黄土高原沟谷密度空间分异特征研究

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2013.05.622

地理科学 ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 622-628.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2013.05.622

黄土高原沟谷密度空间分异特征研究

田剑^1,²(), 汤国安¹(), 周毅³, 宋效东¹

1. 南京师范大学虚拟地理环境教育部重点实验室, 江苏南京 210046
2. 合肥工业大学资源与环境工程学院, 安徽合肥 230009
3. 陕西师范大学旅游与环境学院, 陕西西安 710062

收稿日期:2012-06-27 修回日期:2012-09-20 出版日期:2013-05-20 发布日期:2013-05-20
作者简介:
作者简介：田剑（1982-）,男,安徽庐江人,博士研究生,主要从事GIS与数字地形分析。E-mail：tianjian.1999@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40930531,41101365,41001294)、“资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室”开放基金项目（92010KF0002SA）资助

Spatial Variation of Gully Density in the Loess Plateau

Jian TIAN^1,²(), Guo-an TANG¹(), Yi ZHOU³, Xiao-dong SONG¹

1. Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment, Ministry of Education, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210046, China
2.School of Resources and Environment Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China
3. College of Tourism and Environment, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710062, China

Received:2012-06-27 Revised:2012-09-20 Online:2013-05-20 Published:2013-05-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以5 m分辨率DEM为信息源,借助样方分析思想,运用数字地形分析方法和克里格插值模型,获得黄土高原全区的沟谷密度分布图。在此基础上,探讨黄土高原沟谷的空间分异特征及影响因素。实验结果表明,黄土高原沟谷密度空间分异明显,沟谷密度在陕北的绥德-米脂一带达到高峰,由北向南递减。以六盘山和吕梁山为界,沟谷密度有三种变化特征,六盘山以西地区,沟谷密度较低且变化平稳,六盘山以东吕梁山以西地区的沟谷密度由北向南呈现梯度显著下降变化,吕梁山以东地区,沟谷密度呈现起伏变化,沟谷密度值分布在1.7~6.4 km/km²范围内。在宏观上,由陇西盆地、鄂尔多斯地台和汾渭裂谷等地质构造控制沟谷空间分布态势;降雨强度因素对沟谷侵蚀作用显著,加剧了沟谷密度空间分异特征;植被条件和地面组成物质呈现由西北向东南变化制约着沟谷发育。土壤侵蚀方面,沟谷密度与输沙模数空间耦合性较强,存在明显的正相关。

关键词: 黄土高原, DEM, 沟谷密度, 空间分异

Abstract:

Gully density is used to describe the intensity of regional soil erosion and landform development, which is significant to understand the spatial pattern and formation mechanism of loess landforms by analyzing the spatial distribution. According to the principal of quadrat analysis, this article represent a series of maps revealing the spatial distribution of gully density in the Loess Plateau through digital terrain analysis method and Kriging interpolation model, as well as 5 m×5 m DEM data sets. The spatial variation characteristics of gully in the Loess Plateau were investigated. Moreover, some controlling factors on gully development were explored, and relationship between gully density and soil erosion was revealed. Results showed that the spatial variation feature of gully density was obvious, and gully density reached the peak in region of Suide-Mizhi in northern Shaanxi, then, it decreased from north to south in the Loess Plateau. On the macroscopic, the distribution trend of gully was controlled by geological structure so that it was classified into three parts. To the west of the Liupan Mountains as the first part, its value was low with smooth changes. The second part located in the middle and southern parts of the Loess Plateau to the east of the Liupan Mountains, the west of the Luliang Mountains, and its value decreased in gradient from north to south. To the east of the Luliang Mountains as the third part, its value ranged from 1.7 to 6.4 km/km²with fluctuant change. Rainfall intensity was rather significant for spatial variability of gully erosion, which was coupled with the diversification of gully density in space. In addition, vegetation condition and composition of ground material in the Loess Plateau varied from northwest to southeast, which influenced gully development. Gully density was positively and strongly correlated with the sediment transport modulus in the soil erosion in spatial, especially for regions of the middle Loess Plateau, indicating it is an important factor reflecting the capacity of gully erosion. In conclusion, gully density was significantly indicative on understanding the spatial pattern of loess landform.

Key words: the Loess Plateau, DEM, gully density, spatial variation

中图分类号:

P931.6

田剑, 汤国安, 周毅, 宋效东. 黄土高原沟谷密度空间分异特征研究[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(5): 622-628.

Jian TIAN, Guo-an TANG, Yi ZHOU, Xiao-dong SONG. Spatial Variation of Gully Density in the Loess Plateau[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2013, 33(5): 622-628.

图/表 7

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 22

[1]	罗来兴. 划分晋西、陕北、陇东黄土区域沟间地与沟谷的地貌类型[J].地理学报,1956, 22(03): 201-222.
[2]	张宗祜. 我国黄土高原区域地质地貌特征及现代侵蚀作用[J].地质学报, 1981, (4): 308-320.
[3]	陈永宗. 黄河中游黄土丘陵区的沟谷类型[J].地理科学,1984, 4(4): 321-327.
[4]	汤国安,刘学军,闾国年,等.数字高程模型及地学分析的原理与方法[M].北京:科学出版社, 2005.
[5]	Cotton C A.The control of drainage density[J].N.Z.J.Geol.Geophys,1964,7(2):348-352.
[6]	Madduma Bandara C M.Drainage density and effective precipitation[J].J.Hydrol.,1974, 21(2):187-190.
[7]	Oguchi T.Drainage density and relative relief in humid steep mountains with frequent slope failure[J].Earth Surf. Processes Landforms,1997,22(2):107-120.
[8]	Tucker G E,Bras R L.Hillslope processes,drainage density and landscape morphology[J].Water Resour.Res,1998,34(10):2751-2764.
[9]	Tucker G E,F Catani.Statistical analysis of drainage density from digital terrain data[J].Geomorphology,2001 36(3-4):187-202.
[10]	陈渭南. 黄土梁峁地区影响黄土侵蚀的地貌条件分析[J].地理科学,1988,8(4):323-329.
[11]	陈渭南. 无定河流域黄土区地貌要素之统计特征及其趋势面与聚类分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,1989,3(4): 21-32.
[12]	景可. 黄土高原沟谷侵蚀研究[J].地理科学,1986, 6(4):340-347.
[13]	闾国年,钱亚东,陈钟明.黄土丘陵沟壑区沟谷网络自动制图技术研究[J].测绘学报,1998,27(2):131-137.
[14]	张婷,汤国安,王春.黄土丘陵沟壑区地形定量因子的关联性分析[J].地理科学,2005,25(4): 467-472.
[15]	闫业超,张树文,岳书平.克拜东部黑土区侵蚀沟遥感分类与空间格局分析[J].地理科学,2007,27(2):193-919.
[16]	李郎平,陆化煜.黄土高原25万年以来粉尘堆积与侵蚀的定律估算[J].地理学报,2010,65(1):37-52.
[17]	李俊,汤国安,张婷,等.利用DEM 提取陕北黄土高原沟谷网络的汇流阈值研究[J].水土保持通报, 2007,27(2):75-78.
[18]	赵明伟,汤国安,李发源.黄土塬区DEM水文分析中消除地面伪沟谷的方法[J].中国水土保持,2011,(8):36-38.
[19]	陈永宗,景可,蔡强国.黄土高原现代侵蚀与治理[M].北京:科学出版社,1988.
[20]	石淑芹,陈佑启,李正国,等.基于空间插值分析的指标空间化及吉林省玉米种植区划研究[J].地理科学,2011,31(4):408-411.
[21]	朱求安,张万昌,赵登忠.基于PRISM和泰森多边形的地形要素日降水量空间插值研究[J].地理科学, 2005,25(2):233-238.
[22]	李晓燕,张树文,王宗明,等.吉林省德惠市土壤特性空间变异特征与格局[J].地理学报,2004,59(6):989-997.

编号	计算值（km/km²）	预测值（km/km²）	预测误差	相对误差（%）
1	7.24	8.38	-1.14	15.75
2	9.78	10.91	-1.13	11.55
3	9.69	8.7	0.99	10.21
4	8.04	9.02	-0.98	12.19
5	4.02	4.08	-0.06	1.49
6	4.7	3.89	0.81	17.23
7	5.9	3.84	2.06	34.91
8	6.38	6.44	-0.06	0.94
9	8.8	8.11	0.69	7.84
10	3.2	3.6	-0.4	12.5

黄土高原沟谷密度空间分异特征研究

Spatial Variation of Gully Density in the Loess Plateau

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	辛晓华, 吕拉昌. 中国主要城市技术创新影响环境污染的空间分异与机理[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 129-139.
[2]	王兆峰, 刘庆芳. 产业融合背景下运动休闲特色小镇的空间分异及形成因素[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1310-1318.
[3]	汪言在, 董一帆, 刘目兴, 王勇. 土壤理化性质空间分布及其相关关系分析[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(7): 1191-1201.
[4]	郭政, 陈爽, 姚士谋, 熊传合. 肯尼亚交通优势度及其空间分异格局分析[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 956-964.
[5]	姜洪强, 梅林, 杨立青. 中国淘宝店铺服务质量空间分异及影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(3): 428-436.
[6]	周毅, 王泽涛, 杨锋. 基于DEM的黄土沟谷横剖面形态特征研究——以宜君、延安、绥德为例[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(3): 455-465.
[7]	吕敏娟, 曹小曙. 黄土高原地区乡村性空间特征及其与可达性格局关系[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(2): 248-260.
[8]	尤南山, 董金玮, 肖桐, 刘纪远, Xiao Xiangming. 退耕还林还草工程对黄土高原植被总初级生产力的影响[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(2): 315-323.
[9]	谭雪兰,蒋凌霄,米胜渊,欧阳巧玲,王振凯,安悦. 湖南省县域乡村反贫困绩效评价与空间分异特征[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(6): 938-946.
[10]	李敏纳,程叶青,蔡舒,周春山. 国际旅游岛建设以来海南省产业空间分异格局及其驱动机制[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(6): 967-977.
[11]	肖妮,黄悦,刘继生. 中国本土主题公园旅游体验质量评价及空间分异特征研究[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(6): 978-986.
[12]	张杰, 唐根年. 浙江省制造业空间分异格局及其影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(7): 1107-1117.
[13]	王彬燕, 田俊峰, 程利莎, 浩飞龙, 韩翰, 王士君. 中国数字经济空间分异及影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(6): 859-868.
[14]	张蕾. 1999~2013年长三角主要空港经济区产业结构与空间分异特征研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(5): 699-707.
[15]	郑德凤, 郝帅, 孙才志. 基于DEA-ESDA的农业生态效率评价及时空分异研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(3): 419-427.