基于文献计量方法的国内外城市更新比较研究

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.08.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用文献计量方法，利用Citespace工具对国内外城市更新研究进行知识图谱分析，从演化过程、发文期刊和研究机构的特征、研究热点等方面对比国内外城市更新研究的差异。研究表明：① 国内外城市更新研究的发文量呈现波动上升的趋势，在快速发展阶段尤为显著，每年发文量分别达到117篇和238篇；② 研究文献多集中在城市规划、区域研究、城市设计、建筑学等期刊。相对于国外，国内发文期刊更集中。国内排名前10的期刊发文量占比达46.65%，国外仅29.84%；③ 国内外的研究机构间初步形成合作网络，但网络联系与合作程度依然较低。相对于国外，国内研究机构间联系更紧密。④ 国外研究热点集中在伙伴关系与公众参与、绅士化、可持续发展、城市转型和文化创意等方面，国内研究热点体现在旧城改造与房地产开发、历史街区和工业遗产的保护与更新、广州?深圳城市更新的探索与实践、公众参与的初步探讨等方面。

关键词: 城市地理, 城市更新, 知识图谱, 比较研究

Abstract:

Urban regeneration is an urban redevelopment process inevitable in urbanization, and it is gradually becoming a hot issue covering many disciplines such as economics, social management, public policy, and ecological environment. In this paper, we employed the bibliometric method and use the visualization tool, Citespace, to map knowledge domains of urban regeneration at home and abroad. Then, a quantitative comparative analysis on urban regeneration at home and abroad has been done in three aspects: evolutionary process, characteristics of published journals and research institutions, and research hotspots. Finally, the gaps and future research directions of urban regeneration research in China are put forward. The research indicates that: 1) The number of literatures published on urban regeneration at home and abroad shows a fluctuating upward trend, especially in the rapid development stage, when 117 articles and 238 articles were published each year. 2) Literatures mostly published in journals referring urban planning, regional research, urban design, and architecture. Compared with foreign journals, literature of urban regeneration in domestic is more concentrated. The top ten journals in China accounted for 46.65% of the total number of publications, while only 29.84% in foreign countries. 3) There is a preliminary cooperation network between research institutions both at home and abroad, but the degree of network connection and cooperation is still low. Compared with foreign institutions, links between domestic research institutions are relatively closer. 4) The foreign research hotspots mostly focus on partnership and participation, gentrification, sustainable development, urban transformation, and cultural creativity, while domestic research hotspots are reflected in urban renewal and estate development, protection and regeneration of historical blocks and industrial relics, exploration and practice of urban regeneration in Guangzhou-Shenzhen, and the preliminary discussion on participation, and so on.

Key words: urban geography, urban regeneration, mapping knowledge domains, comparative study

中图分类号:

K902

孙威, 王晓楠, 盛科荣. 基于文献计量方法的国内外城市更新比较研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1300-1309.

Sun Wei, Wang Xiaonan, Sheng Kerong. Comparative Study on Urban Regeneration at Domestic and Foreign Based on Bibliometric Methods[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(8): 1300-1309.

图/表 6

图 1

图 2

图 3

图 4

图 5

图 6

参考文献 26

[1]	Roberts P. Urban Regeneration: A Hand-book[M]. London: SAGE Publications, 2000.
[2]	Knittel R E Effect of urban-renewal on community-development[J]. American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health, 1963. 53 (1): 67- 70. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.53.1.67
[3]	Pozen M W, Goshin A R, Bellin L E Evaluation of housing standards of families within 4 years of relocation by urban renewal[J]. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation’s Health, 1968. 58 (7): 1256- 1264. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.58.7.1256
[4]	Lee B A, Spain D, Umberson D J Neighborhood revitalization and racial change—The case of Washington, DC[J]. Demography, 1985. 22 (4): 581- 602. doi: 10.2307/2061589
[5]	Silvers A H Urban renewal and black power[J]. American Behavioral Scientist, 1969. 12 (4): 43- 46. doi: 10.1177/000276426901200409
[6]	Hackworth J, Smith N The changing state of gentrification[J]. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 2001. 92 (4): 464- 477. doi: 10.1111/1467-9663.00172
[7]	Foley P, Martin S A new deal for the community? Public participation in regeneration and local service delivery[J]. Policy And Politics, 2000. 28 (4): 479- 492. doi: 10.1332/0305573002501090
[8]	Lowndes V, Skelcher C The dynamics of multi-organizational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance[J]. Public Administration, 1998. 76 (2): 313- 333. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00103
[9]	Pratt A C Creative cities: The cultural industries and the creative class[J]. Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography, 2008. 90B (2): 107- 117.
[10]	Evans G Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy[J]. Urban Studies, 2009. 46 (5-6): 1003- 1040. doi: 10.1177/0042098009103853
[11]	韩顺法, 纪小美, 陶卓民创意城市发展模式类型的适应性评价[J]. 地理科学, 2018. 38 (9): 1458- 1465.
	Han Shunfa, Ji Xiaomei, Tao Zhuomin The development mode of creative city and its adaptability evaluation[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018. 38 (9): 1458- 1465.
[12]	李强, 陈宇琳, 刘精明中国城镇化“推进模式”研究[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012. (7): 82- 100+204-205.
	Li Qiang, Chen Yulin, Liu Jingming Research on the‘promoting model’of China's urbanization[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2012. (7): 82- 100+204-205.
[13]	宋金平, 王恩儒, 张文新, 等北京住宅郊区化与就业空间错位[J]. 地理学报, 2007. 62 (4): 387- 396. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2007.04.005
	Song Jinping, Wang Enru, Zhang Wenxin et al Housing suburbanization and employment spatial mismatch in Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007. 62 (4): 387- 396. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2007.04.005
[14]	黄怡, 吴长福, 谢振宇城市更新中地方文化资本的激活——以山东省滕州市接官巷历史街区更新改造规划为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2015. (2): 110- 118.
	Huang Yi, Wu Changfu, Xie Zhenyu Stimulating local cultural capital in urban renewal: The case of urban renewal program and planning of Jieguan Lane, Tengzhou[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2015. (2): 110- 118.
[15]	龙腾飞, 顾敏, 徐荣国城市更新公众参与的动力机制探讨[J]. 现代城市研究, 2008. (7): 22- 26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2008.07.003
	Long Tengfei, Gu Min, Xu Rongguo On the dynamic mechanism of public participation in the urban renewal[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2008. (7): 22- 26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2008.07.003
[16]	钱欣浅谈城市更新中的公众参与问题[J]. 城市问题, 2001. (2): 48- 50+9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2031.2001.02.015
	Qian Xin Talking about the public participation in urban regeneration[J]. Urban Problems, 2001. (2): 48- 50+9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2031.2001.02.015
[17]	李建波, 张京祥中西方城市更新演化比较研究[J]. 城市问题, 2003. (5): 68- 71+49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2031.2003.05.016
	Li Jianbo, Zhang Jingxiang The urban renewal evolvement since modern times and thought of nowadays China urban renewal[J]. Urban Problems, 2003. (5): 68- 71+49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2031.2003.05.016
[18]	张更立走向三方合作的伙伴关系: 西方城市更新政策的演变及其对中国的启示[J]. 城市发展研究, 2004. (4): 26- 32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2004.04.007
	Zhang Gengli Towards three-way partnership in urban regeneration: The western experience and implications to Chinese cities[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2004. (4): 26- 32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2004.04.007
[19]	陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等 CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015. 33 (2): 242- 253. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2015.02.009
	Chen Yue, Chen Chaomei, Liu Zeyuan et al The methodology function of Cite Space mapping knowledge domains[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2015. 33 (2): 242- 253. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2015.02.009
[20]	薛东前, 万斯斯, 马蓓蓓, 等基于城市功能格局的西安市文化产业空间集聚研究[J]. 地理科学, 2019. 39 (5): 750- 760.
	Xue Dongqian, Wan Sisi, Ma Beibei et al Spatial agglomeration of cultural industry of Xi’an City based on urban functional fattern[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019. 39 (5): 750- 760.
[21]	李斌, 徐歆彦, 邵怡, 等城市更新中公众参与模式研究[J]. 建筑学报, 2012. (S2): 134- 137.
	Li Bin, Xu Xinyan, Shao Yi et al Research on public participation mode in urban renewal[J]. Architectural Journal, 2012. (S2): 134- 137.
[22]	刘垚, 田银生, 周可斌从一元决策到多元参与——广州恩宁路旧城更新案例研究[J]. 城市规划, 2015. 39 (8): 101- 111. doi: 10.11819/cpr20150815a
	Liu Yao, Tian Yinsheng, Zhou Kebin From unilateral decision-making to multiple participation in urban regeneration: A case study on En’ning road project in Guangzhou[J]. City Planning Review, 2015. 39 (8): 101- 111. doi: 10.11819/cpr20150815a
[23]	唐婧娴城市更新治理模式政策利弊及原因分析——基于广州、深圳、佛山三地城市更新制度的比较[J]. 规划师, 2016. 32 (5): 47- 53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2016.05.008
	Tang Jingxian An analysis of different urban renewal policies under different models: Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Foshan cases[J]. Planners, 2016. 32 (5): 47- 53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2016.05.008
[24]	严华鸣公私合作伙伴关系在我国城市更新领域的应用——基于上海新天地项目的分析[J]. 城市发展研究, 2012. 19 (8): 41- 48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2012.08.007
	Yan Huaming Public-private partnership in China's urban regeneration: A case study of Xintiandi project in Shanghai[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2012. 19 (8): 41- 48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2012.08.007
[25]	郭友良, 李郇转型期城市居住用地更新的空间加密化研究——广州市金花街改造再考[J]. 地理科学, 2018. 38 (2): 161- 167.
	Guo Youliang, Li Xun Redevelopment of residential land and the densification of inner city admist transition: Revisiting the case of Jinhua neighborhood in Guangzhou[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018. 38 (2): 161- 167.
[26]	郭源园, 李莉中国收缩城市及其发展的负外部性[J]. 地理科学, 2019. 39 (1): 52- 60.
	Guo Yuanyuan, Li Li Change in the negative externality of the shrinking cities in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019. 39 (1): 52- 60.