论文

Spatial Difference of New-Type Industrialization and Its Mechanism in Zhejiang

Expand
  • 1. College of Public Administration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310029;
    2. Zhejiang Provincial Development Planning & Research Institute, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012

Received date: 2008-09-20

  Revised date: 2008-11-19

  Online published: 2009-07-20

Abstract

The stratagem of new-type industrialization has been taken action in the 16th congress of the Chinese Cornmunist Part.The new-type industrialization policy is a scientific solution based on the summarization of the experience and lesson derived from the process of industry all over the world. After the long-term rapid growth, the economy cardinal number incresed rapidly, if we still keep on the traditional mode of development, the supply of resources and the durability of enviroment will become frustrations that can not be overcome. And new-type industrialization emphasized high science and technology content, good economic benefit, low resources consuming, little enviroment pollution and human resources sufficient application. New-type industrialization puting higher demands on county-level economy development in Zhejiang. This paper builds up a new-type industrialization evaluation system, based on the Principal Compnoent Analysis. There three principal compnoents: first is industry size and technology factor; second is industry process and structure factor; third is environment protected and low energy sources consuming factor. After calculating the compositive scores of every administrative district,the paper makes use of ESDA-GIS frame work to analyze spatial difference of new-type industrialization of county area in Zhejiang. Spatial analysis needed in New-type industrialization research for the observed spatial values are not independent each other,i.e.,(or) they do not follow the same distribution,and(or) there is a trend along different directions. The Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis (ESDA),which based on the computing spatial autocorelation and spatial heterogeneity,is also used to detect the geographical dynamics of Zhejiang regional disparity patterns. There are significant positive spatial autocorrelation (Moran’s I) of New-type industrialization level in Zhejiang. Moran’s I Scatter plots and LISA (Local Indicators of Spatial Association) cluster maps are used to test the local pattern of the New-type industrialization development. The result illustrates that the spatial pattern of new-type industrialization comprehensive level in Zhejiang is more advanced in northeastern region than southwestern region; and the region development is mainly driven by the growth poles, such as Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou, Taizhou; there is prominence spatial difference between region development, and the two-side club (high level club and low level club) convergence exists in the growth of industrialization in Zhejiang. The region around Hangzhou bay and region of Wenzhou & Taizhou, had become the high level club convergence, and the southwestern region maybe in the "general poor trap", the self-factors parallel combination of counties’ industrialization is not in equilibrium, and the general intensive level is low based on the light industry and spatial differences of size and structure. Based on the analysis of new-type industrialization spatial difference pattern, the paper puts forward some suggestions: industry regional organization should change to cluster of international industry, in order to accelerate the development of poor districts; improving the ability of region innovation and making region development balanced the development of central urban in undeveloped district; enhancing basic infrastructure services and using the stratagem of point-axis spatial development pattern; strengthening region correspond mechanism in order to promote the flow of elements and optimizing the industry distribution.

Cite this article

WU Yi-zhou, WU Ci-fang, WANG Lin, LOU Wen-bin . Spatial Difference of New-Type Industrialization and Its Mechanism in Zhejiang[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2009 , 29(4) : 508 -514 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2009.04.508

References

[1] 亚当·斯密. 国民财富的原因和性质研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[2] 莱斯特.R.布朗(美). 生态经济[M].北京:东方出版社,2002.
[3] 王新天,周振国. 新型工业化道路与跨越式发展[J].求是,2003,(9)29-31.
[4] 曲格平. 探索可持续的新型工业化道路[J].环境与保护,2003,(1)3-4.
[5] 李荣融. 充分发挥后发优势走新型工业化道路[A].国家经贸委综合司.专家谈走新型工业化道路[C].北京:经济科学出版社,2003.
[6] 胡鞍钢. 新型工业化与发展[A],国家经贸委综合司.专家谈走新型工业化道路[C].北京:经济科学出版社,2003.
[7] 孟 斌,王劲峰,张文忠,等. 基于空间分析方法的中国区域差异研究[J]. 地理科学, 2005,(8)393-400
[8] Anselin L. Interactive techniques and exploratory spatial data analysis. In: Longley P A, Godchild M F,Maguire D J(eds.), Geographical Information Systems(2ndedn.). NewYork: JohnWiley & Sons, 1999. 253-266.
[9] 方创琳. 中国工业战略产业系统发展研究[J]. 地理科学, 1995,(05) 118-127.
[10] 任丽军,尚金城. 山东省产业结构的生态合理性评价[J]. 地理科学,2005(04),215-220.
Outlines

/