长株潭地区乡村功能评价及地域分异特征研究

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.08.010

地理科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (8): 1203-1210.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.08.010

长株潭地区乡村功能评价及地域分异特征研究

谭雪兰^1,²(), 于思远¹, 陈婉铃¹, 欧阳巧玲¹, 贺艳华², 周国华²()

1. 湖南农业大学资源环境学院,湖南长沙 410128
2. 湖南师范大学资源与环境科学学院,湖南长沙 410081

收稿日期:2016-08-25 修回日期:2017-01-09 出版日期:2017-08-15 发布日期:2017-08-15
作者简介:
作者简介：谭雪兰（1978-）,女,湖南茶陵人,副教授,博士后,主要从事城乡规划及乡村地理研究。 E-mail: txl780120@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41571168,41201175,41471145)、湖南省自然科学基金（2016JJ3075）、湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目（14YBA209）、湖南省重点学科地理学建设项目（2011001）资助

Evaluation of Rural Function and Spatial Division in Chang-Zhu-Tan Urban Agglomerations

Xuelan Tan^1,²(), Siyuan Yu¹, Wanling Chen¹, Qiaoling Ouyang¹, Yanhua He², Guohua Zhou²()

1. College of Resources and Environment, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China
2. College of Resources and Environment Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, Hunan, China

Received:2016-08-25 Revised:2017-01-09 Online:2017-08-15 Published:2017-08-15
Supported by:
National Natural Sciences Foundation of China（41571168,41201175,41471145）,Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province（2016JJ3075）,Philosophy and Social Science Fund Project of Hunan Province（14YBA209）,Key Discipline Geography Construction Project of Hunan Province (2011001).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过构建乡村功能评价的指标体系及测度模型,以长株潭地区23个县市区为地域单元,对研究区乡村经济发展、粮食生产、社会保障与生态旅游功能的地域分异特征与规律进行研究。结果表明：① 长株潭城市群的经济发展功能、粮食生产功能、社会保障功能和生态旅游功能指数普遍较低,但各功能之间发展较为均衡;② 长株潭城市群的乡村功能地域分异特征较为明显,经济功能一级区主要分布在长株潭城市群的核心区,以长沙市6个区及国家级经济技术开发区所在地长沙县为主,粮食生产功能一级区主要分布在芦淞区、浏阳市、湘潭县、宁乡县,社会保障功能呈现出由中心城市向外围地域逐渐减弱的特征,且距离中心城市越远,其功能越弱,生态旅游功能强势区主要分布在茶陵县、芙蓉区、岳麓区、韶山市、炎陵县、宁乡县、浏阳市、雨花区等山区丘陵地带。

关键词: 乡村功能, 评价, 地域分异, 长株潭城市群

Abstract:

The village is an important inheritance of urban function diffusion and transfer, and has unique functions such as ecological landscape function, agricultural economic function, social emotional function, cultural aesthetics and so on. In the process of urbanization in China, the development concept of ‘focusing on city, ignoring rural’ has sacrificed the interests of the countryside for a long time. The development path of economic efficiency has neglected the protection of rural multi-value functions such as ecology, society and culture, and how to understand the characteristics and laws of the regional differentiation of rural functions in the new period, how to integrate the population, industry, infrastructure and ecological environment between urban and rural areas, and how to solve the problem of regional differentiation and functions. Constructing the functional structure system of organic coordination between urban and rural, so that the promotion of rural functions not only can become an important fulcrum to crack the "urban disease" and "rural disease", but also gradually develop the village into an unique charm and competitively happy home, and it has become an important issue to be solved in the theoretical research, urban and rural integrated development and beautiful rural construction practice. Based on the index system and measure model of rural function evaluation, this study takes the 23 counties and districts of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration area as the regional unit, and analyzes the regional differentiation characteristics of rural economic development, grain production, social security and eco-tourism in the study area. The results show that: the economic development function, grain production function, social security function and eco-tourism function of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration are generally low, but the development of each function is more balanced; the regional characteristics of rural function of Chang-Zhu-Tan urban agglomeration is obvious, the economic-oriented function areas are mainly distributed in the core area of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration, mainly in 6 districts of Changsha City and Changsha County, the seat of the National Economic and Technological Development Zones, and the grain production-oriented function areas are mainly distributed in Lusong District, Liuyang City, Xiangtan County, Ningxiang County, the social security function shows a gradual decrease from the central city to the periphery, and the farther away from the central city, the weaker the function, the strong distributions of eco-tourism functions are mainly in mountain and hilly areas of Chaling County , Furong District, Yuelu District, Shaoshan City, Yanling County, Ningxiang County, Liuyang City, Yuhua District and so on .

Key words: rural function, evaluation, spatial division, Chang-Zhu-Tan urban agglomerations

中图分类号:

K902

谭雪兰, 于思远, 陈婉铃, 欧阳巧玲, 贺艳华, 周国华. 长株潭地区乡村功能评价及地域分异特征研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(8): 1203-1210.

Xuelan Tan, Siyuan Yu, Wanling Chen, Qiaoling Ouyang, Yanhua He, Guohua Zhou. Evaluation of Rural Function and Spatial Division in Chang-Zhu-Tan Urban Agglomerations[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2017, 37(8): 1203-1210.

图/表 5

表1

表2

图1

图2

图3

参考文献 23

[1]	林若琪,蔡运龙.转型期乡村多功能性及景观重塑[J].人文地理,2012,27(2):45-49.
	[Lin Ruoqi, Cai Yunlong.Study on rural multifunction and landscape reformulation in the transitional period. Human Geography, 2012,27(2):45-49.]
[2]	张婧,李诚固.中国转型期中心城市城乡关系演变[J].地理学报,2012,67(8):1021-1030. doi: 10.11821/xb201208002
	[Zhang Jing, Li Chenggu.The evolution of urban-rural relationship in central cities of China during transformation period. Acta Geographica Sinica,2012,67(8):1021-1030.] doi: 10.11821/xb201208002
[3]	唐承丽,贺艳华,周国华,等.基于生活质量导向的乡村聚落空间优化研究[J].地理学报,2014,69(10):1459-1472. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201410006
	[Tang Chengli, He Yanhua, Zhou Guohua et al. The research on optimization mode of spatial organization of rural settlements oriented by life quality. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(10): 1459-1472.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201410006
[4]	Stola W.An attempt at a functional classification on rural areas in Poland[J].A methodological approach, Geographia Polonica,1984,50:113-129.
[5]	Filion P, Kramer A.Transformative metropolitan development models in large Canadian urban areas: The predominance of nodes[J].Urban Studies,2012,49(10):2237-2264. doi: 10.1177/0042098011423565
[6]	Stola W.Functional classification of communes in Poland[C]// Mohammad N. Socio-economic dimension of agriculture. New Delhi,1992:99-108.
[7]	Serra P, Vera A, Francesc A T.Beyond urbanerural dichotomy: Exploring socioeconomic and land-use processes of change in Spain (1991-2011)[J].Applied Geography,2014,55(9):71-81. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.005
[8]	John H.Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Interpreting regional dynamics in landscapes, lifestyles and livelihoods[J]. Landscape research,2008,33(2):211-223. doi: 10.1080/01426390801912089
[9]	Pons A, Rullan O.Artificialization and islandness on the Spanish Tourist Coast[J].Miscellanea Geographica,2014,18(9):5-15. doi: 10.2478/mgrsd-2014-0010
[10]	Willemen L, Hein L, Martinus E F et al. Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region[J]. Ecological Indicators Landscape Assessment for Sustainable Planning, 2010,10(1):62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.02.015
[11]	鲁莎莎, 刘彦随, 关兴良. 农业地域功能的时空格局与演进特征——以106国道沿线典型样带区为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2014, 28(3): 67-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2014.03.010
	[Lu Shasha, Liu Yansui, Guan Xingliang.Agricultural region multi-function and its spatio-temporal evolution characteristics: a case study of sampling belt along G106 in China. China Land Science, 2014, 28(3): 67-75.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2014.03.010
[12]	李玉恒, 陈聪, 刘彦随. 中国城乡发展转型衡量及其类型——以环渤海地区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(9): 1595-1602.
	[Li Yuheng, Chen Cong, Liu Yansui.Assessment and classification of urban-rural development transformation in China: The study of Bohai Rim. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(9): 1595-1602.]
[13]	刘彦随, 刘玉, 陈玉福. 中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389. doi: 10.11821/xb201110008
	[Liu Yansui, Liu Yu, Chen Yufu.Territorial multi-functionality evaluation and decision-making mechanism at county scale in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389.] doi: 10.11821/xb201110008
[14]	刘玉, 刘彦随. 乡村地域多功能的研究进展与展望[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(10): 164-169. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2012.10.024
	[Liu Yu, Liu Yansui.Progress and prospect in the study of rural region multifunctions. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2012, 22(10): 164-169.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2012.10.024
[15]	李平星, 陈雯, 孙伟. 经济发达地区乡村地域多功能空间分异及影响因素——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(6): 797-807. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201406007
	[Li Pingxing, Chen Wen, Sun Wei.Spatial differentiation and influencing factors of rural territorial multifunctions in developed regions:A case study of Jiangsu Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(6): 797-807.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201406007
[16]	唐林楠,刘玉,唐秀美.北京市城乡转型与乡村地域功能的时序特征及其关联性[J].人文地理,2016, (6) :123-129.
	[Tang Linnan, Liu Yu, Tang Xiumei.Temporal characteristics and coupling of urban-rural transformation and rural regional multifunction in Beijing;from1978 to 2012.Acta Geographica Sinica, Human Geography,2016,(6):123-129.]
[17]	李平星, 陈诚, 陈江龙. 乡村地域多功能时空格局演变及影响因素研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(7): 845-851. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.1997.01.005
	[Li Pingxing, Chen Cheng, Chen Jianglong.Temporal evolution and spatial differentiation of rural territorial multifunctions and the influencing factors:the case of Jiangsu Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(7): 845-851.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.1997.01.005
[18]	唐林楠, 刘玉, 潘瑜春, 等. 基于BP模型及Ward法的北京市平谷区乡村地域功能评价与分区[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(10): 1514-1521.
	[Tang Linnan, Liu Yu, Pan Yuchun et al. Evaluation and zoning of rural regional multifunction based on BP model and ward method:a case in the pinggu district of Beijing city. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(10): 1514-1521.]
[19]	洪惠坤, 廖和平, 李涛, 等. 基于熵值法和Dagum基尼系数分解的乡村空间功能时空演变分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(10): 240-248. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.10.034
	[Hong Huikun, Liao Heping, Li Tao et al. Analysis of spatio-temporal patterns of rural space function based on entropy value method and Dagum Gini coefficient. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(10): 240-248.] doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.10.034
[20]	房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨——超越“现代化”发展范式[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 257-270. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502007
	[Fang Yangang, Liu Jisheng.Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory:Beyond modernization paradigm. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 257-270.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502007
[21]	湖南省统计局. 湖南统计年鉴2015[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2015.
	[Statistical Bureau of Hunan Province.Hunan Statistical Yearbook 2015Beijing:China Statistics Press, 2015.]
[22]	国家统计局城市社会经济调查司. 中国城市统计年鉴2015[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2015.
	[Department of Urban Socioeconomic Survey of National Bureau of Statistics. China Urban Statistical Yearbook 2015. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2015.]
[23]	何艳冰, 黄晓军, 翟令鑫, 等. 西安快速城市化边缘区社会脆弱性评价与影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(8): 1315-1328. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201608003
	[He Yanbing, Huang Xiaojun, Zhai Lingxin et al. Assessment and influencing factors of social vulnerability to rapid urbanization in urban fringe: A case study of Xi'an. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(8): 1315-1328.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201608003

目标层	准则层	指标层	指标权重	计算方法
乡村功能	经济发展功能（0.217）	地均生产总值	0.169	GDP/区域总面积
		地均财政贡献量	0.248	财政收入/区域总面积
		产业结构	0.114	二、三产业产值/地区生产总值
		农村就业结构	0.255	农村非农劳动力数/农村劳动力总数
		人均农林渔牧产值	0.214	农林渔牧总产值/农林渔牧从业人员
	粮食生产功能（0.292）	区域耕地面积	0.280	来自年度统计年鉴
		区域耕地质量	0.088	有效灌溉面积/区域耕地质量
		粮食单产	0.137	粮食产量/耕地面积
		人均粮食占有量	0.148	粮食总产量/区域户籍总人口
		乡村人口人均耕地面积	0.257	耕地面积/乡村人口
		垦殖指数	0.089	已开垦种植的耕地面积/土地总面积
	社会保障功能（0.347）	农村居民人均纯收入	0.053	来自年度统计年鉴
		人口城镇化率	0.120	区域城镇化率/区域总人口
		农村电力设施	0.112	乡村用电量/乡村总人口
		每万人拥有医院、卫生医院床位数	0.166	医院、卫生院床位数/区域人口
		农村人均住房面积	0.452	农村住房面积/农村人口
		城乡收入比	0.030	城镇居民可支配收入/农村居民纯收入
		乡村居民恩格尔系数	0.068	乡村居民食品支出/乡村居民消费总支出
	生态旅游功能（0.145）	森林覆盖率	0.182	林地面积/区域总面积
		实现旅游总收入	0.348	来自年度统计年鉴
		旅游收入占GDP的比重	0.373	区域旅游总收入/区域GDP
		化肥投入强度	0.097	乡村化肥施用量/区域耕地面积

区域	经济发展功能	粮食生产功能	社会保障功能	生态旅游功能	乡村综合功能
雨花区	0.063	0.012	0.050	0.049	0.041
芙蓉区	0.070	0.010	0.049	0.096	0.049
天心区	0.081	0.014	0.028	0.035	0.036
岳麓区	0.046	0.033	0.052	0.084	0.047
开福区	0.074	0.022	0.048	0.037	0.044
长沙县	0.062	0.049	0.016	0.034	0.039
望城县	0.078	0.044	0.012	0.020	0.037
宁乡县	0.048	0.067	0.015	0.060	0.044
浏阳市	0.047	0.073	0.019	0.059	0.047
荷塘区	0.019	0.045	0.065	0.037	0.045
芦淞区	0.026	0.096	0.234	0.034	0.120
天元区	0.047	0.032	0.039	0.037	0.038
石峰区	0.019	0.053	0.142	0.012	0.071
株洲县	0.029	0.048	0.022	0.013	0.030
攸县	0.042	0.050	0.015	0.021	0.032
茶陵县	0.020	0.050	0.032	0.100	0.044
炎陵县	0.033	0.036	0.007	0.066	0.030
醴陵市	0.040	0.053	0.017	0.023	0.034
雨湖区	0.049	0.025	0.027	0.020	0.030
岳塘区	0.015	0.031	0.060	0.023	0.036
湘潭县	0.030	0.070	0.020	0.034	0.039
湘乡市	0.026	0.054	0.017	0.026	0.031
韶山市	0.052	0.033	0.014	0.079	0.037

长株潭地区乡村功能评价及地域分异特征研究

Evaluation of Rural Function and Spatial Division in Chang-Zhu-Tan Urban Agglomerations

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	郑殿元, 文琦, 黄晓军. 干旱风沙区农村多维贫困地域分异机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 149-156.
[2]	张春梅, 李雪铭. 辽宁省老年宜居社区人居环境评价[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 92-99.
[3]	吴吉林, 刘帅, 刘水良, 谢文海, 姚春桂. 张家界农户乡村旅游脆弱性评价与影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1336-1344.
[4]	苏晓虾, 毛旭锋, 魏晓燕, 令建康, 张艳春, 包先霞. 基于生物–环境–服务功能模型的三江源高寒草甸湿地不同恢复措施效果评价[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1377-1384.
[5]	周爱红, 宁志杰. 单沟泥石流危险性评价模型相关问题研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1385-1393.
[6]	董丽晶, 苏飞, 温玉卿, 王永超. 阜新市收缩城市经济系统弹性演变趋势与障碍因素分析[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(7): 1142-1149.
[7]	邹君, 陈菡, 黄文容, 刘沛林. 传统村落活态性定量评价研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 908-917.
[8]	张姗姗, 朱晓东, 张磊, 朱钰. 苏锡常地区制造业污染减排综合分析与评价[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(2): 238-247.
[9]	朱晓华,高春东. 中文权威核心期刊学术论文价值综合评价体系的构建与实践:以地理学科为例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(8): 1351-1360.
[10]	谭雪兰,蒋凌霄,米胜渊,欧阳巧玲,王振凯,安悦. 湖南省县域乡村反贫困绩效评价与空间分异特征[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(6): 938-946.
[11]	熊鹰, 徐亚丹, 孙维筠, 尹建军, 侯珂伦. 城市群空间结构效益评价与优化研究——以长株潭城市群与环洞庭湖城市群为例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(10): 1561-1569.
[12]	王兆峰, 徐赛. 不同交通方式对旅游效率的影响与评价——以张家界为例[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(7): 1148-1155.
[13]	谭雪兰, 安悦, 苏洋, 周国华, 贺艳华. 长株潭地区农业功能的时空变化特征及发展策略研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(5): 708-716.
[14]	王勇, 邹晴晴, 李广斌. 基于活力特征分析的城市安置社区公共空间研究——以苏州城区6个安置社区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(5): 747-754.
[15]	张苏文, 杨青山. 哈长城市群核心-外围结构及发展阶段判断研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(10): 1699-1706.