论文

Spatial Differences of Urban-Rural Development Coordination in Shandong Province

Expand
  • 1. Geography and Planning School of Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong 264025;
    2. Communications School of Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong 264025

Received date: 2008-08-16

  Revised date: 2008-12-13

  Online published: 2009-05-20

Abstract

"Coordination" is a conception of describing fine correlation between things, which meaning is "unanimous harmonious and tie in". From systemic point of view, coordination is unanimous harmonious of system or factor in process of development and evolvement. city and country belong to two different systems, reviewing from historical angle. The relation of them are commonly considered to successively go through four development phase, that is urban-rural intergrowth, urban-rural abruption, urban-rural opposition, and urban-rural amalgamation(urban and rural coordinated development or urban-rural integration).Urban and rural development coordination is an idea or think of urban and rural development aiming at urban and rural opposite to each other. Urban and rural development coordination can be measured by calculating urban-rural coordination degree. Coordination degree is a temporal conception and postural representation which pursues systemic whole furthest excellent. The bigger coordination degree, the upper consistency among system or factor development; otherwise, system or factor development is out of line and needs controlling systemic operation. Urban-rural coordination degree which is ration index of measuring urban and rural coordination status reflects coupling degree of aspect of nature, society and economy of specified time and area in urban-rural terrain system. To measure urban-rural coordination degree needs to figure out comprehensive development status of urban and rural subsystems first of all. Following the principle of comprehensive, dominant, comparable and securable, the paper sets up urban and rural development coordination evaluation index system, figures urban-rural subsystem comprehensive development index of 17 cities in Shandong Province using principal component analysis, analyzes and appraises urban and rural development coordination of those cities through urban-rural coordination degree coefficient. Basing on coordination degree coefficient and urban and rural subsystems development status, the paper classifies seventeen cities in Shandong Province to six types, that is, coordination, basic coordination, border on maladjustment, elementary maladjustment, intermediate maladjustment, and severe maladjustment.As a result, the paper considers: ①Coordination is a relative and dynamic conception, urban and rural development coordination has not absolute standard, and the same coordination degree reflects diverse information. ②Urban-rural coordination degree coefficient is a nondimensional numerical value base on the urban and rural comprehensive development index, which has not any actual meaning with sole region except many regions' contrast analysis. ③There is evident spatial differences of urban and rural development coordination in Shandong Province, and the Eastern Shandong excelled the Midwestern Shandong as a whole. ④There is positive correlation between urban-rural coordination degree and economy development level, and the higher economy development level, the better urban and rural development coordination.

Cite this article

Wang Fu-Xi, Sun Hai-Yan, Sun Feng-Hua . Spatial Differences of Urban-Rural Development Coordination in Shandong Province[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2009 , 29(3) : 323 -328 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2009.03.323

References

[1] 杨士弘. 广州城市环境与经济协调发展预测及调控研究[J]. 地理科学,1994,14(2):136-142
[2] 张晓东,池天河. 90年代中国省级区域经济与环境协调度分析[J]. 地理研究,2001,20(4):506-514
[3] 孟庆松,韩文秀. 复合系统整体协调度模型研究[J]. 河北师范大学学报(自然科学版),1999,23(2):177-179
[4] 周尔鎏,张雨林. 城乡协调发展研究[M]. 南京:江苏人民出版社,1991
[5] 张国. 中国城乡结构调整研究——工业化过程中城乡协调发展[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2002
[6] 张竟竟,陈正江,杨得刚. 城乡协调度评价模型构建及应用[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2007,21(2):5-11
[7] 刘晶,敖浩翔,张明举. 重庆市北碚区经济、社会和资源环境协调度分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2007,16(2):147-151
[8] 李鹤,张平宇,刘文新. 1990年以来辽宁省环境与经济协调度评价[J]. 地理科学,2007,27(4):486-492
[9] 李艳. 经济—环境系统协调发展评价方法研究及应用[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2003,23(5):54-58
[10] 赵媛. 能源与社会经济环境协调发展的多目标决策——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学,2001,21(2):164-169
[11] 徐建华. 现代地理学中的数学方法[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2002
[12] 吴传钧. 关于菏泽地区经济发展战略的若干问题[J]. 人文地理,1996,11(4):10-13
Outlines

/