金沙江三堆子乌东德河段阶地研究

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2006.05.609

地理科学 ›› 2006, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (5): 609-615.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2006.05.609

金沙江三堆子乌东德河段阶地研究

胥勤勉¹, 杨达源², 葛兆帅³, 陈德基⁴, 薛果夫⁵

1. 中国地质调查局天津地质矿产研究所, 天津 300170;
2. 南京大学城市与资源学系, 江苏南京 210093;
3. 徐州师范大学城市与环境学院, 江苏徐州 2211161;
4. 长江勘测规划设计研究院, 湖北武汉 430010;
5. 长江水利委员会三峡勘测研究院, 湖北宜昌 443003

收稿日期:2005-04-15 修回日期:2005-09-15 出版日期:2006-09-20 发布日期:2006-09-20
基金资助:
高校博士点基金(200202084004)和长江水利委员会三峡勘测研究院资助。

Terraces Along Sanduizi-Wudongde Secton of Jinsha River

XU Qin-Mian¹, YANG Da-Yuan², GE Zhao-Shuai³, CHEN De-Ji⁴, XUE Guo-Fu⁵

1. Tianjin Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, China Geological Survry, Tianjin 300170;
2. Department of Urban and Resources Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210093;
3. School of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Xuzhou Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116;
4. Changjiang Exploration Planning Design Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010;
5. Department for Three-Gorge Survey and Investigation of Yangtze Water Conservancy Committee, Yichang, Hubei 443003

Received:2005-04-15 Revised:2005-09-15 Online:2006-09-20 Published:2006-09-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 中更新世晚期,古金沙江曾在金坪子河段发生堵江,使得金坪子河段成为金沙江发育的局部侵蚀基准点,并影响着三堆子-乌东德河段的河流下切速率。金坪子、凹嘎、龙街和鱼鲊的平均下切速率分别为196~217、145~172、257~305、82~97 cm/ka。凹嘎河段和鱼鲊河段在河谷地貌形态和阶地堆积物形成年代上都有很大差异,其原因为金沙江河谷中存在着多级构造裂点或岩性裂点,两河段性质存在差异,所以该河段不宜做传统的阶地位相分析。金沙江三堆子-乌东德河段的阶地沉积物的重矿物种类较多,以磁铁矿、赤褐铁矿、绿帘石、石榴石为主,并含有稳定矿物锆石、金红石和白钛石,以及十字石、兰晶石等典型的变质矿物。

Abstract: After the research of sedimentology, geomorphology and chronology in the Sanduizi-Wudongde reach, we come to the conclusion that the geomorphic feature of the lower reaches of the Jinsha River was formed in the late middle Pleistocene. The ancient Jinsha River was jammed in Jingpingzi and it turned into a local base level of stream, which influences the incision rate along the Sanduizi-Wudongde reach of the Jinsha River. The average incision rate of Jinpingzi, Aoga, Longjie and Yuzha are 196-217 cm/ka, 145-172 cm/ka, 257-305 cm/ka, 82-97 cm/ka respectively. Because of the tectonic knickpoints and lithology knickpoints of the Jinsha River and the distinctions of the fluvial characters, there are some differences in the valley geomorphic feature and the TL datings of the terraces between Aoga reach and Yuzha reach,so the analysis of the terraces height relative to the Jinsha River do not make out. The Sanduizi-Wudongde reach of the Jinsha River contain many kinds of heavy minerals, such as magnetite, russet iron ore, epidote,garnet, and contain many steady minerals and degenerative heavy minerals, for example zircon,rutile, white-titanium, crossed-stone, cyanite, and so on.

中图分类号:

P931.2

胥勤勉, 杨达源, 葛兆帅, 陈德基, 薛果夫. 金沙江三堆子乌东德河段阶地研究[J]. 地理科学, 2006, 26(5): 609-615.

XU Qin-Mian, YANG Da-Yuan, GE Zhao-Shuai, CHEN De-Ji, XUE Guo-Fu. Terraces Along Sanduizi-Wudongde Secton of Jinsha River[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2006, 26(5): 609-615.

参考文献

[1] Schumm S A.The Fluvial System[M].New York: John Wiley,1977.
[2] 杨达源,吴胜光,王云飞.黄河上游阶地与水系变迁[J].地理科学,1996,16(2):137~143.
[3] 杨景春,谭利华,李有利,等.祁连山北麓河流阶地与新构造演化[J].第四纪研究,1998,3:229~237.
[4] 杨农,张岳桥,孟辉,等.川西高原岷江上游河流阶地初步研究[J].地质力学学报,2003,9(4):363~370.
[5] 鹿化煜,安芷生,王晓勇,等.最近14Ma青藏高原东北缘阶段性隆升的地貌证据[J].中国科学(D辑),2004,34(9): 855~864.
[6] 张岳桥,杨农,陈文,等.中国东西部地貌边界带晚新生代构造变形历史与青藏高原东缘隆升过程初步研究[J].地学前缘,2003,10(4):599~612.
[7] 任美锷,包浩生,韩同春,等.云南西北部金沙江河谷地貌与河流袭夺问题[J].地理学报,1959,25(2):135~155.
[8] 计风秸,郑键,李建平,等.滇东、滇西地区主要河流低阶地地貌面的年代学研究[J].地震地质,2000,22(3):365~276.
[9] 杨达源,李徐生.金沙江东流研究[J].南京大学学报(自然科学),2001,37(5):319~322.
[10] 张叶春,李吉均,朱俊杰,等.晚新生代金沙江形成时代与过程研究[J].云南地理环境研究,1998,10(2):43~48.
[11] 沈玉昌.长江上游河谷地貌[M].北京:科学出版社,1965.
[12] 黄镇国,张伟强.华南和中南半岛三角洲发育特征之比较[J].地理科学,2005,25(1):56~62.
[13] 苏良赫.云南之夺河流现象[J].地学集刊,1943,1(2):57~60.
[14] 杨达源.长江三峡阶地的研究(Ⅱ.阶地的分布与阶地位相分析)[J].南京大学学报(地理学),1988,(9):32~43.
[15] Personius S F. Late Quecternary stream incision and upcift in the forearc of the cascadia subdiution zone. Western Orgon[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1995, 100(B10): 20193-20210.
[16] 柴宗新,范建容,刘淑珍.金沙江下游元谋盆地冲沟发育特征和过程分析[J].地理科学,2001,21(4):339~343.

金沙江三堆子乌东德河段阶地研究

Terraces Along Sanduizi-Wudongde Secton of Jinsha River

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	闫冬冬, 吕胜华, 赵洪壮, 李有利. 六棱山北麓中段冲沟地貌发育的定量研究及其新构造意义[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(2): 244-250.
[2]	赵洪壮, 李有利, 杨景春, 吕红华. 基于DEM数据的北天山地貌形态分析[J]. 地理科学, 2009, 29(3): 445-449.
[3]	李有利, 史兴民, 傅建利, 杨景春. 山西南部1.2 Ma B.P.的地貌转型事件[J]. 地理科学, 2004, 24(3): 292-297.
[4]	任雪梅, 陈忠, 罗丽霞, 周心琴, 王建力. 夷平面研究综述[J]. 地理科学, 2003, 23(1): 107-111.
[5]	陈利江, 徐全洪, 赵燕霞, 李庆辰, 张景芳. 嶂石岩地貌的演化特点与地貌年龄[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(8): 964-968.