Flood Evolution of Weihe River in Rencent 120 Years in Gaoling of Xi′an

Expand
  • 1. College of Toruism and Environment Science, Shannxi Northmal University, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710062;
    2. Center of Historical Environment and Socio-Economic Development in Northwest China, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710062;
    3. Xi’an University of Technology, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710048

Received date: 2005-11-25

  Revised date: 2006-03-12

  Online published: 2007-03-20

Abstract

According to the grain size analysis to 210 samples of floodplain deposition of the Weihe River in Gaoling and the age material recorded in history books,we had studied the flood change of the Weihe River in recent about 120 years in Gaoling,Xi′an.The materials indicate that the flood-plain deposit develops well and the change of the grain size is obvious,which can indicate the flood change of the Weihe River clearly and with high-resolution.The flood-plain sediment is mainly composed of the coarse silt,fine silt,very fine silt and clay,and the grain size is comparatively small in general.The layer that the contents of fine sand and the very fine sand are high is the one that the grain size is big,and the layer that the contents of silt and clay are high is the one that the grain size is small.The layer that the grain size is big indicates the strong hydrodynamic condition and the transient moist climate or the rainstorm increase in certain area,the layer that the grain size is small indicates the weak hydrodynamic condition and the transient less moist climate,and the climate of the periods when no flood occurred were the normal or dryer.The flood-plain deposit of the Weihe River in recent 120 years in Gaoling can be divided into 16 layers,which represent 16 big flood stages.In the 1st,3rd,5th,7th,9th,11th,13th and 15th layers the grain size is comparatively small and in the 2nd,4th,6th,8th,10th,12th,14th and 16th layer the grain size is comparatively big,which is clearly shown not only in the accumulative content of the grain size but in the distribution range of such grani size parameters as Md,Mz,σ,Sk and Kg and the characteristic values,and reflects the flood scale in the 2nd,4th,6th,8th,10th,12th,14th and 16th stages is bigger than that in the 1st,3rd,5th,7th,9th,11th,13th and 15th stages.After eliminating the influence of the landform heightened by deposition on the grain size,we can make sure that the order of the depth and scale of 16 flood stages from big to small is the 16th,14th,4th,2nd,6th,1st,5th,8th,3rd,10th,12th,7th,9th,11th,13th and 15th.When the 1st,2nd,4th,6th,14th and 16th layers formed the height that the flood level passed over the flood plain was bigger than 2 m.When the 3rd,5th,7th,8th,9th,10th,11th,12th,13th and 15th layers formed the height that the flood level passed over the was smaller than 2 m.The grain size of the flood plain deposit of the Weihe River in recent about 120 years in Gaoling is smaller than that in early stages,which inflects the depth and scale of the flood of the Wei River in recent 120 years are changing small.This is caused mainly by the drying climate.

Cite this article

ZHAO Jing-Bo, CAI Xiao-Wei, WANG Chang-Yan . Flood Evolution of Weihe River in Rencent 120 Years in Gaoling of Xi′an[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2007 , 27(2) : 225 -230 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2007.02.225

References

[1] 施雅凤,孔昭宸,王苏民,等.中国全新世大暖期的气候波动与重要事件[J].中国科学(B辑),1992,22(12):1300~1308.
[2] 赵景波.关中地区全新世大暖期的土壤与气候变迁[J].地理科学,2003,23(23):554~559.
[3] 靳立亚,符娇兰,陈发虎.近44年来中国西北降水量变化的区域差异以及对全球变暖的响应[J].地理科学,2005,25(5):567~572.
[4] 朱士光.历史时期关中地区气候变化初步研究[J].第四纪研究,1998,18(1):1~9.
[5] 赵景波,杜娟,周旗,等.陕西咸阳人工林地土壤干层研究[J].地理科学,2005,25(3):322~328.
[6] 宋进喜,曹明明,李怀恩,等.渭河陕西段河道自净需水量研究[J].地理科学,2005,25(3):310~316.
[7] 王若柏.黄河北流河道变迁与史前的灾害事件[J].地理科学,2005,25(3):294~298.
[8] 桑广书.秦末以来秦都咸阳地貌演变[J].地理科学,2005,25(6):709~715.
[9] 史念海.黄河流域诸河流的演变与治理[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,1999.315~320.
[10] Dayuan Yang,Ge Yu,Yuebo Xie,et al.Sedimentary records of large Holocene floods from the middle reaches of the Yellow River,China[J].Geomorphology,2000,33(1-2):73-88.
[11] 朱诚,于世永,卢春成.三峡及江汉平原地区全新世环境考古与异常洪水灾害研究[J].地理学报,1997,52(3),268~278.
[12] 刘会玉,林振山,张明阳.建国以来中国洪涝灾害成灾面积变化的小波分析[J].地理科学,2005,25(1):43~48.
[13] Michael J.Large floods and climatic change during the Holocene on the Ara River,Cantral Japen[J].Geomorphology,2001,39:21-37.
[14] James C.Sensitivity of modern and Holocene floods to climate change[J].Quaternary Science Review,2000,19:439-457.
[15] 叶瑜,方修琦,葛全胜,等.从动乱与水旱灾害的关系看清代山东气候变化的区域社会响应与适应[J].地理科学,2004,24(6):680~686.
[16] James C,Knox.Sensitivity of modern and Holocene floods to climate change[J].Quaternary Science Review,2000,19 (1-5):439-457.
[17] 高建慧,刘健,王苏民.中国中世纪暖期气候研究综述[J].地理科学,2006,26(3):376~384.
[18] 谢远云,李长安,王秋良,等.江汉平原近3 000年来古洪水事件的沉积记录[J].地理科学,2007,27(1):81~84.
Outlines

/