黄河三角洲滨海地区植物生长季大气氮沉降动态

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.02.217

地理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 217-222.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.02.217

黄河三角洲滨海地区植物生长季大气氮沉降动态

宁凯^1,^2,³, 于君宝^1,²(), 屈凡柱^1,^2,³, 王光美^1,², 管博^1,²

1.中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所,中国科学院海岸带环境过程与生态修复重点实验室,山东省海岸带环境过程重点实验室,山东烟台 264003
2.山东省海岸带环境过程重点实验室,山东烟台 264003
3.中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2014-01-25 修回日期:2014-04-18 出版日期:2015-02-15 发布日期:2015-02-15
作者简介:
作者简介：宁凯(1986-),男,博士研究生,主要从事生物地球化学研究。E-mail: kning@aliyun.com
基金资助:
十二五国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAC02B01)、山东省自然科学杰出青年基金项目（JQ201114）和中国科学院国家外国专家局创新团队国际合作伙伴计划项目（Y02A071041）资助

Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition During Growing Season in Coastal Zone of the Yellow River Delta

Kai NING^1,^2,³, Jun-bao YU^1,²(), Fan-zhu QU^1,^2,³, Guang-mei WANG^1,², Bo GUAN^1,²

1. Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shandong Provincial key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, Shandong 264003, China
2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Environmental Processes, Yantai , Shandong 264003, China
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2014-01-25 Revised:2014-04-18 Online:2015-02-15 Published:2015-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用SCJ-302型降水降尘自动采样器在植物生长季对黄河三角洲滨海湿地的大气氮沉降进行监测,对沉降物中水溶性离子、干、湿沉降氮输入量、铵态氮和硝态氮在总沉降量中的贡献率及月变化动态等分析表明：黄河三角洲植物生长季,大气干、湿沉降中SO₄²^-和NO₃^-占阴离子总量的92%以上,和Na⁺和Ca²⁺占阳离子总量的80%以上,总N沉降量约为2 264.24 mg/m²,且69%集中在降雨量较丰沛的6-8月。其中干沉降氮贡献率约为32.02%,主要集中在春季。N的湿沉降量与降雨量呈显著正线性相关（R²=0.82）,在降雨量丰沛的8月,达到最大值675.64 mg/m²。该地区大气干沉降的氮素形态以硝态氮为主,约占氮素输入量的57.21%,湿沉降中以铵态氮为主,约占氮素输入量的56.51%。植物生长季中,大气沉降中的硝态氮与铵态氮含量对表层10 cm土壤的月平均贡献率分别为约31.38%和20.50%,可见大气氮沉降是黄河三角洲滨海区域土壤主要氮素来源之一。

关键词: 大气干、湿沉降, 硝态氮, 铵态氮, 黄河三角洲

Abstract:

Wet and dry atmospheric depositions were monitored in plant growing season in coastal wetland of Yellow River Delta using SCJ-302 model automatic sampling equipment. The water-soluble ions, wet and dry atmospheric N depositions, monthly variation and the proportion of NH₄⁺-N and NO₃^--N in total nitrogen deposition were analyzed. The results showed that SO₄²^-and NO₃^- accounted for more than 92% of the anion numbers, Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ accounted for more than 80% of the cation numbers, respectively, in wet and dry atmospheric depositions in growing season in the Yellow River Delta. The total atmospheric nitrogen deposition was about 2 264.24 mg/m², and 69% of it occurred from June to August in which the precipitation was abundant. In the total atmospheric nitrogen deposition, dry atmospheric nitrogen deposition accounted for about 32.02%, and it was high in spring. The significant positive relationship between wet nitrogen deposition and precipitation was observed in the study (R²=0.82). The wet atmospheric nitrogen deposition reached peak value in August (675.64 mg/m²). In the studied area, the predominant nitrogen in dry atmospheric deposition was NO₃^--N with about 57.21% of total dry atmospheric nitrogen deposition, while the predominant nitrogen in wet atmospheric deposition was NH₄⁺-N with about 56.51% of total wet atmospheric nitrogen deposition. In plant growing season, the average monthly attribution rate of atmospheric deposition of NO₃^--N and NH₄⁺-N were about 31.38% and 20.50% for the contents of NO₃^--N and NH₄⁺-N in 10 cm soil layer , respectively. Therefore, the atmospheric nitrogen was one of main sources for soil nitrogen in coastal zone of Yellow River Delta.

Key words: dry and wet atmospheric deposition, NO₃^--N, NH₄⁺-N, the Yellow River Delta

中图分类号:

宁凯, 于君宝, 屈凡柱, 王光美, 管博. 黄河三角洲滨海地区植物生长季大气氮沉降动态[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(2): 217-222.

Kai NING, Jun-bao YU, Fan-zhu QU, Guang-mei WANG, Bo GUAN. Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition During Growing Season in Coastal Zone of the Yellow River Delta[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2015, 35(2): 217-222.

图/表 5

图1

图2

表 1

图3

图4

参考文献 29

[1]	张金良,于志刚,张经.大气的干湿沉降及其对海洋生态系统的影响[J].海洋环境科学,1999,18(1):70-76.
[2]	Galloway J N,Townsend A R,Erisman J W,et al.Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential solutions[J].Science,2008,320(5878): 889-892.
[3]	王小治,朱建国,高人,等.太湖地区氮素湿沉降动态及生态学意义:以常熟生态站为例[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(9):1616-1620.
[4]	Matson P A,McDowell W H,Townsend A R,et al.The globalization of N deposition: ecosystem consequences in tropical environments[J].Biogeochemistry,1999,46(1-3):67-83.
[5]	肖辉林. 大气氮沉降对森林土壤酸化的影响[J].林业科学,2001,37(4):111-116.
[6]	Aber J D,Nadelhoffer K J,Steudler P,et al.Nitrogen saturation in northern forest ecosystems[J].Bioscience,1989,39(6):378-386.
[7]	Bobbink R,Hornung M,Roelofs J G M.The effects of air-borne nitrogen pollutants on species diversity in natural and semi-natural European vegetation[J].Journal of Ecology,1998,86(5):717-738.
[8]	Duce R A,LaRoche J,Altieri K,et al.Impacts of atmospheric anthropogenic nitrogen on the open ocean[J].Science,2008,320(5878):893-897.
[9]	Krupa S V.Effects of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) on terrestrial vegetation: a review[J].Environmental Pollution,2003,124(2):179-221.
[10]	Owens N J P,Galloway J N,Duce R A.Episodic Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition To Oligotrophic Oceans[J].Nature,1992,357(6377):397-399.
[11]	Liu X J,Song L,He C E,et al.Nitrogen deposition as an important nutrient from the environment and its impact on ecosystems in China[J].Journal of Arid Land,2010,2(2):137-143.
[12]	Goulding K W T,Bailey N J,Bradbury N J,et al.Nitrogen deposition and its contribution to nitrogen cycling and associated soil processes[J].New Phytologist,1998,139(1):49-58.
[13]	Asman W A H,Sutton M A,Schjorring J K.Ammonia: emission, atmospheric transport and deposition[J].New Phytologist,1998,139(1):27-48.
[14]	Lamb D,Bowersox V.The national atmospheric deposition program: an overview[J].Atmospheric Environment,2000,34(11):1661-1663.
[15]	Erisman J W,Hensen A,Mosquera J,et al.Deposition monitoring networks: what monitoring is required to give reasonable estimates of ammonia/ammonium?[J].Environmental Pollution,2005,135(3):419-431.
[16]	Dise N B,Wright R F.Nitrogen Leaching from European Forests in Relation to Nitrogen Deposition[J].Forest Ecology and Management,1995,71(1-2):153-161.
[17]	Fenn M E,Poth M A,Aber J D,et al.Nitrogen excess in North American ecosystems: Predisposing factors, ecosystem responses, and management strategies[J].Ecological Applications,1998,8(3):706-733.
[18]	Zhang Y,Liu X J,Fangmeier A,et al.Nitrogen inputs and isotopes in precipitation in the North China Plain[J].Atmospheric Environment,2008,42(7):1436-1448.
[19]	Fan J L,Hu Z Y,Wang T J,et al.Atmospheric inorganic nitrogen deposition to a typical red soil forestland in southeastern China[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2009,159(1-4):241-253.
[20]	孙志高,刘景双,王金达.三江平原典型湿地系统大气湿沉降中氮素动态及其生态效应[J].水科学进展,2007,18(2):182-192.
[21]	董洪芳,于君宝,孙志高,等.黄河口滨岸潮滩湿地植物-土壤系统有机碳空间分布特征[J].环境科学,2010,31(6):1594-1599.
[22]	贺强,崔宝山,赵欣胜,等.水盐梯度下黄河三角洲湿地植被空间分异规律的定量分析[J].湿地科学,2007,5(3):208-214.
[23]	蔡阳阳,杨复沫,贺克斌,等.北京城区大气干沉降的水溶性离子特征[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(7):1071-7076.
[24]	Balestrini R,Galli L,Tartari G.Wet and dry atmospheric deposition at prealpine and alpine sites in northern Italy[J].Atmospheric Environment,2000,34:1455-1470.
[25]	翁永玲,宫鹏.黄河三角洲盐渍土盐分特征研究[J].南京大学学报(自然科学),2006,42(6):602-610.
[26]	Zhang F Z,Zhang J Y,Zhan H R,et al.Chemical composition of precipitation in a forest area of Chongqing, southwest China[J].Water Air and Soil Pollution,1996,90(3-4):407-415.
[27]	Dentener F J,Crutzen P J.A 3-Dimensional Model Of The Global Ammonia Cycle[J].Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry,1994,19(4):331-369.
[28]	房增国,赵秀芬.青岛大气氮湿沉降动态变化[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(1):263-266.
[29]	贾钧彦,张颖,蔡晓布,等.藏东南大气氮湿沉降动态变化——以林芝观测点为例[J].生态学报,2009,29(4):1907-1913.

月份（月）	干沉降		湿沉降		NO₃^--N		NH₄⁺-N		总N输入量 (mg/m²)
月份（月）	N含量 (mg/m²)	所占比例 (%)	N含量 (mg/m²)	所占比例 (%)		含量 (mg/m²)	所占比例 (%)	含量 (mg/m²)	所占比例 (%)
5	139.99	53.68	120.79	46.32	178.55	68.47	82.23	31.53	260.78
6	103.62	27.39	274.77	72.61	242.70	64.14	135.69	35.86	378.39
7	119.84	30.04	279.03	69.96	175.42	43.98	223.44	56.02	398.87
8	111.12	14.12	675.64	85.88	280.22	35.62	506.54	64.38	786.76
9	77.70	41.99	107.34	58.01	97.72	52.81	87.32	47.19	185.03
10	91.66	60.89	58.88	39.11	77.15	51.25	73.38	48.75	150.54
11	81.00	77.98	22.88	22.02	32.37	31.17	71.50	68.83	103.87
总计	724.92	32.02	1539.32	67.98	1084.13	47.88	1180.11	52.12	2264.24

黄河三角洲滨海地区植物生长季大气氮沉降动态

Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition During Growing Season in Coastal Zone of the Yellow River Delta

RichHTML

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	程钰, 任建兰, 侯纯光, 任梅. 沿海生态地区空间均衡内涵界定与状态评估——以黄河三角洲高效生态经济区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(1): 83-91.
[2]	王雪宏, 栗云召, 孟焕, 董洪芳, 郭岳, 佟守正. 黄河三角洲新生湿地植物群落分布格局[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(8): 1021-1026.
[3]	安乐生, 周葆华, 赵全升, 刘贯群, 朱磊. 黄河三角洲土壤氯离子空间变异特征及其控制因素[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(3): 358-364.
[4]	宁凯, 于君宝, 屈凡柱, 王光美, 管博. 黄河三角洲滨海地区植物生长季大气氮沉降动态[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(2): 218-223.
[5]	彭俊, 陈洪全, 马随随, 李志文. 黄河三角洲潮滩沉积物磁性特征与沉积环境分析[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(10): 1262-1269.
[6]	张金芝, 黄海军, 刘艳霞, 刘勇, 马立杰. 基于PSInSAR技术的现代黄河三角洲地面沉降监测与分析[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(7): 831-836.
[7]	王永丽, 于君宝, 董洪芳, 栗云召, 周迪, 付玉芹, 韩广轩, 毛培利. 黄河三角洲滨海湿地的景观格局空间演变分析[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(6): 717-724.
[8]	于君宝, 阚兴艳, 王雪宏, 韩广轩, 管博, 谢文军, 林乾新. 黄河三角洲石油污染对湿地芦苇和碱蓬幼苗生长影响的模拟研究[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(10): 1254-1261.
[9]	师长兴. 黄河河口泥沙扩散规律分析——以钓口河流路为例[J]. 地理科学, 2009, 29(1): 83-88.
[10]	汪小钦, 王钦敏, 励惠国, 刘高焕. 黄河三角洲土地利用/覆盖变化的微地貌区域分异[J]. 地理科学, 2008, 28(4): 513-517.
[11]	杨劲松, 姚荣江. 黄河三角洲地区土壤水盐空间变异特征研究[J]. 地理科学, 2007, 27(3): 348-353.
[12]	师长兴, 尤联元, 李炳元, 张祖陆, 张欧阳. 黄河三角洲沉积物的自然固结压实过程及其影响[J]. 地理科学, 2003, 23(2): 175-181.
[13]	崔保山, 刘兴土. 黄河三角洲湿地生态特征变化及可持续性管理对策[J]. 地理科学, 2001, 21(3): 250-256.
[14]	许学工. 黄河三角洲的适用生态农业模式及农业地域结构探讨[J]. 地理科学, 2000, 20(1): 27-32.
[15]	任美锷. 海平面上升与地面沉降对黄河三角洲影响初步研究[J]. 地理科学, 1990, 10(1): 48-57,96.