城市空间变迁背景下的地方感知与身份认同研究——以广州小洲村为例

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2012.01.18

地理科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 18-24.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2012.01.18

城市空间变迁背景下的地方感知与身份认同研究——以广州小洲村为例

朱竑^1,²(), 钱俊希^1,², 吕旭萍²

1.华南师范大学文化产业与文化地理研究中心,广东广州 510631
2. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广东广州 510275

收稿日期:2010-12-30 修回日期:2011-06-13 出版日期:2012-01-20 发布日期:2012-01-20
作者简介:
作者简介：朱竑（1968-）,男,甘肃临夏人,博士,教授,主要从事文化地理研究。E-mail: zhuh@scnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41171125)、广东省自然科学基金项目(10251063101000007、S2011010005996)、教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目（NCET-07-0889）资助

Place Identity and Sense of Place in the Context of Urban Spatial Transformation: A Case Study of Xiaozhou Village in Guangzhou, China

Hong ZHU^1,²(), Jun-xi QIAN^1,², Xu-ping LU²

1.Center for Cultural Industry & Cultural Geography, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510631, China
2. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510275, China

Received:2010-12-30 Revised:2011-06-13 Online:2012-01-20 Published:2012-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

身份认同是文化和社会研究中一个重要的概念,是指个人在特定的社会文化语境中逐步确定自己在这一社会文化秩序中的个体角色,从而形成完整的自我认知与自我定义。而地方认同则是对某个地方作为社会角色自我感知的一部分的认知,通过地方的意义来形成对个人或社会群体文化与身份的认同。以地方与身份认同作为主要的研究维度,将广州独特的“艺术村”小洲村作为研究对象,探讨城市空间演变背景下,本地村民与艺术家这两类具有不同文化倾向的社会群体基于地方的身份认同,探索艺术家与村民之间在认同上的冲突、断裂与融合。研究剖析了小洲村艺术家及原村民在社区演变的过程中文化身份认同和地方认同形成与变迁的情况,并分析其认同构建的原因和特征。研究的结果显示,小洲村的本地村民与艺术家的地方认同感在本质上看还处在一个消极的割裂与断层的状态,两个社会群体对于地方意义的感知与认同还需要未来进一步的互动与融合。

关键词: 广州小洲村, 城市空间, 地方, 认同

Abstract:

The research on identity is very important within cultural and social studies. Identity represents the roles that individuals or social groups play within a social and cultural structure. It is connected with self-recognition and self-definition. On the other hand, place identity means that the meanings of place are taken as part of self-definition. Through place identity, individuals or social groups understand themselves through the constructive nature of place as a reference. In this paper, place and identity are exploited as the main axes around which this discussion is embarked. Taking Guangzhou's "Artist Village"—Xiaozhou Village as an example, the evolution of identities of both the local villagers and the newcomer artists is to be understanded, under the context of Guangzhou′s urban spatial transformation. In particular, the coexistence, juxtaposition, collision and even conflict between the two groups′ place-based identities are interested in. The research results suggest that there is an apparent status of fragmentation between the place identities of the two social groups. There is no sound proof in support of any progressive sense of place in either group′s place imagination, in which sense it can be believed that there will still be a long process before the two social groups are fully integrated in, regard of the construction of their place-based identities.

Key words: Xiaozhou Village, urban space, place, identity

中图分类号:

K901

朱竑, 钱俊希, 吕旭萍. 城市空间变迁背景下的地方感知与身份认同研究——以广州小洲村为例[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(1): 18-24.

Hong ZHU, Jun-xi QIAN, Xu-ping LU. Place Identity and Sense of Place in the Context of Urban Spatial Transformation: A Case Study of Xiaozhou Village in Guangzhou, China[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2012, 32(1): 18-24.

图/表 2

参考文献 29

[30]	Massey D.Space, place and gender [M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994: 146-156.
[31]	Massey D.A place called home?[J] New Formations, 1992, 17: 3-15.
[32]	Massey D.Power geometry and a progressive sense of place[M]//Bird J, Curtis B, Putman T et al. Mapping the futures: local cultures, global change. London: Routledge, 1993: 60-70.
[33]	May J.Globalization and the politics of place: place and identity in an Inner London Neighbourhood[J]. Transaction of the Institute of British Geographers, NS, 1996, 21(1): 194-215.
[1]	张纯, 王敬甯, 陈平,等. 地方创意环境和实体空间对城市文化创意活动的影响——以北京市南锣鼓巷为例[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(2): 339~348.
[2]	Young T.Place matters[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2001, 91(4): 681-682.
[3]	Wright J K.Terrae incognita: the place of imagination in geography[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1947, 37: 1-15.
[4]	Eyles J.The geography of everyday life[M]∥Gregory D, Walford R. Horizons in Human Geography. London: Macmillan, 1989:102-117.
[5]	Relph E.Place and placelessness[M]. London: Pion, 1976: 2-46.
[6]	Tuan Y F.Space and place: the perspective of experience [M]. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1977: 3-19.
[7]	Blunt A, Gruffud P, May J.Cultural geography in practice[M]. London: Edward Arnold, 2003: 71-73.
[8]	Twigger-Ross C L, Uzzell D. Place and identity process[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1996, 16: 205-220.
[9]	Breakwell G M.Coping with threatened identity[M]. London: Methuen, 1986.
[10]	Breakwell G M.Process of self-evaluation: efficiency and estrangement[M]// Breakwell G M.. Social psychology of identity and self-concept. Surrey: Surrey University Press, 1992.
[11]	Breakwell G M.Integrating paradigms: methodological implications[M]// Breakwell G M. Social psychology of identity and self-concept. Surrey: Surrey University Press, 1992.
[12]	Heidegger M.Poetry, language and thought[M]. New York: Harper and Row, 1971: 143-161.
[13]	Casey E S.Between geography and philosophy: what does it mean to be in a place-world?[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1997, 87(3): 509-531.
[14]	Casey E S.Getting back to place: towards a renewed understanding of the place-world [M]. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993: 41-182.
[15]	Harner J.Place identity and copper mining in Senora, Mexico[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2001, 91(4): 660-680.
[16]	Soja E.Postmodern geographies: the reassertion of space in critical social theory[M]. London: Verso, 1989: 76-93.
[17]	Massey D.Space, place and gender [M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994: 146-156.
[18]	Keith M, Pile S.Introduction part 1: the politics of place[M]//Keith M, Pile S. Place and the politics of identity. London: Routledge, 1993: 1-21.
[19]	Keith M, Pile S.Introduction part 2: the place of politics[M]// Keith M, Pile S. Place and the politics of identity. London: Routledge, 1993: 22-40.
[20]	Bondi L.Locating Identity Politics[M]//Keith M, Pile S. Place and the politics of identity. London: Routledge, 1993: 82-99.
[21]	Proshansky H M.The city and self-identity[J]. Environment and Behavior, 1978, 10(2): 147-169.
[22]	Dowling R.Geographies of identities: landscapes of class[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2009, 33(6): 833-839.
[23]	Lees L, Slater T, Wyly E.Gentrification[M]. New York: Routledge, 2008: 89-128.
[24]	时蓉华. 现代社会心理学[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1989:223.
[25]	凯文•林奇.城市意象[M].北京:华夏出版社,2001.
[26]	Williams D R, Patterson M E, Roggenbuck J W.Beyond the commodity metaphor: examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place[J]. Leisure Sciences, 1992, 14: 29-46.
[27]	Hidalgo M C, Hernandez B.Place attachment: conceptual and empirical questions[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2001, 21: 273-281.
[28]	Harvey D.From space to place and back again[M]//Harvey D. Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1996: 291-326.
[29]	Harvey D.Between space and time: reflections on the geographical imaginations[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1991, 80(3): 418-434.

城市空间变迁背景下的地方感知与身份认同研究——以广州小洲村为例

Place Identity and Sense of Place in the Context of Urban Spatial Transformation: A Case Study of Xiaozhou Village in Guangzhou, China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	朱华友,李涵,代泽娟,蒋自然. 动态外部性视角的企业再地方化效应及地区影响——以皖江产业承接示范区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(8): 1246-1255.
[2]	焦利民,杨璐迪,刘稼丰,张博恩,许刚. 顾及城市空间结构信息的元胞自动机模型构建及其应用[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(8): 1276-1283.
[3]	殷冠文. 地方政府主导下的资本循环与城市化：以鄂尔多斯康巴什新区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(7): 1082-1092.
[4]	郭文. 空间认同：城市空间研究转向中的知识前沿、趋势与启发[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(4): 587-595.
[5]	纪小美, 王超, 赵晓迪. 中国地方政府财政赤字率的时空演变——地理监视的应用[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(3): 424-432.
[6]	夏丽丽, 王润晓, 梁新怡, 肖凡. 全球-地方背景下东道国企业研发行为的演变及其影响因素研究——基于技术溢出视角的广州市本土制造企业微观实证[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(2): 277-284.
[7]	姚晓明, 朱晟君. 银行业空间演化与企业信贷[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(2): 294-304.
[8]	杨永春, 孙燕, 李建新, 唐艳, 张薇, 王伟伟. 藏、汉对比视角下的城市空间环境认知研究——以中国西藏日喀则市为例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(2): 334-341.
[9]	曹小曙,梁斐雯,陈慧灵. 特大城市空间形态差异对交通网络效率的影响[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(1): 41-51.
[10]	杨晓俊, 朱凯凯, 陈朋艳, 郭文浩. 基于渗透原理的农民工城市空间融入变化规律研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(4): 504-510.
[11]	田明. 地方因素对流动人口城市融入的影响研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(7): 997-1005.
[12]	陈如铁, 马健. 辽宁中部城市群城市体系中规模与距离关系的研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(6): 841-849.
[13]	孟德友, 魏凌, 樊新生, 高超. 河南“米”字形高铁网构建对可达性及城市空间格局影响[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(6): 850-858.
[14]	万蕙, 唐雪琼. 中越边境乡村民居景观的符号象征与认同建构——广西龙州县边境乡村案例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(4): 595-602.
[15]	黄颖敏, 薛德升, 黄耿志. 改革开放以来珠江三角洲基层非正规土地利用实践与制度创新——以东莞市长安镇为例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(12): 1831-1840.