中国自1978年改革开放以来,城市与区域空间就已经在具有自我特色的新自由主义实践中发生了重大变革,目前研究仍然处于摸索阶段。在介绍国际自由主义城市研究基础上,将改革开放以来中国沿海和内地两种城市与区域地带内新自由主义的实践纳入中国新自由主义之城市批判研究:①城市场所内管制环境和权力结构;②阶层结构重构的原因、过程、特征;③未来区域发展导向与全球化相伴随的地理分异现象。在此基础上提出一些研究假设和相关方法论上的尝试,期盼给予国内新自由主义城市研究一些启示。
There are many international scholars suspect if China has experimented the process of neoliberalism restructure since post reform agenda.However, it does happen somewhat freedom to redistribute social fortunes from the poor to the rich.With the fast increasing of GDP of China in past three decades, the wildly widening gaps between urban and rural, coastal area and western area, and economic elites and marginalized work class are the persistent feature.Therefore, it would be important to give some hints for the study of the neoliberalism urban studies of China from local scholar’s perspective.As a matter of fact since the reform agenda, regionalized neoliberalism practice has been conducted successfully for over thirty years.the China has experimented a significant transition in the track of neoliberalism practice:namely, 1) the widening gap between export surplus and badly unfulfilled public welfare; 2) multi-scales uneven geographical development of, either between inland area and coast area, or urbanization area and its peripheral region.Unfortunately, relevant research still needs much more input to kick it off.For this purpose, this paper suggests that following study should concentrate in the governance environment transition, power structure modulation and the class structure change both in the coastal and inland area of China.Moreover, in order to analyze the complicated phenomenon of localized neoliberalism, the destructive creativeness of study methodology, namely, the reflexive study paradigm should be attempted as well.
[1] Harvey D.A Brief History of Neoliberalism[M].London:Oxford Press,2005:1-39,120-151.
[2] Friedman M.Capitalism and Freedom[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press(Fortieth anniversary edition),1962:1-5.
[3] Peck J,Tickell A .Neoliberalizing space[J].Antipode,2001,3(34):380-404.
[4] Brenner N,Theodore N.Cities and the geographies of actually existing Neoliberalism[J].Antipode,2001,3(34):349-379.
[5] Castells M.网络社会的崛起[M].夏铸九,王志弘,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003:1~8.
[6] Castells M.The urban Question[M].Boston:MIT Press,1979:1-30.
[7] Logan J,Moloch H.Urban Fortunes[M] Berkeley and Los Angeles,California:University of California Press,1987:1-17.
[8] Lefebvre H.The Production of Space[M].Oxford:Blackwell,1991:15-35.
[9] Burawoy M.Two methods in search of science:Skocpol versus Trotsky[J].Theory and Society,1989,(18):759-805.
[10] Harvey D.Spaces of Hope[M].Berkeley and Los Angeles,California:University of California Press,2000:156-255.
[11] Hegel G.Hegel’s Science of Logic[M].New York:Prometheus Books,1989:29-30.
[12] Agelitta M.A Theory of Capitalist Regulation:the US Experience[M].New York:Verso,1979:9-20.
[13] Jessop B.Narrating the future of the national economy and the national state:Remarks on remapping regulation and reinventing governance[M]// G Steinmetz.State or Culture:State formation after the Cultural Turn.Ithaca,NY:Cornell University Press,1999:378-405.
[14] Solinger D J.Chinese urban jobs and the WTO[J].China Journal,2003,(49):61-87.
[15] 邓小平.邓小平文选(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1993.
[16] Harvey D.Creative Destruction[J].Geografiska Annaler Series B,2006,(88):145-58.
[17] 李若建.城镇居民收入分配与社会分化[J].中山大学学报(社科版),1995,(2):48-56.
[18] Weber M.The Methodology of the Social.Sciences[M].New York:Free Press,1949:20-22..
[19] Burawoy M,Blum J A,George S,et al.Global Ethnography:Forces,Connections,and Imaginations in a Postmodern World[M].Berkeley and Los Angeles,California:The University of California Press,2000:1-41.
