Received date: 2015-04-10
Request revised date: 2016-02-08
Online published: 2016-10-21
Supported by
National Nature Sciences Foundation of China(41271411)
Copyright
Markedly, our understanding of hazard has changed with history, and the hazard paradigm is also in the process of evolution. Based on different hazard concepts and human reaction, there are five hazard paradigms recognized as following: famine policy paradigm, engineering paradigm, behavioral paradigm, social vulnerability paradigm and sustainable paradigm. Famine policy paradigm originated from the pre-Qin period of China, which of main features are as following: Catastrophes are created by nature; Disaster alleviation is main responsibility of the government represented by the emperor; The policy of benevolence is the principal implementing policy against natural disasters. In the 20th century, engineering paradigm was the mainstream paradigm in the world. This paradigm concerns those issues such as the regularities of natural disasters occurrence; the strength and frequency of the potential natural disasters in different region; and the methods of disasters resistance for protection. In the 1930s, behavioral paradigm appeared in the western developed countries. The main points of this paradigm are as following: human perceptions and behaviors influence the consequences of natural disasters, but disaster is a natural process primarily; The principal goal of disasters management is resistance extreme events through project management control; The basic preventive measures include improving disasters early warning for short-term and preparation better land-use planning for long-term. Social vulnerability paradigm came from experience of some western scholars in the developing countries in the 1970s. They discovered the developing countries suffered enormously from natural disasters. They thought the main cause of disaster is human behavior rather than nature and technology development. According to social vulnerability paradigm, the disasters reduction depends on the social- economic and political reform. Sustainable paradigm was growing up as a new inspiration at end of 20th century. This paradigm examines the essence of disaster from view of complex interaction between human society and natural environment. The basic principles of disaster reduction are to maintain and improve the quality of natural environment and living condition of people, to ensure the justice that the same and different generations have the same right to enjoy the resources and environment and the publicaction based on common; to promote regional sustainable development through integrated capacity-building of regional disaster risk management. The final goal of the paradigm is establishment sustainable society and achievement of human coexistence. The author analyzes the five paradigms’ formation of social and historical background, the principal issues, the main points and measures of disaster reduction, the conclusions are as follows: 1) Recognition and understanding of hazards and disasters is deepening and developing gradually through human history; 2) Development of hazard paradigm and practice of disaster reduction are mutual influence; 3) The generation and transformation of paradigms are impacted by social factors deeply; 4) Individual hazard paradigm often rises to dominance for a period of time, but the impact of other paradigms is still exist.
Guo Yue . Hazard Paradigms and Their Historical Evolution[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2016 , 36(6) : 935 -942 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.06.017
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
托马斯·库恩.科学革命的结构[M].金吾伦,吴彤和译.北京:北京大学出版社,2003.
[
|
[2] |
玛格丽特·马斯特曼.范式的本质[M].周寄中译.北京:华夏出版社.1987.
[
|
[3] |
乔治·瑞泽尔. 后现代社会理论[M],谢立中译.北京:华夏出版社.2003.
[George Ritzer. Postmodern Social Theory.Translated by Xie Lizhong. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House,2003.]
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
[
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
[
|
[8] |
[
|
[9] |
[
|
[10] |
[
|
[11] |
[
|
[12] |
[
|
[13] |
[
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
[
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
[
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
[
|
[26] |
[
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
United Nations/International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR).Living With Risk: A Global Review of disaster reduction Initiatives[R].Geneva: United Nations, 2004:1-68.
|
[42] |
ICSU.A Science Plan for integrated research on disaster risk: Addressing the challenge of natural and human-induced environmental hazards[R]. Paris,ICSU.2008.
|
[43] |
[
|
[44] |
史培军.刘婧.徐亚骏. 区域综合公共安全管理模式及中国综合公共安全管理对策[J].自然灾害学报,2006,15(6):9-16.
[
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
中国地理学会.地理学学科发展报告[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2009:1-268.
[The Geographical Society of China. Report on Advances in Geography. Beijing: Science and Technology of China Press,2009:1-268.]
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |