological function network in Xiamen[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010. 25 (1): 71- 79. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.01.008
[26]	毛齐正, 罗上华, 马克明, 等城市绿地生态评价研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2012. 32 (17): 5589- 5600. doi: 10.5846/stxb201112141912
	Mao Qizheng, Luo Shanghua, Ma Keming et al Research progress on ecological evaluation of urban green space[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012. 32 (17): 5589- 5600. doi: 10.5846/stxb201112141912
[27]	国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2010, 2013, 2016.
	National Bureau of Statistics of China. China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2010, 2013, 2016.
[28]	谭雪兰, 蒋凌霄, 米胜渊, 等湖南省县域乡村反贫困绩效评价与空间分异特征[J]. 地理科学, 2019. 39 (6): 938- 946.
	Tan Xuelan, Jiang Lingxiao, Mi Shengyuan et al Performance evaluation and spatial differentiation of rural anti-poverty at county scale in Hunan Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019. 39 (6): 938- 946.
[29]	杨清可, 段学军, 王磊, 等基于 “三生空间” 的土地利用转型与生态环境效应——以长江三角洲核心区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2018. 38 (1): 97- 106.
	Yang Qingke, Duan Xuejun, Wang Lei et al Land use transformation based on ecological-production-living spaces and associated eco-environment effects: A case study in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018. 38 (1): 97- 106.
[30]	秦晓楠, 程钰中国旅游城市生态安全系统评估与类型划分研究——基于节点权重约束网络 DEA模型[J]. 地理科学, 2019. 39 (1): 156- 163.
	Qin Xiaonan, Cheng Yu Evaluation and type classification on Chinese tourist urban ecological security system: Based on the network DEA Model with node weight[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019. 39 (1): 156- 163.

一级	二级	三级	属性	来源或计算方法
生态功能指数	生态产品	生境质量指数	正向	《生态环境状况评估技术规范（试行）》（HJ 192-2015）
	生态空间	生态空间占比（%）	正向	草地、林地、湿地、水域、荒草地、荒漠和盐碱地面积/区域面积
	经济指标	开发强度（%）	负向	建成区面积/区域面积
		人口密度（人/km²）	负向	总人口/区域面积

生态功能指数	分级	说明
>75.01	一级	生态功能高
55.01~75.00	二级	生态功能较高
35.01~55.00	三级	生态功能中等
20.01~35.00	四级	生态功能较低
<20.00	五级	生态功能低

	生境质量指数	生态空间占比	人口密度	开发强度
2009年	0.97^**	0.99^**	?0.39^**	?0.74^**
2012年	0.98^**	0.99^**	?0.27^**	?0.69^**
2015年	0.98^**	0.99^**	?0.34^**	?0.67^**

Evaluation of Ecological Functions of Urbanized Areas Based on the Plan for Major Functional Areas in China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 30

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Zhang Ziang, Bao Jigang. Effects of Multiple Distances on Inbound and Outbound Tourism Flows in China: A Configuration-based Perspective [J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2021, 41(1): 13-21.
[2]	Yang Ruozi, Xing Pei, Du Wupeng, Dang Bing, Xuan Chunyi, Xiong Feilin. Climatic Characteristics of Precipitation in North China from 1961 to 2017 [J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(9): 1573-1583.
[3]	Tong Lei, Zheng Ke, Su Fei, Tang Qing, Cao Yirong, Zheng Yanyan. Analysis of Population Health Vulnerability Assessment and Influencing Factors in Zhejiang Province [J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(8): 1293-1299.
[4]	Zhou Aihong, Ning Zhijie. Related Problems of Single Gully Debris Flow Risk Assessment Model [J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(8): 1385-1393.
[5]	Liu Yungang, Liu Xuanyu, Zhang Zhengsheng. The Territorial Structure in South China Sea from Fishermen's Perspective [J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(7): 1062-1071.
[6]	Qiu Fangdao, Zhang Chunli, Guo Mengmeng, Zheng Ziyan, Shan Yongbing. Heterogeneity of the Coupling Relationship Between the Innovation Capacity and Industrial Transformation of Renewable Resource-based Cities in China [J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(7): 1092-1103.
[7]	Zhao Ruyu, Xu Jun. Spatial Agglomeration and Unbalanced Development of Elements in Northeast China [J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(7): 1104-1113.
[8]	Dong Lijing, Su Fei, Wen Yuqing, Wang Yongchao. Obstacle Factors and Evolution of Urban Economic Resilience of Fuxin Shrinking City and Its Obstacle Factors [J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(7): 1142-1149.
[9]	Wang Ying, Liu Hang, Chen Xiaohong, Song Yunting. Evolution Characteristics and Division of Regional Types of Correlation Coupling of Urban-Rural Systems: A Case Study of the Three Provinces of Northeast China [J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(7): 1150-1159.
[10]	Cao Yongqiang, Qi Jingwei, Wang Fei, Li Linghui, Lu Jie. Analysis of Climate Suitability of Spring Maize in Liaoning Province Based on Modulus and Mathematics [J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(7): 1210-1220.
[11]	Ma Li, Tian Huazheng, Kang Lei, Qi Wei. Assessment of the Social and Economic Support Capacity for the Comprehensive Revitalization of Northeast China [J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(6): 863-873.
[12]	Zou Jun, Chen Han, Huang Wenrong, Liu Peilin. Quantitative Evaluation on the Living State of Traditional Villages [J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(6): 908-917.
[13]	Liu Jian, Yang Qingshan, Zhang Yu, Liu Jie, Jiang Xiaojun. Spatial Patterns Evolution and Classification of Population Aging in the Three Provinces of Northeast China Based on the County Scale [J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(6): 918-927.
[14]	Zhang Hua, Xu Cungang, Wang Hao. Response of Vegetation Change to Meteorological Drought in Northwest China from 2001 to 2018 [J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(6): 1029-1038.
[15]	Luo Xiaolong, Cao Shujun, Gu Zongni. The Returning-migrant-induced Urbanization: The New Path of Urbanization in Middle China [J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(5): 685-690.