生态效率区域差异及其与产业结构升级交互空间溢出效应

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.08.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于包含非期望产出的超效率SBM模型测度中国30个省际地区生态效率，采用基尼系数、对数离差均值及泰尔指数分析不同地区生态效率差异情况，运用空间联立方程模型探讨产业结构升级与生态效率间的交互效应与空间效应。主要结论为：① 中国生态效率整体水平较低且发展不均衡，东部地区高于中西部地区，西部地区高于中部地区；② 基尼系数、对数离差均值及泰尔指数3个指标显示，东部地区省际间生态效率存在较大差异，且差异变化程度并没有显著改善，中部地区省际间生态效率差异较小，西部地区省际间生态效率差异呈现先下降，后上升，再下降的趋势。③ 产业结构升级与生态效率存在双向互促作用，产业结构升级与生态效率均存在正向溢出效应，并且产业结构升级与生态效率存在正向交互空间溢出效应。

关键词: 生态效率, 产业结构升级, 超效率SBM模型, 空间联立方程模型

Abstract:

This article measured the ecological efficiency of 30 provinces (Excluding Tibet, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions) in China based on the Super-SBM model considering the undesirable output, and analyzed the differences of different regional ecological efficiencies by using GINI, GE₀ and GE₁. On this basis, the Spatial Simultaneous Equation was introduced to explore the interaction effect and space spillover effect between industrial structure upgrading and ecological efficiency. The results showed that: 1) The overall level of ecological efficiency in China is relatively low and the development of it is unbalanced among regions. The ecological efficiency of the eastern region is higher than that of the central and the western regions, while the ecological efficiency of the western region is higher than that of the central region. 2) The three indicators of GINI, GE₀ and GE₁ show that there is a great differences in the inter-provincial ecological efficiency in the eastern region, and the degree of the difference has not been significantly improved, the difference of inter-provincial ecological efficiency in the central region is small, and the difference of inter-provincial ecological efficiency in the western region shows a trend of decreasing firstly, then increasing, and then decreasing. 3) There is a mutual promoting effect mechanism, a positive spillover effect and a positive interactive spatial spillover effect between industrial structure upgrading and ecological efficiency.

Key words: ecological efficiency, industrial structure upgrading, Super-SBM model, spatial simultaneous equation model

中图分类号:

F062.2

汪艳涛, 张娅娅. 生态效率区域差异及其与产业结构升级交互空间溢出效应[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1276-1284.

Wang Yantao, Zhang Yaya. Regional Difference of Ecological Efficiency and Its Interactive Spatial Spillover Effect with Industrial Structure Upgrading[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(8): 1276-1284.

图/表 4

图 1

图 2

表 1

表 2

参考文献 29

[1]	Höh H, Schoer K, Seibel S Eco-efficiency indicators in German environmental economic accounting[J]. Statistical Journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 2002. (19): 41- 52.
[2]	邢贞成, 王济干, 张婕中国区域全要素生态效率及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018. 28 (7): 119- 126.
	Xing Zhencheng, Wang Jigan, Zhang Jie Research on regional total-factor ecological efficiency of China: Measurement and determinants[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018. 28 (7): 119- 126.
[3]	杨勇, 邓祥征中国城市生态效率时空演变及影响因素的区域差异[J]. 地理科学, 2019. 39 (7): 1111- 1118.
	Yang Yong, Deng Xiangzheng The spatio-temporal evolutionary characteristics and regional differences in affecting factors analysis of China's urban eco-efficiency[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019. 39 (7): 1111- 1118.
[4]	侯孟阳, 姚顺波空间视角下中国农业生态效率的收敛性与分异特征[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019. 29 (4): 116- 126.
	Hou Mengyang, Yao Shunbo Convergence and differentiation characteristics on agro-ecological efficiency in China from a spatial perspective[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019. 29 (4): 116- 126.
[5]	狄乾斌, 梁倩颖中国海洋生态效率时空分异及其与海洋产业结构响应关系识别[J]. 地理科学, 2018. 38 (10): 1606- 1615.
	Di Qianbin, Liang Qianying Spatio-tempo-ral difference of marine eco-efficiency and identification of its response relationship with marine industrial structure in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018. 38 (10): 1606- 1615.
[6]	盖美, 展亚荣中国沿海省区海洋生态效率空间格局演化及影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学, 2019. 39 (4): 616- 625.
	Gai Mei, Zhan Yarong Spatial evolution of marineecological efficiency and its influential factors in China coastal regions[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019. 39 (4): 616- 625.
[7]	李成宇, 张士强, 张伟中国省际工业生态效率空间分布及影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018. 38 (12): 1970- 1978.
	Li Chengyu, Zhang Shiqiang, Zhang Wei Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of China's inter provincial industrial eco-efficiency[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018. 38 (12): 1970- 1978.
[8]	韩永辉中国省域生态治理绩效评价研究[J]. 统计研究, 2017. 34 (11): 69- 78.
	Han Yonghui Performance evaluation of China’s provincial ecological management[J]. Statistical Research, 2017. 34 (11): 69- 78.
[9]	陈林心, 何宜庆金融集聚、产业结构优化与生态效率提升——基于省域数据的空间面板模型[J]. 企业经济, 2016. (3): 178- 182.
	Chen Linxin, He Yiqing Financial agglomeration, industrial structure optimization and ecological efficiency improvement—Based on the spatial panel model of provincial data[J]. Enterprise Economy, 2016. (3): 178- 182.
[10]	吴义根, 冯开文金融集聚、产业结构优化对生态效率的冲击效应及其区域差异分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2018. 23 (8): 171- 183.
	Wu Yigen, Feng Kaiwen Impact of financial agglomeration and industrial structure optimization on ecological efficiency and its regional differences[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2018. 23 (8): 171- 183.
[11]	韩永辉, 黄亮雄, 王贤彬产业结构优化升级改进生态效率了吗?[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2016. 33 (4): 40- 59.
	Han Yonghui, Huang Liangxiong, Wang Xianbin Does industrial structure upgrading improve eco-efficiency?[J]. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2016. 33 (4): 40- 59.
[12]	梁星, 卓得波中国区域生态效率评价及影响因素分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2017. (19): 143- 147.
	Liang Xing, Zhuo Debo Analysis of regional eco-efficiency eval-uation and influencing factors in China[J]. Statistics&Decision, 2017. (19): 143- 147.
[13]	王艳丝绸之路经济带沿线省份生态效率测定及影响因素——基于FDI与产业结构优化视角[J]. 华东经济管理, 2018. 32 (11): 44- 51.
	Wang Yan Measure of ecological efficiency and influencing factors of the provinces along the silk road economic belt—From the perspectives of FDI and industrial structure optimization[J]. East China Economic Management, 2018. 32 (11): 44- 51.
[14]	王楠, 盖美基于非期望产出SBM模型的环渤海地区生态效率与影响因素研究[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2018. 34 (6): 741- 746. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2018.06.001
	Wang Nan, Gai Mei Study on efficiency and effect of ecological undesirable outputs SBM model of Bohai Bay Area based on factors[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2018. 34 (6): 741- 746. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2018.06.001
[15]	南锐, 翟羽佳中国地区慈善捐赠水平差异实证研究——度量、趋势与政策建议[J]. 经济经纬, 2013. (5): 7- 12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1096.2013.05.002
	Nan Rui, Zhai Yujia Empirical study on China's regional charitable contribution level differences—Measurement, tendency and policy suggestions[J]. Economic Survey, 2013. (5): 7- 12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1096.2013.05.002
[16]	王宝义, 张卫国中国农业生态效率的省际差异和影响因素——基于1996–2015年31个省份的面板数据分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018. (1): 46- 62.
	Wang Baoyi, Zhang Weiguo Cross-provincial differences in determinants of agricultural eco-efficiency in China: An analysis based on panel data from 31 provinces in 1996-2015[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018. (1): 46- 62.
[17]	Lesage J P, Pace R K The biggest myth in spatial econometrics[J]. Econometrics, 2014. 2 (4): 217- 249. doi: 10.3390/econometrics2040217
[18]	张玉昌, 陈保启产业结构、空间溢出与城乡收入差距——基于空间Durbin模型偏微分效应分解[J]. 经济问题探索, 2018. (9): 62- 71.
	Zhang Yuchang, Chen Baoqi Adjustment of industrial structure, spatial spillover and urban-rural income disparity: Based on spatial Durbin model partial eerivatives method[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2018. (9): 62- 71.
[19]	李逸飞, 李静, 许明制造业就业与服务业就业的交互乘数及空间溢出效应[J]. 财贸经济, 2017. 38 (4): 115- 129.
	Li Yifei, Li Jing, Xu Ming The interactive multiplier and spatial spillover between manufacturing employment and service employment[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2017. 38 (4): 115- 129.
[20]	张晴云, 王纯, 曾庆均长江经济带服务业与制造业交互效应与空间效应——基于空间面板联立方程模型的经验分析[J]. 哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018. (5): 88- 97.
	Zhang Qingyun, Wang Chun, Zeng Qingjun The interaction effect and spatial spillover effect between service industry and manufacturing industry in the Yangtze River Economic Zone—Simultaneous equations model of space panel based on different weights[J]. Journal of Harbin University of Commerce (Social Science Edition), 2018. (5): 88- 97.
[21]	黄昶生, 程珊珊青岛市生态文明建设效率实证研究——基于非期望产出SBM模型[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2017. 33 (8): 905- 911. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2017.08.002
	Huang Changsheng, Cheng Shanshan Efficiency evaluation on qingdao ecological civilization construction—Based on SBM-undesirable model[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2017. 33 (8): 905- 911. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2017.08.002
[22]	张军, 吴桂英, 张吉鹏中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952-2000[J]. 经济研究, 2004. (10): 35- 44.
	Zhang Jun, Wu Guiying, Zhang Jipeng The estimation of China's provincial capital stock: 1952-2000[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2004. (10): 35- 44.
[23]	吴义根, 冯开文, 胡鹏人口增长、产业结构优化与区域生态效率[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2019. 40 (2): 17- 26.
	Wu Yigen, Feng Kaiwen, Hu Peng An empirical study of population growth, industrial structure optimization and regional ecological efficiency[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology (Social Sciences), 2019. 40 (2): 17- 26.
[24]	国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2009-2017.
	The National Bureau of Statistics. China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2009-2017.
[25]	国家统计局, 生态环境部. 中国环境统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2009-2017.
	The National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Ecology and Environment. China statistical yearbook on environment. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2009-2017.
[26]	国家统计局. 中国能源统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2009-2017.
	The National Bureau of Statistics. China energy statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2009-2017.
[27]	国家统计局. 中国人口和就业统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2009-2017.
	The National Bureau of Statistics. China population and employment statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2009-2017.
[28]	国家统计局, 科学技术部. 中国科技统计年鉴[M].北京: 中国统计出版社, 2009-2017.
	The National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Science and Technology. Chinese science and technology statistics yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2009-2017.
[29]	侯华丽, 吴尚昆, 王传君, 等基于基尼系数的中国重要矿产资源分布不均衡性分析[J]. 资源科学, 2015. 37 (5): 915- 920.
	Hou Huali, Wu Shangkun, Wang Chuanjun et al Uneven spatial distribution analysis of important Chinese mineral resources based on Gini coefficients[J]. Resources Science, 2015. 37 (5): 915- 920.

变量		2008年	2009年	2010年	2011年	2012年	2013年	2014年	2015年	2016年
ee	Moran’s I	0.206	0.197	0.288	0.287	0.296	0.305	0.141	0.328	0.321
	P值	0.019	0.025	0.003	0.003	0.002	0.002	0.072	0.001	0.001
isc	Moran’s I	0.212	0.210	0.245	0.246	0.254	0.263	0.253	0.245	0.255
	P值	0.015	0.016	0.008	0.007	0.006	0.005	0.006	0.008	0.006

变量	生态效率方程		变量	产业结构升级方程
变量	3SLS	GS3SLS	变量	3SLS	GS3SLS
$\ln isc$	5.6654^***	2.3773^***	$\ln ee$	0.0691^***	0.0341^***
	（0.5032）	（0.7725）		（0.0051）	（0.011 0）
$\ln tec$	0.0371	0.1682^***	$\ln tec$	0.0089^**	0.0145^***
	（0.0403）	（0.0440）		（0.0039）	（0.0045）
$\ln open$	0.3279^***	0.3123^***	$\ln pat$	0.0245^***	0.0296^***
	（0.0467）	（0.0545）		（0.0025）	（0.0028）
$\ln epr$	?0.0800	?0.2351^***	$\ln open$	0.0002	0.0117^*
	（0.0622）	（0.0716）		（0.0047）	（0.0063）
$\ln pop$	?0.0806^**	?0.0768^**	$\ln ger$	0.0245^***	0.0345^***
	（0.0329）	（0.0367）		（0.0067）	（0.0073）
$\ln ent$	?0.1136^***	?0.2063^***	$\ln ent$	?0.0102^***	?0.0194^***
	（0.0338）	（0.0383）		（0.0037）	（0.0044）
$W\ln ee$		0.1486^***	$W\ln ee$		0.0084***
		（0.0260）			（0.0027）
$W\ln isc$		0.0308^***	$W\ln isc$		0.0019^**
		（0.0088）			（0.0008）
常数项	?22.3114^***	?9.6398^***	常数项	3.6302^***	3.5470^***
	（1.8422）	（2.8366）		（0.0238）	（0.0274）
R-sq	0.5706	0.6043	R-sq	0.6445	0.6579