旅游目的地仿生学空间关系研究——以安徽省古村落西递、宏村为例

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2011.012.1518

地理科学 ›› 2011, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 1518-1524.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2011.012.1518

旅游目的地仿生学空间关系研究——以安徽省古村落西递、宏村为例

徐红罡¹, 薛丹^1,2

1. 中山大学旅游发展与规划中心, 广东广州510275;
2. 北京大学深圳研究生院环境与能源学院, 广东深圳518055

收稿日期:2010-09-09 修回日期:2011-08-25 出版日期:1997-12-20 发布日期:1997-12-20
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(40871060)

Spatial Relationships Among Tourism Destinations Based on Bionics Theory:A Case Study of Xidi and Hongcun villages in Anhui Province

XU Hong-gang¹, XUE Dan^1,2

1. Centre for Tourism Planning &　Research, SUN Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510275, China;
2. The School of Environment and Energy, Peking University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China

Received:2010-09-09 Revised:2011-08-25 Online:1997-12-20 Published:1997-12-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 旅游目的地之间在多重因素的影响之下,空间关系总会呈现出有别于竞争与合作关系的其他形式。研究了旅游目的地空间关系的生态学解释和旅游生态位概念,在此基础上建立仿生学空间关系数学模型,构建旅游目的地仿生学空间关系研究体系,并将新体系实际应用于案例地西递、宏村,最后得出结论:宏村的整体竞争力水平高于西递,且两村于2006～2007年间达到稳定的竞争状态并一直延续到现在。案例分析证明了旅游目的地仿生学空间关系研究对于旅游规划与管理的理论和实践意义。

Abstract: In recent years,the researches on the spatial relationship of tourism destinations were halted at three directions: competition,cooperation,and cooperation-competition.However,under the influence of economic,social,and cultural factors,the spatial relationships of tourism destinations always show other different forms.The former relationship classification is so simple that it cannot deal with the complex situations.With a literature review on the domestic and abroad studies,the author found that lots of scholars began to try to explain the relationship in ecological ways.The spatial relationships between two or more destinations are described as competition,predation,symbiosis,and parasitism."Niche",as ecological terminology,has been introduced into tourism study.The purpose of this study is to apply the bionics theory to the tourism destination and to explore new methodology for the spatial relationships of destinations qualitatively and quantitatively.Thus,this paper is composed by three parts: 1) the establishment of the spatial relationship models based on ecological interpretation;2) the construction of a bionics study approach of spatial relationship among tourism destinations;and 3) the application of the new approach to Xidi and Hongcun villages as a case study.After fieldwork,data collection are analyzed,and it is found that the tourism niche of Hongcun Village is bigger than that of Xidi Village,which means the competitiveness of Hongcun is stronger than that of Xidi because of its bionics landscape,business promotion and location advantage.Xidi and Hongcun reached a stable state of competitive spatial relationship in 2006-2007,and they will keep this relationship in future.This study proves that tourism destinations’ bionics relationship approach is better than the traditional ones.It makes a more detailed and comprehensive classification of spatial relationships,which can be applied not only to the large-scale tourism destination,but also to the small-scale scenic spots.When using it,we should pay attention to the choice of niche dimensions and the calculation of tourism niche,which must be based on the reality of cases.More kinds of tourism niche calculation and deeper exploration of the connotation of tourism niche and this new approach are planned to be studied.Through putting both qualitative and quantitative research methods into the bionics relationship,this new approach will be proved to be more useful for the analysis of tourism planning and destination management.

中图分类号:

F590

徐红罡, 薛丹. 旅游目的地仿生学空间关系研究——以安徽省古村落西递、宏村为例[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(12): 1518-1524.

XU Hong-gang, XUE Dan. Spatial Relationships Among Tourism Destinations Based on Bionics Theory:A Case Study of Xidi and Hongcun villages in Anhui Province[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2011, 31(12): 1518-1524.

参考文献

1] Butler R W.The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution:im-plications for management of resources[J].The Canadian Geog-rapher,1980,24(1):5-12.
[2] Cooper C,Jackson S.Destination life cycle:the Isle of Man case study[J].Annals of Tourism Research,1989,16(3):377-398.
[3] Getz D.Tourism planning and destination lifecycle[J].Annals of Tourism Research,1992,19(4):752-770.
[4] 保继刚,彭华.旅游地拓展开发研究:以丹霞山阳元石景区为例[J].地理科学,1995,15(1):63～70.
[5] 陆林.山岳型旅游地生命周期研究:安徽黄山、九华山实证分析[J].地理科学,1997,17(1):63～69.
[6] 张朝枝.旅游地衰退与复苏的驱动力分析:以几个典型旅游景区为例[J].地理科学,2003,23(3):372～378.
[7] 孙儒泳,李博,诸葛阳,等.普通生态学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1998:104～126.
[8] 张序强,董雪旺,李华.旅游地间生态关系分析[J].人文地理,2003,18(1):14～18.
[9] 董雪旺.旅游地空间关系的生态学解释——以山西省旅游业发展为例[J].经济地理,2004,24(1):110～114.
[10] 邹仁爱,陈俊鸿,陈绍愿.旅游地群落:区域旅游空间关系的生态学视角[J].地理与地理信息科学,2005,21(4):80～83.
[11] 邹仁爱,陈俊鸿,陈绍愿,等.旅游地生态位的概念、原理及优化策略研究[J].人文地理,2006,21(5):36～40.
[12] 向延平.旅游生态位评价研究——以张家界、天门山国家森林公园为例[J].林业经济问题,2009,29(2):18～188.
[13] 朱春全.生态位态势理论与扩充假说[J].生态学报,1997,17 (3):324～332.
[14] 向延平.旅游竞争研究:生态位角度分析的新视角[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(26):12771～12772.
[15] 姜启源,谢金星,叶俊.数学模型(第三版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2005:67～75.
[16] Crouch G,Ritchie J.Tourism competitiveness and societal pros-perity[J].Journal of Business Research,1999,44:137-152.
[17] 史春云,张捷,沈正平,等.旅游目的地竞争力定量评价综述[J].人文地理,2006,21(3):72～77.
[18] 臧德霞.关于旅游目的地竞争力内涵的几点认识——基于经济学的分析视角[J].桂林旅游高等专科学校学报,2006,17 (5):612～614.
[19] Dwyer L,Kim C.Destination competitiveness:determinants and indicators for a tourism destination[J].Current Issues in Tourism,2003,6(5):369-414.
[20] 曹艳英,王丽丽.城市旅游竞争力定量评价与差异分析的实证研究——以山东省胶东半岛沿海城市为例[J].学术交流, 2007,(12):137～140.
[21] 王娟.中国省域旅游业竞争力综合定量评价[J].人文地理,2006,(3):78～82.
[22] 王凯,韩贵锋.中国省区旅游竞争力的测度与评价[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报,2006,29(2):106～111.
[23] 史春云,张捷,朱传耿,等.基于WTTC数据库的旅游竞争力测度与分析[J].经济地理,2006,26(2):326～330.
[24] 张序强,董雪旺,李华.旅游地间生态关系分析[J].人文地理,2003,18(1):14～18.
[25] 董雪旺.旅游地空间关系的生态学解释——以山西省旅游业发展为例[J].经济地理,2004,24(1):110～114.
[26] 张骁鸣.旅游对乡村社区的社会经济影响研究——以世界文化遗产地西递为例[D].广州:中山大学,2006.
[27] 刘慧璇.观光凝视下的古村落空间:徽州宏村旅游的空间生产与文化抵抗[D].台北:台湾大学,2004.
[28] 郭舒,曹宁.旅游目的地竞争力问题的一种解释[J].南开管理评论,2004,7(2):95～99.
[29] 朱明芳.关于旅游目的地竞争力测评方法的研究[J].社会科学家,2007,(2):110～114.
[30] 向延平,陈友莲.基于生态位理论的旅游发展问题探析—— 以湖南凤凰为例[J].长江大学学报(自科版)农学卷,2007, 4(4):19～22.
[31] 陈传康.风水现代化及其旅游开发意义[J].人文地理,1996, (1):29～35.
[32] 殷祚云.Logistic曲线拟合方法研究[J].数理统计与管理, 2002,(21):41～42.
[33] 罗明义.旅游经济学分析方法·案例[M].天津:南开大学出版社,2005:67～75. 12期徐红罡等:旅游目的地仿生学空间关系研究1523

[1]	田里, 刘亮. 旅游孤岛效应演化机理研究——以云南普者黑旅游区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 22-32.
[2]	张子昂, 保继刚. 多重距离对中国入境与出境旅游流的影响:基于组态的视角[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 13-21.
[3]	徐少癸, 左逸帆, 章牧. 基于模糊物元模型的中国旅游生态安全评价及障碍因子诊断研究[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 33-43.
[4]	麻学锋, 刘玉林, 谭佳欣. 旅游驱动的乡村振兴实践及发展路径[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 2019-2026.
[5]	刘长生, 董瑞甜, 简玉峰. 旅游业发展产业协同与荷兰病效应研究——基于胡焕庸线的思考[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 2073-2084.
[6]	于洪雁, 王群勇, 张博, 刘继生. 中国旅游供需耦合协调发展的空间分异及驱动机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1889-1898.
[7]	刘沛林. 从新宅居生活看网络虚拟旅游的前景和方向[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(9): 1403-1411.
[8]	朱麟奇, 李秋雨, 刘继生. 中国旅游业与地区发展及民生改善协调关系研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1328-1335.
[9]	张飞, 杨林生, 何勋, 石勇. 大运河遗产河道游憩利用适宜性评价[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(7): 1114-1123.
[10]	孙国霞. 基于旅游市场竞争态的吉林省入境旅游市场研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 973-979.
[11]	李秋雨, 朱麟奇, 王吉玉. 全域旅游背景下吉林省旅游业−经济−社会−生态环境协调性研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 948-955.
[12]	董文静, 王昌森, 张震. 山东省乡村振兴与乡村旅游时空耦合研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 628-636.
[13]	李维维, 陈田, 马晓龙. 西安城市旅游休闲业态空间热点特征及形成机制[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(3): 437-446.
[14]	周彬, 王雨桐, 虞虎, 吕宁, 张亦弛. 基于结构方程模型的宁波城市居民休闲满意度研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(1): 119-127.
[15]	刘美新, 蔡晓梅, 麻国庆. 乡村民宿“家”的生产过程与权力博弈:广东惠州上良村案例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(12): 1884-1893.

旅游目的地仿生学空间关系研究——以安徽省古村落西递、宏村为例

Spatial Relationships Among Tourism Destinations Based on Bionics Theory:A Case Study of Xidi and Hongcun villages in Anhui Province

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0