都市圈旅游空间结构演变研究——以长三角都市圈为例

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2012.05.570

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

旅游空间结构演变研究,对优化都市圈旅游空间结构、促进都市圈整体旅游地形成和发挥都市圈旅游空间效应与功能有重要意义。以旅游人数和旅游收入为指标,利用赫芬达尔指数和位序—规模模型进行分析,并结合长三角都市圈旅游发展实际考察其旅游空间结构演变态势。结果表明,长三角都市圈旅游者和旅游收入空间分布趋向分散,各城市旅游发展相对差异不断缩小,其旅游发展趋向均衡化。长三角都市圈旅游发展实际也显示,其旅游空间结构呈现多中心、网络化和一体化特点。从长期来看,长三角都市圈旅游空间结构演变趋向高水平均衡。借鉴空间相互作用理论,认为以可达性、互补性和替代性为必要条件,以集聚和扩散作用为主要形式,以资金、技术、人员、信息和经验等的流动为主要内容,各城市旅游空间相互作用推动了都市圈旅游空间结构不断由低水平均衡向高水平均衡演变。旅游企业扩张和旅游客流流动带动了旅游资金、技术、人员、信息和经验等的集聚和扩散,推动了都市圈旅游空间结构演变。

关键词: 都市圈, 旅游空间结构演变, 长三角

Abstract:

It is significant to optimize spatial structure and promote tourism destination building of metropolitan tourism by studying tourism spatial structure evolution of metropolitan area, which have an important meaning in playing the function and spatial effects of metropolis tourism. The article, based on the data of tourist number and tourism revenue, using Herfindal index and model of regression analysis of rank-size, studys the evolution of tourism spatial structure evolution of Changjiang River delta metropolitan area. The result demonstrates that the q value of Changjiang River delta metropolitan area decreases from 1999 to 2008. The q value of inbound tourism decreases from 1.861 to 1.438 in 1999-2008. The q value of domestic tourism decreases from 1.155 to 0.779, smaller than 1 after 2003. Also its Herfindal index value of inbound tourism decreases from 0.371 to 0.237 and domestic tourism decreases from 0.219 to 0.105. Only the value of domestic tourism Herfindal index in 2000 is greater than year of 1999. It shows that the density of tourist number and tourism income of domestic tourism is smaller than inbound tourism. So the relative disparity of tourism development among cities is shrinking and tourism development tends to equilibrium in Changjiang River delta metropolitan area. In fact, the tourism development is multi-centered, networked, integrated and balanced, and tends to high-level equalization in the Changjiang River delta metropolitan area. Then we discuss its evolution mechanism of tourism spatial structure using the theory of tourism space interaction. It considers that the evolution of tourism spatial structure of metropolitan area may experience such processes as low-level equalization, concentration, diffusion and high-level equalization from the earlier to late period. In this periods, the tourism space interaction play an important role, and the accessibility, complementary and alternative provide necessary conditions for the tourism space interaction among cities of metropolitan area. As main forms of the tourism space interaction, the accumulation and diffusion of tourism finance, technology, personnel, information and experience and other factors promote the evolution tourism spatial structure of metropolitan area from low-level equalization to the high-level equalization. Finally, this article explores the mechanism of tourism spatial structure evolution of metropolitan area from the view of the expansion of tourism enterprises and spatial behavior of tourists which play an important role in evolution of tourism spatial structure of metropolitan area wholly.

Key words: metropolitan area, tourism spatial structure evolution, Changjiang River Delta

中图分类号:

F592.99

朱付彪, 陆林, 於冉, 鲍捷. 都市圈旅游空间结构演变研究——以长三角都市圈为例[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(5): 570-576.

Fu-biao ZHU, Lin LU, Ran YU, Jie BAO. Tourism Spatial Structure Evolution of Metropolitan Area: A Case Study of Changjiang River Delta Metropolitan Area[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2012, 32(5): 570-576.

图/表 3

表1

图1

图2

参考文献 40

[1]	陈浩,陆林,章锦河,等.珠江三角洲城市群旅游空间结构与优化分析[J].地理科学,2008,28(1):113~118.
[2]	WENG Jin, YANG Kaizhong.Spatial structure of tourism system: spatial model for monopolistic competition with asymmetry[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2007, 27(2): 76-82.
[3]	Shih Hsin-Yu.Network characteristics of drive tourism destinations: an application of network analysis in tourism[J]. Tourism Management, 2006, 27(5): 1029-1039.
[4]	吴国清. 都市旅游圈空间结构的生成与网络化发展[J].中国软科学,2009,(3):100~108,125.
[5]	Chang Chia-Lin, Sriboonchitta Songsak, Wiboonpongse Aree.Modelling and forecasting tourism from East Asia to Thailand under temporal and spatial aggregation[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2009, 79(5): 1730-1744.
[6]	Sophie Masson, Romain Petiot.Can the high speed rail reinforce tourism attractiveness? The case of the high speed rail between Perpignan (France) and Barcelona (Spain)[J]. Technovation, 2009, 29(9): 611-617.
[7]	Khadaroo Jameel, Seetanah Boopen.The role of transport infrastructure in international tourism development: A gravity model approach[J]. Tourism Management, 2008, 29(5):831-840.
[8]	李立华,何毓成.青藏铁路对西藏旅游的影响分析[J].山地学报,2006,24(5):628~635.
[9]	南宇,杨阿莉.西北丝绸之路区重点旅游城市梯度开发研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(9):161~167.
[10]	聂献忠,张捷,章锦河,等.一体化旅游区(ITR) 空间发展战略——以长江三角洲旅游区为例[J].地理科学,2006,26(12):755~763.
[11]	李山, 王铮.旅游业区域溢出的可计算模型及案例[J].旅游学刊, 2009, 24(7):18~26.
[12]	Vasiliadis C H A. Kobotis A. Spatial analysis-an application of nearest-neighbour analysis to tourism locations in Macedonia[J]. Tourism Management, 1999, 20(1): 141-148.
[13]	吴玉鸣. 考虑空间效应的中国省域旅游产业弹性估计[J].旅游学刊,2010,25(8):18~25.
[14]	Hwang Yeong-Hyeon, Gretzel Ulrike, Fesenmaier Daniel R.Multicity trip patterns: tourists to the United States[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2006, 33(4): 1057-1078.
[15]	Marrocu Emanuela, Paci Raffaele.They arrive with new information. Tourism flows and production efficiency in the European regions[J]. Tourism Management, 2011, 32(4): 750-758.
[16]	钟士恩,张捷,韩国圣,等.旅游流空间模式基本理论:问题分析及其展望[J].人文地理,2010,25(2):31~36.
[17]	陈秀琼,黄福才.中国入境旅游的区域差异特征分析[J].地理学报,2006,61(12):1271~1280.
[18]	朱竑,吴旗韬.中国省际及主要旅游城市旅游规模[J].地理学报,2005,60(6):919~927.
[19]	苑涛,何秉宇,吴良飞.新疆旅游经济非均衡演变的时空特征分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2007,21(4):123~126.
[20]	卞显红,沙润.长江三角洲城市旅游空间结构形成的产业机理——基于旅游企业空间区位选择视角[J].人文地理,2008,23(6):106~112.
[21]	薛领, 翁瑾. 我国区域旅游空间结构演化的微观机理与动态模拟研究[J].旅游学刊,2010,25(8): 26~33.
[22]	薛普文. 区域经济成长与区域结构的演变[J].地理科学,1988,8(4):379~384.
[23]	黄金火,吴必虎.区域旅游系统空间结构的模式与优化——以西安地区为例[J].地理科学进展, 2005,24(1):116~126.
[24]	陈志军. 区域旅游空间结构演化模式分析——以江西省为例[J].旅游学刊,2008,23(11):35~41.
[25]	戈冬梅,吴玉鸣.江西旅游规模差异及其位序规模体系分析[J].旅游学刊,2008,23(9):44~48.
[26]	王凯,李华,贺曲夫.我国旅游经济发展水平省际差异的空间分析[J].地域研究与开发,2007,26(1):63~67,94.
[27]	黎筱筱,马晓龙,吴必虎.中国优秀旅游城市空间分布及其动力机制研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(5):120~124.
[28]	乌铁红,张捷, 李文杰,等.中国入境旅游经济发展水平的空间格局演变及成因——基于入境旅游经济区位商的分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(5):189~194.
[29]	朱付彪,陆林.珠江三角洲都市圈旅游空间均衡发展[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(9):1565~1576
[30]	陈浩,陆林,郑嬗婷.基于旅游流的城市群旅游地旅游空间网络结构分析——以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J].地理学报,2011,66(2):257~266.
[31]	马晓龙,保继刚.中国主要城市旅游效率的区域差异与空间格局[J].人文地理,2010,25(1):105~110,99.
[32]	杨建明. 中国旅游业发展空间差异的综合评判[J].地理科学,2009,29(4):613~618.
[33]	黄静波. 湖南省旅游中心地空间结构系统的构建与优化[J].旅游学刊,2008, 23(2):51~55.
[34]	黄耀丽,李凡,郑坚强,等.珠江三角洲城市旅游竞争力空间结构体系初探[J].地理研究,2006,25(4): 730~740.
[35]	陈淑兰. 中部六省旅游发展综合评价及空间结构系统构建[J].经济地理,2009,29(2):327~331.
[36]	国家统计局国际统计信息中心.长江和珠江三角洲及港澳台统计年鉴2009[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2009.
[37]	中华人民共和国国家旅游局.中国旅游统计年鉴: 2009[M].北京:中国旅游出版社, 2009.
[38]	Geoffrey Wall.Tourism attractions: points, lines, and areas[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,1997,24(1): 240-243.
[39]	Ullman E L.American commodity flow [M]. Seattle: University of Washington Press,1957.
[40]	国家旅游局政策法规司,国家统计局城市社会经济调查司,国家统计局农村社会经济调查司.旅游抽样调查资料2009[M].北京:中国旅游出版社,2009.

项目	年份	回归方程	q	相关系数（R）	F(sig.)
入境旅游	1999	lnP_i=5.651-1.861lnP_i	1.861	0.973	252.994 (0.000)
	2000	lnP_i=5.583-1.886lnP_i	1.886	0.964	184.827 (0.000)
	2001	lnP_i=5.872-1.767lnP_i	1.767	0.964	184.127 (0.000)
	2002	lnP_i=6.095-1.708lnP_i	1.708	0.951	131.540 (0.000)
	2003	lnP_i=5.950-1.611lnP_i	1.611	0.977	291.145 (0.000)
	2004	lnP_i=6.398-1.630lnP_i	1.630	0.977	296.036 (0.000)
	2005	lnP_i=6.575-1.606lnP_i	1.606	0.967	204.738 (0.000)
	2006	lnP_i=6.691-1.574lnP_i	1.574	0.955	144.667 (0.000)
	2007	lnP_i=6.778-1.531lnP_i	1.531	0.953	137.680 (0.000)
	2008	lnP_i=6.698-1.438lnP_i	1.438	0.959	160.457 (0.000)
国内旅游	1999	lnP_i=8.697-1.155lnP_i	1.155	0.982	382.331(0.000)
	2000	lnP_i=8.735-1.107lnP_i	1.107	0.984	441.053 (0.000)
	2001	lnP_i=8.832-1.079lnP_i	1.079	0.989	603.935 (0.000)
	2002	lnP_i=8.902-1.000lnP_i	1.000	0.980	335.407 (0.000)
	2003	lnP_i=8.898-0.963lnP_i	0.963	0.979	321.892 (0.000)
	2004	lnP_i=9.032-0.924lnP_i	0.924	0.972	243.961(0.000)
	2005	lnP_i=9.117-0.878lnP_i	0.878	0.967	201.821 (0.000)
	2006	lnP_i=9.213-0.852lnP_i	0.852	0.964	183.553 (0.000)
	2007	lnP_i=9.304-0.820lnP_i	0.820	0.963	177.030 (0.000)
	2008	lnP_i=9.363-0.779lnP_i	0.779	0.960	165.639 (0.000)