南麂列岛旅游生态足迹与生态效用研究

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2008.04.571

地理科学 ›› 2008, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 571-577.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2008.04.571

南麂列岛旅游生态足迹与生态效用研究

周年兴, 林振山, 黄震方, 程春旺

南京师范大学地理科学学院, 江苏南京 210046

收稿日期:2007-09-14 修回日期:2008-06-17 出版日期:2008-07-20 发布日期:2008-07-20
作者简介:周年兴(1976- ),男,浙江江山人,博士后,讲师,主要从事旅游和景观规划方面的研究。E-mail: zhounianxing@263.net
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40471050)和国家"211"二期工程重大资助项目资助。

Tourist Ecological Footprint and Eco-efficiency on Nanji Archipelago

ZHOU Nian-Xing, LIN Zhen-Shan, HUANG Zhen-Fang, CHEN Chun-Wang

College of Geographic Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210046

Received:2007-09-14 Revised:2008-06-17 Online:2008-07-20 Published:2008-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 旅游生态足迹与生态效用分析是从全球角度评价旅游业可持续发展的重要方法,两者相互补充。以南麂列岛国家海洋自然保护区为例,计算并分析了2002年的旅游生态足迹与生态效用。结果表明:① 南麂列岛旅游者人均生态足迹为0.031 hm²,是全国平均水平的1/3;② 叠加了旅游者生态足迹后,南麂列岛生态赤字达939.38 hm²;③ 南麂列岛旅游业单位生态足迹产值为14 221元/ hm²,是全球平均水平的1.8倍,却低于其渔业的单位生态足迹产值;④ 南麂列岛旅游业全年标准CO₂排放量为2 438.7 t,生态效用为0.128 kg/元;⑤ 南麂列岛生态效用略优于全球平均水平,是全国平均水平的3.1倍,但距全球理想的生态效用仍有一定距离。南麂列岛较低的生态足迹和较好的生态效用主要是由于其旅游开发规模适当,管理到位,倡导生态旅游,同时大部分旅游者为短程游客。旅游生态足迹和生态效用不仅在理论上深化了可持续发展的内涵,在技术上也是可持续发展的重要指标体系。

Abstract: From global point of view, tourist ecological footprint and eco-efficiency are the new yardsticks on assessing sustainability of tourism. The two methods are mutual supplementary. Taking Nanji Archipelago as an example, which is the exclusive oceanic protected area in China, the tourist ecological footprint and eco-efficiency have been analysed and discussed. Five characteristics have been summarized: 1)The tourist ecological footprint of Nanji Archipelago was 0.031hm² per captia in 2002, which is only one third of world average footprint. 2) The ecological deficit sums up to 939.38 hm². 3) The average tourism output of ecological footprint is 1402 yuan(RMB)/hm², which is 1.8 times the average output of world, but still lower than that of the fishery output. 4) The total carbon dioxide from tourism on Nanji Archipelago is 2438.7t, and the tourism eco-efficiency per captia is 0.1279kg/yuan. 5) The tourism eco-efficiency of Nanji Archipelago is favorable, which is 3.1 times as much as the world average. But comparing with the ideal emission based on the carbon dioxide of world, it still lacks behind the benchmark. The suitable tourism development volume, effective management, promotion of ecotourism, and short-distance travel contribute to the less ecological footprint and favorable eco-efficiency. The touristic ecological footprint and eco-efficiency will be helpful not only to enlarging the sustainable tourism implication, but also enriching the environmental technique.

中图分类号:

F590

周年兴, 林振山, 黄震方, 程春旺. 南麂列岛旅游生态足迹与生态效用研究[J]. 地理科学, 2008, 28(4): 571-577.

ZHOU Nian-Xing, LIN Zhen-Shan, HUANG Zhen-Fang, CHEN Chun-Wang. Tourist Ecological Footprint and Eco-efficiency on Nanji Archipelago[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2008, 28(4): 571-577.

参考文献

[1] Bulter R. Sustainable tourism: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Tourism Geographics, 1999, 1 (1):7-25.
[2] O’Reilly A M. Tourism carrying capacity-concept and issues[J]. Tourism Management, 1986, 7 :254-258.
[3] Green H, Hunter C. The environmental impact assessment of tourism development. Johnson P, Thomas B. Perspectives on Tourism Policy. London: Mansel, 1992.
[4] Stankey G H, Cole D N, Lucas R C, et al. The limits of acceptable change(LAC) system for wildness planning. Ogden: United States Department of Agriculture(Forest Service), 1985.
[5] Nilson P, Tayler G. A comparative analysis of protected area planning and management frameworks. McCool S F, Cole D N. Proceedings of a Workshop on Limits of Acceptable Change and Related Planning Process. Ogden: United States Department of Agriculture(Forest Service), 1997.49-57.
[6] Wackernagel M, Rees W E. Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth[M]. Gabrioba Island: New Society Publishers, 1996.
[7] 徐中民,张志强,程国栋. 甘肃省1998年生态足迹计算与分析[J]. 地理学报, 2000, 55 (5):607~616.
[8] 张志强,徐中民,程国栋,等. 中国西部12省(区市)的生态足迹[J]. 地理学报, 2001, 56 (5):599~610.
[9] 李金平,王石. 澳门2001年生态足迹分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18 (2):197~203.
[10] 周嘉,尚金城. 绥化市可持续发展状况的生态足迹分析[J]. 地理科学, 2004, 24 (3):333~338.
[11] 臧淑英,智瑞芝,孙学孟. 基于生态足迹模型的资源型城市可持续发展定量评估——以黑龙江省石油城市大庆市为例[J]. 地理科学, 2006, 26 (4):420~425.
[12] Hunter C. Sustainable tourism and the touristic ecological footprint[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainablity, 2002, 4 :7-20.
[13] G?ssling S, Hansson C B, H·rstmeier O. Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 43 :199-211.
[14] WWF(World Wild Fund for nature). Holiday footprinting: a practical tool for responsible tourism[M].WWF-UK, 2002.
[15] Cole V, Sinclair A J. Measuring the ecological footprint of a Himalayan tourist center[J]. Mountain Research and Development, 2002, 22 (2):132-141.
[16] 章锦河,张捷. 旅游生态足迹模型及黄山市实证分析[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59 (5):763~771.
[17] 章锦河,张捷,梁玥琳,等. 九寨沟旅游生态足迹与生态补偿分析[J].自然资源学报, 2005, 20 (5):735~744.
[18] 席建超,葛全胜,成升魁,等. 旅游消费生态占用初探——以北京市入境旅游者为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19 (2):224~229.
[19] 杨桂华,李鹏. 旅游生态足迹:测度旅游可持续发展的新方法[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25 (6):1475~1480.
[20] 符国基. 海南省外来旅游者生态足迹测评[J]. 资源科学, 2006, 28 (5):145~150.
[21] 罗艳菊,吴章文. 鼎湖山自然保护区旅游者生态足迹分析[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2005, 22 (3):330~334.
[22] Bj?rn S. What is eco-efficiency?[M]. Sydney: WBCSD,1999.
[23] G·ssling S, Peeters P, Ceron J P, et al. The eco-efficiency of tourism[J]. Ecological Economics, 2005, 54 :417-434.
[24] G·ssling S. Global environmental consequence of tourism[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2002, 12 :283-302.
[25] 王辉,林建国. 旅游者生态足迹模型对旅游环境承载力的计算[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2005, 31 (3):57~61.

南麂列岛旅游生态足迹与生态效用研究

Tourist Ecological Footprint and Eco-efficiency on Nanji Archipelago

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	田里, 刘亮. 旅游孤岛效应演化机理研究——以云南普者黑旅游区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 22-32.
[2]	张子昂, 保继刚. 多重距离对中国入境与出境旅游流的影响:基于组态的视角[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 13-21.
[3]	徐少癸, 左逸帆, 章牧. 基于模糊物元模型的中国旅游生态安全评价及障碍因子诊断研究[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 33-43.
[4]	麻学锋, 刘玉林, 谭佳欣. 旅游驱动的乡村振兴实践及发展路径[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 2019-2026.
[5]	刘长生, 董瑞甜, 简玉峰. 旅游业发展产业协同与荷兰病效应研究——基于胡焕庸线的思考[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 2073-2084.
[6]	于洪雁, 王群勇, 张博, 刘继生. 中国旅游供需耦合协调发展的空间分异及驱动机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1889-1898.
[7]	刘沛林. 从新宅居生活看网络虚拟旅游的前景和方向[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(9): 1403-1411.
[8]	朱麟奇, 李秋雨, 刘继生. 中国旅游业与地区发展及民生改善协调关系研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1328-1335.
[9]	张飞, 杨林生, 何勋, 石勇. 大运河遗产河道游憩利用适宜性评价[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(7): 1114-1123.
[10]	孙国霞. 基于旅游市场竞争态的吉林省入境旅游市场研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 973-979.
[11]	李秋雨, 朱麟奇, 王吉玉. 全域旅游背景下吉林省旅游业−经济−社会−生态环境协调性研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 948-955.
[12]	董文静, 王昌森, 张震. 山东省乡村振兴与乡村旅游时空耦合研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 628-636.
[13]	李维维, 陈田, 马晓龙. 西安城市旅游休闲业态空间热点特征及形成机制[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(3): 437-446.
[14]	周彬, 王雨桐, 虞虎, 吕宁, 张亦弛. 基于结构方程模型的宁波城市居民休闲满意度研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(1): 119-127.
[15]	刘美新, 蔡晓梅, 麻国庆. 乡村民宿“家”的生产过程与权力博弈:广东惠州上良村案例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(12): 1884-1893.