Huang Manli, Tao Wei
Accepted: 2025-11-07
Energy poverty is a serious challenge facing mankind globally in 21 century and an important problem faced by both developed and developing countries. How to eliminate energy poverty has been included in the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. Energy poverty research has long been dominated by natural sciences, engineering sciences, and eco-nomic statistics, but energy poverty is not only an engineering and economic issue but also a political, cultural, social, and regional issue with distinct geospatial attributes. Geography, with its unique spatial perspective and the advantages of comprehensive, regional, and cross-discip-linary thinking, is not only able to draw a multi-scale spatiotemporal map of energy poverty but also to explore the influencing factors of energy poverty and the political-spatial practices of multiple subjects in a specific space and time. This paper utilizes bibliometric methods to re-view and compare research progress on energy poverty from a geographical perspective both domestically and internationally and systematically categorize the main research topics of en-ergy poverty from 4 aspects, namely, generative logic, identification and measurement, influen-cing mechanisms, and local effects. The results show that 1) the explanatory framework of en-ergy poverty is mainly explained by energy intersectionality, the energy cultural framework, en-ergy vulnerability, and energy justice theory, which together constitute the framework of gener-ative logic in energy poverty. The intersectionality approach reveals mechanisms of multiple discrimination occurring at the intersection of inequality axes. The energy culture framework conceptualizes energy poverty through the interplay among technological factors, social norms, and household behaviors at the individual, local, and global scales from small to large. Energy vulnerability adds a temporal dimension to the energy culture framework by incorporating past, present, and future exposure to risk in considerations of energy poverty. Justice theory is the most widely used approach to understanding energy poverty today and is also a key research fo-cus, including distributive justice, recognition justice, and procedural justice. 2) Energy poverty identification and measurement face challenges related to regional differences, data acquisition, and indicator setting. Research methods include objective methods, subjective methods, and composite indicators or multidimensional measurements. 3) There is a complex two-way feed-back relationship between policy, power, and the mechanisms of energy poverty. Political power plays a role in the entire process of energy poverty production, alleviation, and reproduc-tion at multiple levels and scales, involving various stakeholders, and energy poverty interacts with political power. 4) Energy poverty has a local effect of deconstruction and reconstruction on the material landscape, local identities, and social emotions. Energy poverty promotes the re-configuration of local material landscapes in the negotiated operation of multiple social agents, influences the strengthening and reshaping of group self-identity through processes such as electrification, regional infrastructure segregation, urban renewal, and middle-class formation, involves gender norms and social divisions of labor, and generates social impacts and house-hold quality of life impacts through indoor air temperatures, indoor air pollution, and a lack of infrastructural services, which reduces self-identity and well-being. This paper explores the value of addressing energy poverty in realizing China's dual-carbon targets, energy transition, and common prosperity, with a view to providing a reference for the construction of the field of energy geography and related policy formulation.