Risk Evaluation and Influence Analysis of Flowing Backward From Main Stream in Xiaobei of Huanghe(Yellow) River to Lower Reacher of Weihe River

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Disaster Survey & Mechanism Simulation of Shaanxi Province, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Baoji, Shaanxi 721007, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems of Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gangsu 730000, China

Received date: 2010-08-19

  Revised date: 2010-12-08

  Online published: 1997-08-20

Abstract

Risk evaluation of flowing backward from the main stream in Xiaobei of the Huanghe (Yellow) River to the lower reacher of the Weihe River has become the significant work of flood prevention because of the dangerous situation of the flowing backwark. Based on the contrast of historical observed data and remote sensing images, using the inserting value calculation method, risk degree of flowing backward was evaluated and zoned. The results are as follows: 1) It is obvious that the larger the flood of the Huanghe River, the larger the area of inversely flow deposition, and the more the water level in the reaches of the Weihe River, vice versa. 2) The highest risk regions usually located in the eastness of Dali near by the main stream in Xiaobei of the Huang River and the riverside regions of Tongguan, Huayin, Huaxian, Weinan and Lintong. The higher risk regions are located in the northeastern part of Dali and the common boundary of Weinan and Lintong on the southness shore of mainstream watershed of the Weihe River. Then, the remainder is lower risk regions. 3) Westward moving of the estuary of the Weihe River to the Huang River and flowing backward are the cause-and-effect, which not only resultd in shrinking of the riverbed at the lower reaches of the Weihe River, but also reducing the ability of flood transflux. So there is a complexion of small flux, high water level and big disaster. 4) In order to reduce the risk degree of flowing backward, as the given result, the district regionalism and local protection must be broken to implement the integrated program of the watershed and to decline the Tongguan stage to stabilize the physiognomy at the estuary of the Weihe River to the Huang River.

Cite this article

LI Jing-yi . Risk Evaluation and Influence Analysis of Flowing Backward From Main Stream in Xiaobei of Huanghe(Yellow) River to Lower Reacher of Weihe River[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2011 , 31(8) : 947 -951 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2011.08.947

References

[1] 魏一鸣,杨存建,金菊良,等.洪水灾害评估与分析的综合集成方法[J].水科学进展,1999,10(1):25~30.
[2] 师长兴.黄河河口延伸与下游淤积关系研究中的问题分析[J].地理科学,2005,25(2):183~189.
[3] 杨世伦,杜景龙,郜 昂.近半个世纪长江口九段沙湿地的冲淤演变[J].地理科学,2006,26(3):335~339.
[4] 左书华,李九发,时连强.基于GIS的长江河口没冒沙动态演变及稳定性分析[J].地理科学,2007,27(5): 701~706.
[5] 韩志远,田向平,欧素英.人类活动对磨刀门水道河床地形和潮汐动力的影响[J].地理科学,2010,30(4): 582~587.
[6] 黄崇福.自然灾害风险评价(理论与实践)[M].北京:科学出版社,2005.
[7] 倪晋仁.江河泥沙灾害形成机理及其防治[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
[8] 刘希林.我国泥石流危险度评价研究:回顾与展望[J].自然灾害学报,2002,11(4):6~8.
[9] 张继权,李 宁.主要气象灾害风险评价与管理的数量化方法及其应用[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社, 2007.
[10] 黄春长.渭河流域3 100年前资源退化与人地关系演变[J].地理科学,2001,21(1):30~35.
[11] 赵景波,蔡晓薇,王长燕.西安高陵渭河近120年来的洪水演变[J].地理科学,2007,27(2):225~230.
[12] 李同升,徐冬平.基于SD模型下的流域水资源-社会经济系统时空协同分析——以渭河流域关中段为例[J].地理科学,2006,26(5):551~556.
[13] 查小春,黄春长,庞奖励.泾河流域不同时间尺度洪水序列频率分析对比研究[J].地理科学,2009,29(6): 858~863.
[14] 查小春,延军平.全球变化下秦岭南北河流径流泥沙比较分析[J].地理科学,2002,22(4):403~407.
[15] 宋进喜,曹明明,李怀恩.渭河(陕西段)河道自净需水量研究[J].地理科学,2005,25(3):310~316.
[16] 李景宜,石长伟,傅志军,等.渭河关中段洪水资源化潜力评估[J].地理研究,2008,27(5):1203~1211.
[17] 李景宜.陕西渭河下游湿地环境风险因素浅析[J].地理科学,2007,27(3):371~375.
[18] LI Jingyi.Mechanism and Effect of Channel Evolution at Estuary of Weihe River to Huanghe River[J].Chinese Geographical Science,2006,16(2):122-126.
[19] 屠新武,王 烨,丁宪宝,等.渭河下游冲淤与洪水变化分析[J].人民黄河,2006,28(1):26~28.
[20] 杨平东,田建文.黄渭洛汇流区河势演变及其影响分析[J].陕西水利,2003,3:34~35.
[21] 赵鹏大.定量地学方法及应用[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004:1~464.
[22] 张念强.基于GIS的鄱阳湖地区洪水灾害风险评价.南昌:南昌大学,2006.
[23] 王敏捷.杨武学.渭河下游近期泥沙淤积带来的防洪问题[J].1999,21(10):4~9.
[24] 张玉芳,邢大韦,粟晓玲.黄河北干流与渭河相遇洪水分析[J].灾害学,1995,10(1):57~62.
[25] 粟晓玲,邢大韦,张玉芳.渭河下游三门峡库区洪水趋势及防洪形势分析[J].西北水资源与水工程,1996, 7(3): 80~83.
Outlines

/