论文

Location of Rainbelt of Meiyu During Second Half of 19th Century to Early 20th Century

Expand
  • School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Received date: 2007-05-14

  Revised date: 2007-09-20

  Online published: 2008-05-20

Abstract

In this paper, an ancient diary named Xiangqilou Diary, which was written by Wang Kaiyun during 1869-1916 in the area around Changsha and Hengyang in Hunan Province where he lived, has been dug out. By using of the daily weather recordation in the diary, a series of average precipitation days of every ten days in summer-half-year (Apr.-Sep.) from 1869 to 1916 around Changsha and Hengyang, as well as series of precipitation days of every penta-day(5 days)during June to July, can be reconstructed. After comparing with meteorological observation data in Changsha (1951-1980), it is found that the end of Meiyu period (the third penta-day in July) was about two penta-days(10 days) later than present, and the length of Meiyu period (20-30 days) was about ten days longer. According to phenological recordation on cicada in the diary, the average date when cicada first sang around Changsha and Hengyang was the 30th June. Compared to the modern phonological data, the date was later than Changsha and Hengyang, while similar to several cities along the Changjiang (Yangtze) River, such as Shanghai, which are now in the core area of rainbelt of Meiyu in the eastern China. Consequently, climate during Meiyu period of the two has some similar characters, especially temperature and precipitation. In conclusion, during the second half of the 19th century to the early 20th century, Meiyu was more typical than present around Changsha and Hengyang, which means the area might be much liker to the core area of rainbelt of Meiyu, and the location of rainbelt of Meiyu then was about 1?-2? south to nowadays.

Cite this article

XIAO Ling-Bo, FANG Xiu-Qi, ZHANG Xue-Zhen . Location of Rainbelt of Meiyu During Second Half of 19th Century to Early 20th Century[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2008 , 28(3) : 385 -389 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2008.03.385

References

[1] 周曾奎. 江淮梅雨[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 1996: 1~210.
[2] 张德二, 王宝贯. 18世纪长江下游梅雨活动的复原研究[J]. 中国科学(B辑), 1990,(12): 1333~1339.
[3] 满志敏, 李卓仑, 杨煜达. 《王文韶日记》记载的1867~1872年武汉和长沙地区梅雨特征[J]. 古地理学报, 2007, 9(4): 431~438.
[4] 卜风贤. 周秦两汉时期农业灾害时空分布研究[J]. 地理科学,2002, 22(4): 463~467.
[5] 王张华,陈中原,寇 莹,等. 太湖流域公元960年以来的气候干湿变化研究[J]. 地理科学,2002, 22(5): 546~551.
[6] 韩茂莉. 辽代西辽河流域气候变化及其环境特征[J]. 地理科学,2004, 24(5): 550~556.
[7] 叶 瑜,方修琦,葛全胜,等. 从动乱与水旱灾害的关系看清代山东气候变化的区域社会响应与适应[J]. 地理科学,2004, 24(6): 680~686.
[8] 薛积彬,钟 巍,赵引娟,等. 历史时期广东省旱涝时空分布特征的初步研究[J]. 地理科学,2005, 25(4): 461~466.
[9] 高建慧,刘 健,王苏民. 中国中世纪暖期气候研究综述[J]. 地理科学,2006, 26(3): 376~383.
[10] 方修琦,萧凌波,葛全胜,等. 湖南长沙、衡阳地区1888~1916年的春季植物物候与气候变化[J]. 第四纪研究, 2005, 25(1): 74~79.
[11] 张学珍,方修琦,田 青,等.《翁同龢日记》记录的19世纪后半叶北京的沙尘天气[J]. 古地理学报, 2006, 8(1): 117~124.
[12] 萧凌波,方修琦,张学珍. 《湘绮楼日记》记录的湖南长沙1877~1878年寒冬[J]. 古地理学报, 2006, 8(2): 277~284.
[13] 王闿运(著).马积高(编). 湘绮楼日记[M]. 长沙: 岳麓书社, 1997:1~3438.
[14] 湖南省地方志编纂委员会. 湖南省志·建设志·气象[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 1995:39~40.
[15] 胡忠朗, 韩崇选, 施德祥,等. 蚱蝉生物学习性初步观察[J]. 陕西林业科技, 1990,(3): 43~48.
[16] 程淦藩. 黑蚱[J]. 昆虫知识, 1959, (8): 252~255.
[17] 宛敏渭. 中国自然历选编[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1986: 1~421.
[18] 宛敏渭. 中国自然历续编[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1987. 1~437.
[19] 张福春, 王德辉, 丘宝剑. 中国农业物候图集[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1987:134~178.
[20] 宛敏渭, 刘秀珍. 中国动植物物候图集[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 1986:1~9.
[21] 方修琦, 张 捷, 朱 骊. 中国东部季风区降水变化的区域分异规律探讨[C].//张兰生. 中国生存环境历史演变规律研究(一). 北京: 海洋出版社, 1993:162~168.
[22] 葛全胜, 郑景云, 方修琦,等. 过去2 000年中国东部冬半年温度变化[J]. 第四纪研究, 2002, 22(2): 166~173.
[23] 黄 润,朱 诚,王升堂.天堂寨泥炭地层的磁化率、Rb/Sr值及其反映的古气候意义[J].地理科学,2007,27(3): 385~389.
[24] 史 威,朱 诚,王富葆,等.宁镇及宜溧地区全新世中晚期典型沉积相与5 700 a B.P.前后的气候突变事件[J].地理科学,2007,27(4):512~518.
[25] 李明霞,汪永进,邱庆伦.中全新世7~6 ka东亚季风气候的高分辨率石笋记录[J].地理科学,2007,27(4):519~524.
[26] 薛积彬,钟 巍,赵引娟.珠江三角洲地区降水中δ18O的变化特征及与ENSO的关系[J].地理科学,2007,27(6):825~836.
Outlines

/