The idea of livable city is in the spotlight in China recently,not only the government,but also the researchers and the media have paid attention to the livable city.But it’s a pity that the livable city’s concept and relevant standard are not clear.Reflections on how to define livable city were discussed in the paper.Besides,questionnaire and semi-structured interviews were combined to discuss the livability of Guangzhou from the prospective of some particular citizens,the professional housewives who emigrating from Japan into Guangzhou.All of those Japanese housewives are members of Japanese women’s association of Guangzhou (JWAG),they have only involved the living space and have separated from the production space for some reasons.So their evaluations of Guangzhou city’s livability are objective and relatively neutral.Besides,their home country,Japan,can also offer some meaningful references for Chinese urban development.Therefore,based on the perspective of Japanese housewives,the results of this research,are meaningful to international construction of Chinese metropolis and livable construction of people-oriented city.The evaluation method of this study mainly takes Japanese assessment on "livable city" as a reference.And the public security,housing,insurance,transportation,medical care,education,shopping,food,environment,climate,culture,entertainment and human relationship were taken as the evaluated factors to assess the livable characteristics from five aspects:the living safety,living conditions,affluence,convenience and comfort.Scores were designed to:5 points stands for great satisfaction;4 points refers to quite satisfaction;3 points means general satisfaction;2 points means dissatisfaction;1 point shows rather dissatisfaction.According to those Japanese housewives’ contrast between Japanese cities and Guangzhou,the degree of livability and the main aspects of improvement in Guangzhou were well discussed.Except living condition,other aspects were worse than those in Japan from Japanese housewives’ point of view,especially the data of medical care,education,environment,shopping and entertainment,which were over 2 times less than those of Japan.The result showed that there was a big problem in the convenience and comfort of Guangzhou.In the Japanese housewives opinion,there is a long way to go in order to become a real livable city for Guangzhou.For one thing,its degree of livability is low.For another,both those housewives’ special cultural background,overseas experience,role concepts,and their residence time in Guangzhou also effect on the evaluated results.
LIU Yun-gang, ZHOU Wen-ting, TAN Yu-wen
. The Livability of Guangzhou City: A Subjective Evaluation Approach Based on Japanese Housewives[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2010
, 30(1)
: 39
-44
.
DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2010.01.39
[1] 张文忠.城市内部居住环境评价的指标体系和方法[J].地理科学,2007,27(1):17~22.
[2] 张文忠.宜居城市的内涵及评价指标体系探讨[J].城市规划学刊,2007,30(3):30~34.
[3] 李业锦,张文忠,田山川,等.宜居城市的理论基础和评价研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2008,27(3):101~108.
[4] 田山川.国外宜居城市研究的理论与方法[J].经济地理,2008,28(4):535~538.
[5] 董晓峰,杨保军.宜居城市研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2008,23(3):323~326.
[6] 陈 浮.城市人居环境与满意度评价研究[J].城市规划,2000,24(7):25~53.
[7] 宁越敏,查志强.大都市人居环境评价和优化研究——以上海市为例[J].城市规划,1999,23(6):15~20.
[8] 周志田,王海燕,杨多贵.中国适宜人居城市研究与评价[J].中国人口资源与环境,2004,14(1):27~30.
[9] 顾文选,罗亚蒙.宜居城市科学评价标准[J].北京规划建设,2007,(1):7~10.
[10] 柴彦威,刘志林,翁桂兰.中国城市女性居民行为空间研究的女性主义视角[J].人文地理,2003,18(4):1~4.
[11] 人力资源和社会保障部.2007年度劳动和社会保障事业发展统计公报.2008-05-21. http://w1.mohrss.gov.cn/gb/zwxx/2008-06/05/content_240415.html.
[12] 黄石鼎,宁超乔.中国广州社会发展报告(2008).北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008.
[13] 广州市城市规划局.广州城市总体规划(2001~2010). 2005-12-22. http://www.upo.gov.cn/pages/ghcg/ztgh/default.shtml.
[14] 许学强,李立勋.广州2020城市总体发展战略规划咨询报告. 2007.
[15] 肖明超.宜居城市:要魅力,更要环境.零点指标数据网.http://www.horizonkey.com/showart.asp?art_id=415&cat_id=6.
[16] 零点研究咨询集团.中国城市宜居指数2005年度报告[J].商务周刊,2006,128(3~4):99~106.
[17] 零点研究咨询集团.零点宜居指数——中国公众城市宜居指数2006年度报告.零点研究咨询集团,第一财经, 2006.
[18] 浅见泰司.居住环境:评价方法与理论[M].高晓路,张文忠译. 北京:清华大学出版社,2006.
[19] 都市データバック編集部.全都市·住みよさランキング.引自:都市データパック2008年[M].週刊東洋経済,2008-07-18.