中国基本公共服务效率与城镇化质量的时空耦合关系研究

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.04.003

地理科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 571-579.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.04.003

中国基本公共服务效率与城镇化质量的时空耦合关系研究

尹鹏¹^,²(), 王富喜³(), 段佩利¹

1.鲁东大学商学院，山东烟台 264039
2.中国海洋大学海洋发展研究院，山东青岛 266100
3.鲁东大学资源与环境工程学院，山东烟台 264025

收稿日期:2020-01-12 修回日期:2020-05-20 出版日期:2021-04-25 发布日期:2021-06-04
通讯作者: 王富喜 E-mail:yinp438@nenu.edu.cn;wfx62@163.com
作者简介:尹鹏（1987−），男，山东泰安人，博士，副教授，硕导，主要从事城镇化与基本公共服务研究。E-mail:yinp438@nenu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41871163);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(19YJCZH229)

Spatial-temporal Coupling Relationship Between Basic Public Service Efficiency and Urbanization Quality in China

Yin Peng¹^,²(), Wang Fuxi³(), Duan Peili¹

1. School of Business, Ludong University, Yantai 264039, Shandong, China
2. Institute of Marine Development, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, Shandong, China
3. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, Shandong, China

Received:2020-01-12 Revised:2020-05-20 Online:2021-04-25 Published:2021-06-04
Contact: Wang Fuxi E-mail:yinp438@nenu.edu.cn;wfx62@163.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41871163);Ministry of Education of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences Youth Fund(19YJCZH229)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以2007—2017年中国31个省区（未含港澳台地区）为研究对象，在厘清基本公共服务效率与城镇化质量耦合机理基础上，构建基本公共服务效率与城镇化质量评价指标体系，运用数据包络分析模型和熵值法测算基本公共服务效率与城镇化质量水平，运用耦合协调度模型和障碍度模型，分析两者耦合协调的时空特征及其主要障碍因子。结果表明：① 中国基本公共服务效率具有相对起伏的动态变化特征，纯技术效率水平较高，规模效率水平较低，城镇化质量逐年递增但增速趋缓，子系统大小依次为人口城镇化>经济城镇化>生态城镇化>空间城镇化。② 中国基本公共服务效率与城镇化质量耦合度以拮抗耦合阶段为主，协调度以勉强协调类型为主，呈现较为明显的非同步发展特征，广东耦合协调度最高，青海耦合协调度最低。③ 影响基本公共服务效率与城镇化质量耦合协调的前5位障碍指标是生活垃圾无害化处理率>建成区绿化覆盖率>城镇人口比重>人均社会保障支出>人均社会固定资产投资额，基本公共服务效率子系统的障碍度明显高于城镇化质量子系统障碍度。

关键词: 基本公共服务效率, 城镇化质量, 人的城镇化, 物的城镇化

Abstract:

Taking 31 provinces (not including Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan) in China in 2007-2017 as the research object, on the basis of clarifying the coupling mechanism of basic public service efficiency and urbanization quality, this article constructs the evaluation index system of basic public service efficiency and urbanization quality. The data envelopment analysis model and entropy method are used to measure the basic public service efficiency and the urbanization quality. The coupling coordination degree model and the obstacle degree model are used to analyze the spatial-temporal characteristics and main obstacle factors of the coupling coordination. The results show that: 1) The basic public service efficiency presents a relatively fluctuating dynamic process, and the fluctuation range of comprehensive efficiency is the largest, the change range of pure technical efficiency is the smallest and the level is the highest, the change trend of scale efficiency is consistent with the comprehensive efficiency, and the level is the lowest. The spatial differentiation characteristics are not obvious in China. The urbanization quality increases year by year, but the growth rate slows down. The size of the subsystem is population urbanization, economic urbanization, ecological urbanization and space urbanization in turn. The urbanization quality of Guangdong Province is the highest, and that of Qinghai Province is the lowest. 2) The coupling degree between basic public service efficiency and urbanization quality in China is mainly in the antagonistic coupling stage, and the coordination degree is mainly in the reluctant coordination type, showing obvious non synchronous development characteristics. Guangdong has the highest coupling coordination and Qinghai has the lowest coupling coordination. 3) The first five obstacle indicators affecting the coupling coordination between basic public service efficiency and urbanization quality are harmless treatment rate of domestic waste>green coverage rate of built-up area>proportion of urban population>per capita social security expenditure>per capita social fixed asset investment. The barrier degree of basic public service efficiency is obviously higher than that of urbanization quality. Finally, the corresponding policy recommendations are put forward from three aspects.

Key words: basic public service efficiency, urbanization quality, human urbanization, urbanization of things

中图分类号:

F299.21

尹鹏, 王富喜, 段佩利. 中国基本公共服务效率与城镇化质量的时空耦合关系研究[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(4): 571-579.

Yin Peng, Wang Fuxi, Duan Peili. Spatial-temporal Coupling Relationship Between Basic Public Service Efficiency and Urbanization Quality in China[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2021, 41(4): 571-579.

图/表 7

图1

表1

表2

图2

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 25

[1]	叶裕民. 中国城市化质量研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2001(7): 27-31.
	Ye Yumin. Approach on China’s urbanization quality. China Soft Science, 2001(7): 27-31.
[2]	方创琳. 中国新型城镇化高质量发展的规律性与重点方向[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(1): 13-22.
	Fang Chuanglin. Basic rules and key paths for high-quality development of the new urbanization in China. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(1): 13-22.
[3]	尹鹏, 刘继生, 陈才. 东北地区资源型城市基本公共服务效率研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(6): 127-134.
	Yin Peng, Liu Jisheng, Chen Cai. Efficiency of basic public service for resource-based cities in Northeast China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(6): 127-134.
[4]	邓宗兵, 吴朝影, 封永刚, 等. 中国区域公共服务供给效率评价与差异性分析[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(5): 28-33.
	Deng Zongbing, Wu Chaoying, Feng Yonggang et al. Analysis on the regional differences in the efficiency of public service supply in China. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(5): 28-33.
[5]	Benito B, Faura Ú, Guillamón M D et al. The efficiency of public services in small municipalities: The case of drinking water supply[J]. Cities, 2019, 93 95-103 doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.016
[6]	曾鹏, 张凡. 中国十大城市群公共服务供给效率的比较[J]. 统计与决策, 2017(3): 94-98.
	Zeng Peng, Zhang Fan. China’s top ten urban agglomerations comparative study efficiency of public service supply. Statistics and Decision, 2017(3): 94-98.
[7]	魏后凯, 王业强, 苏红键, 等. 中国城镇化质量综合评价报告[J]. 经济研究参考, 2013(31): 3-32.
	Wei Houkai, Wang Yeqiang, Su Hongjian et al. Report on comprehensive evaluation of urbanization quality in China. Review of Economic Research, 2013(31): 3-32.
[8]	薛德升, 曾献君. 中国人口城镇化质量评价及省际差异分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(2): 194-204.
	Xue Desheng, Zeng Xianjun. Evaluation of China’s urbanization quality and analysis of its spatial pattern transformation based on the modern life index. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(2): 194-204.
[9]	李斌, 李拓, 朱业, 等. 公共服务均等化、民生财政支出与城市化——基于中国286个城市面板数据的动态空间计量检验[J]. 中国软科学, 2015(6): 79-90.
	Li Bin, Li Tuo, Zhu Ye et al. Equalization of public services, financial expenditure on people’s livelihood and urbanization—An empirical study based on dynamic spatial econometrics models by use of panel data from 286 cities of China. China Soft Science, 2015(6): 79-90.
[10]	许恒周, 赵一航, 田浩辰. 京津冀城市圈公共服务资源配置与人口城镇化协调效率研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018, 28(3): 22-30.
	Xu Hengzhou, Zhao Yihang, Tian Haochen. Research of coordination efficiency between basic public service and population urbanization in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018, 28(3): 22-30.
[11]	袁丹, 欧向军, 唐兆琪. 东部沿海人口城镇化与公共服务协调发展的空间特征及影响因素[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(3): 32-39.
	Yuan Dan, Ou Xiangjun, Tang Zhaoqi. Spatial characteristics and driving factors between population urbanization and public service in the eastern coastal areas. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(3): 32-39.
[12]	Yeh A G O, Yang F F, Xu Z. Will rural urbanization produce a new producer service space in China?[J]. Habitat International, 2017, 67 105-117 doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.07.004
[13]	Cao W, Li R, Chi X et al. Island urbanization and its ecological consequences: A case study in the Zhoushan Island, East China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 76 1-14 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.001
[14]	周琎, 赵万民. 三峡库区新型城镇化进程与社会基础设施建设的协调测度[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(12): 1972-1980.
	Zhou Jin, Zhao Wanmin. Coordination measurement of the new urbanization process and social infrastructure construction in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2017, 26(12): 1972-1980.
[15]	程岚, 文雨辰. 不同城镇化视角下基本公共服务均等化的测度和影响因素研究[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2018, 34(6): 108-117.
	Cheng Lan, Wen Yuchen. Research on measurement and influencing factors of equalization of basic public services under different urbanization perspectives. Review of Economy and Management, 2018, 34(6): 108-117.
[16]	林李月, 朱宇, 柯文前, 等. 基本公共服务对不同规模城市流动人口居留意愿的影响效应[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(4): 737-752.
	Lin Liyue, Zhu Yu, Ke Wenqian et al. The impact of migrants’ access to urban public services on their urban settlement intentions: A study from the perspective of different-sized cities. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(4): 737-752.
[17]	鲍超, 邹建军. 中国西北地区城镇化质量的时空变化分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(5): 1141-1152.
	Bao Chao, Zou Jianjun. Spatiotemporal variations of urbanization quality in Northwest China. Arid Land Geography, 2019, 42(5): 1141-1152.
[18]	国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2008-2018.
	National Bureau of Statistics of China. China city statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2008-2018.
[19]	国家统计局. 中国区域经济统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2008-2018.
	National Bureau of Statistics of China. China statistical yearbook for regional economy. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2008-2018.
[20]	宋周莺, 康蕾, 刘毅. 中国区域投入产出效率的综合测度与时空格局[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(2): 326-336.
	Song Zhouying, Kang Lei, Liu Yi. Spatio-temporal analysis of provincial input-output efficiency in China. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(2): 326-336.
[21]	张国俊, 邓鸿鹄. 珠江三角洲地区服务业与城镇化协调关系的时空演变[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(7): 1118-1128.
	Zhang Guojun, Deng Honghu. Spatial-temporal evolution of the coordination relationship between service industry and urbanization in the Pearl River Delta Region. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(7): 1118-1128.
[22]	李雪铭, 郭玉洁, 田深圳, 等. 辽宁省城市人居环境系统耦合协调度时空格局演变及驱动力研究[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(8): 1208-1218.
	Li Xueming, Guo Yujie, Tian Shenzhen et al. The spatio-temporal pattern evolution and driving force of the coupling coordination degree of urban human settlements system in Liaoning Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(8): 1208-1218.
[23]	刘海猛, 方创琳, 李咏红. 城镇化与生态环境“耦合魔方”的基本概念及框架[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1489-1507.
	Liu Haimeng, Fang Chuanglin, Li Yonghong. The coupled human and natural cube: A conceptual framework for analyzing urbanization and eco-environment interactions. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(8): 1489-1507.
[24]	张引, 杨庆媛, 闵婕. 重庆市新型城镇化质量与生态环境承载力耦合分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(5): 817-828.
	Zhang Yin, Yang Qingyuan, Min Jie. An analysis of coupling between the bearing capacity of the ecological environment and the quality of new urbanization in Chongqing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(5): 817-828.
[25]	孙振杰, 袁家冬, 刘继斌. 中国典型旅游城市生活服务水平评价及障碍因素研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(2): 289-297.
	Sun Zhenjie, Yuan Jiadong, Liu Jibin. Evaluation and obstacle factors of life services level of typical tourism cities in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 289-297.

目标层	准则层	投入指标	产出指标
基本公共服务效率评价指标体系	基本教育服务效率	人均教育支出/万元	普通中小学入学率/%
		普通中小学学校数/所	普通中小学毕业率/%
		每十万人普通中小学专任教师数/人
	医疗卫生服务效率	人均医疗卫生支出/万元	医疗卫生机构诊疗人次数/亿人次
		医疗卫生机构数/个	医疗卫生机构出院人数/万人
		医疗卫生机构床位数/张	医疗卫生机构门诊健康检查人数/万人
		每千人口卫生技术人员数/人	医疗卫生机构门急诊诊疗人次数/亿人次
	社会保障服务效率	人均社会保障支出/万元	万人基本养老保险参保人数/人
			万人城镇职工医疗保险参保人数/人
	环境保护服务效率	人均环境保护支出/万元	工业废水排放量/万t
		城市排水管道长度/km	工业废气排放量/万t
		城市污水日处理能力/万m³	生活垃圾无害化处理率/%
		生活垃圾清运量/万t
	文化体育服务效率	人均文化体育支出/万元	公共图书馆数量/个
			博物馆数量/个
			体育场馆数量/个

目标层	准则层	指标层
注：1亩=666.67 m²。
城镇化质量评价指标体系	人口城镇化	城镇人口比重/%
	人口城镇化	城镇从业人员比重/%
	经济城镇化	人均GDP/万元
		二三产业产值比重/%
		人均社会消费品零售额/万元
		人均社会固定资产投资额/万元
	空间城镇化	建成区面积占土地面积比重/%
	空间城镇化	人均耕地面积/亩
	生态城镇化	建成区绿化覆盖率/%
		人均公园绿地面积/m²
		森林覆盖率/%
		工业固体废物综合利用率/%
		污水处理率/%

中国基本公共服务效率与城镇化质量的时空耦合关系研究

Spatial-temporal Coupling Relationship Between Basic Public Service Efficiency and Urbanization Quality in China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 25

相关文章 2

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王富喜, 毛爱华, 李赫龙, 贾明璐. 基于熵值法的山东省城镇化质量测度及空间差异分析[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(11): 1323-1329.
[2]	张春梅, 张小林, 吴启焰, 李红波. 城镇化质量与城镇化规模的协调性研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(1): 16-22.