In the metropolis fringe area, as communications between urban and rural area are intensive, urban space develops rapidly and land use changes sharply. With the rapid urbanization, the effects of city on surrounding areas become more and more obvious. The economic communication between urban and rural area become more and more compact, and the interrelations between them are strengthened constantly. In some developed quasi-urbanization areas, the opportunity of realizing integration of urban and rural area is mature. As a case study, Shuangliu County is analyzed, which is a typical quasi-urbanization area, lying in the fringe area of Chengdu metropolis, and where many factors lead to its imbalance and circle—like spatial structure. Based on the concept of harmonious development of integration of urban and rural area, this paper analyzed the development characteristics of integration of urban and rural area in Shuangliu County, which can be come the base and gist to make harmonious development model of urban and rural integration. Based on the understanding of interrelated relationship and integration trend, it explored the harmonious development model of urban and rural integration in Shuangliu County, which is beneficial to the acceleration of urbanization and realizing the urban and rural integration.
WANG Kai-Yong, CHEN Tian, WANG Li-Yan, YUAN Hong,
. Harmonious Development Model of Urban and Rural Integration in Quasi-urbanization Area[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2008
, 28(2)
: 173
-178
.
DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2008.02.173
[1] McGee TG. The urbanization process in the third world[M]. London: G. Bellandsons, LTD. 1971.15-20.
[2] Victor F S Sit. Mega-city, extended metropolitan region, Desakota and exourbanization: an introduction[J]. Asian Geographer, 1996, 15(1-2): 1-141.
[3] Watters R F, McGee T(eds.). Asia Pacific: New Geographies of the Pacific Rim[M]. London: Hurst and Company, 1997.
[4] Webster D. FDI Induced Peri-urbanization in East Asia, Workshop on China’s Urbanization Strategy: Opportunities, Issues & Policy Options[M], Beijing, May 2000.
[5] Webster Douglas. On the Edge: Shaping the Future of Peri-urban East Asia[J]. Institute of International Studies, Stanford University, USA, 2002.
[6] 于北溟,郭东明. 中国半城市化现象溯源及其存在价值研究[J]. 理论观察, 2006,(4):60~61.
[7] 贾若祥,刘毅. 中国半城市化问题初探[J]. 城市发展研究, 2002,9(2):19~23.
[8] 陈恺龙,彭震伟. 上海半城市化地区小城镇透视[J]. 城市管理,2002,(3):15~17.
[9] 陈佑启,武伟. 城乡交错带人地系统的特征及其演变机制分析[J]. 地理科学,1998,18(5):418~425.
[10] 陈浮,葛小平,陈刚. 城市边缘区景观变化与人为影响的空间分异研究[J]. 地理科学,2001,21(3):210~216.
[11] 郑艳婷,刘盛和,陈田. 试论半城市化现象及其特征——以广东省东莞市为例[J]. 地理研究,2003,22(6):760~768.
[12] 刘盛和,陈田,蔡建明. 中国半城市化现象及其研究[J]. 地理学报,2003,22(增刊):101~108.
[13] 甄峰. 城乡一体化理论及其规划探讨[J]. 城市规划汇刊,1998,6:28~31.
[14] 修春亮. 东北地区城乡一体化进程评估[J]. 地理科学,2004,24(3):320~325.
[15] 陈修颖. 基于城乡互动的衡阳市城市空间结构重组理论与实践[J]. 地理科学,2005,25(3):288~293.
[16] 傅小锋,曹卫东,曹有挥,等. 半城市化地区土地利用变化及其环境效应——以成都新津县为例[J]. 中国人口,资源与环境, 2005,15(3):80~83.
[17] 李培祥,李诚固. 论城乡互动:解决"三农"问题的机制与对策[J]. 地理科学,2003,23(6):409~414.
