SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 1706-1716.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.10.003
Previous Articles Next Articles
Ma Xiaoxue1(), Wu Hao2, Qin Boqiang3, Wang Lachun4(
)
Received:
2021-10-20
Revised:
2022-01-19
Online:
2022-10-30
Published:
2022-10-20
Contact:
Wang Lachun
E-mail:maxiaoxue029@126.com;wang6312@263.net.cn
Supported by:
CLC Number:
Ma Xiaoxue, Wu Hao, Qin Boqiang, Wang Lachun. Spatiotemporal Change of Landscape Pattern and Its Eco-environmental Response in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J].SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2022, 42(10): 1706-1716.
Table 1
Characteristics of urbanization indicators in the upper, middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River
分区 | 包含的地区 | GDP/亿元 | 城镇人口/万人 | 城市化率/% | 建设用地/km2 |
注:表中各数据均来源于《中国统计年鉴2020》[ | |||||
长江上游 | 重庆、四川、云南、贵州、张家界市、湘西土家族苗族自治州、 怀化市、湖北十堰市、神农架林区、恩施土家族苗族自治州 | 116079.995 | 11549.26 | 49.02 | 45544.30 |
长江中游 | 除上游、下游外的江西、湖北、湖南 | 100091.180 | 8894.72 | 59.52 | 43911.97 |
长江下游 | 上海、江苏、浙江、安徽、上饶市、鹰潭市、景德镇市 | 241634.000 | 16043.02 | 67.74 | 60919.77 |
长江经济带 | 457805.175 | 36487.00 | 61.72 | 150376.04 |
Table 2
Landscape index in landscape class level of the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2020
年份 | 类型 | CA/hm2 | PLAND/% | NP/块 | PD/(块/100 hm2) | LPI/% | LSI | COHESION |
注:CA为斑块类型面积;PLAND为斑块所占景观面积的比例;LPI为最大斑块指数;PD为斑块密度;NP为斑块数量;LSI为景观形状指数;COHESION为斑块凝聚度指数。 | ||||||||
2000 | 耕地 | 74049132 | 34.069 | 390548 | 0.180 | 5.759 | 890.052 | 99.776 |
未利用地 | 685156 | 0.315 | 11077 | 0.005 | 0.020 | 100.808 | 95.260 | |
林地 | 100731144 | 46.345 | 368473 | 0.170 | 18.035 | 873.959 | 99.950 | |
草地 | 31308280 | 14.405 | 966943 | 0.445 | 5.471 | 979.707 | 99.272 | |
湿地 | 1059740 | 0.488 | 6563 | 0.003 | 0.163 | 95.653 | 98.516 | |
水体 | 5498724 | 2.530 | 155565 | 0.072 | 0.500 | 354.959 | 98.040 | |
人造地表 | 4018088 | 1.849 | 142447 | 0.066 | 0.035 | 430.231 | 84.996 | |
2010 | 耕地 | 73773400 | 33.928 | 391664 | 0.180 | 5.646 | 900.811 | 99.783 |
未利用地 | 679488 | 0.353 | 11459 | 0.006 | 0.019 | 113.511 | 94.787 | |
林地 | 101179436 | 46.532 | 373582 | 0.172 | 33.569 | 866.412 | 99.971 | |
草地 | 30392260 | 13.977 | 916769 | 0.422 | 5.706 | 931.773 | 99.244 | |
湿地 | 1046764 | 0.481 | 5932 | 0.003 | 0.175 | 85.961 | 98.754 | |
水体· | 5227716 | 2.404 | 135361 | 0.062 | 0.426 | 331.556 | 97.907 | |
人造地表 | 5051200 | 2.323 | 145243 | 0.067 | 0.055 | 420.384 | 89.248 | |
2020 | 耕地 | 71218112 | 32.749 | 401387 | 0.185 | 5.262 | 939.553 | 99.745 |
未利用地 | 775816 | 0.409 | 8356 | 0.004 | 0.038 | 79.635 | 96.794 | |
林地 | 99962212 | 45.967 | 361133 | 0.166 | 26.262 | 862.216 | 99.961 | |
草地 | 29764792 | 13.687 | 884670 | 0.407 | 5.515 | 913.375 | 99.245 | |
湿地 | 761220 | 0.350 | 5409 | 0.003 | 0.168 | 83.003 | 98.572 | |
水体 | 6116792 | 2.813 | 140021 | 0.064 | 0.643 | 365.676 | 98.379 | |
人造地表 | 8751320 | 4.024 | 192651 | 0.089 | 0.117 | 484.051 | 93.361 |
Table 3
Landscape index in landscape level of the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2020
年份 | ED/(m/hm2) | AI | CONTAG | SHDI | SHEI | SIEI |
注:ED为边缘密度;AI为聚合度指数;CONTAG为蔓延度指数;SHDI为香农多样性指数;SHEI为香农均度指数;SIEI为辛普森均匀度指数。 | ||||||
2000 | 21.8403 | 78.1292 | 50.6500 | 1.2133 | 0.6235 | 0.7553 |
2010 | 21.5463 | 78.4237 | 50.5995 | 1.2204 | 0.6272 | 0.7556 |
2020 | 22.0386 | 77.9316 | 48.8228 | 1.2671 | 0.6512 | 0.7703 |
Table 4
Major function kand transformation and contribution rate of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in 2000-2020
主要土地利用变化类型 | 生态贡献率 | 占贡献率的 百分比/% | 主要土地利用变化类型 | 生态贡献率 | 占贡献率的 百分比/% | |||
生 态 环 境 正 效 应 | 耕地−林地 | 0.02696 | 64.52 | 生 态 环 境 负 效 应 | 耕地−人造地表 | 0.002076 | 4.21 | |
耕地−草地 | 0.00589 | 14.10 | 草地−人造地表 | 0.000954 | 1.93 | |||
耕地−水体 | 0.00195 | 4.65 | 林地−人造地表 | 0.001757 | 3.56 | |||
草地−林地 | 0.00388 | 9.29 | 水体−人造地表 | 0.00046 | 0.93 | |||
水体−林地 | 0.00045 | 1.08 | 林地−耕地 | 0.02729 | 55.34 | |||
人造地表−耕地 | 0.00053 | 1.27 | 林地−草地 | 0.003864 | 7.84 | |||
未利用地−草地 | 0.0008 | 1.91 | 林地−水体 | 0.000772 | 1.57 | |||
合计 | 0.0405 | 96.82 | 草地−耕地 | 0.007637 | 15.49 | |||
草地−未利用地 | 0.001469 | 2.98 | ||||||
水体−耕地 | 0.001759 | 3.57 | ||||||
合计 | 0.04804 | 97.41 |
[1] |
杨桂山, 徐昔保, 李平星. 长江经济带绿色生态廊道建设研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(11): 1356-1367.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.003 |
Yang Guishan, Xu Xibao, Li Pingxing. Research on the construction of green ecological corridors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(11): 1356-1367.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.003 |
|
[2] | 陆大道. 建设经济带是经济发展布局的最佳选择: 长江经济带经济发展的巨大潜力[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(7): 769-772. |
Lu Dadao. Economic belt construction is the best choice of economic development layout: The enormous potential for the Changjiang River Economic Belt. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(7): 769-772. | |
[3] |
虞孝感, 王磊, 杨清可, 等. 长江经济带战略的背景及创新发展的地理学解读[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(11): 1368-1376.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.004 |
Yu Xiaogan, Wang Lei, Yang Qingke et al. Background of the Yangtze River Economic Belt development strategy and geography interpretation of its innovative development. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(11): 1368-1376.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.004 |
|
[4] |
秦伯强, 吴庆农, 高俊峰, 等. 太湖地区的水资源与水环境: 问题、原因与管理[J]. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(2): 221-228.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2002.02.015 |
Qin Boqiang, Wu Qingnong, Gao Junfeng et al. Water environmental issues in Taihu Lake of China: Problems, causes and management. Journal of Natural Resources, 2002, 17(2): 221-228.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2002.02.015 |
|
[5] |
Chen W W, Zhao H B, Li J F et al. Land use transitions and the associated impacts on ecosystem services in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China based on the geo-informatic Tupu method[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 701: 134690
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134690 |
[6] | 曹玉红, 陈晨, 张大鹏, 等. 皖江城市带土地利用变化的生态风险格局演化研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(13): 4773-4781. |
Cao Yuhong, Chen Chen, Zhang Dapeng et al. Evolution of ecological risk pattern of land use change in Wanjiang City Belt. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(13): 4773-4781. | |
[7] | 吕立刚, 周生路, 周兵兵, 等. 区域发展过程中土地利用转型及其生态环境响应研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(12): 1442-1449. |
Lv Ligang, Zhou Shenglu, Zhou Bingbing et al. Land use transformation and its eco-environmental response in process of the regional development: A case study of Jiangsu Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(12): 1442-1449. | |
[8] |
Song Y, Yeung G, Zhu D L et al. Efficiency of logistics land use: The case of Yangtze River Economic Belt in China, 2000-2017[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2020, 88: 102851
doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102851 |
[9] |
Luo X, Ao X H, Zhang Z et al. Spatiotemporal variations of cultivated land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt based on carbon emission constraints[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(4): 535-552.
doi: 10.1007/s11442-020-1741-8 |
[10] | 杨喜, 卢新海, 侯娇. 长江经济带城市土地开发强度时空格局特征及溢出效应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(4): 771-781. |
Yang Xi, Lu Xinhai, Hou Jiao. Research on temporal-spatial pattern characteristics and spillover effects of urban land development intensity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2021, 30(4): 771-781. | |
[11] | Pan Z Z, He J H, Liu D F et al. Ecosystem health assessment based on ecological integrity and ecosystem services demand in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 774(7724): 144837 |
[12] | Chen D S, Jiang P H, Li M C. Assessing potential ecosystem service dynamics driven by urbanization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 292(1): 112734 |
[13] |
罗芳, 郭艺, 魏文栋. 长江经济带碳排放与经济增长的脱钩关系—基于生产侧和消费侧视角[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(3): 1364-1373.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2020.03.047 |
Luo Fang, Guo Yi, Wei Wendong. Decoupling analysis between economic growth and carbon emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: production and consumption perspectives. China Environmental Science, 2020, 40(3): 1364-1373.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2020.03.047 |
|
[14] | 周海旺, 欧阳才宇. 长江经济带社会发展报告(2019-2020)[EB/OL].https://cjjjd.ndrc.gov.cn/zhongshuochangjiang/xsyj/202101/t20210122_1265736.htm. |
Zhou Haiwang, Ouyang Caiyu. Report on the social development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt (2019-2020)[EB/OL].https://cjjjd.ndrc.gov.cn/zhongshuochangjiang/xsyj/202101/t20210122_1265736.htm. | |
[15] | 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 土地利用现状调查技术规程(GB/T7929-1995 )[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2003. |
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. Technical specification for investigation of land use status (GB/T7929-1995). Beijing: China Standards Press, 2003. | |
[16] | 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020. |
National Bureau of Statistics. China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2020. | |
[17] | 湖南省统计局. 湖南统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020. |
Hunan Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Hunan statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2020. | |
[18] | 湖北省统计局. 湖北统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020. |
Hubei Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Hubei statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2020. | |
[19] | 江西省统计局. 江西统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020. |
Jiangxi Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Hunan statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2020. | |
[20] |
王娟, 崔保山, 刘杰, 等. 云南澜沧江流域土地利用及其变化对景观生态风险的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2008, 28(2): 269-277.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2468.2008.02.008 |
Wang Juan, Cui Baoshan, Liu Jie et al. The effect of land use and its change on ecological risk in the Lancang River watershed of Yunnan Province at the landscape scale. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2008, 28(2): 269-277.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2468.2008.02.008 |
|
[21] | 刘怡娜, 孔令桥, 肖燚, 等. 长江流域景观格局与生态系统水质净化服务的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(3): 844-852. |
Liu Yina, Kong Lingqiao, Xiao Yi et al. Relationships between landscape pattern and ecosystem water purification service in the Yangtze River Basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(3): 844-852. | |
[22] | 邬建国. 景观生态学: 格局、过程、尺度与等级(第二版)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007: 107-115. |
Wu Jianguo. Landscape Ecology: Pattern, process, scale and hierarchy (2nd edition). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007: 107-115. | |
[23] | 李晓文, 方创琳, 黄金川, 等. 西北干旱区城市土地利用变化及其区域生态环境效应: 以甘肃河西地区为例[J]. 第四纪研究, 2003, 23(3): 281-290. |
Li Xiaowen, Fang Chuanglin, Huang Jinchuan et al. The urban land use transformations and associated effects on eco-environment in Northwest China arid region: A case study in Hexi region, Gansu Province. Quaternary Sciences, 2003, 23(3): 281-290. | |
[24] | Liu Y, Gao J, Yang Y. A holistic approach towards assessment of severity of land degradation along the Great Wall in northern Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 2003, 82(2): 187-202. |
[25] | 胡绵好, 袁菊红, 蔡静远, 等. 河流城市土地利用景观格局变化及其生态风险分析——以江西省德兴市为例[J]. 生态科学, 2018, 37(1): 78-86. |
Hu Mianhao, Yuan Juhong, Cai Jingyuan et al. Landscape pattern changes of land-use and its ecological risks analysis of river urban: A case analysis of Dexing in Jiangxi Province. Ecological Science, 2018, 37(1): 78-86. | |
[26] | 吕乐婷, 张杰, 彭秋志, 等. 东江流域景观格局演变分析及变化预测[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(18): 6850-6859. |
Lv Leting, Zhang Jie, Peng Qiuzhi et al. Landscape pattern analysis and prediction in the Dongjiang River Basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(18): 6850-6859. | |
[27] | 胡昕利, 易扬, 康宏樟, 等. 近25年长江中游地区土地利用时空变化格局与驱动因素[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(6): 1877-1886. |
Hu Xinli, Yi Yang, Kong Hongzhang et al. Temporal and spatial variations of land use and the driving factors in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River in the past 25 years. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(6): 1877-1886. | |
[28] | 张静. 陕南土地景观动态与生态风险变化研究[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2018. |
Zhang Jing. Study on land landscape dynamics and ecological risk change in southern Shaanxi. Xi'an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2018. | |
[29] | 满卫东, 刘明月, 王宗明, 等. 1990~2015年东北地区草地变化遥感监测研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(5): 393-400. |
Man Weidong, Liu Mingyue, Wang Zongming et al. Remote sensing investigation of grassland chang in Northest China during 1990-2015. China Environmental Science, 2020, 40(5): 393-400. | |
[30] | 史娜娜, 肖能文, 王琦, 等. 长江经济带生态系统格局特征及其驱动力分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2019, 32(11): 1779-1789. |
Shi Nana, Xiao Nengwen, Wang Qi et al. Spatial pattern of ecosystems and the driving forces in the Yangtze River Economic Zone. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 32(11): 1779-1789. | |
[31] | 苑韶峰, 唐奕钰, 申屠楚宁. 土地利用转型时空演变及其生态环境效应——基于长江经济带127个地级市的实证研究[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(9): 174-181. |
Yuan Saofeng, Tang Yiyu, Shentu Chuning. Spatiotemporal chang of land-use transformation and its eco-environmental response: A case of 127 counties in Yangtze River Economic Belt. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(9): 174-181. | |
[32] | 孙善良, 张小平. 陕西省土地利用转型时空演变及其生态环境效应分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(6): 356-363+370. |
Sun Shanliang, Zhang Xiaoping. Analysis on the spatiotemporal evolution of land use transformation and its ecological environment effect in Shaanxi Province. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(6): 356-363+370. | |
[33] | 索飞. 长三角城市群生态环境质量水平及影响因素研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽大学, 2017. |
Suo Fei. Research on the level of eco-environmental quality and its influenceing factors in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations. Hefei: Anhui University, 2017. | |
[34] | 年立辉. 土地生态环境质量评价及其影响因素分析——以江苏省为例[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2014. |
Nian Lihui. Land ecological environment quality assessment and analysis of its influence factors: A case study in Jiangsu Province. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2014. | |
[35] | 盛慧琴. 长江经济带产业升级与生态环境优化的耦合性研究[D]. 武汉: 湖北工业大学, 2019. |
Sheng Huiqin. Research on the coupling of industrial upgrading and ecological environment optimization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Wuhan: Hubei University of Technology, 2019. | |
[36] | 蔺雪芹, 方创琳. 城市群工业发展的生态环境效应——以武汉城市群为例[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(12): 2234-2242. |
Lin Xueqin, Fang Chuanglin. Research on the eco-environment effect of industrial development in city group: A case of Wuhan City Group. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(12): 2234-2242. | |
[37] | 王菲, 董锁成, 毛琦梁. 中国工业结构演变及其环境效应时空分异[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(10): 1793-1806. |
Wang Fei, Dong Suocheng, Mao Qiliang. Evolution of China’s industrial structure and spatial-temporal differentiation in environmental effect. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(10): 1793-1806. | |
[38] | 崔木花. 安徽省产业结构演变的生态环境效应[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(8): 133-139+154. |
Cui Muhua. Analysis on the eco-environmental effect of industrial structure evolution. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(8): 133-139+154. |
|