Because of the different natural conditions, urbanization and industrialization, the circles of suburban agricultural areas in Beijing has different productive / non-productive functions. In this paper, agricultural multifunctionality theory and industrial economy theory have been employed to analyze the spatial characteristics of surburban agriculture area in Beijing. The reslute shows that the agriculture can be divided into two transition pathways from the plain outskirts to the outer mountainous suburbs. Firstly, agricultural transition pathway has emerged from modern urban agriculture to the traditional agriculture; secondly, it is a fan-shaped agricultural transition pathway expanding from the plains to the mountainous area. But there is a non-agricultural industry dominated buffer zone 30–40 km away from the central city, which has become the boundary belt due to urban functions transfering to the village functions. The modern agriculture and recreational agriculture have become the dominant rural economy outside the buffer zone. Its non-productive functions are being strengthened, which are also spreading to the outer mountainous suburb, and the ecological function can be the leading one among the multifunctions in Beijing’s midst and outer spheres.
Song Zhi-jun, LIU Li-ming
. Spatial Characteristics Analysis for Multifunctional Transition of Suburban Agricultural Areas in Beijing[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2011
, 31(4)
: 427
-433
.
DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2011.04.427
[1] Wilson G A.From ‘weak’to ‘strong’multifunctionality:Conceptualising farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways[J].Journal of Rural Studies,2008,24(3):367-383
[2] Wilson G A.The spatiality of multifunctional agriculture:A human geography perspective[J].Geoforum,2009,40(2):269-280.
[3] Potter C,Tilzey M.Agricultural multifunctionality,environmental sustainability and the WTO:Resistance or accommodation to the neoliberal project for agriculture?[J].Geoforum,2007,38(6):1290-1303.
[4] Rong Tan,Volker Beckmann,Leo van den Berg.Governing farmland conversion:Comparing China with the Netherlands and Germany[J].Land Use Policy,2009,26(4):961-974.
[5] Hualou Long,Yansui Liu,Xiubin Li,et al.Building new countryside in China:A geographical perspective[J]. Land Use Policy,2010,27(2):457-470
[6] 黄金川,方创琳.城市化与生态环境交互耦合机制与规律性分析[J].地理研究,2003,22(2):211~219.
[7] 赵珂.城乡空间规划的生态耦合理论与方法研究.重庆大学博士学位论文,2007:15~40.
[8] 钱静,律江.北京市城郊生态-循环-立体型都市现代农业[M].北京:农业科学技术出版社,2008:5~58.
[9] 方志权,吴方卫,王威.中国都市农业理论研究若干争议问题综述[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(8):521~525.
[10] 于伯华,吕昌河.城市边缘区耕地面积变化时空特征及其驱动机制[J].地理科学,2008,28(3):348~353.
[11] 张凤荣,赵华甫,陈阜.都市型现代农业产业布局[M].北京:石油大学出版社,2007.
[12] 段晓峰,许学工.基于GIS的北京山区优势林分生态位分析[J].地理科学,2008,28(5):667~671.
[13] 文化,王爱玲,陈俊红.聚焦都市农业:农业在首都经济发展中的地位与作用[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2005.
[14] 王鹏飞,鲁奇,傅桦.1980年以来北京农用地时空演变与驱动力[J].地理学报,2005,60(6):953~964.
[15] Richard S L,Michael T H,Casey R M,et al.Yanarella. Generating sustainable towns from Chinese Villages[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2008,87(2):305–316.
[16] 梁进社,楚波.北京的城市扩展和空间依存发——基于劳瑞模型的分析[J].城市规划,2005,29(6):9~14.
[17] 刘春霞,朱青,李月臣.基于距离的北京制造业空间集聚[J].地理学报,2006,61(12):1247~1258.
[18] 陈红霞,李国平.北京市城乡居民收入差距变化及影响因素分析[J].地理科学,2009,29(6):794~801.
[19] 高晓路,季珏,张文忠.北京市交通出行环境的空间评价[J].地理科学,2009,29(6):817~824.
[20] 余建辉,张文忠.基于社会属性的北京城市居民居住环境安全性评价[J].地理科学,2009,29(2):167 ~173.
[21] 谷国锋.区域经济发展动力系统的构建与运行机制研究[J].地理科学,2008,28(3):320 ~324.
[22] 周天勇,胡锋.托达罗人口流动模型的反思和改进[J].中国人口科学,2007,21(1):18~26.
[23] 温铁军,温厉.中国的"城镇化"与发展中国家城市化的教训[J].中国软科学,2007,12(7):23~29.
[24] 邱化蛟.北京市都市农业的可持续性分析与评价.中国农业大学博士学位论文,2005.
[25] 谈明洪,朱会义,刘林山.北京周围建设用地空间分布格局及解释[J].地理学报,2007,62(8):861~869.
[26] 王宏斌.基于RS和GIS的都市农业研究——以北京为例.北京师范大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[27] 王鹏飞.大城市地区农村改革的政治生态学分析[J].地理研究,2005,24(3):453~463.
[28] 齐永华,张凤荣,吕昌河.大城市郊区农户要素投入特征及差异分析[J].资源科学,2007,29(4):13~17.
[29] 杨志新.北京市城郊区农田生态系统正负效应价值的综合评价研究.中国农业大学博士学位论文,2006.
[30] 冯健,周一星.区化进程中北京城市内部迁居及相关空间行为[J].地理研究,2004,23(2):227~242.
