论文

长白山红松阔叶混交林土壤动物生态分布

展开
  • 1. 东北师范大学城市与环境科学学院, 吉林 长春 130024;
    2. 吉林省动物资源保护与利用重点实验室, 吉林 长春 130024

收稿日期: 2010-10-11

  修回日期: 2010-12-29

  网络出版日期: 1997-08-20

基金资助

东北师范大学"十一五"科技创新平台建设计划项目(106111065202)、国家重点基础研究发展规划(973)项目(2009CB426305);东北师范大学分析测试基金资助。

Ecogeographical Distribution of Soil Fauna in Pinus koraiensis Mixed Broad-leaved Forest of Changbai Mountains

Expand
  • 1. College of Urban and Environmental Science, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin 130024, China;
    2. Jilin Key Laboratory of Animal Resource Conservation and Utilization, Changchun, Jilin 130024, China

Received date: 2010-10-11

  Revised date: 2010-12-29

  Online published: 1997-08-20

摘要

对长白山红松阔叶混交林分布的上缘、典型分布区和分布下缘土壤动物群落进行研究。结果表明,红松阔叶混交林三个分布区土壤动物群落组成存在差异,其中典型分布区土壤动物多样性指数较高,群落组成均匀。甲螨亚目、辐螨亚目、节跳虫科、球角跳虫科、革螨亚目和山跳虫科相关性较大,共同出现在各分布区。土壤动物垂直分布具有明显的表聚性,且红松阔叶混交林的上缘和典型分布区表聚性更为突出。通过灰色综合关联度分析表明,土壤全钾、全氮和有机质含量对土壤动物群落影响较大,而土壤全磷含量和pH对土壤动物的影响次之。

本文引用格式

殷秀琴, 蒋云峰, 陶岩, 安静超, 辛未冬 . 长白山红松阔叶混交林土壤动物生态分布[J]. 地理科学, 2011 , 31(8) : 935 -940 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2011.08.935

Abstract

The Changbai Mountains, located in the Northeast China (41?23'-42?36'N, 126?55'-128?8'E), are rich in natural resources and have always been concerned by scientists. Soil faunas play crucial roles in forest ecosystem processes such as litter decomposition and nutrient mineralization, and also have effects on soil formation and quality. To understand the ecogeographical distribution of soil faunal community and provide the scientific basis for the conservation of forest ecosystems in Changbai Mountains, community composition, structure and biodiversity of soil fauna were investigated in top, typical and bottom distribution areas of Pinus koraiensis mixed broad-leaved forest of Changbai Mountain in July 2008. The sample area was 50 cm?50 cm for soil macrofauna and 10 cm?10 cm for soil meso-microfauna. Soil macrofauna was picked out by hands. Soil meso-microfauna was extracted by Tullgren funnel. All extracted soil samples were identified to the suborder or family level under a stereoscopic microscope. Soil pH was measured with PHS-3B acidity meter. Soil organic C was determined by K2Cr2O7 oxidation method and total N by Kjeldahl method. Total P was analyzed by using the colorimetric method with molybdenum in sulphuric acid. Total K was determined with flame photometer. A total of 39 groups, 6 124 individuals of soil fauna were obtained and fell into 3 phylum, 6 classes, 17 orders. Oribatida, Actinedida and Isotomidae were the dominant groups. There were 5 common groups, involving Hypogastruridae, Pseudachorutidae, Gamasida, Entomobryidae and Tomoceridae, and 31 rare groups in the collection. Results showed that there was significant difference in the individual numbers of soil fauna between typical and bottom (p<0.05) distribution areas, while group numbers of soil fauna were no significant difference among top, typical and bottom distribution areas of Pinus koraiensis mixed broad-leaved forest. The highest community diversity and evenness of soil fauna was recorded in typical distribution area. Group and individual numbers of soil fauna decreased with the increase of soil layer depth in a vertically distribution, which was significant in top and typical distribution areas. There were greater correlation coefficient among Oribatida, Actinedida, Isotomidae, Hypogastruridae, Gamasida and Pseudachorutidae, and they were all found in three distribution areas at the same time, and individual numbers of them were also more than others. The pH,organic matter, total P, total K and total N of soil had effects on the composition of soil fauna community. The difference in total K, total N, total P and organic matter content were significant in 0-30 cm soil layers among top, typical and bottom distribution areas of Pinus koraiensis mixed broad-leaved forest (p<0.001). Grey relevant analysis showed that total K, total N and organic matter content had more effects on the composition of soil fauna than pH and total P of soil. Environment factors had different effects on the key soil fauna community.

参考文献

[1] Seastadt T R.The role of microarthropods in decomposition and mineralisation processes[J].Annual Review of Entomology,1984,29:25-46.
[2] 张雪萍,张 毅,侯威岭,等.小兴安岭针叶林凋落物的分解与土壤动物的作用[J].地理科学,2000,20(6):552~556.
[3] YIN Xiuqin,SONG Bo,DONG Weihua,et al.A review on the eco-geography of soil fauna in China[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2010,20(3): 333-346.
[4] 殷秀琴,刘继亮,高 明.小兴安岭森林生态系统中营养元素关系及土壤动物作用[J].地理科学,2007,27(6):814~819.
[5] 张荣祖,杨明宪,陈 鹏,等.长白山北坡森林生态系统土壤动物初步调查[J].森林生态系统,1980,1:133~152.
[6] 陈 鹏,张 一.长白山北坡冰缘环境与土壤动物[J].地理科学,1983,3(2):133~140.
[7] 佟富春,金哲东,王庆礼,等.长白山北坡土壤动物群落物种共有度的海拔梯度变化[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(10):1723~1728.
[8] 佟富春,王庆礼,刘兴双.长白山次生林演替过程中土壤动物群落变化[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(9):1531~1535.
[9] 王野乔,吴正方,冯 江.长白山地理系统论文集(第一辑)[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,2010:17~26.
[10] 尹文英,肖宁年,林长闲,等.中国土壤动物检索图鉴[M].北京:科学出版社,1998:131~392.
[11] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978:96~134.
[12] 廖崇惠,李健雄,黄海涛.南亚热带森林土壤动物群落多样性研究[J].生态学报,1997,17(5):549~555.
[13] 刘思峰,党耀国,方志耕,等.灰色系统理论及其应用(第三版)[M].北京:科学出版社,2004:50~95.
[14] 殷秀琴,吴东辉,韩晓梅.小兴安岭森林土壤动物群落多样性的研究[J].地理科学,2003,23(3):316~322.
[15] 张林静,岳 明,张远东,等.新疆阜康绿洲荒漠过渡带植物群落物种多样性特征[J].地理科学,2003,3(3):329~334.
[16] Wardle D A.Communities and ecosystems,linking the aboveground and belowground components[M].Princeton: Princeton University Press,2002:56-103.
[17] Noah Fierer,Michael S Strickland,Daniel Liptzin,et al.Global patterns in belowground communities[J].Ecology Letters,2009,12:1238-1249.
[18] 殷秀琴.东北森林土壤动物研究[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,2001:96~106.
[19] Bardgett R D.Causes and consequences of biological diversity in soil[J].Zoology,2002,105:367-374.
[20] Magura T,Tóthmérész B,Elek Z.Diversity and composition of carabids during a forestry cycle[J].Biodiversity and Conservation,2003,12:73-85.
文章导航

/