论文

陕西渭河下游湿地环境风险因素分析

展开
  • 1. 兰州大学资源与环境学院西部环境教育部重点实验室, 甘肃兰州, 730000;
    2. 陕西省灾害监测与机理模拟重点实验室, 陕西, 宝鸡, 721007

收稿日期: 2006-02-21

  修回日期: 2006-06-22

  网络出版日期: 2007-05-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(40501077);陕西省社会科学基金(06E016Z)项目资助

Analysis on Environmental Risk of Wetland along the Lower Weihe River

Expand
  • 1. College of Resources & Environment, Lanzhou University, Key Laboratory of Western China Environmental Systems, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000;
    2. Key Laboratory of Disaster Survey & Mechanism Simulation of Shaanxi, Baoji, Shaanx 721007

Received date: 2006-02-21

  Revised date: 2006-06-22

  Online published: 2007-05-20

摘要

运用统计计算和RS/G IS方法,分析渭河下游湿地环境的水文特性、水污染特征、土地利用/覆被状况及其演变特征等湿地环境风险因素,结论为:①渭河下游水沙量年际变化大、年内水沙量分配不均,且呈现减少趋势;汛期黄河洪水倒灌渭河,降低了由于水沙供给变化而导致的湿地水文环境风险度;②湿地水环境日趋恶化的变化趋势降低了湿地的生态净化功能,增加了湿地水环境风险度;③1989~2000年渭河下游新增湿地12.76km2,年均增长率2.70%;湿地裸地化和盐碱化形势严峻;④以加强湿地保护立法、完善流域水污染治理、重建河岸植被带、强化湿地管理等重点措施确保湿地环境安全和湿地资源的可持续利用。

本文引用格式

李景宜 . 陕西渭河下游湿地环境风险因素分析[J]. 地理科学, 2007 , 27(3) : 371 -375 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2007.03.371

Abstract

By statistical computation and RS/GIS method,the environmental risk factors,including hydrological characteristics of wetland,water pollution,land-use/cover and their evolution in lower reaches of the Weihe River,were analyzed.The results are as follows.(1) The quantities of the water and sand are changing dramatically in recent years,and their distribution with the decreasing tendency are not even.In flood season water from the Yellow River flows backward to the Weihe River,which relieves the threat resulted from the decreasing of water and sand supply,and reduces the risk for wetland brought by the changing mentioned above.(2) The degeneration of the hydrological environment of wetland lowers its purification capability,and increases its hydrological environment risk.(3) From 1989 to 2000,in the lower reaches of the Weihe River,the area of the wetland increasesd 12.96 km2 with an annual increase rate of 2.7%,and there were 2.002km2 and 0.94km2 of wetland become bare and saline land,respectively.In addition,0.03 km2 wetland was occupied by urban construction.(4) By some measures,such as strengthening lawmaking,fathering water pollution,reconstructing vegetation and enhancing management,environment safety and resources sustainable use will be come tuer.

参考文献

[1] 刘子刚.湿地生态系统碳储存和温室气体排放研究[J].地理科学,2004,24(5):634~639.
[2] 张明祥,董瑜.双台河口自然保护区濒海湿地景观变化及其管理对策研究[J].地理科学,2002,22(1):119~123.
[3] 杨永兴.从魁北克2000-世纪湿地大事件活动看21世纪国际湿地科学研究的热点与前沿[J].地理科学,2002,22(2):150~156.
[4] 张芸,朱诚,于世永.长江三峡大宁河流域3000年来的环境演变与人类活动[J].地理科学,2001,21(3):267~272.
[5] 王学雷,吕宪国,任宪龙.江汉平原湿地水系统综合评价与水资源管理探讨[J].地理科学,2006,26(3):311~315.
[6] 张金波,宋长春,杨文燕.沼泽湿地垦殖对土壤碳动态的影响[J].地理科学,2006,26(3):340~344.
[7] 佟守正,吕宪国.松嫩平原重要湿地恢复研究进展[J].地理科学,2007,27(1):127~128.
[8] 王计平,邹欣庆,左平基.于社区居民调查的海岸带湿地环境质量评价——以海南东寨港红树林自然保护区为例[J].地理科学,2007,27(2):249~255.
[9] 周西平.三河湿地资源评价与保护利用[J].陕西林业科技,1998,(1):61~64.
[10] 毛平宇.论陕西黄河湿地保护的统一规划与管理[J].陕西环境,2002,9(4):21~23.
[11] 孙娴,贺安乾.三河湿地现状及对环境的影响[J].陕西气象,2002,(4):43~44.
[12] 崔保山,刘兴土.黄河三角洲湿地生态特征变化及可持续性管理对策[J].地理科学,2001,21(3):250~256.
[13] 刘红玉,吕宪国.三江平原湿地景观生态制图分类系统研究[J].地理科学,1999,19(5):432~436.
[14] 殷康前,倪晋仁.湿地研究综述[J].生态学报,1998,18(5):539~546.
[15] Maltby E.Waterlogged wealth:why waste the world′s wetplaces[M].UK:An Earthscan Paperback,1986.
[16] Boule M.An early history of wetland ecology[A].in:Mitsch W J(ed).Global wetlands:old world and new[C].Netherlands:Elsevier,1994.
[17] 汪爱华,张树清,何艳芬.RS和GIS支持下的三江平原沼泽湿地动态变化研究[J].地理科学,2002,22(5):636~640.
[18] 陕西省统计局.陕西统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1996~2005.
[19] 何执兼,关履基,柯栋.广东省海岸带湿地遥感调查与开发[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2001,40(5):122~126.
[20] 肖笃宁,胡远满,李秀珍,等.环渤海三角洲湿地的景观生态学研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.
[21] 陈刚起,张文芬.三江平原沼泽对河川径流影响的初步分析[J].地理科学,1982,2(3):254~263.
[22] 吕宪国,黄锡畴.我国湿地研究进展——献给中国科学院长春地理研究所成立40周年[J].地理科学,1998,18(4):293~300.
文章导航

/