关键词: 公共空间, 活力评价, 城市安置社区, AHP-模糊综合评价法, 苏州

Abstract:

The previous rural neighborhood is disintegrated from “diaspora” to “assembly”, making the resettlement community facing to enormous reconstruction pressure in social relation. Based on the connotation of public space vitality and by the AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the author constructed the model evaluating the community public space vitality of urban resettlement communities, conducted quantitative evaluation and comparison for the features of community public space vitality of the three resettlement modes by taking the 6 resettlement communities of Suzhou as examples and found: 1) There were obvious difference in the public space vitality of communities in different resettlement modes. Though the public space of nonlocal resettlement communities was consummated in facilities anddiversiform in types, the social vitality of the public space was the lowest of which the fundamental cause was that: most of the nonlocal resettlement communities were the assembled residential communities crossing villages and houses were distributed in lottery random mode, thus making the fragmentation degree of the social relation of nonlocal resettlement communities the highest. Such phenomenon meant that the social attribute behind the community public space was more important that its physical attribute for the improvement of public space vitality. 2) There was mismatch between the public space factors’ vitality degree and attention degree. Based on the match status between the public space factors’ vitality degree and attention degree, the author divided that public space to four categories—“high attention-low vitality”, “high attention-high vitality”, “low attention-high vitality” and “low attention-low vitality”. Based on the dialectical interactive logic of “the society-the space”, the author proposed the strategies creating the public space vitality of resettlement communities: 1) As for the future resettlement communities suiting the resettlement mode-“small assemblies inside villages plus large assemblies crossing villages”, we may minimize the fragmentation degree of community social relation in the process from “diaspora” to “assembly” by maintaining the population boundary of the previous “villages community” acquaintance society to the maximum extent in order to improve the public space vitality and abate the reconstruction pressure of community social relation. 2) As for the existing resettlement communities, we may divide the priority level of public space transformation based on the matching relation of public space factors’ vitality degree and attention degree, adopt differentiated transformation strategies to improve the public space vitality and the utilization efficiency of the transformation funds.

Key words: public space, vitality evaluation, urban resettlement community, AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, Suzhou