地理科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (12): 2006-2013.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.12.008
王敏1(), 朱竑1(
), 王盈盈1, 丘小静1, 曹伟2, 朱绘霖3
收稿日期:
2018-01-24
修回日期:
2018-05-16
出版日期:
2018-12-20
发布日期:
2018-12-20
作者简介:
作者简介:王敏(1981-),女,广东澄海人,副教授,博士,研究方向为社会文化地理与城乡规划。E-mail:
基金资助:
Min Wang1(), Hong Zhu1(
), Yingying Wang1, Xiaojing Qiu1, Wei Cao2, Huilin Zhu3
Received:
2018-01-24
Revised:
2018-05-16
Online:
2018-12-20
Published:
2018-12-20
Supported by:
摘要:
以广州市永庆坊为例,研究采用内隐联想测验法、问卷以及质性访谈相结合的方法,探究其改造前后社区相关主体的社区感知,旨在探讨社区空间变化背后相关主体的感知态度差异。研究结果揭示了社区感知的外显态度和内隐态度的分离效应,且外显态度表现的差异性强于内隐态度。参与者对永庆坊改造前后的连贯性和积极性存在外显感知态度的显著差异,在内隐态度结果上,参与者对永庆坊改造前后的连贯性和积极性并未存在显著差异。实验结果表明:物质层面的更新并非引起居民等主体对改造热议的根本原因,社区更新重点应关注利益主体对权利、参与权的诉求,关注其利益分配的合理性。诚然,社区改造规划中不仅应重视公众参与和调查,也应深入挖掘社区公众对于社区改造的内隐感知态度,以提高社区规划的效力。研究采用内隐联想测验的神经科学认知方法对景观感知的探讨,以期开拓人文地理学研究方法神经科学转向的新方向。
中图分类号:
王敏, 朱竑, 王盈盈, 丘小静, 曹伟, 朱绘霖. 城市再开发背景下的社区感知——基于内隐联想测验的研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(12): 2006-2013.
Min Wang, Hong Zhu, Yingying Wang, Xiaojing Qiu, Wei Cao, Huilin Zhu. Sense of Community in the Background of Urban Redevelopment:Research with Implicit Association Test[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2018, 38(12): 2006-2013.
表1
广州永庆坊连贯性或积极消极性的内隐联想测验(IAT)程序"
测验顺序 | 任务描述 | (左上侧)标签(右上侧) | 呈现材料 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 概念词辨别 | 永庆坊改造前-永庆坊改造后 | 景观图片 |
2 | 属性词辨别 | 连贯性词汇-不连贯性词汇/积极词汇—消极词汇 | 连贯性或不连贯性词汇/积极或消极词汇 |
3 | 相容任务(练习) | 永庆坊改造前+连贯-永庆坊改造后+不连贯 /永庆坊改造前+积极-永庆坊改造后+消极 | 景观图片+词汇 |
4 | 相容任务(正式) | 永庆坊改造前+连贯-永庆坊改造后+不连贯 /永庆坊改造前+积极-永庆坊改造后+消极 | 景观图片+词汇 |
5 | 相反概念词辨别 | 永庆坊改造后-永庆坊改造前 | 景观图片 |
6 | 不相容任务(练习) | 永庆坊改造后+连贯-永庆坊改造前+不连贯 /永庆坊改造后+积极-永庆坊改造前+消极 | 景观图片+词汇 |
7 | 不相容任务(正式) | 永庆坊改造后+连贯-永庆坊改造前+不连贯 /永庆坊改造后+积极-永庆坊改造前+消极 | 景观图片+词汇 |
[1] | 陆小璇. 初论段义孚思想的形成[J]. 人文地理, 2014, 29(4): 13-18+2. |
[Lu Xiaoxuan. On formation of Yi-Fu Tuan’s thoughts on humanistic geography. Human Geography, 2014, 29(4): 13-18+2.] | |
[2] |
Long D A, Perkins D D.Community social and place predictions of sense of community: A multilevel and longitudinal analysis[J]. Journal of Community Psychology, 2010, 35(5): 563-581.
doi: 10.1002/jcop.20165 |
[3] |
Winnie W S Mak, Rebecca Y M Cheung, Lawrence S C Law. Sense of community in Hong Kong: Relations with community-level characteristics and residents’ well-being[J]. Am J Community Psychol, 2009, 44: 80-92.
doi: 10.1007/s10464-009-9242-z pmid: 19533333 |
[4] |
French S, Wood L, Foster S A et al. Sense of community and its association with the neighborhood built environment[J]. Environment and Behavior, 2014, 46(6): 677-697.
doi: 10.1177/0013916512469098 |
[5] |
李萍, 陈田, 王甫园, 等. 基于文本挖掘的城市旅游社区形象感知研究——以北京市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(6): 1106-1122.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201706009 |
[Li Ping, Chen Tian, Wang Fuyuan et al. Urban tourism community image perception and differentiation based on online comments: A case study of Beijing. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(6): 1106-1122.]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201706009 |
|
[6] |
Greenwald A G, Banaji M R.Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes[J]. Psychological Review, 1995, 102(1): 4-27.
doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.102.1.4 pmid: 7878162 |
[7] | 许骁, 罗小龙, 刘晓曼, 等. 被“遗忘”的城市角落: 对常熟历史街区衰败的思考[J]. 人文地理, 2015, 30(6): 72-76+159. |
[Xu Xiao, Luo Xiaolong, Liu Xiaomanet al. Cornerswith oblivion: Reflection on decay in historic districts in Changshu. Human Geography, 2015, 30(6): 72-76+159.] | |
[8] |
Greenwald A G, Mcghee D E, Schwartz J L.Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1998, 74(6): 1464-1480.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 pmid: 9654756 |
[9] |
Forbes C E, Cameron K A, Grafman J et al. Identifying temporal and causal contributions of neural processes underlying the Implicit Association Test (IAT)[J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2012, 6(1): 320.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00320 pmid: 23226123 |
[10] | 苟雅宏. 应用内隐联想测验的内隐社会认知研究新进展[J]. 社会心理科学, 2008, 23(5): 12-17. |
[Gou Yahong.The new progress in implicit social cognition research which applied implicit association test. Science of Social Psychology, 2008, 23(5): 12-17.] | |
[11] |
侯珂, 邹泓, 张秋凌. 内隐联想测验: 信度、效度及原理[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12(2): 223-230.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2004.02.009 |
[Hou Ke, Zou Hong, Zhang Qiuling.Implicit association test: Reliability, validity and mechanisms. Advances in Psychological Science, 2004, 12(2): 223-230.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2004.02.009 |
|
[12] | 辜应康, 杨杰. 基于内隐联结测验的旅游目的地形象偏好测量研究[J]. 人文地理, 2015, 30(1): 117-121. |
[Gu Yingkang, Yang Jie.Research on the preference measure of tourism destination image by approach of implicit association test. Human Geography, 2015, 30(1): 117-121.] | |
[13] | Nosek B A, Greenwald A G, Banaji M R.The implicit association test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review[M]// Bargh J A. Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior. Hove: Psychology Press, 2007:265-292. |
[14] |
王敏, 林钿, 江荣灏, 等. 传统节庆、身体与展演空间——基于人文地理学视觉量化方法的研究[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(4): 671-684.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201704009 |
[Wang Min, Lin Tian, Jiang Ronghao et al. Analysis of the traditional festival, body and performative space: A human geographical method from the perspective of visual quantitative research. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(4): 671-684.]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201704009 |
|
[15] |
蔡华俭. Greenwald 提出的内隐联想测验介绍[J]. 心理科学进展, 2003, 11(3): 339-344.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2003.03.017 |
[Cai Huajian.A review on implicit association test. Advances in Psychological Science, 2003, 11(3): 339-344.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2003.03.017 |
|
[16] | 凯文•林奇, 城市意象[M] 城市意象[M]. 方益萍, 等译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2001: 35-64. |
[Kevin Lynch.The image of the city. Translated by Fang Yiping et al. Beijing: Hua Xia Press, 2001: 35-64.] | |
[17] | 胡正凡, 林玉莲. 环境心理学(第三版)[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2012: 108-126. |
[Hu Zhengfan, Lin Yulian.Environmental psychology (Third edition). Beijing: China Construction Industry Press, 2012: 108-126.] | |
[18] |
Francis J, Giles-Corti B, Wood L et al. Creating sense of community: The role of public space[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2012, 32(4): 401-409.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002 |
[19] | 耿柳娜, 周文君. 内隐联想测验法在留守儿童电视认知研究中的应用[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2011, 32(10): 144-148. |
[Geng Liuna, Zhou Wenjun.Research on TV cognition of left-behind children by implicit association test. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Science), 2011, 32(10): 144-148.] | |
[20] | 吴丹贤, 周素红. 基于日常购物行为的广州社区居住-商业空间匹配关系[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(2): 228-235. |
[Wu Danxian, Zhou Suhong.The matching pattern of housing-shopping space based on residents’daily shopping behaviors: A case study of communities in Guangzhou, China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(2): 228-235.] | |
[21] | 刘云刚,周雯婷,黄徐璐,等.全球化背景下在华跨国移民社区的空间生产——广州远景路韩国人聚居区的案例研究[J].地理科学,2017,37(7):976-986. |
[Liu Yungang, Zhou Wenting, Huang Xulu et al. Production of space of south Korean enclave in Yuanjing Road, Guangzhou.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2017,37(7):976-986.] | |
[22] | 郭友良,李郇.转型期城市居住用地更新的空间加密化研究——广州市金花街改造再考[J].地理科学, 2018, 38(2):161-167. |
[Guo Youliang, Li Xun.Redevelopment of residential land and the densification of inner city admisttransition:Revisiting the case of Jinhua neighbourhood in Guangzhou.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2018, 38(2):161-167.] | |
[23] |
杨晓辉, 丁金华. 利益博弈视角下的城市土地再开发与规划调控策略[J]. 规划师, 2013, 29(7): 85-89+100.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2013.07.015 |
[Yang Xiaohui, Ding Jinhua. Land redevelopment and planning control strategies based on benefit gaming. Planners, 2013, 29(7): 85-89+100.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2013.07.015 |
|
[24] |
Zhang C, Li X.Urban redevelopment as multi-scalar planning and contestation: The case of Enning Road project in Guangzhou, China[J]. Habitat International, 2016, 56:157-165.
doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.05.008 |
[25] |
Tan X H, Altrock U.Struggling for an adaptive strategy? Discourse analysis of urban regeneration processes: A case study of Enning Road in Guangzhou City[J]. Habitat International, 2016, 56: 245-257.
doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.06.006 |
[26] | Wu Z Q, Wang D, Zhu C S et al. The role of third-party participation in urban planning: A case study on the Enning Road neighborhood renovation project in Guangzhou[J]. China City Planning Review, 2014, 23(3): 48-57. |
[27] | 赵渺希, 钟烨, 王世福, 等. 不同利益群体街道空间意象的感知差异——以广州恩宁路为例[J]. 人文地理, 2014, 29(1): 72-79. |
[Zhao Miaoxi, Zhong Ye, Wang Shifu et al. Comparing street space perception of stakeholders: A case study of Enning Road in Guangzhou. Human Geography, 2014, 29(1): 72-79.] | |
[28] | 张延吉, 秦波, 唐杰. 城市建成环境对居住安全感的影响——基于全国278个城市社区的实证分析[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(9): 1318-1325. |
[Zhang Yanji, Qin Bo, Tang Jie.The influence of urban built-up environment on sense of residential security: Based on the empirical research of 278 communities in urban China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(9): 1318-1325.] | |
[29] |
Korf B.A neural turn? On the ontology of the geographical subject[J]. Environment and Planning A, 2008, 40(3): 715-732.
doi: 10.1068/a3938 |
[30] | Pykett J.Geography and neuroscience: Critical engagements with geography’s ‘neural turn’[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2017 (e42): 1-14. |
[1] | 洪学婷, 黄震方, 陈晓艳, 徐冬. 场所叙事视角下乡愁的多维解构与影响机理——基于新民谣歌词与评论的分析[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 55-63. |
[2] | 陈昊曦, 袁振杰, 蔡晓梅. 广州法系群体的日常生活与地方认同研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 2027-2036. |
[3] | 王兆峰, 刘庆芳. 产业融合背景下运动休闲特色小镇的空间分异及形成因素[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1310-1318. |
[4] | 刘云刚, 刘玄宇, 张争胜. 渔民视角下中国南海的领域构建[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(7): 1062-1071. |
[5] | 林耿, 王念, 产斯友. 乡村建筑营造:认同的建构[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 518-527. |
[6] | 陶伟, 蔡浩辉, 廖健豪. 粮食地理学视角下乡村本土农业的社会建构——元阳哈尼梯田稻作系统案例[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 637-645. |
[7] | 杨槿, 徐辰, 朱竑. 本土产业发展视角下的乡村地方性重构——基于阳美玉器产业的文化经济地理分析[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(3): 374-382. |
[8] | 尹铎, 高权, 杨梦琪. 城市失地农民“家”的重构与协商——以鄂尔多斯为例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(12): 1849-1856. |
[9] | 顾秋实, 张海平, 陈旻, 谢毅. 基于手机信令数据的南京市旅游客源地网络层级结构及区域分异研究[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(11): 1739-1748. |
[10] | 尹铎, 蔡慕言, 梁金多, 朱竑, 高权. 广州城市流浪乞讨者的空间管治与日常生活实践[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(3): 450-458. |
[11] | 卢松, 张小军, 张业臣. 徽州传统村落的时空分布及其影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(10): 1690-1698. |
[12] | 袁钰莹. 全新世中期西辽河流域聚落空间分布及成因[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(5): 773-779. |
[13] | 阙维民. 世界遗产预备项目“丝绸之路-海路-中国段”研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(11): 1678-1688. |
[14] | 朱竑, 尹铎. 自然的社会建构:西方人文地理学对自然的再认识[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(11): 1609-1616. |
[15] | 万蕙, 唐雪琼. 中越边境乡村民居景观的符号象征与认同建构——广西龙州县边境乡村案例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(4): 595-602. |
|