廊道型乡村旅游地农户生计资本评价与空间格局特征——以大别山国家风景道为例

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.02.017

地理科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 340-349.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.02.017

廊道型乡村旅游地农户生计资本评价与空间格局特征——以大别山国家风景道为例

李龙¹^,²(), 杨效忠¹^,*()

1. 安徽师范大学地理与旅游学院，安徽芜湖 241002
2. 宿州学院管理学院，安徽宿州 234000

收稿日期:2019-12-14 出版日期:2021-04-10 发布日期:2021-04-13
通讯作者: 杨效忠 E-mail:name.lilong@163.com;1075742914@qq.com
作者简介:李龙（1988−），男，山东枣庄人，讲师，博士研究生，主要从事旅游地理与旅游规划研究。E-mail: name.lilong@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41471129）、教育部人文社会科学基金项目（19YJA840008）、安徽省教育厅人文社会科学重点项目（SK2018A0476）资助

Evaluation and Spatial Pattern of Farmers’ Livelihood Capital in Corridor-type Rural Tourism Areas: A Case Study of the Dabie Mountain National Landscape

Li Long¹^,²(), Yang Xiaozhong¹^,*()

1. College of Geography and Tourism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241002, Anhui, China
2. College of Management, Suzhou University, Suzhou 234000, Anhui, China

Received:2019-12-14 Online:2021-04-10 Published:2021-04-13
Contact: Yang Xiaozhong E-mail:name.lilong@163.com;1075742914@qq.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (41471129), Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Science Fund Project (19YJA840008), University Social Science Research Project of Anhui Province (SK2018A0476)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以大别山国家风景道为例，借鉴DFID可持续生计分析框架，构建农户生计评价指标体系，分析廊道型乡村旅游地农户生计资本的空间特征及影响因素。研究发现：① 大别山旅游廊道内自然资本等有形生计资本权重较高，社会资本等无形生计资本权重较低。② 农户生计资本具有较为明显的空间分布不均衡的特征，各乡镇以及乡镇内各村的农户生计资本水平也存在明显的空间差异。③ 农户生计资本空间分布的不均衡受到核心景区、主干公路、当地产业业态成熟度、政府政策等因素的影响较为明显。

关键词: 旅游廊道, 乡村旅游地, 农户生计, 生计资本

Abstract:

Taking the Dabie Mountain National Landscape as an example, this article constructs an evaluation index system of farmers’ livelihood based on DFID sustainable livelihood analysis framework and case study, and analyzes the spatial distribution differences and influencing factors of farmers’ livelihood capital in corridor rural tourism. The results show that: 1) The visible livelihood capital, such as natural capital, has a higher weight in the tourism corridor of Dabie Mountains, while the intangible livelihood capital, such as social capital, has a lower weight. Five indicators of livelihood capital weights: Natural capital>financial capital> physical capital>human capital>social capital. The five comprehensive scores of livelihood capital: Natural capital>physical capital>financial capital>human capital>social capital. 2) Farmers’ livelihood capital in corridor-type rural tourism areas has obvious characteristics of unbalanced spatial distribution.The overall level of farmers’ livelihood capital: Jinzhai County > Huoshan County, the five livelihood capital show strong spatial differences. There are also obvious spatial differences in the total level of farmers’ livelihood capital and the five livelihood capital levels in the villages and townships. 3) The unbalanced spatial distribution of farmers’ livelihood capital is affected by core scenic spots, main roads, maturity of local industrial forms, government policies. The overall level of farmers’ livelihood capital is higher in the core scenic spots or near the main roads. Influenced by the diversity of industrial formats and the stage of tourism development, two tourism agglomeration zones have been formed around Tiantangzhai and Baimajian scenic spots. The effect of tourism agglomeration is obvious, but the radiation scope is limited, and the driving force of the impact on the surrounding areas is insufficient. The difference of government’s policies leads to the change of livelihood mode and livelihood capital of farmers in different rural communities.

Key words: tourism corridors, rural tourism destination, farmers’ livelihood, livelihood capital

中图分类号:

F590.3

李龙, 杨效忠. 廊道型乡村旅游地农户生计资本评价与空间格局特征——以大别山国家风景道为例[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(2): 340-349.

Li Long, Yang Xiaozhong. Evaluation and Spatial Pattern of Farmers’ Livelihood Capital in Corridor-type Rural Tourism Areas: A Case Study of the Dabie Mountain National Landscape[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2021, 41(2): 340-349.

图/表 3

表 1

表 2

图 1

参考文献 36

[1]	赵雪雁. 地理学视角的可持续生计研究: 现状、问题与领域[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36 (10): 1859- 1872.
	Zhao Xueyan. Sustainable livelihoods research from the perspective of geography: The present status, questions and priority areas[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36 (10): 1859- 1872.
[2]	Koczberski G, Curry G N. Making a living: Land pressures and changing livelihood strategies among oil palm settlers in Papua New Guinea[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2005, 85 (3): 324- 339. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2005.06.014
[3]	Rai M, Paudel B, Zhang Y et al. Vegetable farming and farmers’ livelihood: Insights from Kathmandu Valley, Nepal[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11 (3): 889- 906. doi: 10.3390/su11030889
[4]	Scoones I, Borras S M J. Livelihoods perspectives and rural development[J]. Journal of Peasant Studies, 2009, 36 (1): 171- 196. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820503
[5]	Iorio M, Corsale A. Rural tourism and livelihood strategies in Romania[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2010, 26 (2): 152- 162. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.10.006
[6]	Erenstein O, Hellin J, Chandna P. Poverty mapping based on livelihood assets: A meso-level application in the Indo-Gangetic Plains, India[J]. Applied Geography, 2010, 30 (1): 112- 125. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.05.001
[7]	Tadesse G, Zewdie T. Grants vs. credits for improving the livelihoods of ultra-poor: Evidence from Ethiopia[J]. World Development, 2019, 113 (1): 320- 329.
[8]	Xueyan Z, Haili Z, Lu J et al. The influence of farmers’ livelihood strategies on household energy consumption in the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10 (6): 1780- 1792. doi: 10.3390/su10061780
[9]	Yang L, Liu M, Lun F et al. The impacts of farmers’ livelihood capitals on planting decisions: A case study of Zhagana Agriculture-Forestry-Animal Husbandry Composite System[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 86 (7): 208- 217.
[10]	Newton P, Nichols E S, Endo W et al. Consequences of actor level livelihood heterogeneity for additionality in a tropical forest payment for environmental services program with an undifferentiated reward structure[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2012, 22 (1): 127- 136. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.006
[11]	Walelign S Z, Jiao X. Dynamics of rural livelihoods and environmental reliance: Empirical evidence from Nepal[J]. Forest Policy & Economics, 2017, 83 (10): 199- 209.
[12]	Zenteno, Mario, Zuidema et al. Livelihood strategies and forest dependence: New insights from Bolivian forest communities[J]. Forest Policy & Economics, 2013, 26 (1): 12- 21.
[13]	Alary V, Messad S, Aboul Naga A et al. Livelihood strategies and the role of livestock in the processes of adaptation to drought in the Coastal Zone of Western Desert(Egypt)[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2014, 128 (2): 44- 54.
[14]	杨忍, 陈燕纯, 张菁, 等. 20世纪90年代以来西方乡村地理研究的主要理论演变与启示[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40 (4): 544- 555.
	Yang Ren, Chen Yanchun, Zhang Jing et al. The main theoretical evolution and enlightenment of western rural geography since 1990s[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40 (4): 544- 555.
[15]	张环宙, 李秋成, 黄祖辉. 亲缘网络对农民乡村旅游创业意愿的影响——基于浙江浦江农户样本实证[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39 (11): 1787- 1795.
	Zhang Huanzhou, Li Qiucheng, Huang Zuhui. The impact of kinship network on peasants tourism entrepreneurial intention based on a sample of Pujiang County, Zhejiang Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39 (11): 1787- 1795.
[16]	董文静, 王昌森, 张震. 山东省乡村振兴与乡村旅游时空耦合研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40 (4): 628- 636.
	Dong Wenjing, Wang Changsen, Zhang Zhen. The space-time coupling between rural revitalization strategy and rural tourism development in Shandong Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40 (4): 628- 636.
[17]	孔祥智, 钟真, 原梅生. 乡村旅游业对农户生计的影响分析——以山西三个景区为例[J]. 经济问题, 2008, (1): 115- 119.
	Kong Xiangzhi, Zhong Zhen, Yuan Meisheng. The impacts of rural tourism on farmers’ livelihood: Taking three tourist attractions as Hougou ancient village, Qiaojia great courtyard, and Jinci temple of Shanxi Province for example[J]. Economic Problems, 2008, (1): 115- 119.
[18]	喻忠磊, 杨新军, 杨涛. 乡村农户适应旅游发展的模式及影响机制: 以秦岭金丝峡景区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68 (8): 1144- 1156.
	Yu Zhonglei, Yang Xinjun, Yang Tao. Exploring conditions, determinants and mechanisms of rural households’ adaptability to tourism development: A case study of Jinsixia in Qinling Mountains[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68 (8): 1144- 1156.
[19]	席建超, 张楠. 乡村旅游聚落农户生计模式演化研究——野三坡旅游区苟各庄村案例实证[J]. 旅游学刊, 2016, 31 (7): 65- 75.
	Xi Jianchao, Zhang Nan. An analysis of the sustainable livelihood of tourism households: A case study in Gougezhuang Village, Yesanpo Tourism Area[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2016, 31 (7): 65- 75.
[20]	吴吉林, 刘水良, 周春山. 乡村旅游发展背景下传统村落农户适应性研究——以张家界4个村为例[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37 (12): 232- 240.
	Wu Jilin, Liu Shuiliang, Zhou Chunshan. Peasant households adaptability under the bankground of rural tourism development in traditional villages in Zhangjiajie[J]. Economic Geography, 2017, 37 (12): 232- 240.
[21]	向雁, 陈印军, 侯艳林, 等. 河北省休闲农业的空间分布及影响机制[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39 (11): 1806- 1813.
	Xiang Yan, Chen Yinjun, Hou Yanlin et al. Spatial distribution and influencing factors of leisure agriculture: A case from Hebei Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39 (11): 1806- 1813.
[22]	李龙, 杨效忠. 旅游廊道扶贫: 大别山旅游扶贫模式创新研究[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2018, 27 (5): 29- 33+79.
	Li Long, Yang Xiaozhong. The poverty alleviation of tourism corridor: The mode innovation of poverty alleviation in Dabie Mountains[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2018, 27 (5): 29- 33+79.
[23]	Department for International Development. Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets[R]. London: Department for International Development, 2000.
[24]	贺爱琳, 杨新军, 陈佳, 等. 乡村旅游发展对农户生计的影响: 以秦岭北麓乡村旅游地为例[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34 (12): 174- 181.
	He Ailin, Yang Xinjun, Chen Jia et al. Impact of tural tourism development on farmer’s livelihoods: A case study of rural tourism destinations in northern slop of Qinling Mountains[J]. Economic Geography, 2014, 34 (12): 174- 181.
[25]	陈佳, 张丽琼, 杨新军, 等. 乡村旅游开发对农户生计和社区旅游效应的影响——旅游开发模式视角的案例实证[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36 (9): 1709- 1724.
	Chen Jia, Zhang Liqiong, Yang Xinjun et al. The impact of tourism development on changes of households livelihood and community tourism effect: A case study based on the perspective of tourism development mode[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36 (9): 1709- 1724.
[26]	崔晓明, 杨新军. 旅游地农户生计资本与社区可持续生计发展研究——以秦巴山区安康一区三县为例[J]. 人文地理, 2018, 33 (2): 147- 153.
	Cui Xiaoming, Yang Xinjun. A research on farmers’ livelihood assets and sustainable livelihoods development of community: A case study of Ankang in Qinling-Bashan mountainous area[J]. Human Geography, 2018, 33 (2): 147- 153.
[27]	赵雪雁, 李巍, 杨培涛, 等. 生计资本对甘南高原农牧民生计活动的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21 (4): 111- 118. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2011.04.018
	Zhao Xueyan, Li Wei, Yang Peitao et al. Impact of livelihood capital on the livelihood activities of farmers and herdsmen on Gannan Plateau[J]. China Popolation Resource and Environment, 2011, 21 (4): 111- 118. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2011.04.018
[28]	张丽, 赵雪雁, 侯成成, 等. 生态补偿对农户生计资本的影响——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2012, 34 (1): 186- 195.
	Zhang Li, Zhao Xueyan, Hou Chengcheng. Effect of ecological compensation on farmer household livelihood capital: A case study in the Yellow River water supply area in Gannan[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2012, 34 (1): 186- 195.
[29]	赵雪雁. 不同生计方式农户的环境影响: 以甘南高原为例[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33 (5): 545- 552.
	Zhao Xueyan. Environmental impact of farmers of different livelihood strategies: A case of Gannan plateau[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33 (5): 545- 552.
[30]	韩国圣, 张捷, 黄跃雯, 等. 天堂寨景区农村社区居民旅游影响感知的差异分析[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31 (12): 1525- 1532.
	Han Guosheng, Zhang Jie, Huang Yuewen et al. Evaluation of difference in rural residents conception on tourism impact: A case study of Tiantangzhai scenic spot[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31 (12): 1525- 1532.
[31]	何仁伟, 刘邵权, 刘运伟, 等. 典型山区农户生计资本评价及其空间格局——以四川省凉山彝族自治州为例[J]. 山地学报, 2014, 32 (6): 641- 651. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2014.06.001
	He Renwei, Liu Shaoquan, Liu Yunwei et al. Evaluation and spatial distribution of farmers livelihood capital in representative mountain areas: A case study of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture of Sichuan, China[J]. Mountain Research, 2014, 32 (6): 641- 651. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2014.06.001
[32]	李聪, 柳玮, 黄谦. 陕南移民搬迁背景下农户生计资本的现状与影响因素分析[J]. 当代经济科学, 2014, 36 (6): 106- 112+126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2848.2014.06.012
	Li Cong, Liu Wei, Huang Qian. The current situation and influencing factor analysis on rural households’ livelihood capitals in the background of migrates’ relocation of Southern Shaanxi[J]. Modern Economic Science, 2014, 36 (6): 106- 112+126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2848.2014.06.012
[33]	任国平, 刘黎明, 付永虎, 等. 基于GWR模型的都市城郊村域农户生计资本空间差异分析——以上海市青浦区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38 (8): 1594- 1608.
	Ren Guoping, Liu Liming, Fu Yonghu et al. Spatial differentiation of rural household livelihood capital in metropolitan suburbs based on GWR model: A case study of Qingpu District in Shanghai[J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38 (8): 1594- 1608.
[34]	刘春芳, 刘宥延, 王川. 黄土丘陵区贫困农户生计资本空间特征及影响因素——以甘肃省榆中县为例[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37 (12): 153- 162.
	Liu Chunfang, Liu Youyan, Wang Chuan. Spatial characteristics of livelihood assets of poor farmers and its influential factors in loess hilly region: A case study of Yuzhong County, Gansu Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2017, 37 (12): 153- 162.
[35]	吴乐, 靳乐山. 生态补偿扶贫背景下农户生计资本影响因素研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, (6): 55- 61+153-154.
	Wu Le, Jin Leshan. Study on influential factors of peasant households livelihood capital under the policy of eco-compensation poverty alleviation[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2018, (6): 55- 61+153-154.
[36]	李靖, 廖和平, 樊昊. 重庆市贫困农户生计资本的空间格局及影响因素分析[J]. 山地学报, 2018, 36 (6): 942- 952.
	Li Jing, Liao Heping, Fan Hao. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of livelihood capital of rural poor households in Chongqing, China[J]. Mountain Research, 2018, 36 (6): 942- 952.

生计资本类型	指标因子
自然资本（N）	耕地面积（N1）、林地面积（N2）、耕地用地质量（N3）、林地用地质量（N4）、居住环境质量（N5）
物质资本（P）	房屋市场估值（P1）、房屋修建年限（P2）、房屋面积（P3）、可用于从事旅游经营的房间数量（P4）、用于旅游经营的房屋面积（P5）
人力资本（H）	家庭劳动者数量（H1）、劳动力平均受教育程度（H2）、劳动力健康状况（H3）、是否参加过旅游相关培训（H4）、有没有旅游方面工作经验（H5）
金融资本（F）	家庭年收入（F1）、家庭存款情况（F2）、借款难易程度（F3）、是否有政府补贴（F4）、是否有接受无偿现金的机会（F5）
社会资本（S）	本村亲戚人数（S1）、与本村亲戚/朋友的交往程度（S2）、亲戚中有无政府/事业单位上班（S3）、政府/企业和居民合作机制（S4）、对周围人的信任程度（S5）

廊道型乡村旅游地农户生计资本评价与空间格局特征——以大别山国家风景道为例

Evaluation and Spatial Pattern of Farmers’ Livelihood Capital in Corridor-type Rural Tourism Areas: A Case Study of the Dabie Mountain National Landscape

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 36

相关文章 4

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

排名	案例村	自然资本N	物质资本P	人力资本H	金融资本F	社会资本S	生计资本水平
1	金竹坪村	高	高	高	高	中	高
2	龙井冲村	中	高	高	中	中	中
3	前畈村	低	高	高	高	中	中
4	渔潭村	高	中	中	低	高	中
5	斑竹园街道村	中	中	高	中	中	中
6	宋家河村	高	中	中	中	中	中
7	大峡谷村	中	中	中	中	中	中
8	后畈村	高	低	高	中	中	中
9	马石村	高	中	高	低	中	中
10	陡沙河村	低	低	中	中	高	中
11	铜锣寨村	低	中	中	中	低	低
12	船舱村	低	低	低	低	中	低

[1]	王文辉, 白冰, 张茵. 相对剥夺视角下的乡村旅游地居民不规范行为研究——以江西婺源县李坑、思溪为例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(11): 1814-1821.
[2]	吴清, 吴黎, 李细归, 周雯. 广东省残疾人生计资本的空间差异及影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(9): 1345-1353.
[3]	李伯华, 刘沛林, 窦银娣, 王鹏. 景区边缘型乡村旅游地人居环境演变特征及影响机制研究——以大南岳旅游圈为例[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(11): 1353-1360.
[4]	吴必虎, 黄琢玮, 马小萌. 中国城市周边乡村旅游地空间结构[J]. 地理科学, 2004, 24(6): 757-763.