市场转型背景下北京市中低收入居民的住房机会与职住分离研究

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.01.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于北京市9个不同类型中低收入社区的600位就业者的问卷调查数据,通过构建多元线性回归模型,验证了住房机会（住房搬迁机会）以及就业机会（工作单位类型）等市场转型过程中的制度性因素对中低收入者就业可达性的影响。研究表明,北京市中低收入居民中,国有企业单位及非国有企业单位就业者相对于行政事业单位就业者,显著地承受更大程度的职住分离,体现出单位制度残留的持续影响。由于政府保障性住房项目而搬迁的中低收入居民职住分离程度最大,而因个人原因发生居住搬迁的中低收入者职住距离则相对较近。拥有北京市户口的本地内生型中低收入者、非户主低收入者、男性低收入者的职住分离程度显著更大。最后,北京市中低收入者的月收入与其职住距离成显著正相关,表明市场因素开始发挥作用,但当考虑了住房搬迁机会变量后,部分市场化因素的影响不仅减弱并且变得不显著,而制度性因素的影响变得更强且统计上显著。由此说明,对于转型期的城市中低收入者而言,计划经济下再分配制度的残留与路径依赖以及城市空间的结构性调整对其职住关系的影响更为显著。

关键词: 市场转型, 住房机会, 职住分离, 城市中低收入者, 北京市

Abstract:

In developed and developing countries alike, scholars have endeavored to theorize and test the impacts of urban spatial restructuring—from city-scale suburbanization to neighborhood-scale land use change—on individual commuting and daily travel behaviour. This article tried to provide empirical evidences of residential mobility and home-work links of the moderate to low-income urban residents in Beijing. Based on a 492 household surveys of nine typical neighborhoods which were mainly located in the traditional city centre as well as suburban districts, we compared home-work links and commuting pattern among different moderate to low-income groups, using the measurement of home-work distance and commuting time. Specifically, we used regression models to examine the impacts of institutional factors (such as access to housing, affordable housing policy, different types of work units, HUKOU, home ownership, gender etc.) on low-income residents' job accessibility. The results firstly showed that those who worked for state-owned enterprises (SOE) and these who worked for other non-SOE enterprises, compared to these worked in administrative institution and public sectors, experienced significantly longer home-work separation, which reflected the legacy of DANWEI. Secondly, as to the residential move opportunity, these who were relocated by the governmental housing program tend to endure greatest home-work separation while these who moved by personal reasons had shorter home-work distance. As we expected, those who lived in the suburban neighborhoods had significant worse job accessibility than their counterparts lived in inner city. Thirdly, these who had Beijing HUKOU, who were not household head, male commuters had longer home-work distance. Besides, we found that there was a significant positive correlation between personal monthly salary and home-work distance, which suggested that the job market began to play an important role. Finally, we pointed out special attentions should be paid to the spatial implications of low-income residents’ job accessibility and employment outcomes after passive relocation of their homes as well as their work units.

Key words: market transition, access to housings, home-work link, moderate to low-income, Beijing

中图分类号:

K901.2

张艳, 刘志林. 市场转型背景下北京市中低收入居民的住房机会与职住分离研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(1): 11-19.

Yan Zhang, Zhilin Liu. Access to Housings and Home-work Separation of Moderate to Low-income Residents in Beijing Under the Market-oriented Transition[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2018, 38(1): 11-19.

图/表 4

图1

表1

表2

图2

参考文献 36

[1]	Kain J. Housing Segregation, Negro Unemployment and Metropolitan segregation[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1968, 83(2): 175-197.
[2]	Wilson W J.The Truly Disadvantaged: the Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy.
	[M]. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press,1987.
[3]	McLafferty S, Preston V. Spatial Mismatch and Employment in a Decade of Restructuring[J]. Professional Geographer,1996, 48(4): 420-431. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1996.00420.x
[4]	Shen Q.Spatial and Social Dimensions of Commuting[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,2000, 66(1): 68-82. doi: 10.1080/01944360008976085
[5]	Sanchez T W, ShenQ, Peng Z R. Transit Mobility, Jobs Access and Low-income Labor Participation in US Metropolitan Areas[J]. Urban Studies,2004, 41(7): 1313-1331. doi: 10.1080/0042098042000214815
[6]	Blumenberg E.En-gendering effective planning: spatial mismatch, low-income women, and transportation policy[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,2004, 70(3): 269-281. doi: 10.1080/01944360408976378
[7]	Huang Y Q,Clark W A V. Housing Tenure Choice in Transitional Urban China: A Multilevel Analysis[J]. Urban Studies,2002, 39(1): 7-32. doi: 10.1080/00420980220099041
[8]	Logan J R, Fang Y P, Zhang Z X.The Winners in China's Urban Housing Reform[J]. Housing Studies,2010, 25(1): 101-117. doi: 10.1080/02673030903240660 pmid: 24163494
[9]	刘志林,王茂军,柴彦威. 空间错位理论研究进展与方法论评述[J]. 人文地理,2010,25(1):1-6.
	[Liu Zhilin,Wang Maojun,Chai Yanwei.Spatial Mismatch Theory: A Review on empirical Research and Methodology. Human Geography,2010, 25(1):1-6.]
[10]	孟斌,于慧丽,郑丽敏. 北京大型居住区居民通勤行为对比研究——以望京居住区和天通苑居住区为例[J].地理研究,2012,31(11):2069-2079. doi: 10.11821/yj2012110014
	[Meng Bin,Yu Huili,Zheng Limin.The analysis of commuting behavior in the huge residential districts: A case study of Wangjing and Tiantongyuan in Beijing. Geographical Research,2012,31(11):2069-2079.] doi: 10.11821/yj2012110014
[11]	Zhou S, Wu Z, Cheng L.The impact of spatial mismatch on residents in low-income housing neighborhoods: A study of the Guangzhou metropolis, China[J]. Urban Studies,2013, 50(9):1817-1835. doi: 10.1177/0042098012465906
[12]	柴彦威,张艳,刘志林. 职住分离的空间差异性及其影响因素研究[J]. 地理学报,2011,66(2):157-166.
	[Chai Yanwei, Zhang Yan,Liu Zhilin.Spatial differences of home-work separation and the impacts of housing policy and urban sprawl: Evidence from household survey data in Beijing.Acta Geographica Sinica,2011, 66(2):157-166.]
[13]	Zhou S, Liu Y, Kwan M P.Spatial mismatch in post-reform urban China: A case study of a relocated state-owned enterprise in Guangzhou[J]. Habitat International,2016, 58:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.08.003
[14]	刘志林,张艳,柴彦威. 中国大城市职住分离现象及其特征——以北京市为例[J]. 城市发展研究,2009,16(9):110-117. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2009.09.020
	[Liu Zhilin,Zhang Yan,Chai Yanwei.Home-Work Separation in the Context of Institutional and Spatial Transformation in Urban China. Evidence from Beijing Household Survey Data.Urban Studies,2009,16(9):110-117.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2009.09.020
[15]	Hanson S, Pratt G.Reconceptualizing the links between home and work in urban geography[J]. Economic Geography,1988, 64(4), 299-321. doi: 10.2307/144230
[16]	Nee V.Social Inequalities in Reforming State Socialism-between Redistribution and Markets in China[J]. American Sociological Review,1991, 56(3): 267-282. doi: 10.2307/2096103
[17]	Nee V.The Emergence of a Market Society: Changing Mechanisms of Stratification in China[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1996, 101(4): 908-949. doi: 10.1086/230784
[18]	Bian Y, Logan J R.Market Transition and the Persistence of Power: The Changing Stratification System in Urban China[J]. American Sociological Review,1996, 61(5):739-758. doi: 10.2307/2096451
[19]	魏立华,李志刚. 中国城市低收入阶层的住房困境及其改善模式[J]. 城市规划学刊,2006(2):53-58.
	[Wei Lihua,Li Zhigang.Housing dilemma of urban poor in China and its problem-solving pattern. Urban Planning Forum, 2006(2):53-58.]
[20]	柳林,杨刚斌,何深静. 市场转型期中国大城市低收入社区住房分异研究[J]. 地理科学,2014,34(8):897-906. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201402015
	[Liu Lin,Yang Gangbin,He Shenjing.Housing differentiation in low-income neighborhoods in large Chinese cities under market transition.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2014,34(8):897-906.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201402015
[21]	Huang Y Q, Jiang L W.Housing Inequality in Transitional Beijing[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2009, 33(4): 936-956. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00890.x
[22]	Li S M, Yi Z.The Road to Homeownership under Market Transition - Beijing, 1980-2001[J]. Urban Affairs Review,2007, 42(3): 342-368. doi: 10.1177/1078087406292523
[23]	侯懿珊,柴彦威. 中国住房改革中的单位作用“隐形化”及其住房表现——以北京部分高校居住区为例[J]. 人文地理,2014,29(5):19-24.
	[Hou Yishan, Chai Yanwei.Research for the Invisible Action of Danwei and its Housing Manifestation in China’s Housing Reform: Cases from Several College Staff Neighborhoods in Beijing. Human Geography,2014, 29(5):19-24.]
[24]	李梦玄,周义,胡培. 保障房社区居民居住—就业空间失配福利损失研究[J]. 城市发展研究,2013,10:63-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2013.10.011
	[Li Mengxuan,Zhou Yi, Hu Pei.Welfare Loss Study of the Jobs-Housing Spatial Mismatch of Residents in Ensuring Housing Communities.Urban Development Studies,2013,10:63-68.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2013.10.011
[25]	党云晓, 张文忠, 刘志林. 北京经济适用房布局特征及影响因素研究[J]. 地理研究,2014, 33(5): 876-886. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201405007
	[Dang Yunxiao, Zhang Wenzhong, Liu Zhilin.Spatial distribution and analysis of land-based influencing factors of economical housing projects in Beijing.Geographical Research,2014, 33(5): 876-886.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201405007
[26]	周素红,程璐萍,吴志东. 广州市保障性住房社区居民的居住-就业选择与空间匹配性[J]. 地理研究,2010,29(10):1735-1745.
	[Zhou Suhong,Chen Luping,Wu Zhidong.The Jobs-Housing Relocation and Spatial Matching of Residents in Alleviatory Housing Neighborhoods in Guangzhou. Geographical Research,2010,29(10):1735-1745.]
[27]	易成栋,高萌,张纯. 基于项目、家庭和个体视角的经济适用住房的就业可达性——以北京市为例[J]. 城市发展研究,2015,12:31-37.
	[Yi Chendong,Gao Meng,Zhang Chun.Job accessibility of economic and comfortable housing in Beijing from the perspectives of project, individual and family. Urban Development Studies,2015,12:31-37.]
[28]	张艳,柴彦威. 基于居住区比较的北京城市通勤研究[J]. 地理研究,2009,28(5):1327-1340.
	[Zhang Yan,Chai Yanwei.Characteristics of commuting pattern in Beijing: Based on the comparison of different urban residential areas. Geographical Research,2009, 28(5):1327-1340.]
[29]	于迪,王德,朱玮. 上海市近郊大型社区居民的通勤特征——以宝山区顾村为例[J]. 地理研究,2015,34(8):1481-1491.
	[Yu Di,Wang De,Zhu Wei.Research on the residents’ commuting feature of large-scale residential district in suburban Shanghai: A case study on Gucun, Baoshan District. Geographical Research,2015, 34(8):1481-1491.]
[30]	潘海啸,王晓博,Jennifer DAY.动迁居民的出行特征及其对社会分异和宜居水平的影响[J]. 城市规划学刊,2010(6):61-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2010.06.009
	[Pan Haixiao,Wang Xiaobo,Tennifer Day.Travel characteristics and its impact on social segregation and urban livability. Urban Planning Forum,2010, (6):61-67.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2010.06.009
[31]	张艳,柴彦威. 北京城市中低收入者日常活动时空间特征分析[J]. 地理科学,2011,29(9):1056-1064.
	[Zhang Yan,Chai Yanwei.The Spatio-temporal Activity Pattern of the Middle and the Low-income Residents in Beijing,China. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2011, 29(9):1056-1064.]
[32]	国家统计局.北京市统计年鉴2011[M].北京: 中国统计出版社, 2012.
	[National Bureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China.Beijing Statistical Yearbook 2011.Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2012.]
[33]	刘志林,廖露,钮晨琳. 社区社会资本对居住满意度的影响——基于北京市中低收入社区调查的实证分析[J]. 人文地理,2015, 30(3):21-27.
	[Liu Zhilin,Liao Lu,Niu Chenlin.Residential satisfaction of community social capital: An empirical study of middle and low income residents in urban Beijing. Human Geography,2015, 30(3):21-27.]
[34]	孟斌,郑丽敏,于慧丽. 北京城市居民通勤时间变化及影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展,2011,31(10):1218-1224.
	[Meng Bin,Zheng Limin, Yu Huili.Commuting time change and its influencing factors in Beijing. Progress in Geography,2011,31(10):1218-1224.]
[35]	张纯,柴彦威. 中国城市单位社区的残留现象及其影响因素[J]. 国际城市规划,2009,24(5):15-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9493.2009.05.004
	[Zhang Chun,Chai Yanwei.The residential residual in Danwei community and its impact factor.International Urban Plan,2009, 24(5):15-19.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9493.2009.05.004
[36]	塔娜,柴彦威,刘志林. 单位社区杂化过程与城市性的构建[J]. 人文地理,2012,27(3):39-43.
	[Ta Na,Chai Yanwei,Liu Zhilin.Hybridization of Danwei neighborhood and the emergence of urbanism. Human Geography,2012,27(3):39-43.]

		全体就业样本				回答问卷的就业样本
		样本数		百分比（%）	职住距离均值（km）	样本数	百分比（%）	职住距离均值（km）
工作单位类型	行政事业单位	146	24.3	5.67		58	27.1	3.85
	国有企业	133	22.2	8.96		36	16.8	7.33
	非国有企业	153	25.5	8.09		43	20.1	5.14
	其他单位	161	26.8	2.74		75	35.0	1.57
住房产权	租赁	247	41.2	4.62		104	48.6	2.64
	自有	352	58.7	7.42		110	51.4	5.14
住房搬迁机会	1988年以来未搬迁					31	14.5	2.42
	单位住房福利搬迁					24	11.2	1.73
	拆迁安置搬迁					39	18.2	4.29
	政府保障性住房搬迁					14	6.5	10.89
	个人原因搬迁					92	43.0	3.93

自变量	模型1			模型2
自变量	系数		标准误差	系数	标准误差
住房搬迁机会（参照：1988年以来未搬迁）
单位住房福利搬迁				-0.251	0.482
拆迁安置搬迁				-0.009	0.432
保障性住房项目搬迁				1.248*	0.667
个人原因搬迁				0.203	0.439
工作单位类型（参照：行政事业单位）
国有企业	0.558***	0.184		1.347***	0.394
非国有企业	0.506***	0.180		1.084***	0.386
其他	-0.987**	0.187		-0.706**	0.349
居住区位（参照：市中心）	0.496**	0.129		0.259	0.268
北京户口（参照：外来人口）	0.728**	0.195		0.702*	0.363
自有产权（参照：租房）	0.326**	0.157		0.649**	0.305
人均住房面积	0.013*	0.007		0.018	0.013
家庭就业人数比	-0.390	0.261		0.549	0.510
小汽车拥有率	0.162	0.370		0.236	0.665
年龄	-0.023***	0.008		-0.006	0.019
个人月工资（取对数）	0.274**	0.128		0.026	0.248
男性（参照：女性）	0.200	0.131		0.608**	0.293
户主（参照：非户主）	-0.396**	0.154		-0.502*	0.302
已婚（参照：未婚）	0.095	0.180		-0.104	0.453
有未成年孩子（参照：无未成年孩子）	-0.006	0.162		0.359	0.317
常数	5.536***	1.042		5.092**	2.031
样本数	454			145
R²	0.374			0.435
调整R²	0.353			0.349