地理科学 ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 1361-1368.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.011.1361

• • 上一篇    下一篇

基于Ripley’s K函数浙江城市空间格局及其影响分析

葛莹(), 朱国慧, 王华辰, 赵慧慧   

  1. 河海大学地球科学与工程学院,江苏 南京 210098
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-18 修回日期:2013-10-28 出版日期:2014-11-10 发布日期:2014-11-10
  • 作者简介:

    作者简介:葛 莹(1963-),女,浙江慈溪人,教授,主要从事GIS与区位理论研究。E-mail: geying@hhu.edu.cn

  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(41071347)、地理空间信息工程国家测绘局重点实验室经费资助项目(201005)资助

Pattern and Impact of Urban Spatial Distribution in Zhejiang Province Based on Ripley’s K Function

Ying GE(), Guo-hui ZHU, Hua-chen WANG, Hui-hui ZHAO   

  1. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • Received:2013-04-18 Revised:2013-10-28 Online:2014-11-10 Published:2014-11-10

摘要:

以Ripley′s K函数为核心,通过城市区位与规模联立估计、地理权重引入、全局函数分解等手段,研究2001~2010年浙江省已有县级及以上城市空间分布的总体及局部估计问题,探讨城市空间格局与特征,以期揭示边界效应和市场潜力对浙江城市空间格局的影响机理。结果表明: 浙江省城市区位与规模的空间格局不一致,即前者是分散分布而后者是集聚分布,且随着空间尺度的增加,其分散或集聚程度逐步加强。 无论是行政边界还是海岸线,对浙江省城市区位与规模的空间分布演化有一定的负向作用。空间尺度越大,边界负效应越强。 在城市化发展过程中,浙江形成了3个各具产业特色的块状组团式城市聚集区,但边界负效应会抑制它们的发展,此时杭州、宁波将承担起服务全省经济的重要职责。 浙江城市规模因受市场潜力因素的影响会出现空间分布不均衡性。城市规模与市场潜力显著正相关,其程度却随着空间尺度的增加而减小。

关键词: 城市空间分布格局, Ripley′s K函数, 边界效应, 市场潜力, 浙江省

Abstract:

This article considers 3 different constructions of Ripley’s K function to deal with the global and local measure of urban spatial distribution in a particular area. Specifically, the first one allows us to identify and measure the distribution pattern of city location and size over space. By incorporating a geography-weighted variable into the K function, the second one may better capture the importance of border effects on the urban distribution disparities across regions. The third one decomposes the K function into the contribution of each individual observation, and provides the suggestion of spatial regimes on city distribution. Based on these three kinds of K function form, we investigate the spatial characteristics of city distribution at the county level in Zhejiang Province, given the population data and per capita income data between 2001 and 2010. The results are as follows. 1) The spatial distributions of city location are not inconsistent with those of city size in Zhejiang Province during this period. That is to say, the location distribution of Zhejiang’s cities has been more dispersed while the size distribution has been more concentrated across space at geographical scales over time. 2) In terms of provincial boundaries and coastlines, the border effects have negative impacts on the spatial distributions of both city location and city size. The negative border effects increase with geographical scale. 3) In the dynamic process of Zhejiang urbanization, three mass-clusters of urban accumulative regions with individual industrial characteristics can be found. However, the negative border effects would limit to the exposition of these urban accumulative regions. In this way, Hangzhou and Ningbo might have a public service responsibility to provide assistance for the whole province. 4) The uneven distributions of city sizes in Zhejiang Province might have been influenced by its market potential, that is to say, its city sizes positively related to market potential, and the growth rate of city population is less than that of market potential at geographical scales.

Key words: pattern of urban spatial distribution, Ripley’s K function, border effect, market potential, Zhejiang Province

中图分类号: 

  • K902