近60年洪泽湖流域汛期降水特征及其与EASM关系

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2012.011.1358

地理科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 1358-1363.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2012.011.1358

近60年洪泽湖流域汛期降水特征及其与EASM关系

叶正伟^1,²()

1. 江苏省环洪泽湖生态农业生物技术重点实验室, 江苏淮安 223300
2. 南京大学地理与海洋科学学院, 江苏南京 210093

收稿日期:2011-11-22 修回日期:2012-01-23 出版日期:2012-11-20 发布日期:2012-11-20
作者简介:
作者简介：叶正伟（1973-）,男,安徽黄山人,博士,副教授,主要从事水文水资源与自然灾害方面的研究。E-mail：leafyzw@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(40801052)、教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(10YJC790342)、江苏省教育厅高校哲社科学研究(2011SJB790005)、江苏省高校“青蓝工程”项目、江苏省洪泽湖渔业管委会合作项目资助

Precipitation Change in Flood Season and Its Relationship with EASM in the Hongze Lake Catchments in Recent 60 Years

Zheng-wei YE^1,²()

1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Eco-agricultural Biotechnology Around Hongze Lake, Huaian, Jiangsu 223300, China
2. School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210093, China

Received:2011-11-22 Revised:2012-01-23 Online:2012-11-20 Published:2012-11-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

洪泽湖流域近60 a来汛期降水的综合分析表明,汛期降水呈现总体增加的趋势,且未来仍呈增加趋势。汛期降水在2000年出现突变,此后呈现明显增加特征,是2000年来洪涝频繁的主要因素。SPI旱涝等级显示,旱涝以1960 s波动最为显著,而2000 s以来SPI值明显偏高。汛期降水与东亚夏季风（EASM）指数存在6 a左右和准2 a的共振周期。在1960~1972年间的6 a左右共振周期上,EASM越强,降水越少;而在1986~1992年的6 a左右共振周期上,EASM与汛期降水呈较弱正相关。1996~2004年间准2 a左右的共振周期上,EASM与汛期降水呈反相关系。

关键词: 洪泽湖流域, 汛期降水, 标准化降水指数, 东亚夏季风

Abstract:

The methods of anomaly analysis, Mann-Kendall analysis, Rescaled Range Analysis, Standardized Precipitation Index and the wavelet analysis are applied t to detect the characteristics of the precipitation in flood season in the Hongze Lake catchments. Result shows that the precipitation in flood season undergoes an insignificant upward trend in the recent 60 years, and it would continue to be an increasing trend in the near future. Abrupt change of precipitation in flood season occurred in 2000 and it increased greatly in the nearest 10 years which resulted in more flood in 2000s. Result of the Standardized Precipitation Index analysis also confirmed that the 1960s experienced the greatest fluctuations for the precipitation while the 1980s was quite steady and the 2000s had a higher SPI value in general. 1965,1951,1954,1956,1991,2000,2003,2005 and 2007 are the years in which the SPI value is lager than 1.0, which means a flood year. While in 1966,1953,1973,1978,1985,1988,1994,1999 and 2004, the SPI value is smaller than -1.0, which implied a drought year accordingly. Wavelet coherence analysis suggests that a syntonic period of about 2 a and 6 a can be found between East Asia summer monsoon and precipitation in flood season. At period of about 6 a in 1960-1972, it appears to be a stronger monsoon accompanied by less precipitation, but in 1986-1992, it is demonstrated to be a stronger monsoon with more precipitation relatively. The flood year of 1991 and the drought year of 1988 are the typical in phase years. However, at period of about 2 a in 1996-2004, anti-phase between the East Asia summer monsoon and precipitation in flood season resulted in flood year in 2003 and drought year in 1999 and 2004 respectively.

Key words: Hongze Lake catchments, precipitation in flood season, Standardized Precipitation Index( SPI), East Asia summer monsoon （EASM）

中图分类号:

P468.1/7

叶正伟. 近60年洪泽湖流域汛期降水特征及其与EASM关系[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(11): 1358-1363.

Zheng-wei YE. Precipitation Change in Flood Season and Its Relationship with EASM in the Hongze Lake Catchments in Recent 60 Years[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2012, 32(11): 1358-1363.

图/表 8

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 18

[1]	IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Summary for Policy Makers[M]. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[2]	丁一汇,任国玉,石广玉,等.气候变化国家评估报告(I):中国气候变化的历史和未来趋势[J].气候变化研究进展, 2006, 2(1):3~8.
[3]	叶正伟,朱国传.洪泽湖流域洪涝灾害演变趋势及其与El Niño事件关系[J].长江流域资源与环境,2009,18(11):1086~1092.
[4]	章国材,毕宝贵,鲍媛媛,等.2003年淮河流域强降水大尺度环流特征及成因分析[J].地理研究,2004,23(6):795~804.
[5]	崔林丽,史军,周伟东.上海极端气温变化特征及其对城市化的响应[J].地理科学,2009,29(1):93~97.
[6]	叶正伟,许有鹏,徐金涛.江苏里下河地区洪涝灾害演变趋势与成灾机理分析[J].地理科学,2009,29(6):880~885.
[7]	朱松泉,窦鸿身.洪泽湖[M].合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,1993:71~93.
[8]	Mann H B.Nonparametric tests against trend[J]. Econometrica,1945, 13: 245-259.
[9]	Hurst H E.Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs[J].Transactions of the American Society of Civil,1951, 116:770-808.
[10]	Mandelbr B B, J R Wallis. Robustness of rescaled range R/S in measurement of noncyclic long run statistical dependence[J]. Water Resources Research,1969,5(5):967-988.
[11]	Lloyd-Hughes B,Saunders M A.A drought climatology for Europe[J].Int. J. Climatol., 2002, 22:1571-1592.
[12]	McKee T B,Doesken N J,Kleist J. The relationship of drought frequency and duration of time scales[C]//Eighth Conference on Applied Climatology. American Meteorological Society,1993,January,17-23,Anaheim CA:179-186.
[13]	Torrence C,Compo G P.A practical guide to wavelet analysis[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1998, 79:61-78.
[14]	Grinsted A,Moore J C,Jevrejeva S.Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series[J].Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 2004,11:561-566.
[15]	李建平,曾庆存.一个新的季风指数及其年际变化和与雨量的关系[J].气候与环境研究,2005,10(3):351~365.
[16]	杨素英,孙凤华,马建中.增暖背景下中国东北地区极端降水事件的演变特征[J].地理科学,2008,28(2):224~228.
[17]	李子君,李秀彬.近45年来降水变化和人类活动对潮河流域年径流量的影响[J].地理科学,2008,28(6):809~813.
[18]	于兴修,杨桂山,王瑶.土地利用/覆被变化的环境效应研究进展与动向[J].地理科学,2004,24(5):627~633.

标准化降水指数(SPI)	旱涝等级	标准化降水指数(SPI)	旱涝等级
<-1.96	极旱	0.5~1.0	微涝
-1.96~-1.48	重旱	1.0~1.48	中涝
-1.48~-1.0	中旱	1.48~1.96	重涝
-1.0~-0.5	微旱	>1.96	极涝
-0.5~0.5	接近正常

近60年洪泽湖流域汛期降水特征及其与EASM关系

Precipitation Change in Flood Season and Its Relationship with EASM in the Hongze Lake Catchments in Recent 60 Years

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 18

相关文章 11

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	李明, 葛晨昊, 邓宇莹, 王贵文, 柴旭荣. 黄土高原气象干旱和农业干旱特征及其相互关系研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 2105-2114.
[2]	李明, 胡炜霞, 王贵文, 柴旭荣, 张莲芝. 基于Copula函数的中国东部季风区干旱风险研究[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(3): 506-515.
[3]	余方琳, 翟石艳, 王铮, 宋根鑫, 李亚婷, 贺楠. 基于SPI的1960~2012年西南地区水稻生长季干旱时空特征分析[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(5): 808-817.
[4]	冯波, 章光新, 李峰平. 松花江流域季节性气象干旱特征及风险区划研究[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(3): 466-474.
[5]	卢洪健, 莫兴国, 孟德娟, 刘苏峡. 气候变化背景下东北地区气象干旱的时空演变特征[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(8): 1051-1059.
[6]	叶正伟. 基于SPI的江苏沿海开发地区旱涝演变特征分析——以盐城市为例[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(4): 479-487.
[7]	孙鹏, 张强, 刘剑宇, 邓晓宇, 白云岗, 张江辉. 新疆近半个世纪以来季节性干旱变化特征及其影响研究[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(11): 1377-1384.
[8]	刘占明, 陈子燊. 广东北江流域前汛期降水与全球海温及遥相关的相关性研究[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(10): 1239-1246.
[9]	杨建平, 丁永建, 陈仁升, 刘俊峰. 亚洲季风与中国干湿、农牧气候界线之关系[J]. 地理科学, 2005, 25(4): 441-447.
[10]	郝永萍, 方小敏, 奚晓霞, 胡双熙, 管东红. 柴达木盆地东缘晚更新世气候变化的(古)土壤发生记录[J]. 地理科学, 1998, 18(3): 249-254.
[11]	钱步东. 我国汛期降水与ENSO不同位相的联系[J]. 地理科学, 1996, 16(1): 3-9.