30年来东南红壤丘陵区土壤侵蚀度时空演变研究——以长汀县为例

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2011.010.1235

地理科学 ›› 2011, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 1235-1241.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2011.010.1235

30年来东南红壤丘陵区土壤侵蚀度时空演变研究——以长汀县为例

林晨^1,2, 周生路¹, 吴绍华^1,2

1. 南京大学地理与海洋科学学院, 江苏南京 210093;
2. 中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室, 江苏南京 210008

收稿日期:2011-01-24 修回日期:2011-08-10 出版日期:1997-10-20 发布日期:1997-10-20
通讯作者: 周生路,教授。E-mail: zhousl@nju.edu.cn E-mail:zhousl@nju.edu.cn
基金资助:
"十一五"国家科技支撑计划重点项目 (2009BADC6B)资助。

Evolution of Soil Erosion Degree in 30 Years in Granite Hills, Southeastern of China —A Case Study of Changting County,Fujian

LIN Chen^1,2, ZHOU Sheng-lu¹, WU Shao-hua^1,2

1. School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210093, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210008, China

Received:2011-01-24 Revised:2011-08-10 Online:1997-10-20 Published:1997-10-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 土壤侵蚀动态监测是侵蚀研究体系中的重要内容,当前国内大部分研究直接引用国外监测模型,不仅在因子选取以及模型通用性上存在不足,而且对区域土壤的潜在性侵蚀危险考虑不够。因此,研究提出土壤侵蚀度的概念,作为区域土壤实际侵蚀强度与潜在侵蚀危险的综合表征,并基于人地关系系统,通过多指标的量化与建模进行土壤侵蚀度测算,从而分析福建省长汀县土壤侵蚀时空演变规律。结果表明,长汀县土壤侵蚀分布存在集中连片的特点,汀中地区的侵蚀度最高,并向周边逐渐衰减。同时,侵蚀度在变化方向上虽然存在不确定性,但总体侵蚀状况近30a来得到了明显的改善,安全区的比重从1975年的3.87%增长至2006年的56.38%,相比而言,极度侵蚀危险区的比重仅从1975年的12.3%,减少至2006年的6.66%,改善幅度较其他等级土壤有所差距,这与区域在立地条件、经济发展水平以及政策导向上的差异密切相关。研究结果说明选取侵蚀影响因子具有一定的适宜性,也证明土壤侵蚀度可以有效表征土壤侵蚀时空演变趋势。

Abstract: Monitoring the soil erosion dynamically is an important part in soil erosion research.The studies in China always adopt the quantitative model which were developed abroad, so the shortage is existed in factors selection and commonality of the model, and such studies are also considered less in erosion potentiality. As a result, a concept of erosion degree is proposed in the study, which is a consolidated representation of actual erosion intensity and potential erosion risk. Based on human-land relationship system, the erosion degree were calculated by quantification of multi index, and the spatial and temporal soil erosion degree transition tendency in Changting County, Fujian Provience was analyzed. The results show that characteristics of concentration and contiguous are existed in erosion distribution, the highest erosion degree is existed in central of Changting County, and gradually decay to the surrounding area. On the other wise, although the uncertainty is existed in transition of soil erosion degree, the soil erosion had improved in the passed 30 years, the proportion of safe area in 1975 was 3.87%, and it rose quickly to approximately 56.38% in 2006.In contrast, the decrease rate of extremely dangerous area is less than the other areas, the proportion only reduced from 12.3% in 1975 to 6.66% in 2006.The phenomenon is closely related with the region differences in habitats, economic development and policy orientation. In generally,the result not only certify the suitability in the selection of erosion factors, but also indicted that the erosion degree can characterize the transition tendency of soil erosion.

中图分类号:

S159.2

林晨, 周生路, 吴绍华. 30年来东南红壤丘陵区土壤侵蚀度时空演变研究——以长汀县为例[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(10): 1235-1241.

LIN Chen, ZHOU Sheng-lu, WU Shao-hua. Evolution of Soil Erosion Degree in 30 Years in Granite Hills, Southeastern of China —A Case Study of Changting County,Fujian[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2011, 31(10): 1235-1241.

参考文献

[1] 赵其国, 史学正.土壤资源概论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,2007.
[2] 周正朝, 上官周平. 土壤侵蚀模型研究综述[J]. 2004, 2 (1):52~55.
[3] Laflen J M, Lwonard J L, Foster G R. WEPP: a new generation of erosion prediction technology[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Cons, 1991, 46(1): 34-38.
[4] Morgan R P C, Quinton J N, Smith R E, et al. The European soil erosion model (EUROSEM): a dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments[J]. Earth Surface Processes and landforms, 1998, 23(1): 527-544.
[5] Renard K G, Foster G R, WeesiesG A, et al. Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Univesal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE)[M].USDA Handbook, No.537,1978.
[6] Gouée P Le, Delahaye D. SCALES: a large-scale assessment model of soil erosion hazard in Basse-Normandie (Northern-Western France) [J]. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, 2010, 35(1), 887-901.
[7] Febles J M. Edaphic indicators for assessment of soil erosion in Karst regions, Province of Havana [J]. Land Degrad Dev. 2009, 20(1): 522-534.
[8] Maria Kouli, Pantelis Soupios. Soil erosion prediction using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) in a GIS framework, Chania, Northwestern Crete, Greece[J]. Environ Geol 2009, 57(1):483-497.
[9] 蔡国强, 刘纪根.关于我国土壤侵蚀模型研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2003,22(3):242~250.
[10] 蔡崇法, 丁树文, 史志华等.应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J].水土保持学报, 2000, 14(2): 20~26.
[11] 马国斌.基于GIS的黄土高原小流域土壤侵蚀定量评价研究.南京:南京师范大学, 2003.
[12] 李智广. 区域土壤侵蚀遥感定量监测技术研究[D].西安:西北农林科技大学, 2001.
[13] 郭旭东, 邱扬, 连纲,等.基于PSR框架的土地质量指标体系研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展, 2003, 22(5): 479~489.
[14] 贺秀斌, 文安邦, 张信宝,等.农业生态环境评价的土壤侵蚀退耦指标体系[J].土壤学报,2005,42(5) :852~855.
[15] 史德明, 韦启潘, 梁音等.中国南方侵蚀土壤退化指标体系研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(3):1~9.
[16] 吴清泉, 陈明华, 陈文祥,等. 福建省水蚀区土壤侵蚀遥感监测技术探讨[J]. 水土保持通报. 2007, 27 (4):49~52.
[17] 王维明, 陈明华, 林敬兰,等. 长汀县水土流失动态变化及防治对策研究[J].水土保持通报,2005, 25 (4) :73~77.
[18] 黄炎和, 卢程隆. 闽南次降雨量与土壤侵蚀量的关系研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(3) :75~78.
[19] 阮伏水. 花岗岩坡地土壤侵蚀强度分级参考指标探讨[J]. 水土保持研究.1997, 4(1):113~19.
[20] 陈明华.闽南地区不同土地利用类型土壤侵蚀现状分析[J].福建农业学报,2002,17(2) :78~80.
[21] 国家统计局长汀调查队. 长汀统计年鉴[M]. 长汀: 长汀县统计局,1975, 1990, 1999, 2006.
[22] 福建省土壤普查办公室. 长汀土壤志[M]. 长汀: 长汀水土保持局[M].1997.
[23] 曾慧娟, 潘文斌. 基于RS/GIS和RUSLE的福建武步溪流域土壤侵蚀研究[J]. 安全与环境学报.2007, 7(5):88~92.
[24] Wischemier W H. A soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites [J]. Soil and Water Conversation, 1971, 26: 189-193.
[25] 丁凤, 徐涵秋.TM 热波段图像的地表温度反演算法与实验分析[J].地球信息科学.2006, 8(3):125~130.
[24] 杨学震. 丘陵红壤的土壤侵蚀与治理[M].北京: 中国农业出版社.2005: 77~141.
[27] Pan J J, Zhang T L . Dynamics of soil erosion in Xingguo County, China, determined using remote sensing and GIS [J]. Pedosphere, 2005, 15 (3): 356~362.
[28] 林敬兰. 福建省土壤侵蚀空间分布规律及防治对策探讨[J]. 资源科学,2003,26(增刊): 111~118.

30年来东南红壤丘陵区土壤侵蚀度时空演变研究——以长汀县为例

Evolution of Soil Erosion Degree in 30 Years in Granite Hills, Southeastern of China —A Case Study of Changting County,Fujian

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	杨艳丽, 史学正, 于东升, 王洪杰, 徐茂, 王果. 区域尺度土壤养分空间变异及其影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学, 2008, 28(6): 788-792.
[2]	赵彦锋, 郭恒亮, 孙志英, 史学正, 吴克宁. 基于土壤学知识的主成分分析判断土壤重金属来源[J]. 地理科学, 2008, 28(1): 45-50.
[3]	张绪美, 董元华, 王辉, 沈旦, 刘德雄. 江苏省农田畜禽粪便负荷时空变化[J]. 地理科学, 2007, 27(4): 597-601.
[4]	刘庆花, 史学正, 于东升, 孙维侠, 王洪杰. 土壤区划类型的参比与属地化研究[J]. 地理科学, 2006, 26(2): 217-222.
[5]	刘付程, 史学正, 潘贤章, 于东升. 太湖流域典型地区土壤磷素含量的空间变异特征[J]. 地理科学, 2003, 23(1): 77-81.
[6]	李绪谦, 蒋惠中, 赵晓波, 李宏卿. 考虑地质条件进行土壤生态分区的原则、方法探讨[J]. 地理科学, 2002, 22(1): 114-118.