Allen theoretically derived model of Twin City and developed theory of regional spatial structure, basing on a large quantity of experimental analysis on America. Suzhou, which rises rapidly impulsed by the oversea investments after 1990, has constructed the paragenetic relation on function with Shanghai, i.e. Twin City model. The formation of the model is derived from two reasons. One is the administration reason that the management costs and industrial policies of Suzhou and Shanghai have obvious differences since 1980, because they belong to different provinces. The other is economic reason that Suzhou is located in the inner circle of Shanghai municipal circles that radius is 100 km and about 50 km away from Hongqiao airport. The formation of Suzhou-Shanghai Twin Cities by the rising of Suzhou generates versatile regional effects. Suzhou and Wuxi, with the same development level and industrial property originally, now have different tendency of development. This gives them the basis on the reasonable division of function. Suzhou, which is located on the boundary of two provinces, and Nanjing, which is the capital of Jiangsu Province construct the generalized dual-nuclei structure model. We build the multiple spatial composite model of reasonable division of function of cities along Shanghai-Nanjing railway, by the comprehensive action of above-said factors. We generalize the formative condition of Suzhou-Shanghai Twin City model and analyze the formative condition and possibility of Twin Cities at others area in China as Hong Kong and Beijing.The rising of Suzhou drives scholars to discuss the ideal spatial structure form of cities along the Shanghai-Nanjing railway in Jiangsu province, observed by theoretical level. In definition the dual-nuclei structure is composed of the regional center city and port city. The connotation and application range are expended widely by inducing the definition of margin effect. Although border cities are not near large river, they have the dominance of margin effect, because they have difference on economic, management mechanism and ethnical culture. The combination of regional center city and border city also is one of the representations of the dual-nuclei structure model. The border city is referred to not only the city between two countries that is named borderer city, but also the city between two provinces that is named boundary city. The border city and boundary city are called margin city together. The combination of regional center city and port city is the primary form of dual-nuclei structure model; the combination of regional center city and margin city is the secondary form of dual-nuclei structure model. The evolution of spatial structure in Yangtze delta is effected deeply by the rising of Suzhou and the relocation of cities near Suzhou. In fact, the cities near Suzhou all take some corresponding strategies in recent years, as 173 planning of Shanghai and exploitation planning of Hangzhou bay. How to accept challenge is the main task of Suzhou to be relocated in Yangtze delta.
LU Yu-Qi, DONG Ping, YU Yong-Jun
. Formative Mechanism and Regional Effect of the Twin Cities of Shanghai and Suzhou[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2004
, 24(3)
: 305
-313
.
DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2004.03.305
[1] 宁越敏.长江三角洲都市连绵区形成机制与跨区域规划研究[J].城市规划,1998,(1):16~20.
[2] 张京祥.城镇群体空间组合研究[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2000.
[3] 胡序威,周一星,顾朝林.中国沿海城镇密集区聚集与扩散研究[J].北京:科学出版社,2000.
[4] 刘荣增.新时期大都市周边地区城市定位研究——以苏州与上海关系为例[M].地理科学,2001,21(2): 158~163.
[5] Allen P M. Cities and Regions as Self-Organizing Systems Models of Complexity[M].Gordon and Breach Science Pulishers,1997.
[6] 谭遂,杨开忠.基于自组织理论的两种城市空间结构动态模型比较[M].经济地理,2002,22(3):322~326.
[7] Hymer S H. The efficiency(contradictions)of multional corporation. In Paquet, Ge. (ed.): the multional Firms and Nation-state. Don Mill: Coller-Macllan, 1972:138-154.
[8] Dicken P. Global shift: The Internationalization of economic Activity [M]. New York: Guilford press,1992. 124-128.
[9] Frederick P. Stutz. The world economy Resources, location, trade, and development (third edition) [M]. Prentice Hall, 1998. 317-319.
[10] Ullman E L, Harris C D. The nature of cities[J]. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1945, (242): 7-17.
[11] Vance J E. The merchant’s world: the geography of whole soling. Englewood Cliffs[M]. NJ: Prentice Hall,1970, 12-102.
[12] Whebell C F J.Corridors: a theory of urban systems[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1969, (59): 1-26.
[13] Burghardt A F. A hypothesis about gateway cities[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1971, (61): 269-285.
[14] 顾朝林.经济全球化与中国城市发展[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[15] 阎小培.信息产业和世界城市体系[J]. 经济地理,1995,15(3):18~24.
[16] 杨开忠. 北京经济基础的基本特点与变化趋势[J]. 地理学报,1997,52(6):481~490.
[17] 吕拉昌.世界城市体系的形成与中国城市国际化[J]. 世界地理研究,2000,9(1):57~61.
[18] 杨卫泽.苏州增长的故事[J]. 江苏经济,2003, 5:18~21.
[19] 姚士谋.中国城市群[J]. 合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,2001.
[20] 曾菊新.现代城乡网络化发展模式研究[J]. 北京:科学出版社,2001.
[21] 周牧之.城市化:中国现代化的主旋律[J]. 长沙:湖南人民出版社,2000.
[22] 陆玉麒.江苏沿江地区的空间结构与区域发展[J]. 地理科学,2000,22(3):136~143.
[23] 陆玉麒.区域双核结构模式的形成机理[J]. 地理学报,2002,57(1):85~95.
[24] 陆玉麒.区域双核结构模式的数学推导[J]. 地理学报,2003,58(3):406~414.
[25] 陆玉麒.区域发展中的空间结构研究[M]. 南京:南京师范大学出版社,1998.
[26] 王如松.高效、和谐-城市生态调控原则与方法[M]. 长沙:湖南教育出版社,1988.
[27] 陆大道.区域发展及其空间结构[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1995.
[28] 陆大道.我国区域开发的宏观战略[J]. 地理学报, 1987,42(2):97~105.
[29] 陆玉麒.苏州与嘉兴生产力布局的比较研究[J]. 经济地理,1994,14(5):234~238.
[30] Beaverstock J V, Smith R G, Taylor P J. A roster of world cities[J]. cities, 1999, 16: 445-458.
[31] Beaverstock J V, Smith R G, Taylor P J. 1999, World city network:a new metageography[J]. Annals,Association of American Geographers,90,123-134.
[32] Friedmann J. Where we stand: A decade of world city research[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University press,1995.
[33] 薛凤旋.都会经济区:香港与广东共同发展的基础[J]. 经济地理, 2000,(1):37~42.
[34] 阎小培,冷勇.深圳-香港双城协调发展研究[J]. 地理学报,1997,62(增刊):95~103.
[35] 宗跃光,周尚意.北京城郊化空间特征与发展对策[J]. 地理学报,2002,57(2):135~141.
[36] 吴良镛.规划"大北京地区" 建设"世界城市"——《京津冀北(大北京地区)城乡空间发展规划研究》要点[J]. 城市,2002,1:13~17.
