华南老红砂沉积年代学及其环境意义：以福建青峰老红砂为例

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.02.017

地理科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 301-310.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.02.017

华南老红砂沉积年代学及其环境意义：以福建青峰老红砂为例

靳建辉^1,^2,³(), 李志忠^1,^2,³(), 雷国良^1,^2,³, 凌智永⁴, 姜锋², 申健玲², 刘秀铭^1,^2,³

1. 福建师范大学地理研究所,福建福州 350007
2. 福建师范大学地理科学学院,福建福州 350007
3. 湿润亚热带生态地理过程教育部重点实验室,福建福州 350007
4. 中国科学院青海盐湖研究所,青海西宁 810008

收稿日期:2016-01-05 修回日期:2016-04-20 出版日期:2017-02-25 发布日期:2017-02-25
作者简介:
作者简介：靳建辉（1981-）,男,山西陵川人,博士,讲师,主要从事海岸风沙地貌和OSL年代学研究。E-mail: geojjh@fjnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41301012,41271031）;国家自然科学基金委员会-福建省人民政府促进海峡两岸科技合作联合基金（U1405231）资助

Chronology and Environmental Significance of Old Red Sand in South China：Take the Old Red Sand in Qingfeng, Fujian as An Example

Jianhui Jin^1,^2,³(), Zhizhong Li^1,^2,³(), Guoliang Lei^1,^2,³, Zhiyong Ling⁴, Feng Jiang², Jianling Shen², Xiuming Liu^1,^2,³

1.Institute of Geography, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007,Fujian,China
2.School of Geography Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, Fujian,China
3. Key Laboratory of Humid Subtropical Ecosystem and Geography, Ministry of Education, Fuzhou 350007, Fujian,China
4.Qinghai Institute of Salt Lake, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008,Qinghai,China

Received:2016-01-05 Revised:2016-04-20 Online:2017-02-25 Published:2017-02-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41301012, 41271031), NSFC-Fujian Province Untied Foundation(U1405231)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对福建海坛岛青峰老红砂进行了系统的光释光测年研究,结合已发表的相关测年数据,在统一的时间标尺上探讨了老红砂发育过程及其与海平面变化和东亚季风变化之间的关系。结果表明：① QFS剖面沉积年龄为110~33 ka,起始发育年龄延伸到了末次间冰期。主要涵盖了MIS5c~MIS3阶段,其中存在4个快速堆积期。结合已发表的年代学数据进行综合分析,认为前人得出的老红砂发育在末次冰期以来的结论需要得到修正。② 华南老红砂发育过程与区域海平面变化密切相关。在末次间冰期和末次冰期均有发育,高海面（>-50 m）或较高海面（-50~-70 m）时期是老红砂普遍发育期。区域地壳运动叠加海平面变化造成闽南和闽东北老红砂的沉积差异：海退过程中的较高海面时期北部先发生快速堆积;海侵过程中的较高海面时期南部先发生快速堆积。LGM（海平面<-70 m）期,老红砂不发育。③ 老红砂在冰期-间冰期尺度上的沉积速率体现了源区气候和海平面变化对老红砂物源输送的双重制约。

关键词: 老红砂, OSL测年, 环境剂量率, 海平面

Abstract:

In this article, luminescence chronology of ‘Old Red Sand’(ORS) in Haitan Island are discussed in Fujian Province. Combined with the published OSL data, the development process of ORS and the relationship between the process and the change of sea-level and East Asia Monsoon(EAM) are discussed on the standard chronology. The results show that, the development age of QFS section is 110-33 ka, of which the initial development age extend to the Last Interglacial period which mainly covers Marine Isotope Stage(MIS)5c-MIS3, and there are 4 stages of rapid accumulation. We hold opinion that the conclusions of other researches, who consider ORS is the aeolian sediment since the last glacial period, should be corrected. 2) The development process of ORS in South China is closely tied with the change of regional sea-level. ORS of South China is broadly forming at the Last Interglacial period and the Last glacial period, of which high (the height of sea-level is between -70 m and -50 m) or higher(the height of sea-level is more than -50 m) sea-level is one of important premises. Synthetic impact of regional crustal uplift and sea-level change creates the diversity of sedimentary rate of ORS of South China: there is a rapid accumulation in upstate firstly at the high or higher sea-level period of the regressive process, and there is a rapid accumulation in south area firstly at the high or higher sea-level period of the process of marine transgression. At the same time, its a remarkable face that the sediment is absent at the period of Last Glacial Maximum(LGM) (the height of sea-level is under -70 m ). 3) The depth-age pattern of ORS reflects not merely the control action of solar radiation on east Asian winter monsoon but also the change of global ice volume which is the response of solar radiation. 4) The variation of ORS material source of South China are changed with glacial-interglacial cycle, and the main part of ORS is the regional response to the global climate change, especially the East Asia Winter Monsoon(EAWM), meanwhile there are secondary response process of global sea-level change and regional structure. Sedimentary rate of ORS mainly embodied the double restriction of climate and sea level changes on conveying of material source.

Key words: Old Red Sand, OSL dating, dose rate, sea-level

中图分类号:

P534.63

靳建辉, 李志忠, 雷国良, 凌智永, 姜锋, 申健玲, 刘秀铭. 华南老红砂沉积年代学及其环境意义：以福建青峰老红砂为例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(2): 301-310.

Jianhui Jin, Zhizhong Li, Guoliang Lei, Zhiyong Ling, Feng Jiang, Jianling Shen, Xiuming Liu. Chronology and Environmental Significance of Old Red Sand in South China：Take the Old Red Sand in Qingfeng, Fujian as An Example[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2017, 37(2): 301-310.

图/表 6

图1

图2

表1

QFS老红砂剖面光释光测年结果"

采样点	埋深 (m)	测片数	U （μg/g）	Th （μg/g）	K (％)	含水量 (％)	环境剂量率 (Gy/ka)	等效剂量 (Gy)	年龄^a （ka)	年龄^b （ka）	年龄^c （ka）
QFS-2	1	14	2.11	11.1	1.2	8.56	2.57	86.87±3.75	33.79±3.68	79.70±3.44	31.79±1.37
QFS-3	2	13	1.93	10	1.06	6.08	2.33	102.88±6.95	44.14±5.33	94.63±6.38	37.64±2.54
QFS-4	3	13	0.93	4.86	0.95	4.52	1.61	137.40±14.29	85.30±12.31	126.06±13.11	50.27±5.23
QFS-5	4	14	0.90	4.86	1.05	3.42	1.68	86.50±1.61	51.35±5.22	79.36±1.48	31.65±0.59
QFS-6	5	14	1.28	7.38	1.24	6.76	2.09	141.28±4.68	67.51±7.11	129.61±4.29	51.69±1.71
QFS-7	5.5	16	1.29	7.60	1.14	4.95	2.03	139.55±2.43	68.68±6.97	128.03±2.23	51.06±0.89
QFS-8	6.5	15	1.38	7.51	1.07	7.20	1.94	144.63±6.94	74.44±8.26	132.69±6.37	52.92±2.54
QFS-9	7.7	15	1.14	5.24	1.15	3.42	1.82	209.80±10.24	115.02±12.80	192.48±9.39	76.77±3.75
QFS-10	8.5	15	0.93	4.13	1.30	2.46	1.84	140.52±13.60	76.53±10.65	128.92±12.48	51.42±4.98
QFS-11	9.6	15	1.98	14.50	1.51	6.58	2.98	204.43±18.19	68.59±9.18	187.55±16.69	74.80±6.66
QFS-12	9.6	15	0.88	5.19	1.23	6.18	1.80	162.02±7.04	90.16±9.83	148.64±6.46	59.28±2.58
QFS-13	10.6	15	0.95	5.95	1.62	5.05	2.25	185.80±3.52	82.73±8.42	170.46±3.32	67.98±1.29
QFS-14	11.6	15	0.59	4.03	1.18	3.76	1.61	155.14±15.52	96.52±13.65	142.33±14.24	56.77±5.68
QFS-15	13.2	15	0.54	3.41	1.07	1.61	1.45	133.22±3.17	92.10±9.47	122.22±2.91	48.74±1.16
QFS-16	14.4	15	0.97	5.05	1.25	2.93	1.83	158.24±7.43	86.28±9.53	145.17±6.82	57.90±2.72
QFS-17	15.4	15	0.70	3.98	1.34	2.72	1.78	179.12±6.97	100.73±10.81	164.33±6.39	65.54±2.55
QFS-18	16.4	15	0.81	4.20	1.18	3.05	1.66	168.10±19.86	101.08±15.65	154.22±18.22	61.51±7.27
QFS-19	17.4	15	0.78	4.14	1.14	样干	1.61	173.13±7.75	107.57±11.79	158.83±6.94	63.35±2.77
QFS-20	18.2	15	1.19	6.68	1.25	样干	2.00	209.42±11.35	104.81±11.92	192.13±10.41	76.63±4.15
QFS-21	19.1	15	0.68	4.67	1.09	样干	1.57	173.49±5.27	110.31±11.53	159.17±4.83	63.55±1.93

表1

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 27

[1]	王根绪, 丁永建, 王建, 等. 近15年来长江黄河源区的土地覆被变化[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(2): 163-173. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2004.02.001
	[Wang Genxu, Ding Yongjian, Wang Jian et al. Land ecological changes and evolutional patterns in the source regions of the Yangtze and Yellow rivers in recent 15 years. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(2): 163-173.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2004.02.001
[2]	邵全琴, 樊江文. 三江源区生态系统综合监测与评估[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012.
	[Shao Quanqin, Fan Jiangwen.Integrated monitoring and evaluation of ecosystem in the Three Rivers Headwaters Region. Beijing: Science Press, 2012.]
[3]	罗小勇, 唐文坚. 长江源生态环境问题及其防治对策[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2003, 20(1): 47-49, 59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2003.01.014
	[Luo Xiaoyong, Tang Wenjian.Eco-environmental problems at source area of Yangtze River and countermeasures for their prevention and treatment. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2003, 20(1): 47-49, 59.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2003.01.014
[4]	杨建平, 丁永建, 陈仁升. 长江黄河源区高寒植被变化的NDVI记录[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(3): 467-478. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2005.03.013
	[Yang Jianping, Ding Yongjian, Chen Rensheng.NDVI reflection of alpine vegetation changes in the source regions of the Yangtze and Yellow rivers. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(3): 467-478.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2005.03.013
[5]	Liu Jiyuan, Xu Xinliang, Shao Quanqin.Grassland degradation in the "Three-River Headwaters" region, Qinghai Province. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2008, 18(3): 259-273. doi: 10.1007/s10499-007-9164-4
[6]	王根绪, 郭晓寅, 程国栋. 黄河源区景观格局与生态功能的动态变化[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(10): 1587-1598. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2002.10.003
	[Wang Genxu, Guo Xiaoyin, Cheng Guodong.Dynamic variations of landscape pattern and the landscape ecological functions in the source area of the Yellow River. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 22(10): 1587-1598.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2002.10.003
[7]	国务院. 《青海三江源自然保护区生态保护和建设总体规划》[R]. 2005, 1-54.
	[The State Council.The ecological protection and construction master plan of Qinghai Sanjiangyuan Nature Reserve[R]. 2005,1-54.]
[8]	沙占江, 马海州, 李玲琴, 等. 多尺度空间分层聚类算法在土地利用与土地覆被研究中的应用[J]. 地理科学, 2004, 24(4): 477-483. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0690.2004.04.015
	[Sha Zhanjiang, Ma Haizhou, Li Lingqin et al. Application of hierarchical clustering algorithm based on multiscale space in land use and land cover study. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2004, 24(4): 477-483.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0690.2004.04.015
[9]	Geist H J, Lambin E F. What drives tropical deforestion [R]. LUCC Report Series No. 4, 2001.
[10]	于兴修, 杨桂山, 王瑶. 土地利用/覆被变化的环境效应研究进展与动向[J]. 地理科学, 2004, 24(5): 627-633. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0690.2004.05.019
	[Yu Xingxiu, Yang Guishan, Wang Yao.Advances in researches on environmental effects of land use/cover change. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2004, 24(5): 627-633.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0690.2004.05.019
[11]	邵全琴, 赵志平, 刘纪远, 等. 近30年来三江源地区土地覆被与宏观生态变化特征[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(8): 1439-1451. doi: 10.11821/yj2010080009
	[Shao Quanqin, Zhao Zhiping, Liu Jiyuan et al. The characteristics of land cover and macroscopical ecology changes in the source region of three rivers on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau during last 30 years. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(8): 1439-1451.] doi: 10.11821/yj2010080009
[12]	邴龙飞, 邵全琴, 刘纪远. 近30年黄河源头土地覆被变化特征分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2011, 13(3): 289-296. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2011.00289
	[Bing Longfei, Shao Quanqin, Liu Jiyuan.Characteristic of land cover changes in the Yellow River headwaters region over the past 30 years. Geo-information Science, 2011, 13(3): 289-296.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2011.00289
[13]	吴丹, 邵全琴. 近30年来长江源区土地覆被变化特征分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2014, 16(1): 61-69. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2014.00061
	[Wu Dan, Shao Quanqin.Characteristics of land cover change in headwaters of the Yangtze river over the past 30 years. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2014, 16(1): 61-69.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2014.00061
[14]	刘宪锋, 任志远, 林志慧, 等. 2000-2011年三江源区植被覆盖时空变化特征[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(7): 897-908.
	[Liu Xianfeng, Ren Zhiyuan, Lin Zhihui et al. The spatial-temporal changes of vegetation coverage in the Three-River Headwater region in recent 12 years[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(7): 897-908.]
[15]	Liu Xianfeng, Zhang Jinshui, Zhu Xiufang et al. Spatiotemporal changes in vegetation coverage and its driving factors in the Three-River Headwaters Region during 2000-2011[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014, 24(2): 288-302. doi: 10.1007/s11442-014-1088-0
[16]	Tong Laga, Xu Xinliang, Fu Ying et al. Wetland changes and their responses to climate change in the "Three-River headwaters'' region of China since the 1990s[J]. Energies, 2014, 7(4): 2515-2534.
[17]	刘纪远, 刘明亮, 庄大方, 等. 中国近期土地利用变化的空间格局分析[J]. 中国科学D辑, 2002, 32(12): 1031-1040. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-9267.2002.12.008
	[Liu Jiyuan, Liu Mingliang, Zhuang Dafang et al. Spatial pattern of land use change in China. Science in China:Series D, 2002, 32(12): 1031-1040.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-9267.2002.12.008
[18]	刘纪远, 张增祥, 庄大方. 中国土地利用变化的遥感时空信息研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005: 54-268.
	[Liu Jiyuan, Zhang Zengxiang, Zhuang Dafang.Research on the remote sensing information on land use change in 1990s, China. Beijing: Science Press, 2005: 54-268.]
[19]	刘纪远,布和敖斯尔.中国土地利用变化现代过程时空特征的研究—基于卫星遥感数据[J]. 第四纪研究, 2000, 20(3): 229-239. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7410.2000.03.003
	[Liu Jiyuan, Buheaosier. Study on spatial-temporal feature of modern land-use change in China:using remote sensing techniques. Quaternary Sciences, 2000, 20(3): 229-239.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7410.2000.03.003
[20]	陈浩, 赵志平. 近30年来三江源自然保护区土地覆被变化分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2009, 11(3): 390-399. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1560-8999.2009.03.019
	[Chen Hao, Zhao Zhiping.Analysis on the characteristics of land cover change in Nature reserves in the three river source region during recent 30 years. Geo-information Science, 2009, 11(3): 390-399.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1560-8999.2009.03.019
[21]	李辉霞, 刘国华, 傅伯杰. 基于NDVI的三江源地区植被生长对气候变化和人类活动的响应研究[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(19): 5495-5504.
	[Li Huixia, Liu Guohua, Fu Bojie.Response of vegetation to climate change and human activity based on NDVI in the Three-River Headwaters region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(19): 5495-5504.]
[22]	马松江. 三江源地区生态保护与建设投资项目实施效果分析——以格尔木市唐古拉山镇为例[J]. 草业科学, 2010, 27(9): 161-168.
	[Ma Songjiang.Analysis of ecosystem protection and construction projects implemented in Three-River Headwaters region-a case study in Tanggulashan Town of Geermu City.Pratacultural Science, 2010, 27(9): 161-168.]
[23]	李惠梅, 张安录. 三江源草地气候生产力对气候变化的响应[J]. 华中农业大学学报:社会科学版, 2014, 1: 124-130.
	[Li Huimei, Zhang Anlu.Response of grassland climate productivity to climate change in Sanjiangyuan regions. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2014, 1: 124-130.]
[24]	Fan Jiangwen, Shao Quanqin, Liu Jiyuan, et al.Assessment of effects of climate change and grazing activity on grassland yield in the Three Rivers Headwaters Region of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2010, 170(1/4): 571-584. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-1258-1 pmid: 20041346
[25]	徐维新, 古松, 苏文将, 等. 1971-2010年三江源地区干湿状况变化的空间特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2012, 35(1): 46-55. doi: 10.75.249.4/handle/363003/3511
	[Xu Weixin, Gu Song, Su Wenjiang et al. Spatial pattern and its variations of aridity/humidity during 1971 -2010 in Three-River Source Region on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Arid Land Geography, 2012, 35(1): 46-55.] doi: 10.75.249.4/handle/363003/3511
[26]	赵志平, 刘纪远, 邵全琴. 三江源自然保护区土地覆被变化特征分析[J]. 地理科学, 2010, 30(3): 415-420. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1560-8999.2009.03.019
	[Zhao Zhiping, Liu Jiyuan, Shao Quanqin.Characteristic analysis of land cover change in Nature reserve of three river's source regions. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2010, 30(3): 415-420.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1560-8999.2009.03.019
[27]	徐新良, 刘纪远, 邵全琴, 等. 30年来青海三江源生态系统格局和空间结构动态变化[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(4): 829-838, 974.
	[Xu Xinliang, Liu Jiyuan,Shao Quanqin et al. The dynamic changes of ecosystem spatial pattern and structure in the Three-River headwaters region in Qinghai Province during recent 30 years. Geographical Research, 2008, 27(4): 829-838, 974.]

华南老红砂沉积年代学及其环境意义：以福建青峰老红砂为例

Chronology and Environmental Significance of Old Red Sand in South China：Take the Old Red Sand in Qingfeng, Fujian as An Example

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	俞鸣同, 张红艳, 龚正权, 陈有喜, 王佳韡, 张熠, 胡绍洁, 吴惠. 福建平潭青峰老红砂中季风组分以及形成期研究[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(3): 352-357.
[2]	王远东, 侯西勇, 施平, 于良巨. 海平面上升背景下环渤海海岸敏感性研究[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(12): 1514-1523.
[3]	李加林, 王艳红, 张忍顺, 葛云健, 齐德利, 张殿发. 海平面上升的灾害效应研究——以江苏沿海低地为例[J]. 地理科学, 2006, 26(1): 87-93.
[4]	李冬环, 吴正. 浙江普陀山岛老红砂的成因与环境[J]. 地理科学, 2005, 25(6): 716-719.
[5]	欧素英, 陈子燊. 小波变换在相对海平面变化研究中的应用[J]. 地理科学, 2004, 24(3): 358-364.
[6]	黄镇国, 张伟强, 陈奇礼, 陈特固. 海平面上升对广东沿海工程设计参数的影响[J]. 地理科学, 2003, 23(1): 39-41.
[7]	杨桂山. 三峡与南水北调工程建设及海平面上升对上海城市供水水质的可能影响[J]. 地理科学, 2001, 21(2): 123-129.
[8]	黄镇国, 张伟强, 陈特固. 香港/澳门近72年海平面变化曲线[J]. 地理科学, 1999, 19(3): 282-285.
[9]	杨清书, 罗宪林. 珠江口伶仃洋海平面变化趋势研究[J]. 地理科学, 1999, 19(2): 125-127.
[10]	王建, 杨怀仁. 转换函数与南黄海13万年来海水深度的变化[J]. 地理科学, 1995, 15(4): 321-326,393.
[11]	许朋柱. 海平面上升对里下河地区洪涝灾害的影响[J]. 地理科学, 1994, 14(4): 315-323,390.
[12]	朱季文, 季子修, 蒋自巽, 杨桂山. 海平面上升对长江三角洲及邻近地区的影响[J]. 地理科学, 1994, 14(2): 109-117,199.
[13]	杨桂山. 全球海平面上升机制和趋势及其环境效应[J]. 地理科学, 1993, 13(3): 250-256,295.
[14]	任美锷. 全球气候变化及海平面上升问题研究的现状与发展趋势--为《地理科学》创刊十年而作[J]. 地理科学, 1990, 10(3): 195-207,291.
[15]	吴正, 吴克刚. 中国海岸风沙研究的进展和问题[J]. 地理科学, 1990, 10(3): 230-236,291.