以广州市花都区为研究区,研究利用CA-Markov模型进行土地利用变化模拟的空间尺度敏感性特征,结论如下:①元胞尺寸的选择会明显影响模拟结果,元胞尺寸越大,模拟结果精度越低。模型中存在元胞尺寸的阈值,当元胞尺寸超出该阈值时,模拟结果的精度急剧下降,因此对于元胞尺寸的选择必须要慎重。②邻域类型的选择也会对模拟结果产生影响。采用3×3冯诺依曼邻域的模拟结果会比3×3摩尔邻域和5×5摩尔邻域生成更多的斑块数量和更高的斑块密度,但是模拟结果的Kappa系数值相差不大。
Cellular Automata (CA) model is an efficient model to simulate land use/cover change (LUCC) process. However, the majority of geographic cellular automata researches now focus more on transition rules than on spatial scale selection. As a result, the spatial scale decisions of geographic cellular automata are often made arbitrarily. When using CA model in geographic context, nontrivial questions have to be answered about the choice of spatial scale and neighborhood configuration. This article takes Huadu district,Guangzhou City as the study area, to investigate the effect of changing spatial scale and neighborhood configuration on the result prediction accuracy of the CA-Markov model and the morphology of land use change simulation result. The result shows that (1)the spatial scale has great impact on the simulation results of CA-Markov model. Coarse cell size will reduce the result prediction accuracy of the model. There is a threshold of cell size in the model. When the cell size exceeds this threshold, the result prediction accuracy dropped rapidly. (2) Neighborhood configuration also has impact on the simulation results of CA-Markov model. The patch number and patch density of simulation result using 3?3 Von Neumann neighborhood are higher than simulation result using 3?3 and 5?5 Moore neighborhood, but there is little difference of Kappa coefficients of the simulation results.
[1] 李秀彬.全球环境变化研究的核心领域——土地利用/土地覆盖变化的国际研究动向[J].地理学报,1996,51(6) :553~557.
[2] 史培军,宫 鹏,李晓兵,等.土地利用/土地覆盖变化研究的方法和实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
[3] 田光进,邬建国.基于智能体模型的土地利用动态模拟研究进展[J].生态学报,2008,28(9):4451~4459.
[4] Wu F L,Webster C J.Simulation of Land Development through the Integration of Cellular Automata and Multi-Criteria Evaluation [J].Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,1998,25(1):103-126.
[5] 黎 夏,叶嘉安.基于神经网络的单元自动机CA及真实和优化的城市模拟[J].地理学报,2002,57(2): 159~166.
[6] 黎 夏,叶嘉安.基于元胞自动机的城市发展密度模拟[J].地理科学,2006,26(2):165~172.
[7] 黎 夏,刘小平.基于案例推理的元胞自动机及大区域城市演变模拟[J].地理学报,2007,62(10):1097~1109.
[8] 刘小平,黎 夏,叶嘉安,等.利用蚁群智能挖掘地理元胞自动机的转换规则[J].中国科学(D辑·地球科学), 2007,37(6):824~834.
[9] 杨青生,黎 夏.多智能体与元胞自动机结合及城市用地扩张模拟[J].地理科学,2007,27(4):542~548.
[10] 罗 平,耿继进,李满春,等.元胞自动机的地理过程模拟机制及扩展[J].地理科学,2005,25(6):724~730.
[11] 伍少坤,黎 夏,刘小平,等.基于城市扩张的动态选址模型——以深圳垃圾转运站选址为例[J].地理科学,2008,28(3):314~319.
[12] 秦贤宏,段学军,李 慧,等.基于SD和CA的城镇土地扩展模拟模型——以江苏省南通地区为例[J].地理科学,2009,29(3): 439~444.
[13] 邵一希,李满春,陈振杰,等.地理加权回归在区域土地利用格局模拟中的应用——以常州市孟河镇为例[J].地理科学,2010,30(1):92-97.
[14] Verburg P H, Nijs T C M d,Eck J R V,et al.A method to analyse neighbourhood characteristics of land use patterns [J].Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,2004,28(6):667-690.
[15] Yeh A GO,Li X.Errors and Uncertainties in Urban Cellular Automata[J].Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2006,30(1):10-28.
[16] Benenson I. Warning! The scale of land-use CA is changing![J].Computers,Environment and Urban Systems,2007,31(2):107-113.
[17] 尹长林,张鸿辉,游胜景,等.元胞自动机城市增长模型的空间尺度特征分析[J].测绘科学,2008,33(5):78~ 80.
[18] 张 杰,周寅康,李仁强,等.土地利用/覆盖变化空间直观模拟精度检验与不确定性分析——以北京都市区为例[J].中国科学(D辑·地球科学),2009,39(11):1560~ 1569.
[19] 柯新利,邓祥征,何书金.地理元胞自动机模型的尺度敏感性及原因[J].地理研究,2010,29(5):863~872.
[20] 郑青华,罗格平,朱 磊,等.基于CA_Markov模型的伊犁河三角洲景观格局预测[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(04):873~882.
[21] 侯西勇,常 斌,于信芳.基于CA-Markov的河西走廊土地利用变化研究[J].农业工程学报,2004,20(5):286~291.
[22] 杨国清,刘耀林,吴志峰.基于CA-Markov模型的土地利用格局变化研究[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2007,32(5):414~418.
[23] 赵建军,张洪岩,乔志和,等.基于CA-Markov模型的向海湿地土地覆被变化动态模拟研究[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(12):2178~2186.
[24] 李 志,刘文兆,郑粉莉.基于CA-Markov模型的黄土塬区黑河流域土地利用变化[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(1):346~352.
[25] 中华人民共和国国土资源部.《城镇新旧土地分类转换表》. http://websearch.mlr.gov.cn/cgi~bin/web.cgi?query=%B3%C7%D5%F2%D0%C2%BE%C9%CD%C1%B5%D8%B7%D6%C0%E0%D7%AA%BB%BB%B1%ED&word=&cl=3&tn=wst&rn=10&ct=0&lm=0&sort=&pn=0&doquery.x=14&doquery.y=11,2008-08-20/2010-10-20.
