地方依恋对城市居民社区参与的影响研究 ——以广州为例

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.05.004

地理科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 734-741.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.05.004

地方依恋对城市居民社区参与的影响研究 ——以广州为例

吴蓉¹^,²(), 黄旭¹^,², 刘晔¹^,², 李志刚³^,⁴(), 刘于琪⁵

1.中山大学地理科学与规划学院, 广东广州 510275
2.广东省城市化与地理环境空间模拟重点实验室, 广东广州 510275
3.武汉大学城市设计学院, 湖北武汉 430070
4.湖北省人居环境工程技术研究中心, 湖北武汉 430070
5.香港大学城市规划与设计系, 香港 999077

收稿日期:2018-04-09 修回日期:2018-07-02 出版日期:2019-05-10 发布日期:2021-03-17
通讯作者: 李志刚 E-mail:wurong5@mail2.sysu.edu.cn;zhigangli@whu.edu.cn
作者简介:吴蓉（1993-）,女,甘肃天水人,博士研究生,研究方向为城市地理、社会与环境心理。E-mail:wurong5@mail2.sysu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金优秀青年基金项目(41422103);国家自然科学基金面上项目(41771167);国家自然科学基金青年项目资助(41501151);国家自然科学基金青年项目资助(41701153)

The Effect of Place Attachment on Urban Residents’ Civic Engagement: The Case of Guangzhou City

Wu Rong¹^,²(), Huang Xu¹^,², Liu Ye¹^,², Li Zhigang³^,⁴(), Liu Yuqi⁵

1. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, China
2. Guangdong Key Laboratory for Urbanization and Geo-simulation, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, China
3. School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
4. Hubei Residential Environment Research Center of Engineering and Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
5. Faculty of Architecture, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China

Received:2018-04-09 Revised:2018-07-02 Online:2019-05-10 Published:2021-03-17
Contact: Li Zhigang E-mail:wurong5@mail2.sysu.edu.cn;zhigangli@whu.edu.cn
Supported by:
Excellent Young Scholars Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(41422103);General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(41771167);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41501151);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41701153)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于2015年广州市1 273份居民问卷调查和半结构性访谈数据,结合逐步LPM回归和中介效应模型,探讨地方依恋和社区参与两者关系中存在的中介效应及其传导机制,并系统对比本地居民与外来移民之间的差异。研究发现：① 社区居民的地方依恋能够直接提升其社区参与期望;② 社区参与行为作为一个中介变量,在地方依恋对社区参与期望的影响中发挥中介效应;③ 对比本地居民,外来移民的社区参与行为和期望程度相对较低;④ 外来移民的社区参与行为对其社区参与期望影响的中介效应相对较弱。揭示了中国城市居民社区参与中存在户籍制度壁垒,需要进一步通过社区公共服务均等化措施,提升居民尤其是外来移民的获得感、幸福感和安全感。

关键词: 社区参与, 地方依恋, 社区治理, 户籍, 广州

Abstract:

China has experienced an unprecedented surge of rural-urban migration since the mid 1980s, which has led to rapid growth of the urban population, especially in large cities. Along with the vigorous reconstruction of urban space, residents’ place attachment to the neighborhood and their civic engagement are also dramatically changing, which deserves in-depth research. Particularly, without the official residential registration status(Hukou in Chinese), floating population own a lower level of place attachment to the destination neighborhood, and they seem to be lack of aspiration for civic engagement. Against this background, the first objective of this article is to explore the relationship between residents’ place attachment and their civic engagement(which is framed by two dimensions: actual participation behavior and aspiration for civic engagement), with the emphasis on the mediation effect in their interactions. The other purpose is to discuss the heterogeneity of residents’ civic engagement brought by the difference in their Hukou status. It contrasts the group of local residents with the group of migrants, especially in the fields of their aspiration for civic engagement and related mediation effects. In light of the evidence from a 2015 survey of about 1 273 residents in Guangzhou, our empirical findings by a stepwise approach of LPM Models have found that: 1) Residents’ place attachment has a directly-positive impact on their aspiration to participate in civic engagement; 2) This relation is mediated by residents’ actual participation behavior: place attachment also exert an indirect effect on the future aspiration via actual participation behavior; 3) Compared to the group of local residents, migrants hold a lower level of place attachment and civic engagement (both actual behavior and future aspiration); 4) The mediation effect of migrants’ actual participation behavior is much weaker than the one of local residents. These results imply that: without Hukou status, migrants did not get a positive feedback from their participation experience and thereby are not eager to participate in civic engagement. Based on these findings, this article outlines the nature of heterogeneity of place attachment and the institutional barriers of civic engagement in urban China: The Hukou system is still restricting migrants’ participation. Thus, to improve residents’ social wellbeing and their sense of gaining, policymaking needs to give more emphasis on the equalization of public services and the access to civic engagement, especially for migrants.

Key words: civic engagement, place attachment, neighborhood governance, hukou, Guangzhou

中图分类号:

K901.2

吴蓉, 黄旭, 刘晔, 李志刚, 刘于琪. 地方依恋对城市居民社区参与的影响研究 ——以广州为例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(5): 734-741.

Wu Rong, Huang Xu, Liu Ye, Li Zhigang, Liu Yuqi. The Effect of Place Attachment on Urban Residents’ Civic Engagement: The Case of Guangzhou City[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2019, 39(5): 734-741.

图/表 4

图1

图2

表1

表2

广州市分样本（本地居民与外来移民）社区参与的回归结果比较"

	本地居民分组						外来移民分组
	模型一		模型二		模型三		模型一		模型二		模型三
	系数	t值	系数	t值	系数	t值	系数	t值	系数	t值	系数	t值
Std（地方依恋）	0.253^***	(7.97)	0.185^***	(5.81)	0.181^***	(6.02)	0.306^***	(5.66)	0.172^***	(4.02)	0.278^***	(5.02)
45岁及以下	0.245^*	(2.44)	0.301^***	(3.92)	0.128	(1.33)	0.091	(0.73)	0.298^**	(3.21)	0.043	(0.34)
45岁以上	0.193	(1.60)	0.445^***	(4.53)	0.020	(0.17)	0.006	(0.02)	0.27	(1.50)	-0.038	(-0.17)
性别	0.009	(0.15)	0.163^**	(2.65)	-0.054	(-0.91)	-0.047	(-0.49)	0.135	(1.63)	-0.069	(-0.72)
大学本科（大专）及以上	0.011	(0.10)	-0.191^*	(-2.09)	0.085	(0.91)	0.211	(1.53)	-0.052	(-0.44)	0.219	(1.60)
高中（中专）及以下	-0.055	(-0.63)	-0.137	(-1.63)	-0.001	(-0.02)	-0.068	(-0.60)	0.053	(0.54)	-0.076	(-0.68)
党员	0.341^***	(4.45)	0.489^***	(5.93)	0.150	(1.94)	0.359	(1.91)	0.124	(0.72)	0.339	(1.78)
未婚、离异或丧偶	-0.473^*	(-2.46)	0.081	(0.46)	-0.505^**	(-2.94)	-0.188	(-0.98)	0.139	(0.89)	-0.21	(-1.11)
已婚	0.032	(0.25)	-0.140	(-1.07)	0.087	(0.71)	-0.402^**	(-3.00)	-0.023	(-0.23)	-0.398^**	(-2.97)
拓展型家庭	-0.000	(-0.01)	0.145	(1.72)	-0.057	(-0.75)	0.162	(0.82)	0.267	(1.40)	0.119	(0.60)
联合家庭	-0.043	(-0.47)	-0.043	(-0.52)	-0.027	(-0.31)	-0.232	(-1.24)	0.051	(0.33)	-0.24	(-1.29)
其他家庭	-0.099	(-0.69)	-0.123	(-0.90)	-0.051	(-0.37)	0.172	(1.15)	0.366^**	(2.60)	0.113	(0.76)
Std（收入）	-0.163	(-0.74)	-0.149	(-0.97)	-0.105	(-0.49)	-0.011^*	(-2.30)	-0.033^***	(-6.22)	-0.006	(-1.12)
Std（居住时长）	-0.025	(-0.72)	0.054	(1.39)	-0.046	(-1.50)	0.052	(0.47)	0.040	(0.41)	0.046	(0.41)
房屋所有权	-0.054	(-0.64)	-0.184^*	(-2.23)	0.018	(0.23)	0.305^*	(2.22)	0.242	(1.85)	0.265	(1.95)
Std（社会交往人数）	0.010	(0.45)	0.010	(0.39)	0.006	(0.30)	0.000	(0.01)	0.056	(0.60)	-0.009	(-0.10)
老街坊社区	0.000	(0.00)	0.000	(0.00)	0.000	(0.00)	0.000	(0.00)	0.000	(0.00)	0.000	(0.00)
单位社区	-0.184	(-1.92)	-0.157	(-1.60)	-0.123	(-1.39)	0.039	(0.22)	0.239	(1.40)	0.001	(0.00)
城中村	-0.092	(-0.92)	0.201	(1.92)	-0.170	(-1.88)	0.014	(0.09)	-0.003	(-0.02)	0.015	(0.10)
保障房社区	0.095	(0.61)	0.381^**	(2.78)	-0.053	(-0.36)	0.455^*	(2.00)	0.673^*	(2.03)	0.346	(1.70)
商品房社区	-0.280^**	(-2.78)	0.050	(0.48)	-0.300^**	(-3.10)	-0.004	(-0.03)	0.089	(0.50)	-0.019	(-0.11)
高档商品房社区	-0.511^**	(-3.29)	-0.349^**	(-2.92)	-0.375^*	(-2.52)	-0.126	(-0.57)	0.511^**	(2.59)	-0.209	(-0.97)
Std（社区参与频率）	–	–	–		0.390^***	(11.31)	0.191^***	–	–	–	–	(3.00)
常量	0.140	(0.88)	0.0876	(0.62)	0.106	(0.70)	-0.251	(-1.11)	-1.010^***	(-5.14)	-0.0882	(-0.39)
样本数	818	–	818	–	818	–	455	–	455	–	455	–

表2

参考文献 32

[1]	李志刚. 中国城市“新移民”聚居区居住满意度研究: 以北京、上海、广州为例[J]. 城市规划, 2011,35(12):75-82.
	[ Li Zhigang. A study of residential satisfaction in the neo-migrant enclaves of Chinese cities: A case of Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. City Planning Review, 2011,35(12):75-82.]
[2]	Brand R, Fregonese S. The radicals’ city: Urban environment, polarisation, cohesion[M]. Surrey: Ashgate, 2013.
[3]	Forrest R, Kearns A. Social cohesion, social capital and the Neighbourhood[J]. Urban Studies, 2001,38(12):2125-2143.
[4]	Putnam R D. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community[M]. New York: Simon & Schuste, 2000.
[5]	Lewicka M. Ways to make people active: The role of place attachment, cultural capital, and neighborhood ties[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2005,25(4):381-395.
[6]	Palmer N A, Perkins D D, Xu Q W. Social capital and community participation among migrant workers in China[J]. Journal of Community Psychology, 2011,39(1):89-105.
[7]	Bourdieu P. The forms of capital//J Richardson. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education[M]. New York: Greenwood Press, 1986: 24-258.
[8]	Xu Q, Perkins D D, Chow J C. Sense of community, neighboring, and social capital as predictors of local political participation in China[J]. American journal of community psychology, 2010,45(3-4):259-271. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9312-2 pmid: 20229225
[9]	Stefaniak A, Bilewicz M, Lewicka M. The merits of teaching local history: Increased place attachment enhances civic engagement and social trust[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2017,51:217-225.
[10]	杜宗斌, 苏勤. 社区归属感对乡村旅游地居民社区参与的影响——以浙江安吉为例[J]. 旅游科学, 2013,27(3):61-71.
	[ Du Zongbin, Su Qin. Influence of sense of community on community involvement in rural tourism destination: A case study of Anji County in Zhejiang Province. Tourism Science, 2013,27(3):61-71.]
[11]	Williams D R, Roggenbuck J W. Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results[Z]. Paper Presented at the Session on Outdoor Planning and Management, NRPA Symposium on Leisure Research, San Antonio, TX, 1989.
[12]	Shamai S. Sense of place: An empirical measurement[J]. Geoforum, 1991,22(3):347-358.
[13]	盛婷婷, 杨钊. 国外地方感研究进展与启示[J]. 人文地理, 2015,30(4):11-17.
	[ Sheng Tingting, Yang Zhao. Research process and enlightenment on sense of place in foreign countries. Human Geography, 2015,30(4):11-17.]
[14]	杜宗斌, 苏勤, 姜辽. 乡村旅游地居民社区归属感模型构建及应用——以浙江安吉为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2013,28(6):65-74.
	[ Du Zongbin, Su Qin, Jiang Liao. A structural model of residents’ sense of community in rural tourism destinations and its application: A case study of Anji County in Zhejiang Province. Tourism Tribune, 2013,28(6):65-74.]
[15]	Walker A J, Ryan R L. Place attachment and landscape preservation in rural New England: A maine case study[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2008,86(2):141-152.
[16]	Halpenny E A. Pro-environmental behaviours and park visitors: The effect of place attachment[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010,30(4):409-421.
[17]	张京祥, 赵丹, 陈浩. 增长主义的终结与中国城市规划的转型[J]. 城市规划, 2013(1):45-50.
	[ Zhang Jingxiang, Zhao Dan, Chen Hao. Termination of growth supremacism and transformation of China’s urban planning. City Planning Review, 2013(1):45-50.]
[18]	王洋, 金利霞, 张虹鸥, 等. 广州市居民住房条件的空间分异格局与形成机制[J]. 地理科学, 2017,37(6):868-875.
	[ Wang Yang, Jin Lixia, Zhang Hongou, et al. The spatial differentiation pattern and formation mechanism of housing conditions in Guangzhou City, China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017,37(6):868-875.]
[19]	封丹, Breitung W, 朱竑. 住宅郊区化背景下门禁社区与周边邻里关系——以广州丽江花园为例[J]. 地理研究, 2011,30(1):61-70.
	[ Feng Dan, Werner Breitung, Zhu Hong. Space of Fragmentation: A study of the linkages between gated communities and their neighborhoods in Guangzhou, China. Geographical Research, 2011,30(1):61-70.]
[20]	刘云刚, 周雯婷, 黄徐璐, 等. 全球化背景下在华跨国移民社区的空间生产——广州远景路韩国人聚居区的案例研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017,37(7):976-986.
	[ Liu Yungang, Zhou Wenting, Huang Xulu, et al. Production of space of south Korean Enclave in Yuanjing Road, Guangzhou. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017,37(7):976-986.]
[21]	赵静, 闫小培, 朱莹. 深圳市城中村“非正规住房”空间特征与演化研究[J]. 地理科学, 2016,36(12):1802-1810.
	[ Zhao Jing, Yan Xiaopei, Zhu Ying. Spatial characteristics and evolution of informal housing in urban village of Shenzhen. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016,36(12):1802-1810.]
[22]	张艳, 刘志林. 市场转型背景下北京市中低收入居民的住房机会与职住分离研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018,38(1):11-19.
	[ Zhang Yan, Liu Zhilin. Access to housings and home-work separation of moderate to low-income residents in Beijing under the market-oriented transition. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(1):11-19.]
[23]	黎熙元, 陈福平 . 社区论辩: 转型期中国城市社区的形态转变[J]. 社会学研究, 2008(2):192-217.
	[ Li Xiyuan, Chen Fuping. Community issue: Change of urban community in China’s social transition. Sociological Studies, 2008(2):192-217.]
[24]	Liu Y, Li Z G, Liu Y, et al. Growth of rural migrant enclaves in Guangzhou, China: Agency, everyday practice and social mobility[J]. Urban Studies, 2015,52(16):3086-3105.
[25]	田明. 地方因素对流动人口城市融入的影响研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017,37(7):997-1005.
	[ Tian Ming. Local factors effects on the urban integration for the floating population. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017,37(7):997-1005.]
[26]	Trentelman C K. Place attachment and community attachment: A primer grounded in the lived experience of a community sociologist[J]. Society & Natural Resources, 2009,2(3):191-210.
[27]	Wu F L. Neighborhood attachment, social participation, and willingness to stay in China’s low-income communities[J]. Urban Affairs Review, 2012,48(4):547-570.
[28]	赵莉, 王萌, 蒋亮亮. 城市居民社区参与意愿及相关影响因素分析——以苏州城市老新村改造为例[J]. 社会工作, 2011(24):55-57.
	[ Zhao Li, Wang Meng, Jiang Liangliang. Analysis of citizens' willingness of community involvement and its relevant factors:Take an example in the modification of old estates in Suzhou. Journal of Social Work, 2011(24):55-57.]
[29]	Lewicka M. Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2011,31(3):207-230.
[30]	Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Health Psychology Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology American Psychological Association, 2002,21(2):194-201.
[31]	Zhu Y S, Fu Q. Deciphering the civic virtue of communal space: Neighborhood attachment, social capital, and neighborhood participation in urban China[J]. Environment and Behavior, 2016,49(7):446-447.
[32]	温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014,22(5):731-745.
	[ Wen Zhonglin, Ye Baojuan. Analyses of mediating effects: The development of methods and models. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014,22(5):731-745.]

	社区参与期望			社区参与行为		社区参与期望
	（模型一）			（模型二）		（模型三）
	系数		t值	系数	t值	系数		t值
Std（地方依恋）	0.272^***		(9.87)	0.177^***	(6.88)	0.216^***		(7.96)
45岁及以下	0.162^*		(2.11)	0.312^***	(5.34)	0.063		(0.83)
45岁以上	0.143		(1.46)	0.408^***	(4.91)	0.014		(0.15)
性别	0.028		(0.52)	0.186^***	(3.81)	-0.031		(-0.61)
大学本科（大专）及以上	0.100		(1.23)	-0.111	(-1.54)	0.135		(1.74)
高中（中专）及以下	-0.015		(-0.22)	-0.024	(-0.37)	-0.008		(-0.12)
党员	0.317^***		(4.39)	0.440^***	(5.85)	0.177^*		(2.47)
未婚、离异或丧偶	-0.279^*		(-2.06)	0.083	(0.71)	-0.305^*		(-2.34)
已婚	-0.257^**		(-2.75)	-0.177^*	(-2.20)	-0.201^*		(-2.18)
拓展型家庭	0.019		(0.24)	0.168^*	(2.16)	-0.035		(-0.49)
联合家庭	-0.090		(-1.09)	0.010	(0.14)	-0.094		(-1.17)
其他家庭	0.057		(0.56)	0.111	(1.18)	0.0214		(0.22)
广州户口（本地）	0.197^*		(2.32)	0.691^***	(8.18)	-0.022		(-0.26)
广州户口（迁移）	0.189^*		(2.16)	0.525^***	(6.40)	0.022		(0.26)
Std（收入）	-0.016^***		(-3.50)	-0.030^***	(-5.18)	-0.006		(-1.49)
Std（居住时长）	0.015		(0.45)	0.085^*	(2.40)	-0.012		(-0.38)
房屋所有权	0.080		(1.14)	-0.017	(-0.25)	0.085		(1.29)
Std（社会交往人数）	0.015		(0.66)	0.024	(1.02)	0.007		(0.34)
老街坊社区	0.000		(0.00)	0.000	(0.00)	0.000		(0.00)
单位社区	-0.113		(-1.34)	-0.033	(-0.39)	-0.102		(-1.29)
城中村	-0.113		(-1.38)	0.041	(0.50)	-0.126		(-1.62)
保障房社区	0.266^*		(1.98)	0.551^***	(4.47)	0.091		(0.72)
商品房社区	-0.181^*		(-2.08)	0.098	(1.10)	-0.212^*		(-2.49)
高档商品房社区	-0.360^**		(-3.02)	0.004	(0.04)	-0.361^**		(-3.17)
Std（社区参与频率）	-	-		-	-	0.317^***		(10.70)
样本数	1273	-		1273	-	1273	-
R²	0.193	-		0.332	-	0.259	-

地方依恋对城市居民社区参与的影响研究 ——以广州为例

The Effect of Place Attachment on Urban Residents’ Civic Engagement: The Case of Guangzhou City

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	魏宗财, 甄峰, 莫海彤, 刘晨瑜, 彭丹丽. 基于地理加权回归的中心城区共享单车出行特征及影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(7): 1082-1091.
[2]	邓清华, 薛德升, 龚建周. 广州市居民网络购物频率的影响因素及其空间差异[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 928-938.
[3]	陈昊曦, 袁振杰, 蔡晓梅. 广州法系群体的日常生活与地方认同研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 2027-2036.
[4]	陈浩然, 安宁, 朱竑. 城市的垂直流动：广州再领域化中的人地关系重构[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(10): 1627-1635.
[5]	魏宗财, 甄峰, 秦萧. 广州市保障房住区居住环境品质及其制度影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(1): 89-96.
[6]	陈慧灵,王伯礼,曹小曙,石恩名,刘永伟. 广州市地铁对常规公交出行成本影响及其空间公平性研究[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(8): 1265-1275.
[7]	李先锋, 李郇, 杜志威. 快速城镇化地区外来人口入户时空特征与影响因素分析——基于2010~2015年东莞积分入户全样本数据[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(5): 742-749.
[8]	尹铎, 蔡慕言, 梁金多, 朱竑, 高权. 广州城市流浪乞讨者的空间管治与日常生活实践[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(3): 450-458.
[9]	夏丽丽, 王润晓, 梁新怡, 肖凡. 全球-地方背景下东道国企业研发行为的演变及其影响因素研究——基于技术溢出视角的广州市本土制造企业微观实证[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(2): 277-284.
[10]	古恒宇, 刘子亮, 沈体雁. 中国省际流动人口户籍迁移意愿的空间格局及影响机制分析[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(11): 1702-1710.
[11]	郭友良, 李郇. 转型期城市居住用地更新的空间加密化研究——广州市金花街改造再考[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(2): 161-167.
[12]	王敏, 朱竑, 王盈盈, 丘小静, 曹伟, 朱绘霖. 城市再开发背景下的社区感知——基于内隐联想测验的研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(12): 2006-2013.
[13]	傅辰昊, 周素红, 闫小培, 柳林. 广州市零售商业中心消费活动时变模式及其影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(1): 20-30.
[14]	齐兰兰, 周素红. 邻里建成环境对居民外出型休闲活动时空差异的影响——以广州市为例[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(1): 31-40.
[15]	周李, 张清源, 朱其静, 陆林. 广交会对星级酒店房价影响的时空分异研究——以第117和118届广交会为例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(9): 1363-1373.