耕地与建设用地变化驱动力比较分析

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2008.02.214

地理科学 ›› 2008, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 214-218.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2008.02.214

耕地与建设用地变化驱动力比较分析

赵小汎^1,2, 代力民¹, 陈文波³, 于大炮¹, 周莉¹

1. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 辽宁沈阳 110016;
2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049;
3. 江西农业大学国土资源与环境学院, 江西南昌 330045

收稿日期:2007-03-16 修回日期:2007-07-11 出版日期:2008-03-20 发布日期:2008-03-20
作者简介:赵小汎(1977-), 男, 江西临川人, 博士研究生, 主要从事土地科学和城市生态研究。E-mail: xfzhao1977@163.com
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD03A09)、863计划项目(2006AA10Z251)资助。

Comparative Analysis on Driving Forces of Cultivated Land and Construction Land Use Change

ZHAO Xiao-Fan^1,2, DAI Li-Min¹, CHEN Wen-Bo³, YU Da-Pao¹, ZHOU Li¹

1. Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016;
2. Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049;
3. College of Land Resources and Environment, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330045

Received:2007-03-16 Revised:2007-07-11 Online:2008-03-20 Published:2008-03-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于南昌市新建县1991~2005年土地利用和自然社会经济数据,采用数理统计分析方法,定量综合探讨耕地和建设用地变化驱动力。结果表明,社会经济因子对耕地、建设用地变化驱动方向和强弱顺序表现差异性;驱动因素同一性主要表现在,经济发展状况、城镇化水平和人口增长是耕地和建设用地变化的驱动因子主分量;相同驱动因素的影响敏感性也表现出差异性。

Abstract: In order to discover the similarities and differences of driving forces on cultivated land and construction land changes, based on year-by-year renew investigation and statistical data involving nature, society and economy from 1991 to 2005 in Xinjian County of Nanchang City, driving forces of cultivated land and construction land use changes were analyzed synthetically and quantitatively in terms of mathematical statistics methods. Results indicated that driving factors display difference. Socio-economic factors make negative urge on cultivated land use change, relatively, and positive urge on construction land use change. And the sequences in strength of each socio-economic driving force on cultivated land or construction land show distinction. The similarity was manifested mainly in that the economic development, urbanization level and population growth are main components of all driving factors on cultivated land or construction land. Identically driving main components also displayed discrepancy in order of strength. For cultivated land, the sequence is economic development, population growth and urbanization. However, for construction land, that is economic development, urbanization and population growth. The research results contribute to knowing quantitatively and comparatively driving forces on cultivated land and construction land, and point out a way for land use change mechanism research.

中图分类号:

F323.211

赵小汎, 代力民, 陈文波, 于大炮, 周莉. 耕地与建设用地变化驱动力比较分析[J]. 地理科学, 2008, 28(2): 214-218.

ZHAO Xiao-Fan, DAI Li-Min, CHEN Wen-Bo, YU Da-Pao, ZHOU Li. Comparative Analysis on Driving Forces of Cultivated Land and Construction Land Use Change[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2008, 28(2): 214-218.

参考文献

[1] Romero H, Ihl M, Rivera A, et al. Rapid urban growth, land-use changes and air pollution in Santiago, Chile [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1999,33(24-25):4039-4047.
[2] Carlson T N, Arthur S T. The impact of land use-land cover changes due to urbanization on surface microclimate and hydrology: a satellite perspective [J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2000,25(1-2):49-65.
[3] 史纪安,陈利顶,史俊通,等.榆林地区土地利用/覆被变化区域特征及其驱动机制分析[J].地理科学,2003,23(4): 493~498.
[4] 肖捷颖,葛京凤,沈彦俊,等.基于TM 和ETM+遥感分析的石家庄市土地利用/覆被变化研究[J].地理科学,2005,25(4):495~500.
[5] Price S J, Dorcas M E, Gallant A L, et al. Three decades of urbanization: estimating the impact of land-cover change on stream salamander populations[J]. Biological Conservation, 2006,133(4):436-441.
[6] Fazal S. The need for preserving farmland: a case study from a predominantly agrarian economy (India)[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001,55(1):1-13.
[7] 栾维新,王茂军.提高城市化水平与耕地面积变化的关系研究——对大连市的实证研究[J].地理科学,2002,22(2):208~212.
[8] Tan M H, Li X B, Xie H, et al. Urban land expansion and arable land loss in China-a case study of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region [J]. Land use policy, 2005,22(3):187-196.
[9] Weber C, Puissant A. Urbanization pressure and modeling of urban growth: example of the Tunis Metropolitan Area [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003,86(3):341-352.
[10] 张心怡,刘敏,孟飞.基于RS和GIS的上海城建用地扩展研究[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2006,15(1):29~33.
[11] Xiao J Y, Shen Y J, Ge J F, et al. Evaluating urban expansion and land use change in Shijiazhuang, China, by using GIS and remote sensing [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006,75(1-2):69-80.
[12] 熊鹰,王克林,吕辉红,等.湖南省耕地动态变化及驱动机制研究[J].地理科学,2004,24(1):26~30.
[13] Xie Y C, Yu M, Tian G J, et al. Socio-economic driving forces of arable land conversion: a case study of Wuxian City, China [J]. Global Environmental Change, 2005,15(3):238-252.
[14] 马荣华,陈雯,陈小卉,等.常熟市城镇用地扩展分析[J].地理学报,2004,59(3):418~426.
[15] 雷军,张雪艳,吴世新,等.新疆城乡建设用地动态变化的时空特征分析[J].地理科学,2005,25(2):161~166.
[16] 何艳芬,马超群,朱金花,等.吉林省东部山区耕地动态变化研究——以延边朝鲜族自治州为例[J].地理科学,2003,23(2):245~250.
[17] 谭永忠,吴次芳,牟永铭.20世纪90年代浙江省耕地非农化过程分析[J].地理科学,2004,24(1):14~19.
[18] 赵永华,何兴元,胡远满,等.岷江上游汶川县耕地变化及驱动力研究[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(2):94~97.
[19] 王秀春,黄秋昊,蔡运龙,等.贵州省猫跳河流域耕地空间分布格局模拟[J].地理科学,2007,27(2):188~192.
[20] 陈雯,孙伟,段学军,等.以生态-经济为导向的江苏省土地开发适宜性分区[J].地理科学,2007,27(3):312~317.
[21] 曹小曙,马林兵,颜廷真.珠江三角洲交通与土地利用空间关系研究[J].地理科学,2007,27(6):743~748.
[22] 郑荣宝,刘毅华,董玉祥.广州市土地安全预警系统与RBF评估模型的构建[J].地理科学,2007,27(6):774~778.
[23] 胥建华.昌九工业走廊推进城市化的制度性矛盾[J].中国城市研究,2006,1(1):18~25.
[24] 赵小汎,吴明发,代力民.新建县土地利用变化机制分析[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2007,23(1):33~37.

耕地与建设用地变化驱动力比较分析

Comparative Analysis on Driving Forces of Cultivated Land and Construction Land Use Change

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	许宁, 郭旭东, 洪友堂, 张聪, 董华. 基于文献分析的土地退化评价指标研究[J]. 地理科学, 2008, 28(3): 425-430.
[2]	李森, 李凡, 孙武, 李保生. 黑河下游额济纳绿洲现代荒漠化过程及其驱动机制[J]. 地理科学, 2004, 24(1): 61-67.
[3]	张建平. 西南地区山地不同土地退化类型特征及调控途径[J]. 地理科学, 2001, 21(3): 236-241.
[4]	刘彦随. 山地土地结构格局与土地利用优化配置[J]. 地理科学, 1999, 19(6): 504-509.
[5]	祝功武, 刘瑞华. 南方丘陵山区耕地现状、潜力与开发对策——以德庆县为例[J]. 地理科学, 1998, 18(1): 10-15.
[6]	刘彦彤, 张延军, 赵玲. 长春市耕地动态变化及其驱动力分析[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(7): 868-873.