论文

复杂网络理论下世界原油贸易空间格局演进研究

展开
  • 1. 东北师范大学城市与环境科学学院, 吉林 长春 130024;
    2. 吉林农业大学发展学院, 吉林 长春 130600

收稿日期: 2010-12-23

  修回日期: 2011-07-04

  网络出版日期: 1997-11-20

基金资助

教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(11YJCZH020)资助

Evolution of Spatial Pattern of World Crude Oil Trade Based on Complicated Network Theory

Expand
  • 1. Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin 130024, China;
    2. Development College, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin 130600, China

Received date: 2010-12-23

  Revised date: 2011-07-04

  Online published: 1997-11-20

摘要

依据世界原油贸易数据,以复杂网络理论为基础,结合地理学的区域分析方法,勾勒出世界原油贸易空间结构,并比较了区域间节点、出、入度及权重值的差异。利用熵值分析了网络的均质性,并对世界原油贸易空间结构进行了模拟。研究表明:①尽管世界原油贸易空间格局的节点增幅不大,但随时间推移,节点的度与权重值大幅增加,即世界原油贸易范围及效应在逐渐加大;②通过对节点、出、入度及权重值的比较,揭示了不同区域在世界原油贸易空间格局中的职能差异;③结构熵、权重熵的测定与世界原油贸易空间格局的模拟均表明世界原油贸易空间格局网络的有序性,世界原油空间格局是非均质的。多元化不等于均质化,贸易主体要依据各自所面临的客观环境选择适合区域合作伙伴,才能更好的落实多元化进口策略,切实解决可能面临的石油供给危机。

本文引用格式

程淑佳, 王肇钧 . 复杂网络理论下世界原油贸易空间格局演进研究[J]. 地理科学, 2011 , 31(11) : 1342 -1348 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2011.011.1342

Abstract

The crude oil importing countries are nowadays taking advantage of the diversification strategy to shield from the risk of oil import in the strained circumstance of world wide crude oil import.The oil strategy of a country is however highly tied up with other countries with the rapidly intensified affinity in crude oil trade.Therefore,an in-depth understanding and extensive knowledge in the status of external oil trade is justified in the decision-making and executing process of oil strategy.Ignorance of such interactive effects will definitely incur obstruction to the diversification strategy and further detriment to the guarantee of oil importing safety.This paper develops a novel approach to assessing the world’s network of crude oil import and revealing the evolving law of the degree,weight,and standard entropy with the aid of complex network method.Furthermore, a parallel regional comparison is analyzed to highlight the differences between the states and the homogeneity of international crude oil trade networks.A simulation analysis of the spatial structure of world crude oil trade is finally presented.Major conclusions are drawn as follows: 1) Variations in terms of the importing and exporting nodes within the period from 2001 to 2008 are marginal and therefore indicate relatively stable orientations of trading countries;2) An ascending trend in terms of global crude petroleum trade magnitude,together with the more aggressive competition in the crude petroleum trade,is revealed from the perspective of exporting and importing weights.The general pattern indicates that most of the crude petroleum is transported from Middle-east,Africa,Central and South Americ,East Europe as well as Middle Asia to Asia-Pacific,North America,Central Europe and West Europe;3) Heterogeneity to a certain extent is also demonstrated with the spatial structure of global petroleum trade.However,neither the structure entropy nor the weight entropy indicates a random spatial structure of global crude petroleum but an ordered one.Comparison of weight and structure entropy shows that quota is more homogeneous than weight,which can therefore scale the desire of the countries to build more comprehensive relations,despite the fact that resource reserve determines the magnitude of petroleum trade.4) Diversity in terms of magnitude and direction of connection in the network nodes is highlighted by the topology structure of global crude petroleum trade.The Middle East is still the primary supplier who provides most of the petroleum to the majority of the world,while other areas including the former Soviet Union,West Africa,North Africa and North America(Canada and Mexico)mainly provide crude petroleum to specific regions.Non-uniform spatial structure is also displayed by the topology structure of global crude petroleum.In conclusion,diversification does not necessarily mean homogeneity.The resource reserve in each region varies and the economic and political relationships in different regions are also diverse,which consequently justify that diversification of import channels depends on the objective situation and relationship with business partners.

参考文献

[1] 王肇均,程淑佳.基于复杂网络理论的中美原油进口空间格局比较[J].地理科学,2010,30(5):667~671
[2] 郝瑞彬,王伟毅.21世纪中国石油安全与中俄石油合作[J].中国矿业,2006,15(3):5~8.
[3] 徐世刚.从中俄石油管道项目“安大线”的夭折看中日能源战略竞争[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,8(1):34~38.
[4] 明庭权,韩学峰.21世纪中国石油安全与中国中亚石油战略[J].兰州学刊,2004,140(5):46~48.
[5] 王海滨.美国因素对中国石油安全的影响[J].石油大学学报(社会科学版),2004,20(3):6~10.
[6] Duncan J Watts,Strogatz H Srogatz.Collective dynamics of‘small-world’networks[J].Nature,1998,393(4):440-442.
[7] Reagans R,Zuckerman E.Networks,diversity and perfor-mance:The social capital of R&D units「J].Organization Science,2001,12(4):502-517.
[8] Tsai W.Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks:Ef-fects of network position and absorptive capacity on businessunit innovation and performance[J].Academy of ManagementJournal,2001,44(5):996-1004.
[9] 金凤君.我国航空客流网络发展及其地域系统研究[J].地理研究,2001,20(1):31~39.
[10] 周一星,胡智勇.从航空运输看中国城市体系的空间网络结构[J].地理研究,2002,21(3):276~286.
[11] 赵伟,何红生,林中材.中国铁路客运网网络性质的研究[J].物理学报,2006,55(8):3906~3910.
[12] Rosvall M,A Trusina,P Minnhagen,et al.Networks and cities:an information perspective[J].Phys Rev Lett,2005,94(2):028701-1-028701-4
[13] Barabasi A L,Albert R.Emergence of scaling in random net-works[J].Science,1999,286:509-512
[14] Gastner M T,Newman.The spatial structure of networks[J].EurPhvs J B,2006(49):247-252.
[15] Albert R,Barabasi A L.Statistical mechanics of complex networks[J].Rev.Mod.Phys,2002,74(2):47-97.
[16] Faloutsos M,Faloutsos P,Faloutsos C.On Power Law Relation-ships of the Internet Topology[J].ComputCommunRev 1999,29(4):251-262.
[17] 刘宝全.国际贸易网络测度与演化研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2007.
[18] 聂锐,高伟.区际生产要素流动的网络模型研究[J].财经研究,2008,34(7):87~97
[19] 王土林,戴冠中,胡海波.无标度网络的一个新的拓扑参数[[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(6):49~53
[20] International Trade Centre,ITC.Imports 2001-2010 International Trade in Goods Statistics by Product Group[R/OL].http://www.intracen.org/exporters/Stat_import_product_country/
文章导航

/