论文

基于最终需求的中国出口贸易碳排放研究

展开
  • 1. 北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院, 北京 100875;
    2. 天津大学环境科学与工程学院, 天津 300072
魏本勇(1982- ),男,山东胶南人,博士研究生,主要从事气候变化研究。E-mial: bywei1982@163.com

收稿日期: 2008-11-15

  修回日期: 2009-03-14

  网络出版日期: 2009-09-20

基金资助

国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2007BAC03A11)。

Estimation of Carbon Emissions Embodied in Export in the View of Final Demands for China

Expand
  • 1. School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875;
    2. School of Environment Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072

Received date: 2008-11-15

  Revised date: 2009-03-14

  Online published: 2009-09-20

摘要

以2002年为例,采用投入产出模型,从最终需求的角度对中国出口贸易引起的碳排放(包括直接和间接排放)进行了评估。结果表明,2002年中国为满足对外出口需求而在国内和国外引起的碳排放约288.22~330.49 MtC,其中国内出口排放261.19 MtC,约占当年国内一次能源消费碳排放量的23.45%;大部分部门的出口碳排放主要是由国内排放所贡献,进口再出口排放对总出口排放的平均贡献率在9.38%~20.97%之间。中国单位产值出口的平均碳排放为0.093~0.106 kgC,其中0.084 kgC是在国内排放;碳密集部门多集中于重化工业、交通运输和部分轻工业。将来一方面,中国不宜增加高耗能行业的出口;另一方面,国外发达国家也应积极向中国等发展中国家转让先进生产技术,以减少全球温室气体排放,实现全球减排行动中公平与效率的双赢。

本文引用格式

魏本勇, 方修琦, 王媛, 张学珍, 杨会民 . 基于最终需求的中国出口贸易碳排放研究[J]. 地理科学, 2009 , 29(5) : 634 -640 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2009.05.634

Abstract

International trade is also an important factor influencing the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of an economy. As the continuously increasing of export trade, a part of Chinese carbon emissions had been used to produce exported goods satisfying the consumption demands outside China. The foreign consumers, especially from developed countries, have also the responsibility to Chinese carbon emissions. Knowing about the situation of carbon emissions embodied in Chinese international trade clearly is important in responding the international negotiation and trying to win more development rights in the future. In view of this, based on the input-output table (2002) with 122 sectors and 44 sectoral energy consumption data, this paper estimated the national and sectoral carbon emissions embodied in Chinese exporting trade from the view of final demands. In order to understand the carbon emissions embodied in exports accurately, the imported input was distinguished from domestic input and, the emission imported and later exported was also included in this paper. The results showed the production of Chinese exports required the carbon emission generation of 288.22-330.49 MtC within and outside China, most of it (261.19 MtC) being generated in domestic production processes. In this way, the domestic production of goods for exporting accounted for about 23.45% of Chinese total emissions from the consumption of primary energy in 2002. For most sectors, over 80% of their exported carbon pollution was generated in domestic production. Exported carbon emissions from the manufacture of communication and electronic equipment, the one of raw chemical materials and chemical products, and the one of textile were most significant in all industries, and their exported emissions generated in domestic production processes were also the biggest in all sectors of China. Looking at the ratios of imported and later exported emissions to the total exported emissions in the minimum scenario, there were 13 sectors whose ratio values were higher than the average of Chinese economy, and the sectors mining and processing of ferrous metal ores, production and supply of water, production and supply of electric power and heat power showed the highest values. However, in all sectors, the manufacture of raw chemical materials and chemical products, manufacture of communication and electronic equipment, smelting and pressing of ferrous metals, extraction of petroleum and natural gas had the highest imported and later exported emission. The production of Chinese exports per unit output generated about 0.093-0.106 kgC in China and abroad, 0.084 kgC of which was generated in domestic production. The most significant carbon-intensive sectors were mining and processing of ferrous metal ores, production and supply of electric power and heat power, and production and supply of water. Given the pressure of carbon emission reduction and national energy security, it is not appropriate for China to increase the exports of goods with higher energy consumption, and it is necessary to improve the production technology to decrease the intensities of sectoral energy consumption in the future; On the other hand, the developed countries should actively provide advanced production technologies to China and other developing countries to reduce global emissions of GHG, which will be helpful to get a win-win situation of equality and efficiency in the action of global carbon emission reduction.

参考文献

[1] Keeling C D, Whorf T P, Wahlen M, et al. Interannual extremes in the rate of rise of atmospheric carbon dioxide since [J]. Nature, 1995, 375: 666-670.
[2] Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, et al. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis [M]. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[3] 潘家华, 郑 燕. 碳排放与发展权益 [J]. 世界环境,2008, (4): 58~63.
[4] 魏一鸣, 刘兰翠, 范 英, 等. 中国能源报告2008: 碳排放研究 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
[5] Wang T, Watson J. Who owns China’s carbon emissions [J]. Tyndall Briefing Note. 2007, 23: 1-7.
[6] Shui B, Harriss R C. The role of CO2 embodiment in US-China trade [J]. Energy Policy, 2006, 34: 4063-4068.
[7] Li Y, Hewitt C N. The effect of trade between China and the UK on national and global carbon dioxide emissions [J]. Energy Policy, 2008, 36: 1907-1914.
[8] Schaeffer R, Sá A D. The embodiment of carbon associated with Brazilian imports and exports [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 1996, 37(6-8): 955-960.
[9] Lenzen M. Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input-output analysis [J]. Energy Policy, 1998, 26(6): 495-506.
[10] Machado G, Schaeffer R, Worrell E. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: an input-output approach [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 39(3): 409-424.
[11] Tolmasquim MT, Machado G. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2003, (8): 139-155.
[12] Sánchez-Chóliz J, Duarte R. CO2 emissions embodied in international trade: evidence for Spain [J]. Energy Policy, 2004, 32 (18): 1999-2005.
[13] Mongelli I, Tassielli G, Notarnicola B. Global warming agreements, international trade and energy/carbon embodiments: an input-output approach to the Italian case [J]. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(1): 88-100.
[14] Ackerman F, Ishikawa M, Suga M. The carbon content of Japan-US trade [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(9): 4455-4462.
[15] Maenpaa I, Siikavirta H. Greenhouse gases embodied in the international trade and final consumption of Finland: an input-output analysis [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(1): 128-143.
[16] 国家统计局国民经济核算司. 中国投入产出表(2002年) [M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2006.
[17] 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴(2004) [M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2004.
[18] 国家统计局工业交通统计司, 国家发展和改革委员会能源局. 中国能源统计年鉴(2007)[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2008.
[19] 董承章. 投入产出分析 [M]. 北京: 中国财政经济出版社, 2000.
[20] 国气候变化国别研究组. 中国气候变化国别研究 [M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2000.
文章导航

/