城市化进程中家屋空间重构的过程、内容与逻辑——以广州珠村为例

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.09.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于家的地理学视角,运用空间句法的基本理论与方法,把传统村落及家空间的重构现象放置在快速城市化进程中进行思考, 既重视文化的空间分析又强调空间的文化研究。在微观空间中,揭示了快速城市化进程中家空间物质形态变迁的文化观念表征和空间形态重构过程中的社会文化逻辑。主要结论如下：① 快速城市化进程中,个体家庭的响应遵循着不同的空间生产逻辑。家屋空间产生了家庭现代化、从家到户、家与房子的分离3种不同的重构模式。② 在家屋物质空间重构过程中,家中人与自然的关系、祭祀空间、内外关系、家庭关系、代际关系、性别关系等均发生着重构。③ 区位和大量外来人口是珠村家屋空间重构的外在动力;村民家庭的现代化诉求和家空间的经济需求是家屋空间重构的内在因素。城市化带来的新的社会经济关系是珠村家空间重构的内在逻辑。

关键词: 快速城市化, 家空间, 空间句法, 珠村

Abstract:

Traditional village as the material carrier of human culture heritage, facing space reconstruction and transformation of society in the process of rapid urbanization. Village traditional culture facing the realistic problem that lost its space carrier and space. As the basic unit of the village, home is the micro scale for geography to research the man-land relationship. Based on the geography of home, this article, which uses the basic theory and method of space syntax, locates the reconstruction of traditional villages and the home space in the context of repaid urbanization. It not only focuses on the spatial analysis of culture but also emphasizes the cultural studies of space. Following the insight into the micro space, this article reveals the cultural representation of material changes of the home space and the socio-cultural logic that hidden in the reconstruction process of space form. The findings of this article include: 1) In the process of rapid urbanization, the responses of individual families follow different logics of spatial production. Three different reconstruction patterns could be discovered in the process of the reconstruction of the home space, namely “family modernization”, “from home to household”, and “home is separated from the house”. 2) Accompanied with the reconstruction of home space, the relationship between human and nature, the sacrifice space, the internal and external relations, the kinship between family members, the intergenerational relationship, and the gender relationship have been reconstructed as well. 3) The location and the large number of immigrants are the main external driving forces while the modernization of the villagers' families and the economic needs of the home space are the internal driving forces. Both of them contribute to the reconstruction of home space in Zhucun Village. The new socio-culture relations brought by urbanization are the intrinsic logic of the reconstruction of the home space in Zhucun village. This research provide references and enlightenment for the new urbanization and the development of urban villages.

Key words: rapid urbanization, home space, space syntax, Zhucun

中图分类号:

K901

丁传标, 赵永琪, 陶伟. 城市化进程中家屋空间重构的过程、内容与逻辑——以广州珠村为例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(9): 1326-1336.

Chuanbiao Ding, Yongqi Zhao, Wei Tao. The Reconstruction of Household of Zhucun in Guangzhou in the Process of the Rapid Urbanization[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2017, 37(9): 1326-1336.

图/表 12

Fig.1

表1

图2

表2

表3

图3

图4

表4

表5

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 36

[1]	田银生,唐晔,李颖怡.传统村落的形式和意义[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社, 2011.
	[Tian Yinsheng, Tang Ye, Li Yingyi.The form and meaning of the traditional village.Guangzhou: South China University of Technology Press,2011.]
[2]	陶然,王瑞民,潘瑞.新型城镇化的关键改革与突破口选择[J].城市规划,2015, 30(1):9-15.
	[Tao Ran, Wang Ruimin, Pan Rui.Key reforms of new urbanization. Urban Planning,2015, 30(1):9-15.]
[3]	陶伟, 程明洋, 符文颖.城市化进程中广州城中村传统宗族文化的重构[J].地理学报,2015,70(12):1987-2000. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201512010
	[Tao Wei,Cheng Mingyang, Fu Wenying.Reconstruction of Guangzhou urban villages’traditional lineage culture in the context of rapid urbanization: From spatial form of ancestral hall to behavioral patterns of villagers.Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(12):1987-2000.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201512010
[4]	Papastergiadis N.Dialogues in the Diasporas, essays and conversations on cultural identity[J].Meanjin, 1998, 57(4):836-839. doi: 10.1017/CCOL0521554772.008
[5]	Gorman-Murray A.Gay and lesbian couples at home: Identity work in domestic space[J]. Home Cultures,2006, 3(2): 145-167. doi: 10.2752/174063106778053200
[6]	Gorman-Murrayd A.Homeboys:use of home by gay Australian men[J].Social & Cultural Geography, 2006, 7(1): 53-68. doi: 10.1080/14649360500452988
[7]	Blunt A, Dowling R.Home[M].London/New York:Routledge,2006.
[8]	Blunt A.Cultural geography: cultural geographies of home[J]. Progress in Human Geography,2005, 29(4): 505. doi: 10.1191/0309132505ph564pr
[9]	封丹,朱竑, Breitung W.门禁社区边界和家的构建关系研究[J].世界地理研究, 2014, 3(3):64-73.
	[Feng Dan, Zhu Hong, Breitung W.Boundary and the making of home: a cultural study of the gated communities in Guangzhou, China. World Regional Studies, 2014,23(3):64-73.]
[10]	封丹,朱竑.住宅郊区化背景下门禁社区与周边邻里关系——以广州丽江花园为例[J].地理研究, 2011,30(1): 61-70. doi: 10.11821/yj2011010006
	[Feng Dan, Zhu Hong.Space of fragmentation :A study of the linkages between gated communities and their neighborhoods in Guangzhou, China. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(1): 61-70.] doi: 10.11821/yj2011010006
[11]	Anna Tarrant.Grandfathering as spatio-temporal practice: conceptualizing performances of ageing masculinities in contemporary familial carescapes[J].Social&Cultural Geography, 2013,14(2):192-210. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2012.740501
[12]	封丹,李鹏,朱竑.国外"家"的地理学研究进展及启示[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(7):809-817.
	[Feng Dan, Li Peng, Zhu Hong.Progress in geographic studies on “home” and implications for China. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(7): 809-817.]
[13]	王梅梅, 杨永春, 谭一洺,等.中国城市居民的家庭代际分/合居行为及其影响要素——以成都市为例[J].地理学报,2015,70(8):1296-1312.
	[Wang Meimei, Yang Yongchun, Tan Yiming et al. Behavior and factors influencing intergenerational household cohabitation/separation among urban Chinese citizens: A case study from Chengdu.Acta Geographica Sinica,2015,70(8):1296-1312.]
[14]	刘云刚,谭宇文,周雯婷.广州日本移民的生活活动与生活空间[J].地理学报,2010,65(10):1173-1186.
	[Liu Yungang, Tan Yuwen, Zhou Wenting.Japanese Expatriates in Guangzhou City: The Activity and Living Space.Acta Geographica Sinica,2010,65(10):1173-1186.]
[15]	修春亮,孙平军,王绮.沈阳市居住就业结构的地理空间和流空间分析[J].地理学报, 2013,68(8):1110-1118.
	[Xiu Chunliang, Sun Pingjun, Wang Qi.Residence-employment structure analysis on spaces of geography and flows in Shenyang City. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013,68(8):1110-1118.]
[16]	张文佳,柴彦威.基于家庭的城市居民出行需求理论与验证模型[J].地理学报,2008,63(12):1246-1256.
	[Zhang Wenjia, Chai Yanwei.Theories and Confirmed Model of Urban Resident's Travel Demand: Considering Intra-household Interaction. Acta Geographica Sinica,2008,63(12):1246-1256.]
[17]	柴彦威,肖作鹏,刘志林.基于空间行为约束的北京市居民家庭日常出行碳排放的比较分析[J].地理科学,2011,31(7):843-849.
	[Chai Yanwei, Xiao Zuopeng, Liu Zhilin.Comparative Analysis on CO2 Emission Per Household inDaily Travel Based on Spatial Behavior Constraints. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2011,31(7):843-849.]
[18]	张果,曾永明,王群.“5·12”震后再生育小孩及家庭发展的影响机制——基于震区调查的证据和probit模型的分析[J]. 地理研究,2015,34(8):1592-1604. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201508016
	[Zhang Guo, Zeng Yongming, Wang Qun.Influence mechanism over reborn babies and newly developed families after“5⋅12”Wenchuan earthquake: Based on investigation study and Ordered Probit Model. Geographical Research,2015,34(8):1592-1604.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201508016
[19]	王瑛,林齐根,宋崇振,等.中国农村家庭的震后生活恢复过程研究[J].地理科学进展,2015, 34(8):1009-1018. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.08.008
	[Wang Ying, Lin Qigen, Song Chongzhen et al. Post-earthquake household recovery in rural China. Progress in Geography,2015, 34(8):1009-1018.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.08.008
[20]	刘晨,蔡晓梅,曾国军.西方厨房研究及其对中国文化地理家庭空间研究之启示[J].热带地理, 2014, 34(4): 445-453.
	[Liu Chen, Cai Xiaomei, Zeng Guojun.Kitchen Studies through Western Gaze and Cultural Geographies of Home in Urban China. Tropical Geography, 2014, 34(4):445-453.]
[21]	Bafna S.Space syntax: Abrief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques[J].Environment and Behavior, 2003, 35(1):17-29. doi: 10.1177/0013916502238863
[22]	Hillier B, Hanson J,Graham H.Ideas are in things: an application of the space syntax method to discovering house genotypes[J].Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,1987,14(4):363-385. doi: 10.1068/b140363
[23]	Hillier B.Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1996.
[24]	De Franca F C,De Holanda Frederico R B.My bedroom,my world: domestic space between modernity and tradition[R/OL]..
[25]	Christenson M.Registering visual permeability in architecture:isovists and occlusion maps in AutoLISP[J]. Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design,2010,37:1128-1136. doi: 10.1068/b36076
[26]	Orhun D, Hiliier B, Hanson J.Spatial types in traditional Ibrkish houses[J].Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,1995,22: 475-498. doi: 10.1068/b220475
[27]	Dawson P C.Space syntax analysis of central Inuit snow houses[J].Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2002,21(4):464-480. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4165(02)00009-0
[28]	Orhun D,Hillier B,Hanson J.Socialising spatial types in traditional Turkish houses[J].Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,1996,23:329-352. doi: 10.1068/b230329
[29]	Griffiths S.Temporality in Hiller and Hanson’s theory of spatial description: Some implication of historical research for space syntax[J].The Journal of Space Syntax,2011,(2):73-96.
[30]	Lawrence R J.Translating anthropological concepts into architectural practice[M].Philadelphia,PA:University of Pennsylvania Press,1989.
[31]	Bellal T ,Brown F.The visibility graph: an approach to the analysis of domestic M’ zabite traditional spaces[R/OL].
	Brownpaper.pdf.
[32]	陶伟,丁传标.家的解码:空间句法对家空间研究的内容与方法[J].地理科学,2015,35(11):1365-1371.
	[Tao Wei, Ding Chuanbiao.Decoding Homes: Application of Space Syntax to Content and Methods of Home Space. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2015,35(11):1365-1371.]
[33]	丁传标, 古恒宇, 陶伟.空间句法在中国人文地理学中的应用进展评述[J].热带地理, 2015, 35(4):515-521. doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.002722
	[Ding Chuanbiao, Gu Hengyu, Tao Wei.Progress in the Application of Space Syntax in Human Geography Research in China. Tropical Geography, 2015, 35(4):515-521.] doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.002722
[34]	丁传标, 张涵, 程明洋, 等.城中村空间形态对居民居住安全感的影响——以广州珠村为例[J].地域研究与开发, 2015,34(4):68-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2015.04.013
	[Ding Chuanbiao, Zhang Han, Cheng Mingyang et al. Analysis of the Sense of Residents Living Safety from the Perspective of Spatial form in Zhucun Village, Guangzhou City.Areal Research and Development,2015,34(4):68-73.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2015.04.013
[35]	赵美婷, 王敏.华侨建筑形态与宗族意义场所的重构——陈慈黉故居的建筑地理学研究[J].热带地理, 2016, 36(2):198-207. doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.002757
	[Zhao Meiting, Wang Min.Overseas Chinese Architecture Morphology and Reconstruction of Patriarchal Clan Locality:A Study on Architectural Geography of Chen Cihong’s Former Residence. Tropical Geography, 2016, 36(2):198-207.] doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.002757
[36]	郑诗琳, 朱竑, 唐雪琼.旅游商业化背景下家的空间重构——以西双版纳傣族园傣家乐为例[J].热带地理, 2016, 36(2):225-236. doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.002827
	[Zheng Shilin, Zhu Hong, Tang Xueqiong.Space Reconstruction of Home under the Background of Tourism Commercialization:A Case Study of Dai Family Hotel in Xishuangbanna. Tropical Geography, 2016, 36(2):225-236.] doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.002827

案例	楼层	人口数量	家庭类型	空间类型
1	4	5	三代直系家庭	自住型
2	5	3	核心家庭	部分出租型
3	6	4	核心家庭	完全出租型

空间编号	名称	空间主要用途	深度值	RRA值	整合度值	控制值
1	廊	连通\存储	1	1.18	0.85	0.83
2	天井	连通\取水\晾晒\通风\饲养	2	0.59	1.69	2.33
3	厨房	生活\饮食	1	1.18	0.85	0.83
4	厅	连通\待客\活动\祭拜	4	0.79	1.27	2.33
5	房1	休息\存储	4	1.77	0.56	0.33
6	房2	休息\存储	4	1.77	0.56	0.33
外部空间	连接		0	1.77	0.56	1

时期	楼层	空间变化					家空间中RRA值
时期	楼层	数量		消失	新增	最整合	厨房	卧室	客厅	外部空间	平均
1960年代	1	4	/	/	天井		1.89	2.37	0.95	1.89	1.51
1980年代	2	9	天井	楼梯、卫生间、露台	楼梯		1.72	1.64	1.45	1.45	1.39
2005年	4	39	门廊神台	阳台、餐厅、手工艺室、娱乐室、洗衣房	楼梯走廊		1.34	1.55	1.26	2.11	1.53

	楼层	空间变化						家空间中RRA值
	楼层	空间数量		厨房数量	客厅数量	新增空间	最整合	厨房	卧室	客厅	外部空间	平均
1960年代	1	4	1	1	/	天井		1.42	2.84	1.42	2.84	1.90
1980年代	2	10	1	1	楼梯、卫生间、露台	门廊		1.21	1.85	1.21	1.21	1.49
2005年	5	45	6	6	出租房、阳台、餐厅、洗衣房	楼梯走廊		2.40 1.17*	2.29 1.67*	1.83 0.79*	1.72 1.77*	1.75 1.40*

时期	楼层	空间变化						家空间中RRA值
时期	楼层	空间数量		厨房数量	客厅数量	新增空间	最整合	厨房	卧室	客厅	外部空间	平均
1960年代	1	4	1	1	/	天井		1.71	2.29	1.15	2.29	1.53
1980年代	2	10	1	1	楼梯、卫生间、露台	厅		1.58	1.62	0.83	1.58	1.55
2006年	5	75	15	15	出租房、阳台	楼梯		1.60	1.52	1.35	1.81	1.57