广东省残疾人生计资本的空间差异及影响因素研究

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.09.007

地理科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 1345-1353.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.09.007

广东省残疾人生计资本的空间差异及影响因素研究

吴清¹, 吴黎², 李细归³(), 周雯⁴

1.肇庆学院旅游管理系,广东肇庆 526061
2.肇庆学院教师教育学院,广东肇庆 526061
3.华中师范大学地理过程分析与模拟湖北省重点实验室,湖北武汉 430079
4.肇庆市残疾人联合会,广东肇庆 526060

收稿日期:2017-02-14 修回日期:2017-04-15 出版日期:2017-11-20 发布日期:2017-11-20
作者简介:
作者简介：吴清（1983-）,男,湖南涟源人,博士,讲师,主要研究方向为旅游扶贫与区域可持续发展。E-mail: wuqing913@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41401165）、广东省残疾人事业理论与实践研究项目（2016168、2017156）资助

Spatial Difference and Influencing Factors of Livelihood Capital of People with Disabilities in Guangdong Province

Qing Wu¹, Li Wu², Xigui Li³(), Wen Zhou⁴

1. Department of Tourism Management , Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing 526061,Guangdong, China
2. College of Teacher Education, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing 526061, Guangdong, China
3. Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province,Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China;
4. Zhaoqing Disabled Persons’Federation, Zhaoqing 526060, Guangdong, China;

Received:2017-02-14 Revised:2017-04-15 Online:2017-11-20 Published:2017-11-20
Supported by:
National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (41401165), Theory and Practice Research Project of the Disabled People of Guangdong Province (2016168, 2017156).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

运用改进的TOPSIS模型和GIS空间分析方法,对2015年广东省21个地市残疾人生计资本的空间分布特征及影响因素进行分析。结果表明：① 残疾人生计资本综合水平呈明显的“级差化”分异特征,高生计资本地市以广州、肇庆和清远3市为主,而低生计资本地市分布相对分散,总体表现出“大分散、小集中”的分布格局。② 残疾人不同类型生计资本水平空间差异显著,各类型资本大多处于较低等级,多种资本匹配性较低;社会和金融资本较高区主要分布在粤北地区,人力、康复和物质资本较高区均以广州最高;各类型资本以东部沿海城市及粤西云浮、茂名、阳江等地相对偏低。③ 残疾人生计资本总量具有显著的空间自相关性,热点区和冷点区分布差异明显,总体上表现出集聚分布特征。经分析,政策环境、经济水平、教育培训及康复服务等方面是影响广东省残疾人生计资本空间分布格局的重要因素。

关键词: 生计资本, 空间差异, 残疾人, 广东省

Abstract:

The improved TOPSIS Model and GIS Spatial Analysis Method are used to study the spatial difference characteristics and influencing factors of livelihood capital in 21 prefecture-level cities in Guangdong in 2015. Results show that: 1) The comprehensive level of livelihood capital of people with disabilities is obviously characterized with “level difference”. High-livelihood capital prefecture-level cities are represented by Guangzhou, Zhaoqing and Qingyuan while middle- and low-livelihood capital prefecture-level cities are distributed dispersedly, mainly in Shaoguan in the northern Guangdong, Yunfu and Yangjiang in the western Guangdong, Chaozhou, Jieyang and Shanwei in the eastern Guangdong. The overall distribution pattern is characterized by “large disperse and small cluster”. 2) Obvious differences are shown in different types of livelihood capital levels of people with disabilities. Regions with higher financial and social capital level are mainly distributed in the northern Guangdong. Labor, rehabilitation and material capital level are highest in Guangzhou while other areas are relatively low and scattered. Five types of capital in coastal city in the eastern China and Yunfu, Maoming, Yangjiang of the western Guangdong is relatively low. 3) The total amount of livelihood capital of people with disabilities demonstrates significant spatial autocorrelation and regions with similar size tend to cluster geographically; distinctive differences are shown between hot regions and unpopular regions, with cluster distribution characteristics on the whole. Thereof, hot regions are mainly distributed in Guangzhou and Qingyuan while unpopular regions are mainly in Jieyang and Shanwei in the eastern Guangdong. Both have small coverage. The analysis finds that policy environment, economy level, education and training and rehabilitation service are all important factors that affect the spatial distribution pattern of livelihood capital of people with disabilities in Guangdong Province.

Key words: livelihood capital, spatial difference, people with disabilities, Guangdong Province

中图分类号:

F213

吴清, 吴黎, 李细归, 周雯. 广东省残疾人生计资本的空间差异及影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(9): 1345-1353.

Qing Wu, Li Wu, Xigui Li, Wen Zhou. Spatial Difference and Influencing Factors of Livelihood Capital of People with Disabilities in Guangdong Province[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2017, 37(9): 1345-1353.

图/表 6

表1

图1

图2

表2

图3

图4

参考文献 27

[1]	Chambers R, Conway G R.Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century, IDS Discussion Paper 296[M].Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, 1992.
[2]	DFID. Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets[M].London: Department for International Development, 2000.
[3]	Hahn M B, Riederer A M, Foster S O.The livelihood vulnerability index: A pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change: A case study in Mozambique[J].Global Environmental Change,2009,19(1):74-88. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.11.002
[4]	Nunan F.Mobility and fisher folk livelihoods on Lake Victoria: Implications for vulnerability and risk.Geoforum,2010,41(5): 776-785. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.04.009
[5]	陈传波,丁士军.中国小农户的风险及风险管理研究[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2005.
	[Chen Chuangbo, Ding Shijun.The small farmers’ risk and risk management in China. Beijing: China Financial and Economic Publishing House,2005.]
[6]	Adam Y O, Pretzsch J, Pettenella D.Contribution of Non-Timber Forest Products livelihood strategies to rural development in drylands of Sudan: Potentials and failures[J].Agricultural Systems,2013,117:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.12.008
[7]	Fang,Y P, Fan J, Shen M Y et al. Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital in mountain areas: Empirical analysis based on different settlements in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River, China[J].Ecological Indicators,2014,38:225-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.007
[8]	王成超,杨玉盛.农户生计非农化对耕地流转的影响——以福建省长汀县为例[J].地理科学,2011,31(11):1362-1367.
	[Wang Chengchao, Yang Yusheng.Impact of Rural Households’ Nonfarm Employment on Cropland Transfer: Case of Changting County in Fujian Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2011,31(11):1362-1367.]
[9]	苏芳,蒲欣冬,徐中民,等.生计资本与生计策略关系研究:以张掖市甘州区为例[J].中国人口⋅资源与环境, 2009,19(6):119-125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2009.06.022
	[Su Fang, Pu Xindong, Xu Zhongmin et al. Analysis about the relationship between livelihood capital and livelihood strategies: Take Ganzhou in Zhangye city as an example. China Population Resources and Environment,2009,19(6):119-125.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2009.06.022
[10]	Xu G C, Kang M Y, Jiang Y.Adaptation to the Policy-oriented Livelihood Change in Xilingol Grassland, Northern China[J].Procedia Environmental Sciences,2012,13:1668-1683. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.160
[11]	Malley Z J U, Taeb M, Matsumoto Tet al. Linking perceived land and water resources degradation, scarcity and livelihood conflicts in southwestern Tanzania: Implications for sustainable rural livelihood, Environment[J]. Development and Sustainability,2008,10(3):349-372. doi: 10.1007/s10668-006-9069-9
[12]	赵雪雁. 不同生计方式农户的环境影响——以甘南高原为例[J].地理科学,2013,33(5):545-552. doi: 10.5846/stxb201109211386
	[Zhao Xueyan.Environmental impact of different livelihood strategies of farmers: A Case of the Gannan plateau. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2013,33(5):545-552.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201109211386
[13]	吴孔森,杨新军,尹莎.环境变化影响下农户生计选择与可持续性研究——以民勤绿洲社区为例[J].经济地理,2016,36(9):141-149.
	[ Wu Kongsen,Yang Xinjun, Yin sha. Farmers' livelihood choice and sustainability under the influence of environmental change: A case study of Minqin oasis community in Gansu province. Economic Geography,2016,36(9):141-149.]
[14]	Dercon S.Assessing Vulnerability [R].Oxford: Jesus College and CSAE, Department of Economics,Oxford University,2001:1-80.
[15]	Hahn M B, Riederer A M, Foster S O.The livelihood vulnerability index: A pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change: A case study in Mozambique[J].Global Environmental Change, 2009,19(1): 74-88. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.11.002
[16]	苏飞,应蓉蓉,李博.生计脆弱性研究热点与前沿的可视化[J].地理科学,2016,36(7):1073-1080. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.07.014
	[Su Fei,Ying Rongrong, Li Bo.Visualization analysis of the hot topics and frontier on livelihood vulnerability research. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2016,36(7):1073-1080.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.07.014
[17]	张国培,庄天慧.自然灾害对农户贫困脆弱性的影响——基于云南省2009年的实证分析[J].四川农业大学学报,2011,29(1):136-140. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2650.2011.01.026
	[Zhang Guopei, Zhuang Tianhui.Impacts of the natural disasters on poverty vulnerability of farmer households: based on empirical analysis of Yunnan province in 2009.Journal of Sichuan Agricultural Universuty,2011,29(1):136-140.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2650.2011.01.026
[18]	赵立娟. 灌溉管理改革背景下农户生计脆弱性评估[J].干旱区地理,2014,37(5):1055-1064.
	[Zhao Lijuan.Assessment on households’ livelihood vulnerability under irrigation management reform. Arid Land Geography,2014,37(5):1055-1064.]
[19]	杜金沛,张兴杰.农村残疾人隐蔽性贫困及社保制度缺陷[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014,13(1):46-52.
	[Du Jinpei, Zhang Xingjie.The hidden poverty of disabled people in rural area and social security system deficiency. Journal of South China Agricultural University(Social Science Edition), 2014,13(1):46-52.]
[20]	廖娟. 残疾与贫困:基于收入贫困和多维贫困测量的研究[J].人口与发展,2015,21(1):68-77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1668.2015.01.008
	[Liao Juan.Disability and poverty: A research based on income poverty and multidimensional poverty measurements. Population and Development, 2015,21(1):68-77.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1668.2015.01.008
[21]	张兴杰,王静,卓彩琴.农村残疾人经济状况实证调查分析——以广州市农村残疾人为例[J].江汉论坛,2008,(7):130-133. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-854X.2008.07.029
	[Zhang Xinjie, Wang Jin, Zhuo Caiqin.An empirical analysis on the economic situation of the disabled in rural areas: A case study of rural disabled people in Guangzhou. Jianghan Tribune,2008,(7):130-133.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-854X.2008.07.029
[22]	李艳,史琤莉,张长杰,等.社区康复在残疾人康复体系中的意义及发展现状[J].中国康复理论与实践,2012,18(2):190-192. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2012.02.029
	[Li Yan, Shi Zhengli, Zhang Changjie et al. Significance and Developmental Status of Community-based Rehabilitation in the Disabled Rehabilitation System. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice,2012,18(2):190-192.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2012.02.029
[23]	赖德胜,廖娟,刘伟.我国残疾人就业及其影响因素分析[J].中国人民大学学报,2008,(1):10-15.
	[Lai Desheng, Liao Juan, Liu Wei.Employment of the disabled and its determinants in China. Journal of Renmin University of China,2008,(1):10-15.]
[24]	马雪莹,邵景安,徐新良.基于熵权-TOPSIS的山区乡镇通达性研究:以重庆市石柱县为例[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(9):1144-1154. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.09.009
	[Ma Xueying, Shao Jjing’an, Xu Xinliang.Rural transportation accessibility in mountainous areas based on the entropy-weight TOPSIS method: A case study of Shizhu County, Chongqing Municipality. Progress in Geography,2016,35(9):1144-1154.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.09.009
[25]	鲁春阳,文枫,杨庆媛,等.基于改进TOPSIS法的城市土地利用绩效评价及障碍因子诊断:以重庆市为例[J].资源科学,2011,33(3):535-541.
	[Lu Chunyang, Wen Feng, Yang Qingyuan et al. An evaluation of urban land use performance based on the improved TOPSIS method and diagnosis of its obstacle indicators: A case study of Chongqing.Resources Science,2011,33(3):535-541.]
[26]	冯长春,曾赞荣,崔娜娜.2000年以来中国区域经济差异的时空演变[J].地理研究,2015,34(2): 234-246.
	[Feng Changchun, Zeng Zanrong, Cui Nana.The economic disparities and their spatio-temporal evolution in China since 2000.Geographical Research,2015,34(2):234-246.]
[27]	徐建华. 计量地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:121-131.
	[Xu Jianhua.Quantitative geography. Beijing: Higher Education Press,2006:121-131.]

一级指标	二级指标	三级指标（%）	三级指标代码	权重
残疾人生计资本	人力资本	普通高等院校残疾考生达到录取分数线人数占比	X1	0.24
		城乡残疾人就业人数占比	X2	0.24
		残疾人实用技术培训占比	X3	0.25
		残疾人城镇职业培训人数占比	X4	0.26
	社会资本	扶持贫困残疾人占比	X5	0.32
		参加体育活动人次数占比	X6	0.39
		残疾人法律救助（援助）工作机构占比	X7	0.29
	康复资本	已开展社区康复服务社区（村）数占比	X8	0.33
		已建社区康复服务档案人数占比	X9	0.32
		接受社区康复服务累计人数占比	X10	0.34
	物质资本	本年度危房改造户数占比	X11	0.34
		辅助器具供应件数占比	X12	0.33
		综合服务设施累计建设规模占比	X13	0.33
	金融资本	残疾人已纳入最低生活保障范围人数占比	X14	0.32
		享受生活和护理补贴人数占比	X15	0.30
		残疾人其他救助救济人数占比	X16	0.37

资本匹配类型	地市
人力资本缺乏型	云浮、阳江、珠海、东莞、惠州、汕尾、揭阳、潮州
社会资本缺乏型	茂名、云浮、阳江、汕尾
康复资本缺乏型	茂名、云浮、佛山、中山、珠海、东莞、深圳、韶关、河源、汕尾、潮州、汕头
物质资本缺乏型	云浮、阳江、佛山、中山、珠海、东莞、韶关、汕尾、揭阳、潮州、汕头
金融资本缺乏型	阳江、珠海、东莞、惠州、揭阳
多种资本缺乏型	云浮、阳江、珠海、东莞、惠州、汕尾、揭阳、潮州、茂名、佛山、中山、韶关、汕头
资本搭配合理型	广州、湛江、肇庆、梅州、清远、江门

广东省残疾人生计资本的空间差异及影响因素研究

Spatial Difference and Influencing Factors of Livelihood Capital of People with Disabilities in Guangdong Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	涂唐奇, 闫东升, 陈江龙, 王晖, 郑琰琳. 南京城市义务教育设施空间演化[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(3): 433-441.
[2]	金彪, 颜丽玲, 沙晋明, 姚志强. 中国省域信息流、资金流强度的空间差异——以2015年京东手机交易为例[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(2): 223-232.
[3]	王圣云, 翟晨阳, 罗颖, 谭嘉玲. 基于“功能-能力”框架的中国多维福祉测评及区域均衡分析[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(12): 2031-2039.
[4]	毛东雷, 蔡富艳, 雷加强, 杨雪峰, 杨余辉, 薛杰. 新疆策勒沙漠-荒漠-绿洲典型下垫面小气候空间变化分析[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(4): 630-640.
[5]	冯亚芬, 俞万源, 雷汝林. 广东省传统村落空间分布特征及影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(2): 236-243.
[6]	李秋雨, 朱麟奇, 刘继生. 中国入境旅游的经济增长效应与空间差异性研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(10): 1552-1559.
[7]	王兆峰, 李丹. 基于交通网络的区域旅游空间合作效率评价与差异变化分析——以湘西地区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(11): 1697-1705.
[8]	雒海潮, 李国梁. 河南省城镇化协调发展评价与空间差异分析[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(6): 749-755.
[9]	杨朝丹, 姜会明, 王寒冰. 吉林省粮食大县经济发展差异及成因分析[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(7): 825-830.
[10]	王宜强, 赵媛. 中国煤炭资源流源、汇地空间格局演变与内部空间差异研究[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(10): 1153-1160.
[11]	王少剑, 赵亚博, 王洋. 广东省区域经济差异的多尺度与多机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(10): 1184-1192.
[12]	方远平, 毕斗斗, 谢蔓, 林彰平. 知识密集型服务业空间关联特征及其动力机制分析——基于广东省21个地级市的实证[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(10): 1193-1201.
[13]	王富喜, 毛爱华, 李赫龙, 贾明璐. 基于熵值法的山东省城镇化质量测度及空间差异分析[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(11): 1323-1329.
[14]	徐辉, 刘俊. 广东省区域技术创新能力测度的灰色关联分析[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(9): 1075-1080.
[15]	陈志凡, 赵烨, 谷蕾, 呼红霞, 田青. 基于农业区位论的北京市土壤-小麦系统中重金属Pb积累特征及其健康风险[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(9): 1142-1147.