地理科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 682-690.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.05.005

• • 上一篇    下一篇

长江三角洲集装箱班轮网络空间格局及其演化

潘坤友1(), 曹有挥2(), 刘可文3, 梁双波2, 魏鸿雁1   

  1. 1.盐城工学院管理学院,江苏 盐城 224051
    2.中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所,江苏 南京 210008
    3.浙江工商大学旅游与城乡规划学院,浙江 杭州310018
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-25 修回日期:2016-11-05 出版日期:2017-05-25 发布日期:2017-05-25
  • 作者简介:

    作者简介:潘坤友(1979-),男,安徽六安人,副教授,博士,主要从事港口物流与区域发展研究。E-mail:pankunyou@163.com

  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41301126,41271136,41501125)资助

Evolution and Spatial Structure of Container Liner Network in the Yangtze River Delta

Kunyou Pan1(), Youhui Cao2(), Kewen Liu3, Shuangbo Liang2, Hongyan Wei1   

  1. 1.School of Management, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, Jiangsu, China
    2.Nanjing of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, China
    3. School of Tourism and Urban-rural Planning, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2016-07-25 Revised:2016-11-05 Online:2017-05-25 Published:2017-05-25
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Sciences Foundation of China(41301126, 41271136, 41501125)

摘要:

以长江三角洲为案例区,以1996~2013年为研究期限,选取1996、2002、2007、2013年4个重点年份,分别从班轮航线、班轮密度、空间联系3个方面分析长江三角洲集装箱班轮网络的空间格局与演化,共涉及74家船公司、10 726条集装箱班轮航线。研究表明:18 a来长江三角洲集装箱班轮网络空间结构趋于集中,与箱流的空间结构变化呈现相反趋势;上海港集装箱班轮航线数量、班轮密度领先于其它港口,国际枢纽港地位不断强化,宁波港虽在班轮航线、班轮密度增速方面超越上海港,但班轮网络组织能力明显落后于上海港;长江沿线基本形成以上海港为枢纽港,太仓、南京、张家港和南通港为干线港、其它港口为支线港的集装箱班轮运输网络;上海港和宁波港的关系已由原来主要依托沿海班轮支线联系的喂给关系演化为依托国际班轮航线联系的竞合关系。

关键词: 港口, 班轮网络, 班轮航线, 班轮密度, 长江三角洲

Abstract:

Research based on shipping line has been the frontier issues and hot areas in the western port geography for the past few years, but it is still weak in the domestic. The article selects the Yangtze River Delta as a case because of the most active global container transport and better Liner network, with study period from 1996 to 2013 years and four key years of 1996, 2002, 2007, 2013. Respectively, the article has explored time-space evolution of container liner network in the Yangtze River Delta from shipping route, liner density and spatial linkage, involving 78 liner shipping companies and 10 726 container liner routes. Analysis shows: the spatial structure of container liner routes has tended to concentration in recently 18 years, and shows the opposite tendency of spatial structure of container flow. In the liner routes quantity and liner density, Shanghai port has been ahead of the other ports and its international hub has been constantly strengthen for the last 18 years. Although, the Ningbo’s growth rate has been greater than Shanghai, but compared with Shanghai, it still has a large gap in the liner network organization. In the Yangtze River liner network, it has basically formed a container liner shipping network with Shanghai as an international hub port, with Taicang, Nanjing, Zhangjiagang, Nantong as trunk ports and other ports as feeder ports. From the spatial linkages of container ports, the connection between Shanghai and Ningbo port has transformed from mainly relying on coastal liner routes to international shipping route, and their relationship also has evolved from feeding relationship to competing relationship.

Key words: port, liner network, liner route, liner density, the Yangtze River Delta

中图分类号: 

  • K902