基于PLSR的典型沼泽湿地植物叶片性状与光谱模型构建——以三江国家级自然保护区为例

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.09.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过植物光学特性测量叶片性状是一种非破坏性的、长期的湿地动态监测方法。选择三江国家级自然保护区多种典型湿地植物为研究对象，探究植物性状与叶片光谱之间的联系。研究表明：叶片氮含量与光谱的模型构建效果最好，模型R²为0.61，均方根误差（RMSE）为2.3862；叶片含水量、叶片磷、可溶性糖、纤维素和木质素含量之和的模型一般，R²在0.38~0.55范围内，RMSE在0.0004~10.7019范围内；淀粉含量拟合效果较差， R²为0.29，RMSE为0.0106。光谱预测重要性的结果表明，可见光与近红外边缘范围内的光谱信息对于叶片含水量、叶片氮含量、叶片磷含量、单位叶面积质量、纤维素和木质素之和、可溶性糖和淀粉的预测具有最高的重要性。

关键词: 湿地植物, 叶片性状, 光谱, PLSR, 光谱重要性

Abstract:

In this article, the importance of each band for predicting leaf character data was obtained by calculating variable importance of prediction (VIP) values. In the summer of 2020, the full-wavelength spectral information (350-2500 nm) of 12 species of typical wetland plants in Sanjiang National Nature Reserve was collected by ASD Lab spectrometer. Seven functional traits of plant leaves were tested in the laboratory. Through principal component analysis, the optimal principal component number of the spectrum required for modeling was obtained. The traits and spectrum models of 12 wetland plants were established by Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR). The R² and RMSE were used to test the fitting effect of the models. The VIP value is used to determine the most important spectral region. Finally, two main conclusions were drawn. Firstly, compared with studies on single species in other ecosystems, the traits-spectral general models for 12 typical wetland plants were satisfied except for starch. Among the seven traits, spectral model of nitrogen had the highest model accuracy. The fitting results of LMA, water content, leaf phosphorus, sugar, cellulose, and lignin were good, with R² ranging from 0.38 to 0.55. The fitting result of starch content model was not ideal which R² was only 0.29. Secondly, the VIP value showed the importance of each band in model construction. The first and second peaks of the VIP value are in the range of 400-405 nm and 708-719 nm. Therefore, for 7 traits, visible spectrum and near infrared edge are the most important for model construction. Inversion of plant traits through hyperspectral data has become one of the important means of ecological environment monitoring. But due to the complexity of wetland environment, spectral inversion of leaf traits of wetland plants had rarely studied. Based on previous modeling methods of grassland and forest ecosystems, this study established general models for 7 leaf functional traits for 12 typical wetland plants, it is feasible to monitor wetland plant traits by using spectrum. However, the fitting effect of starch content model was not ideal and needs to further improvement.

Key words: wetland plants, leaf traits, spectrum, PLSR, importance of spectrum

中图分类号:

X144

姚允龙, 王欣, 谭霄鹏, 单元琪. 基于PLSR的典型沼泽湿地植物叶片性状与光谱模型构建——以三江国家级自然保护区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(9): 1638-1645.

Yao Yunlong, Wang Xin, Tan Xiaopeng, Shan Yuanqi. Models Building Between Leaf Spectral Reflectance and Traits for Typical Marshland Wetland Plants Based on PLSR: A Case of Sanjiang National Nature Reserve[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2022, 42(9): 1638-1645.

图/表 4

参考文献 34

[1]	Kingsford, Basset, Jackson. Wetlands: Conservation’s poor cousins[J]. Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 2016, 26(5) 892-916. doi: 10.1002/aqc.2709
[2]	Huang Laibin, Zhang Guangliang, Bai Junhong et al. Desalinization via freshwater restoration highly improved microbial diversity, co-occurrence patterns and functions in coastal wetland soils[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 765(6) 142769
[3]	Gibbs. Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation[J]. Conservation Biology, 2000, 14(1) 314-317. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98608.x
[4]	王莉雯, 卫亚星. 湿地生态系统雷达遥感监测研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(9) 1107-1117. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.09.005
	Wang Liwen, Wei Yaxing. Progress in monitoring wetland ecosystems by radar remote sensing. Progress in Geography, 2011, 30(9) 1107-1117. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.09.005
[5]	Xue Yang, Xu Yujuan, Man Jiang et al. Interpreting the effects of plant species diversity and genotypic diversity within a dominant species on above- and belowground overyielding[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 786(3) 147505
[6]	Ustin, Gamon. Remote sensing of plant functional types[J]. New Phytologist, 2010, 186(4) 795-816. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03284.x
[7]	Anna K Schweiger, Jeannine Cavender-Bares, Philip A Townsend et al. Plant spectral diversity integrates functional and phylogenetic components of biodiversity and predicts ecosystem function[J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2018, 2(6) 976-982.
[8]	仲俊涛. 基于InVEST模型的宁夏盐池县禁牧草地生态补偿标准空间识别[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6) 1019-1028. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.06.018
	Zhong Juntao. Spatial recognition of ecological compensation standard for grazing grassland in Yanchi county based on InVEST model. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(6) 1019-1028. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.06.018
[9]	Roshanak Darvishzadeh, Clement Atzberger, Andrew Skidmore et al. Mapping grassland leaf area index with airborne hyperspectral imagery: A comparison study of statistical approaches and inversion of radiative transfer models[J]. Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2011, 66(6) 894-906. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.09.013
[10]	Paul J Curran. Remote sensing of foliar chemistry[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1990, 30(3) 271-278.
[11]	Clevers J G P W, Kooistra L, Schaepman M E. Estimating canopy water content using hyperspectral remote sensing data[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation & Geoinformation, 2010, 12(2) 119-125.
[12]	Hannes Feilhauer, Ben Somers, Sebastian van der Linden. Optical trait indicators for remote sensing of plant species composition: Predictive power and seasonal variability[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 73(2) 825-833.
[13]	Sabrina Carvalho, Mirka Macel, Martin Schlerf et al. Changes in plant defense chemistry (pyrrolizidine alkaloids) revealed through high-resolution spectroscopy[J]. Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 2013, 80(6) 51-60.
[14]	Yuan Huanhuan, Yang Guijun, Li Changchun et al. Retrieving soybean leaf area index from unmanned aerial vehicle hyperspectral remote sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM regression models[J]. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(4) 309 doi: 10.3390/rs9040309
[15]	Alby D.Rocha, Thomas A.Groen, Andrew K.Skidmore et al. The nave overfitting index selection (NOIS): A new method to optimize model complexity for hyperspectral data[J]. Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 2017, 133(11) 61-74.
[16]	Maria F Buitrago,Thomas A Groen,Andrew K Skidmore et al. Spectroscopic determination of leaf traits using infrared spectra[J]. Ecological Applications, 2017, 69(11): 237-250.
[17]	Yihyun Kim, Thomas Jackson, Rajat Bindlish et al. Retrieval of wheat growth parameters with radar vegetation indices[J]. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett, 2014, 11(4) 808-812. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2013.2279255
[18]	William James Frampton, Jadunandan Dash, Gary Watmough et al. Evaluating the capabilities of Sentinel-2 for quantitative estimation of biophysical variables in vegetation[J]. Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2013, 82(7) 83-92.
[19]	Fons Van der Plas, Thomas Schroeder-Georgi, Alexandra Weigelt et al. Plant traits alone are poor predictors of ecosystem properties and long-term ecosystem functioning[J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2020, 4(12) 1602-1611.
[20]	朱倩, 李路云, 刘振生, 等. 黑龙江三江国家级自然保护区赤狐的生境选择[J]. 野生动物学报, 2021, 42(1) 215-227. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0127.2021.01.030
	Zhu Qian, Li Luyun, Liu Zhensheng et al. Habitat selection of red fox(Vulpes vulpes) in Heilongjiang Sanjiang National Nature Reserve . Chinese Journal of Wildlife 2021, 42(1) 215-227. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0127.2021.01.030
[21]	马慧婷. 三江平原区耕地质量评价及时空演变规律研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2017.
	Ma Huiting. Assessment of cultivated land quality and the spatial-temporal variation in the region of Three-river Plain. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2017.
[22]	Bendix. Hyperspectral data analysis in {R}: The {hsdar} Package[J]. Journal of Statistical Software, 2019, 89(12) 1-23.
[23]	Song Xingyang, Zhou Guangsheng, He Qijin. Critical leaf water content for maize photosynthesis under drought stress and its response to rewatering[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(13) 7218 doi: 10.3390/su13137218
[24]	Aditya Singh,Shawn P Serbin,Brenden E McNeil. Imaging spectroscopy algorithms for mapping canopy foliar chemical and morphological traits and their uncertainties[J]. Ecological Applications, 2015, 25(8) 2180-2197. doi: 10.1890/14-2098.1
[25]	Svante Wold. PLS for multivariate linear modeling[J]. Chemometric Methods in Molecular Design, 1995, 17(1) 28-28.
[26]	王莉雯. 基于减小叶片水分影响的湿地芦苇氮浓度高光谱反演研究[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(1): 135-141.
	Wang Liwen. Estimating nitrogen concentrations in wetland reeds based on reducing foliar water effect by hyperspectral data. Scientia Geographica Sinica. 2016, 36(1): 135-141.
[27]	Angela C Burnett, Jeremiah Anderson, Kenneth J Davidson et al. A best-practice guide to predicting plant traits from leaf-level hyperspectral data using partial least squares regression[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2021, 72(18) 6175-6189. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab295
[28]	Barbara J.Yoder,Rita E Pettigrew-Crosby. Predicting nitrogen and chlorophyll content and concentrations from reflectance spectra (400–2500 nm) at leaf and canopy scales[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1995, 53(3) 199-211. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(95)00135-N
[29]	Christopher E Doughty, Gregory P Asner, Roberta E Martin. Predicting tropical plant physiology from leaf and canopy spectroscopy[J]. Oecologia, 2011, 165(2) 289-299. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1800-4
[30]	Lucie Homolová, Zbyněk Malenovský, Jan G P W Clevers et al. Review of optical-based remote sensing for plant trait mapping[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2013, 15(5) 1-16.
[31]	Andrew D Richardson,Bobby H Braswell,David Y Hollinger et al. Near-surface remote sensing of spatial and temporal variation in canopy phenology[J]. Ecol Appl, 2009, 19(6) 1417-1428. doi: 10.1890/08-2022.1
[32]	Dieter Lohr, Peter Tillmann, UweDruege et al. Non-destructive determination of carbohydrate reserves in leaves of ornamental cuttings by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) as a key indicator for quality assessments[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2017, 158(C) 51-63.
[33]	Kim S Ely, Angela C Burnett, Wil Lieberman-Cribbin et al. Spectroscopy can predict key leaf traits associated with source-sink balance and carbon-nitrogen status[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2019, 70(6) 1789-1799. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz061
[34]	Jan U H Eitel, Lee A Vierling, Marcy E Litvak et al. Broadband, red-edge information from satellites improves early stress detection in a New Mexico conifer woodland[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011, 115(12) 3640-3646. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.09.002

叶片功能性状	正态性检验 P value	方差齐性检验 P value	差异性检验 P value
注：^、^、^**分别为P<0.05，P<0.01和P<0.001。
叶片含水量	9.95E-08	0.0453	0.0007^***
氮	6.98E-05	9.45E-09	4.31E-05^***
磷	9.22E-11	0.0279	0.0063^**
可溶性糖	2.53E-08	0.0019	0.4919
淀粉	1.10E-11	0.0001	3.20E-02^**
叶面积质量	0.0001	0.0024	6.12E-05^***
纤维素和木质素	5.71E-11	0.0146	3.17E-05^***