After selecting 28 indexes, an evaluation system for social benefit of transportation in Tibet was established, and then the social benefits of aviation, highway and railway were evaluated via the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Likert scale in this paper. According to the result, it is evident that the political significance is the most important index in the development of transportation, and there is good social benefit to develop aviation in Tibet. It is also suggested that the constructing of transportation system should be based on conditions of history, geography, and actuality in Tibet. What’s more, the development on each vehicle, combined with their characters, should be taken into account of the relative social benefit of transportation to invest and plan. In terms of the above study, it may be helpful to support a direct, macro control to construct transportation system, and achieve development between transportation and society harmoniously in Tibet.
MEI Hu
. Quantitative Evaluation for Social Benefit of Transportation and Development Strategy in Tibet[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2008
, 28(2)
: 205
-208
.
DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2008.02.205
[1] 花拥军,雍少宏,张志恒.项目社会评价研究概述[J].商业时代, 2006, 26(1): 32~33.
[2] 汪侠,顾朝林,梅虎.多层次灰色评价方法在旅游者感知研究中的应用[J].地理科学, 2007,27(1): 121~126.
[3] 冯德显,贾晶,乔旭宁.区域性中心城市辐射力及其评价-以郑州市为例[J].地理科学, 2006,26(3): 266~272.
[4] 钟诚,何宗宜,刘淑珍.西藏生态环境稳定性评价研究[J].地理科学, 2005,25(5): 573~578.
[5] 李新运,郑新奇,范纯增,等.山东省旅游资源开发潜力评价研究[J].地理科学, 1997,17(4): 372~376.