以北京市城八区和外城五个有代表性的地区为调查研究对象,以2005年的大规模调查问卷为基础数据,运用数理统计和GIS分析手段对北京城市居民自身居住环境安全性的评价做出分析。结果显示,北京市居民对自身居住环境安全性总体较为满意,但不同类型人群对居住环境安全性的评价差别明显,其中高知青年和富裕人群的满意度最高,而贫困老年人群满意度最差。从空间差异来看,内城和城北是安全性评价较好的地区,外城和城南地区评价较差,城市东西方向上的评价值无明显空间差别。

On the background of continued expansion and population growth of Beijing, the living environment safety is becoming more and more important and get increased emphasis by researchers. Based on the large-scale survey in 2005, this study used the method of qualitative interviews and the survey data analysis to give the evaluation of residents’ living environment safety in eight districts and the suburbs of five representative region including a total of 134 communities. Through analyzing the four indicators which can indicate the residents’ living environment safety, the article made on evaluation of breakdown and overall rating of living environment safety. Then, the article compared the result of the evaluation and residents’ social attribute, and discussed the attribute’s effects on the evaluation. At last, it concluded the spatial distribution of evaluation of the residents’ living environment safety through a GIS analysis. The conclusion shows that the residents evaluate that living environment safety in Beijing is in a general level. Among the four indicators, the evaluation scores of the security situation and traffic safety situation are much higher than that of the government safety management and the situation of Emergency Evacuation Sites(EES). This difference indicates that the government have done well in the traditional field of living safety, but the soft environment of management and the site building for emergency are not as good as the former. Using the ways of principle component analysis and cluster analysis, the thesis tries to integrate all the residents’ characteristics into two main integrated factors, which are the level of education of and the level of richness. Then, according to the result of trying to divide all the residents into five groups with those two different integrated attributes, the paper reveals that the poor old man has the lowest evaluation among the five groups, and the high-educated youth and rich people have the highest one. This result is highly correlated with their social characteristics. On the view from space, the inner city evaluation higher than the other regions because of the long-term traditional development difference. The north part of the city marks a higher score than the south part because of the same reason above. There is no obvious difference between the east part and the west part of the city. The areas around Sijiqing, Xinjiekou and northeast part of suburb of Chaoyang District have the highest scores of the evaluation. The regions which have the lowest scores are the southeast part of Beijing, Tiantongyuan, Huilongguan and Sujiatuo.