The urban-rural development of non-dense-town region involves both spatial equity and general efficiency.The spatial effects of economic globalization maybe accelerate "marginalization" of non-dense-town region.Therefore,this region should choose the mode of urban-rural interaction development which its essence is the spatial connection of regional economy,including the spatial connection of the economic subjects,organizations,resources,information,etc.The spatial welfare economy studies the relationship between the spatial consumption form and the spatial utility distribution.The spatial consumption form refers to the spatial utilization way depending on the regional collocation of the economic resources,and the spatial utility distribution refers to the spatial segmentation of the economic resources efficiency.The essence of regional spatial structure is the consumption form of some certain regional space and the spatial welfare economy mode based on the regional spatial structure can provide the urban-rural development in the non-dense-town region with theoretical foundation.Both the urban-rural interaction development and the spatial structural innovation in the non-dense-town region are compatible to the regional development principles embodying both the spatial equity and general efficiency.The spatial structural innovation can effectively facilitate the development of the urban-rural interaction,in which the selection of enterprises location is the basic impulse in forming the regional spatial structure.The spatial intervention and administration of local government constitutes the leading force of the spatial structure.
YU Bin, ZENG Ju-Xin, LUO Jing
. Spatial Innovation of Urban-rural Development in the Non-dense-town Region[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2007
, 27(3)
: 296
-303
.
DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2007.03.296
[1] 南开大学区域经济研究所.空间平等与总体经济效率——中国区域经济格局转型分析[J].经济研究,1994(8):62～70.
[2] 陆大道.区域发展及其空间结构[M].北京:科学出版社,1995.100～104.
[3] 陈修颖.空间结构重构的效应及地域性策略[J].财经科学,2003,(6):39～42.
[4] Robert Reich.The Work of nations[M].New York:Knof 1991.3～4.
[5] 马丽,刘毅.经济全球化下的区域经济空间结构演化研究评述[J].地理科学进展,2003,18 (2):270～276.
[6] 杨伯溆.全球化:起源、发展和影响[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.5～6.
[7] Porter Michael E.Location,competition,and economic development:Local cluster in a global economy[J].Economic Development Quarterly,2000,14 (1):15～35.
[8] 余斌,罗静,靳军.城市化与城乡发展:世界不同类型国家之比较与启示[J].地域研究与开发,2005,24 (5):17～20.
[9] 胡序威.沿海城镇密集地区空间聚集与扩散研究[J].城市规划,1998,22 (6):22～28.
[10] T Scarlett Epstein,David Jezeph.Development-There is another Way:A Rural-Urban Partnership Development Paradigm[J].World Development,2001,29 (8):1443-1454.
[11] Yasusada Murata.Rural-urban interdependence and industrialization[J].Journal of Development Economics,2002,68:1-34
[12] Bar-El,Raphael Parr,John B.Overreliance on the Core-periphery Model? The Case of Israel.Environment & Planning C[J].Government & policy,2003,21 (3):353-370.
[13] 曾菊新.现代城乡网络化发展模式[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.65～66.
[14] 李培祥,李诚固.论城乡互动:解决"三农"问题的机制与对策[J].地理科学,2003,23 (4):408～413.
[15] 罗静,曾菊新.空间稀缺性——公共政策地理研究的一个视角[J].经济地理,2003,23 (6):722～725.
[16] 余斌,罗静.试论城乡地域系统的空间组织[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,39 (4):564～567.
[17] 史晋川,潘士远.政府在城市化过程中的作用:温州的案例[A].见:陈甬军,陈爱民(主编).中国城市化:实证分析与对策研究[C].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2002.287～94.
[18] 陆大道.论区域的最佳结构与最佳发展[J].地理学报,2001,56 (2):127～135.
[19] 曾菊新,罗静.经济全球化的空间效应——论基于企业网络的地域空间结构重组[J].经济地理,2002,22 (3):257～261.
[20] 余斌,曾菊新,罗静.试论城乡地域系统空间组织的微观机制[J].经济地理,2006,26 (3):364～368.
[21] 道格拉斯C诺思.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1997.20～33.
[22] 陈修颖.基于城乡互动的衡阳市城市空间结构重组:理论与实践[J].地理科学,2005,25 (3):288～293.
