江苏省土地开发度与利用效益的空间特征及协调分析

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.11.011

地理科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 1696-1704.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.11.011

江苏省土地开发度与利用效益的空间特征及协调分析

杨清可^1,^2,³(), 段学军^1,³(), 李平星^1,³, 王磊^1,³

1. 中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所, 江苏南京 210008
2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
3. 中国科学院流域地理学重点实验室, 江苏南京 210008

收稿日期:2017-03-02 修回日期:2017-06-23 出版日期:2017-11-20 发布日期:2017-11-20
作者简介:
作者简介：杨清可（1986-）,男,山东滕州人,博士研究生,主要从事区域规划与土地利用研究。E-mail:yangqingke66@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（41401187, 41601169）、中国科学院STS重点项目（KFJ-STS-ZDTP-011）资助

The Spatial Pattern and Coordination Analysis Between Degree of Land Development and Use Benefit in Jiangsu

Qingke Yang^1,^2,³(), Xuejun Duan^1,³(), Pingxing Li^1,³, Lei Wang^1,³

1. Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3. Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu,China

Received:2017-03-02 Revised:2017-06-23 Online:2017-11-20 Published:2017-11-20
Supported by:
National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (41401187, 41601169), Science and Technology Service Network Initiative of Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-STS-ZDTP-011)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过探讨江苏省土地开发度与利用效益的空间特征、耦合格局及其协调发展程度,为相关研究提供参考。研究表明：① 1996~2015年,江苏省土地开发度指数从0.339升至0.426,呈现平稳增长→快速增长→平稳增长的态势。利用效益指数从0.459提高至0.596。② 土地开发度与利用效益存在显著的空间差异。1996~2015年苏南地区土地开发强度高,利用效益提升显著。苏北地区的宿迁、淮安与盐城等市的利用效益较低,“中部凹陷”特征明显。③ 土地开发度与利用效益耦合关系处于不断变化过程中,总体耦合态势可划分为减弱-波动-增强3个阶段,土地开发与利用效益重心均向东南移动,但效益重心移动速度稍快。④ 苏南地区土地开发度与开发效益耦合度大于0.8,低值区集聚在淮安、盐城等地。

关键词: 土地开发度, 利用效益, 空间特征, 协调分析, 江苏省

Abstract:

Rapid urbanization and industrialization have promoted the rapid expansion of construction land in Jiangsu. By clarifying and coordinating the relationship between land development and use benefit, it’s of great significance for the rational allocation of land resources to improve the coordination of interests and the compensation mechanism. In this article, the spatial distribution characteristics, the coupling pattern and the coordinated development degree of land development and use benefit discussed would provide the scientific reference for policy formulation. Our results show that: 1) During the study period, the index of the degree of land development rises from 0.339 to 0.426, showing a steady growth->rapid growth->steady growth trend. Meanwhile, the index on land use benefit increases from 0.459 to 0.596. 2) There are obvious spatial differences between land development and use benefit. In the last 20 years, the intensity of land development in South of Jiangsu is high, and the use benefit is also significantly improved. Suqian, Huai’an, Yancheng and other cities in the north of Jiangsu have low use benefit, leading to the formation of a significant phenomenon of "central depression". 3) The coupling degree between land development and use benefit is changing. The overall coupling situation can be divided into 3 stages, that is, the weakening, the fluctuation and the enhancement. Although the gravity centers of land development and use benefit are moving towards the southeast, the speed is faster. 4) The coupling degree of land development and use benefit is greater than 0.8 in South Jiangsu, and the low value of coupling is concentrated in Huaian, Yancheng and other places. Various factors, such as regional industrial development, infrastructure, land demand of human settlements, would produce different effects for land development and expansion intensity. The significant difference of land use policy and land intensive use level makes spatial variation on the feedback and degrees of coupling coordination degree between land development and use benefit.

Key words: degree of land development, land use benefit, spatial pattern, coordination analysis, Jiangsu

中图分类号:

K902

杨清可, 段学军, 李平星, 王磊. 江苏省土地开发度与利用效益的空间特征及协调分析[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(11): 1696-1704.

Qingke Yang, Xuejun Duan, Pingxing Li, Lei Wang. The Spatial Pattern and Coordination Analysis Between Degree of Land Development and Use Benefit in Jiangsu[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2017, 37(11): 1696-1704.

图/表 10

表1

表2

表3

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 31

[1]	Byomkesh T, Nakagoshi N, Dewan A M.Urbanization and green space dynamics in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh[J]. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2012, 25(1): 45-58. doi: 10.1007/s11355-010-0147-7
[2]	吴晓青,胡远满,贺红士,等. 沈阳市城市扩展与土地利用变化多情景模拟[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(5): 1264-1275. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2009.05.013
	[Wu Xiaoqing, Hu Yuanman, He Hongshi et al. Research for scenarios simulation of future urban growth and land use change in Shenyang City. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(5): 1264-1275.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2009.05.013
[3]	杨伟民. 北京上海开发强度超东京伦敦约一倍[N]. 中国经济导报, 2012-03-31.
	[Yang Weimin. The development intensity of Beijing and Shanghai is about doubled than Tokyo and London. China Economic Herald 2012-03-31.]
[4]	Thapa G B, Paudel G S.Evaluation of the livestock carrying capacity of land resources in the Hills of Nepal based on total digestive nutrient analysis[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2000, 78(3): 223-235. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00128-0
[5]	哈斯巴根,李百岁,宝音,等. 区域土地资源人口承载力理论模型及实证研究[J]. 地理科学, 2008, 28(2): 189-194. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0690.2008.02.010
	[Hasbagen, Li Baisui, Bao Yin et al. Theoretical model and empirical researches of regional land carrying capacity. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2008, 28(2): 189-194.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0690.2008.02.010
[6]	肖思思. 江苏小环太湖地区国土资源承载力及其优化调控措施研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2008.
	[Xiao Sisi.Study on the regulation measures and optimization of carrying capacity of land resources in Taihu Area of Jiangsu. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2008.]
[7]	Kasanko M, Barredo J I, Lavalle C et al. Are European cities becoming dispersed? A comparative analysis of 15 European urban areas[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 77(1-2): 111-130. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.003
[8]	Dai Junliang, Gao Xiaolu, Du Shoushuai.Expansion of Urban Space and Land Use Control in the Process of Urbanization: an Overview[J]. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 8(3): 73-82. doi: 10.1080/10042857.2010.10684994
[9]	Chambers C P.Allocation rules for land division[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2005, 121(2): 236-258. doi: 10.1016/j.jet.2004.04.008
[10]	李智,余宝林,陈晓,等. 基于MAPGIS的土地利用强度分析——以秦皇岛市主城区为例[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息, 2008, 31(4): 34-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5867.2008.04.011
	[Li Zhi, Yu Baolin, Chen Xiao et al. Analysis on present intensity of land use based on MapGIS—Taking the urban area of Qinhuangdao city as an example. Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology, 2008, 31(4): 34-36.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5867.2008.04.011
[11]	田彦军,郝晋珉,韩亮,等. 县域土地利用程度评估模型构建及应用研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2003, 19(6): 293-297.
	[Tian Yanjun, Hao Jinmin, Han Liang et al. Application and modeling of land use degree evaluation-models on county regional scale. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2003, 19(6): 293-297.]
[12]	曹堪宏,朱宏伟. 基于耦合关系的土地利用效益评价——以广州和深圳为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2010,(8): 58-66. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2010.01351
	[Cao Kanhong, Zhu Hongwei.The study on evaluation of land us efficiency: Guangzhou and Shenzhen cases study. Chinese Rural Economy, 2010,(8): 58-66.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2010.01351
[13]	陶江,吴世新,董雯. 天山北坡经济带土地利用效益评价[J]. 干旱区地理, 2009, 32(6): 985-990.
	[Tao Jiang, Wu Shixin, Dong Wen.Evaluation of land use efficiency in Economic Belt on the Northern Slope of the Tianshan Mountains. Arid Land Geography, 2009, 32(6): 985-990.]
[14]	Payne G.Urban land tenure policy options: Titles or rights?[J]. Habitat International, 2001, 25(3): 415-429. doi: 10.1016/S0197-3975(01)00014-5
[15]	Wannasai N, Shrestha R P.Role of land tenure security and farm household characteristics on land use change in the Prasae Watershed, Thailand[J]. Land Use Policy, 2008, 25(2): 214-224. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.07.003
[16]	Louw E.Land assembly for urban transformation—The case of ‘s-Hertogenbosch in The Netherlands[J]. Land Use Policy, 2008, 25(1): 69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.09.002
[17]	Owen S M, Mackenzie A R, Bunce R G H et al. Urban land classification and its uncertainties using principal component and cluster analyses: A case study for the UK West Midlands[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 78(4): 311-321. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.11.002
[18]	Chakir R, Gallo J L.Predicting land use allocation in France: A spatial panel data analysis[J]. Ecological Economics, 2013, 92(8): 114-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.009
[19]	刘彦随,刘玉,陈玉福. 中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389. doi: 10.11821/xb201110008
	[Liu Yansui, Liu Yu, Chen Yufu.Territorial multi-functionality evaluation and decision-making mechanism at county scale in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389.] doi: 10.11821/xb201110008
[20]	龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(2): 131-138. doi: 10.11821/xb201204012
	[Long Hualou.Land use transition and rural transformation development. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(2): 131-138.] doi: 10.11821/xb201204012
[21]	宋戈,高楠. 基于DEA方法的城市土地利用经济效益分析——以哈尔滨市为例[J]. 地理科学, 2008, 28(2): 185-188.
	[Song Ge, Gao Nan.Economic benefit analysis of urban land utilization based on DEA method—A case of Harbin City. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2008, 28(2): 185-188.]
[22]	王国刚,刘彦随,方方. 环渤海地区土地利用效益综合测度及空间分异[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(4): 649-656. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.04.017
	[Wang Guogang, Liu Yansui, Fang Fang.Comprehensive evaluation and spatial distinction of land use efficiency around Bohai Rim in China. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(4): 649-656.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.04.017
[23]	陈逸,黄贤金,吴绍华. 快速城镇化背景下的土地开发度研究综述[J]. 现代城市研究, 2013,(7): 9-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2013.07.003
	[Chen Yi, Huang Xianjin, Wu Shaohua.Review of the degree of land development against the background of rapid urbanization. Modern Urban Research, 2013,(7): 9-15.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2013.07.003
[24]	刘欢,张荣群,郝晋民,等. 基于半方差函数的银川平原土地利用强度图谱分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(23): 225-231. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2012.23.030
	[Liu Huan, Zhang Rongqun, Hao Jinmin et al. Tupu analysis of land use intensity using semi-variance in Yinchuan Plain. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(23): 225-231.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2012.23.030
[25]	关伟,许淑婷. 辽宁省能源效率与产业结构的空间特征及耦合关系[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(4): 520-530. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201404008
	[Guang Wei, Xu Shuting.Spatial patterns and coupling relations between energy efficiency and industrial structure in Liaoning Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(4): 520-530.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201404008
[26]	Costanza R, D’Arge R, Groot R D et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(15): 253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
[27]	Cai Y, Zhang H, Pan W et al. Urban expansion and its influencing factors in Natural Wetland Distribution Area in Fuzhou City, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, 22(5): 568-577. doi: 10.1007/s11769-012-0564-7
[28]	樊杰,陶岸君,吕晨. 中国经济与人口重心的耦合态势及其对区域发展的影响[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(1): 87-95. doi: 10.3760/j.issn:1001-7097.2007.07.012
	[Fan Jie, Yao Anjun, Lv Chen.The coupling mechanism of the centroids of economic gravity and population gravity and its effect on the regional gap in China. Progress in Geography, 2010, 29(1): 87-95.] doi: 10.3760/j.issn:1001-7097.2007.07.012
[29]	吴玉鸣,张燕. 中国区域经济增长与环境的耦合协调发展研究[J]. 资源科学, 2008, 30(1): 25-30. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2008.01.004
	[Wu Yuming, Zhang Yan.Analyzing coupled regional economic growth and environmental conservation in China. Resources Science, 2008, 30(1): 25-30.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2008.01.004
[30]	刘浩,张毅,郑文升. 城市土地集约利用与区域城市化的时空耦合协调发展评价——以环渤海地区城市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(10): 1805-1817. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2011.00211
	[Liu Hao, Zhang Yi, Zheng Wensheng.Evaluation on spatio-temporal development and interaction of intensive urban land use and urbanization: Case studies of the cities in the Bohai Rim region. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(10): 1805-1817.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2011.00211
[31]	江苏省统计局. 江苏统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社,1997-2016.
	[National Bureau of Statistics of Jiangsu Province. Jiangsu Statistics Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press,1997-2016.]

目标层	准则层	指标层	指标计算方法	权重	属性
土地开发度	土地开发广度	建设用地开发	建设用地/区域土地面积	0.577	+
	土地开发强度	用地结构强度	x =∑(Ai ×Ci)	0.205	+
	土地开发强度	人口承载强度	常住人口/城乡建设用地	0.218	+

目标层	准则层	指标层	指标计算方法	权重	属性
土地利用效益	社会效益	居民人均纯收入	居民收入总额/常住人口	0.153	+
		城镇化水平	城镇人口/常住人口	0.039	+
		恩格尔系数	食品消费/居民消费支出总额	0.040	–
		居民人均生活消费	社会消费零售额/常住人口	0.010	+
	经济效益	地均国内生产总值	GDP/区域土地面积	0.005	+
		地均公共财政收入	财政收入/区域土地面积	0.020	+
		地均固定资产投资	固定资产投资/区域土地面积	0.005	+
		产业结构发展高级度^[25]	IH=θ₁+θ₂,其中θ₁用于度量第二三产业相对第一产业转移的效应,θ₂用于度量第二产业向第三产业转移的效应	0.052	+
	生态效益	森林覆盖率	林地面积/区域土地面积	0.063	+
		地均生态服务价值^[26]	生态服务价值总量/区域土地面积	0.393	+
		景观多元化指数^[27]	GM = 1-∑S_i²/ (∑S_i)²,S_i第i类型土地面积	0.220	+

耦合度	耦合阶段	协调发展度	协调发展阶段
0<C≤0.3	分离阶段	0<A≤0.3	低协调阶段
0.3<C≤0.5	拮抗阶段	0.3<A≤0.5	中协调阶段
0.5<C≤0.8	磨合阶段	0.5<A≤0.8	高协调阶段
0.8<C≤1	耦合阶段	0.8<A≤1	极协调阶段

江苏省土地开发度与利用效益的空间特征及协调分析

The Spatial Pattern and Coordination Analysis Between Degree of Land Development and Use Benefit in Jiangsu

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王伟, 王成金. 东北地区高质量发展评价及其空间特征[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1795-1802.
[2]	韩刚,袁家冬,张轩,冯学良. 紧凑城市空间结构对城市能耗的作用机制——基于江苏省的实证研究[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(7): 1147-1154.
[3]	刘晶, 金晓斌, 徐伟义, 杨绪红, 曹帅, 徐翠兰, 隋雪燕, 刘敏, 周寅康. 江苏省耕地细碎化评价与土地整治分区研究[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(5): 817-826.
[4]	田俊峰, 王彬燕, 王士君. 东北三省城市土地利用效益评价及耦合协调关系研究[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(2): 305-315.
[5]	柳林, 杜方叶, 宋广文, 龙冬平, 姜超, 肖露子. 犯罪共生空间的类型识别及其特征分析[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(8): 1199-1209.
[6]	张春梅, 张小林, 徐海英, 卢中辉, 刘传明. 基于空间自相关的区域经济极化结构演化研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(4): 557-563.
[7]	车磊, 白永平, 周亮, 汪凡, 纪学朋, 乔富伟. 中国绿色发展效率的空间特征及溢出分析[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(11): 1788-1798.
[8]	许昕, 赵媛, 张新林, 张秀改. 江苏省人口老龄化空间分异演变及影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(12): 1859-1866.
[9]	车冰清, 朱传耿, 李敏. 江苏省银行网点分布格局及其影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(12): 1867-1874.
[10]	浩飞龙, 王士君. 长春市零售商业空间分布特征及形成机理[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(6): 855-862.
[11]	韩楠, 于维洋. 中国工业废气排放的空间特征及其影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(2): 196-203.
[12]	赵静, 闫小培, 朱莹. 深圳市城中村“非正规住房”空间特征与演化研究[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(12): 1802-1810.
[13]	柯文前, 陆玉麒, 朱宇, 陈伟, 杨青. 交通流网络的时空特征解析——基于张量分解方法视角[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(11): 1679-1687.
[14]	毛广雄, 钱肖颖, 曹蕾, 刘传明. 江苏省劳动密集型产业集群化转移的空间路径及机理研究[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(1): 72-80.
[15]	李平星, 陈诚, 陈江龙. 乡村地域多功能时空格局演变及影响因素研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(7): 845-851.